NATION

PASSWORD

Gay Weddings Legalized in....wait, Vietnam?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Shershah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 759
Founded: Nov 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:40 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:Then you would be making a flaw in logic, which would make you look bigoted against people who do not want any kids.

Also, fun fact! Remember how you go on and about the whole "it's hardwired" thing? Well, it is also "hardwired" into us to prefer our own children over someone else's. Yet my girlfriend has a child from someone else and I see him as a child I would like to raise on my own. How do you explain that through science, genius?

Also, you would be surprised at how little you know about words.


Every rule has an exception. That seems to be your case. Personally though if that was me then i would just choose someone else to marry instead, but that is me.

Also i may be bigoted. Doesn't matter really. Labels are just that labels.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:43 am

Shershah wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:Then you would be making a flaw in logic, which would make you look bigoted against people who do not want any kids.

Also, fun fact! Remember how you go on and about the whole "it's hardwired" thing? Well, it is also "hardwired" into us to prefer our own children over someone else's. Yet my girlfriend has a child from someone else and I see him as a child I would like to raise on my own. How do you explain that through science, genius?

Also, you would be surprised at how little you know about words.


Every rule has an exception. That seems to be your case. Personally though if that was me then i would just choose someone else to marry instead, but that is me.

Also i may be bigoted. Doesn't matter really. Labels are just that labels.


And yet it is a natural exception, or to put it another way, it is a natural thing for some people.

Same with homosexuality, it is a natural thing for some people while for others being heterosexual is a natural thing. Now THAT'S biology and logic put together. Not your pseudo-scientific logic.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:44 am, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Shershah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 759
Founded: Nov 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:44 am

Blasveck wrote:
Shershah wrote:
"Natural selection"

Mutations are a thing.

And besides, having a gay population has a benefit to humanity anyways.


Mutations doesn't contradict the fact that only the strong survive. You need to be able to reproduce to ensure the continuity of the species and hence heterosexual behaviour is favoured. That is a fact.

Also it can just as well be sterility or asexuality. It need not be homosexuality. So not really much of a point.

Lost heros wrote:
Shershah wrote:
If the one enslaved have no problem with it, i don't see anything wrong with it.

You don't see any problem with removing any and all Rights and freedoms. Yeah, I can see why you're anti-gay. Also, your post had nothing to do with mine. Land of Christ was making an appeal to tradition, and I showed that some traditions are horrible, making your post completely irrelevant.


I was referring more to his/her statement that they can me one cry with just words. I am not that sensitive.

And it is unusual because biology doesn't use that as the norm.

I didn't read it like that.

An appeal to nature won't get you anywhere.
Also,in case your curious


True freedom can only be found in the midst of anarchy and chaos. We are still slaves, just a different kind.

And exceptions are not the norm.

User avatar
Shershah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 759
Founded: Nov 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:45 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Shershah wrote:
Every rule has an exception. That seems to be your case. Personally though if that was me then i would just choose someone else to marry instead, but that is me.

Also i may be bigoted. Doesn't matter really. Labels are just that labels.


And yet it is a natural exception, or to put it another way, it is a natural thing for some people.

Same with homosexuality, it is a natural thing for some people while for others being heterosexual is a natural thing. Now THAT'S biology and logic put together. Not your pseudo-scientific logic.


And i just consider it as something for which a cure if possible should be created. That is all. I don't hate them, i just pity them.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:45 am

Shershah wrote:Mutations doesn't contradict the fact that only the strong survive. You need to be able to reproduce to ensure the continuity of the species and hence heterosexual behaviour is favoured. That is a fact.

Also it can just as well be sterility or asexuality. It need not be homosexuality. So not really much of a point.


Mutations are many times favorable, it doesn't need to be harmful.

Again, you are talking baseless assumptions. Also, just because it is favored it doesn't mean that is the universal flow of the universe.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:46 am

Shershah wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Mutations are a thing.

And besides, having a gay population has a benefit to humanity anyways.


Mutations doesn't contradict the fact that only the strong survive. You need to be able to reproduce to ensure the continuity of the species and hence heterosexual behaviour is favoured. That is a fact.

Also it can just as well be sterility or asexuality. It need not be homosexuality. So not really much of a point.

Lost heros wrote:You don't see any problem with removing any and all Rights and freedoms. Yeah, I can see why you're anti-gay. Also, your post had nothing to do with mine. Land of Christ was making an appeal to tradition, and I showed that some traditions are horrible, making your post completely irrelevant.


I didn't read it like that.

An appeal to nature won't get you anywhere.
Also,in case your curious


True freedom can only be found in the midst of anarchy and chaos. We are still slaves, just a different kind.

And exceptions are not the norm.

Your proverbs are not arguments.

