Advertisement

by Immoren » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:11 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by The Truth and Light » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:11 pm
Shershah wrote:I would try to explain to you the concept of "political correctness", but you're not paying me, so.

by Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:11 pm
Shershah wrote:I would try to explain to you the concept of "political correctness", but you're not paying me, so.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:11 pm
The Truth and Light wrote:Shershah wrote:Don't think so. I am not really someone known for their empathy. And for the record, i don't mind receiving the backlash. I am just pointing out that others might.
If you're not capable of relating to other people, maybe that explains why you're so fucking strapped for clues as to how they work.

by Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:12 pm
The Truth and Light wrote:GWACA wrote:Lets say for the sake of argument that he is right, and homosexuality is a disorder... Then by his logic, wouldn't unique personalities also be a "disorder"?
If we're defining disorder as, "a characteristic that is statistically rare," then literacy is a disorder too.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Blasveck » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:12 pm
Shershah wrote:Liriena wrote:That's a fallacy, and the age of your evidence is irrelevant, since said "evidence" is also false.
I don't consider it to be false. The only reason why there are disagreements is because of reasons like poli... yeah you know.GWACA wrote:Lets say for the sake of argument that he is right, and homosexuality is a disorder... Then by his logic, wouldn't unique personalities also be a "disorder"?
If it was a trait shown by a very few minority then yes.The Truth and Light wrote:I would try to explain to you the concept of scientific trial-and-error, but you're not paying me, so.
I would try to explain to you the concept of "political correctness", but you're not paying me, so.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:13 pm
Shershah wrote:Liriena wrote:That's a fallacy, and the age of your evidence is irrelevant, since said "evidence" is also false.
I don't consider it to be false. The only reason why there are disagreements is because of reasons like poli... yeah you know.GWACA wrote:Lets say for the sake of argument that he is right, and homosexuality is a disorder... Then by his logic, wouldn't unique personalities also be a "disorder"?
If it was a trait shown by a very few minority then yes.The Truth and Light wrote:I would try to explain to you the concept of scientific trial-and-error, but you're not paying me, so.
I would try to explain to you the concept of "political correctness", but you're not paying me, so.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Prumkom » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:13 pm


by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:14 pm
Liriena wrote:Shershah wrote:
I don't consider it to be false. The only reason why there are disagreements is because of reasons like poli... yeah you know.
Prove it.Shershah wrote:I would try to explain to you the concept of "political correctness", but you're not paying me, so.
Provide evidence that political correctness is keeping scientists from presenting research proving homosexuality to be a disorder. I mean actual evidence, not "common sense" bollocks or your edgy, incoherent ramblings about our decadent society.

by Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:14 pm
Prumkom wrote:So gay weddings are now legal but gay marriage isn't recognized for any legal purpose?![]()
But I hope this is just the first step towards full marriage equality for Vietnamese people.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by The Truth and Light » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:15 pm
Shershah wrote:Look, it is not my job to empathize with someone who i barely even know.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:15 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:15 pm
Shershah wrote:Liriena wrote:Prove it.
Provide evidence that political correctness is keeping scientists from presenting research proving homosexuality to be a disorder. I mean actual evidence, not "common sense" bollocks or your edgy, incoherent ramblings about our decadent society.
Right, you want me to start a private eye or something next then ?
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:16 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by The Truth and Light » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:17 pm


by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:17 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:"Political Correctness" is the first thing that comes to mind to people like you, who have their heads so deep up a boxhole that it is impossible to get them out.
Political Correctness has nothing to do with research. Research presents data, that may or may not conflict with present beliefs; political correctness is a sociological concept and it doesn't tie into science.
Stop being so dishonest.

by Lithosano » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:17 pm
Shershah wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
You discussed it but never gave any relevant proof, either logical or peer-reviewed, that may justify your belief.
That wiki article clearly states that it was once considered to be a form of paraphilia. Do you disagree on that ? and yes "it was".
If not then there is nor further need for discussion on that.

by Immoren » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:18 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:18 pm
Shershah wrote:1 - That wiki article clearly states that it was once considered to be a form of paraphilia. Do you disagree on that ? and yes "it was".
2 - Right, you want me to start a private eye or something next then ?
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Lemanrussland » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:18 pm

by Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:18 pm

| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:19 pm
Shershah wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:"Political Correctness" is the first thing that comes to mind to people like you, who have their heads so deep up a boxhole that it is impossible to get them out.
Political Correctness has nothing to do with research. Research presents data, that may or may not conflict with present beliefs; political correctness is a sociological concept and it doesn't tie into science.
Stop being so dishonest.
Right... so if the moon landings were indeed fake, they would have no problem saying so. If we had encountered aliens, same thing ? Or what about some kind of accidental epidemic outbreak ?
If you honestly believe that politics plays no part then i have no idea what to say.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Lemanrussland » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:20 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Shershah wrote:
Right... so if the moon landings were indeed fake, they would have no problem saying so. If we had encountered aliens, same thing ? Or what about some kind of accidental epidemic outbreak ?
If you honestly believe that politics plays no part then i have no idea what to say.
So much conspiracy theory.
So much bullshit I can disprove but isn't the topic of this thread.

by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:21 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Shershah wrote:1 - That wiki article clearly states that it was once considered to be a form of paraphilia. Do you disagree on that ? and yes "it was".
2 - Right, you want me to start a private eye or something next then ?
1 - It WAS, past tense. The fact that there has been peer-reviewed research on the subject is what you are missing up there, champ.
2 - No, just better document your beliefs with more recent data. You are starting to sound like a 70 year old person who's bitter he didn't get a chance in life.
Lithosano wrote:Shershah wrote:
That wiki article clearly states that it was once considered to be a form of paraphilia. Do you disagree on that ? and yes "it was".
If not then there is nor further need for discussion on that.
Having once been thought of as a paraphilia does not mean that it is one. The evidence shows that it is sufficiently dissimilar for paraphilias as to be an unrelated construct.
Homosexuality is only a paraphilia inasmuch as heterosexuality is a paraphilia.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:21 pm

Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belogorod, Best Mexico, Bing sung, Margraviate of Moravia, Norse Inuit Union, Riviere Renard, Senkaku, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, The Holy Therns, Tlaceceyaya
Advertisement