So? Because they are an exception to the norm we should deny them basic human rights?
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:46 am

Shershah wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Mutations are a thing.

And besides, having a gay population has a benefit to humanity anyways.


Mutations doesn't contradict the fact that only the strong survive. You need to be able to reproduce to ensure the continuity of the species and hence heterosexual behaviour is favoured. That is a fact.

Also it can just as well be sterility or asexuality. It need not be homosexuality. So not really much of a point.

Lost heros wrote:You don't see any problem with removing any and all Rights and freedoms. Yeah, I can see why you're anti-gay. Also, your post had nothing to do with mine. Land of Christ was making an appeal to tradition, and I showed that some traditions are horrible, making your post completely irrelevant.


I didn't read it like that.

An appeal to nature won't get you anywhere.
Also,in case your curious

True freedom can only be found in the midst of anarchy and chaos. We are still slaves, just a different kind.

And exceptions are not the norm.


Evolution is not about the "survival of the strong"

Evolution is about the survival of the species as a whole.

And it just so happens that not everybody needs to be able to reproduce to contribute to the survival of the species.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:46 am

Shershah wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
And yet it is a natural exception, or to put it another way, it is a natural thing for some people.

Same with homosexuality, it is a natural thing for some people while for others being heterosexual is a natural thing. Now THAT'S biology and logic put together. Not your pseudo-scientific logic.


And i just consider it as something for which a cure if possible should be created. That is all. I don't hate them, i just pity them.

You pity mentally healthy people for having a sexual orientation different from yours, and think they should be force to undergo medical procedures aimed at "curing" them of something that is not a disease and is inherently harmless?

You make no sense.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:47 am

Shershah wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
And yet it is a natural exception, or to put it another way, it is a natural thing for some people.

Same with homosexuality, it is a natural thing for some people while for others being heterosexual is a natural thing. Now THAT'S biology and logic put together. Not your pseudo-scientific logic.


And i just consider it as something for which a cure if possible should be created. That is all. I don't hate them, i just pity them.


Are you even trying to make an argument anymore?

A cure does not exist for a biological process that is an advantage. Even if we were to kill them all (in the most radical case) it would appear again because it is a biological trait, is not something that has a cure.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Shershah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 759
Founded: Nov 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:48 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Shershah wrote:Mutations doesn't contradict the fact that only the strong survive. You need to be able to reproduce to ensure the continuity of the species and hence heterosexual behaviour is favoured. That is a fact.

Also it can just as well be sterility or asexuality. It need not be homosexuality. So not really much of a point.


Mutations are many times favorable, it doesn't need to be harmful.

Again, you are talking baseless assumptions. Also, just because it is favored it doesn't mean that is the universal flow of the universe.


Favoured = the norm =/= the exception.

Sanity is the norm, insanity is the exception. Healthy is the norm, diseased is the exception. We try to cure diseases don't we. That is what i see it as.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:49 am

Shershah wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
And yet it is a natural exception, or to put it another way, it is a natural thing for some people.

Same with homosexuality, it is a natural thing for some people while for others being heterosexual is a natural thing. Now THAT'S biology and logic put together. Not your pseudo-scientific logic.


And i just consider it as something for which a cure if possible should be created. That is all. I don't hate them, i just pity them.

They don't need nor want your pity. They don't want you to enforce your baseless rules on to them. There is nothing to cure. Gayness is not a disease.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:49 am

Shershah wrote:That is what i see it as.

Yet you have no valid, peer-reviewed research to prove your hypothesis right.
Last edited by Liriena on Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:49 am

Shershah wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Mutations are many times favorable, it doesn't need to be harmful.

Again, you are talking baseless assumptions. Also, just because it is favored it doesn't mean that is the universal flow of the universe.


Favoured = the norm =/= the exception.

Sanity is the norm, insanity is the exception. Healthy is the norm, diseased is the exception. We try to cure diseases don't we. That is what i see it as.

And the medical community has agreed that homosexuality is not a disease. I'll take their researched, informed conclusion over your baseless assertions.

Unless you are a doctor, in which case, please submit your findings on homosexuality to the medical community.
Last edited by Blasveck on Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:49 am

Shershah wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Mutations are many times favorable, it doesn't need to be harmful.

Again, you are talking baseless assumptions. Also, just because it is favored it doesn't mean that is the universal flow of the universe.


Favoured = the norm =/= the exception.

Sanity is the norm, insanity is the exception. Healthy is the norm, diseased is the exception. We try to cure diseases don't we. That is what i see it as.


Favored just means it is more likely to appear, it doesn't mean it has, by law, to appear in a population.

Again, you can't cure a natural process.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:50 am

Shershah wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Mutations are many times favorable, it doesn't need to be harmful.

Again, you are talking baseless assumptions. Also, just because it is favored it doesn't mean that is the universal flow of the universe.


Favoured = the norm =/= the exception.

Sanity is the norm, insanity is the exception. Healthy is the norm, diseased is the exception. We try to cure diseases don't we. That is what i see it as.
Then you are woefully wrong. It hasn't been seen as a disease by any reputable mental health professional in over half a century
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54741
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:50 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Land of Christ wrote:Gay marriage is a threat to traditional society and should be discouraged. Marriage is between a man and a woman


So, we should do away with Christianity because it is also a threat to traditional society and must be discouraged?


Exactly what I was telling Octavianus...
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:50 am

Lost heros wrote:
Shershah wrote:
And i just consider it as something for which a cure if possible should be created. That is all. I don't hate them, i just pity them.

They don't need nor want your pity. They don't want you to enforce your baseless rules on to them. There is nothing to cure. Gayness is not a disease.


But saying "gayness" is :p
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:51 am

Shershah wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Mutations are a thing.

And besides, having a gay population has a benefit to humanity anyways.


Mutations doesn't contradict the fact that only the strong survive. You need to be able to reproduce to ensure the continuity of the species and hence heterosexual behaviour is favoured. That is a fact.

Also it can just as well be sterility or asexuality. It need not be homosexuality. So not really much of a point.

Humans are K strategists. A larger number of adults looking after a fewer number of children is favored. A non-reproducing uncle with strong family ties is a boon for you.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Shershah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 759
Founded: Nov 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:51 am

Blasveck wrote:Evolution is not about the "survival of the strong"

Evolution is about the survival of the species as a whole.

And it just so happens that not everybody needs to be able to reproduce to contribute to the survival of the species.


And your argument ?

Liriena wrote:You pity mentally healthy people for having a sexual orientation different from yours, and think they should be force to undergo medical procedures aimed at "curing" them of something that is not a disease and is inherently harmless?

You make no sense.


I consider it as a disorder or mental illness. I thought i said that already.

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Shershah wrote:
And i just consider it as something for which a cure if possible should be created. That is all. I don't hate them, i just pity them.


Are you even trying to make an argument anymore?

A cure does not exist for a biological process that is an advantage. Even if we were to kill them all (in the most radical case) it would appear again because it is a biological trait, is not something that has a cure.


Only it is not an advantage. If you are talking about overpopulation, sterility is an advantage, but homosexual people can still reproduce, so not really an advantage from biological point of view.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:51 am

Risottia wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
So, we should do away with Christianity because it is also a threat to traditional society and must be discouraged?


Exactly what I was telling Octavianus...


I don't think he listened to you that well...
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:51 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Lost heros wrote:They don't need nor want your pity. They don't want you to enforce your baseless rules on to them. There is nothing to cure. Gayness is not a disease.


But saying "gayness" is :p

I couldn't think of a better word.
Last edited by Lost heros on Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Totalise
Diplomat
 
Posts: 563
Founded: Jun 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Totalise » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:52 am

another leftet state

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:53 am

Shershah wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Evolution is not about the "survival of the strong"

Evolution is about the survival of the species as a whole.

And it just so happens that not everybody needs to be able to reproduce to contribute to the survival of the species.


And your argument ?

Liriena wrote:You pity mentally healthy people for having a sexual orientation different from yours, and think they should be force to undergo medical procedures aimed at "curing" them of something that is not a disease and is inherently harmless?

You make no sense.


I consider it as a disorder or mental illness. I thought i said that already.

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Are you even trying to make an argument anymore?

A cure does not exist for a biological process that is an advantage. Even if we were to kill them all (in the most radical case) it would appear again because it is a biological trait, is not something that has a cure.


Only it is not an advantage. If you are talking about overpopulation, sterility is an advantage, but homosexual people can still reproduce, so not really an advantage from biological point of view.

Having a non-reproducing member of the species is not always a bad thing. In small populations, it can be, sure.
But with 7 billion members of the human species, i think we're okay.
Last edited by Blasveck on Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:54 am

Shershah wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Evolution is not about the "survival of the strong"

Evolution is about the survival of the species as a whole.

And it just so happens that not everybody needs to be able to reproduce to contribute to the survival of the species.


And your argument ?

The vast majority of ants are non-reproductive. Ants are among, if not the most, successful species on the planet.

Natural selection does not support your argument.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:54 am

Shershah wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Are you even trying to make an argument anymore?

A cure does not exist for a biological process that is an advantage. Even if we were to kill them all (in the most radical case) it would appear again because it is a biological trait, is not something that has a cure.


Only it is not an advantage. If you are talking about overpopulation, sterility is an advantage, but homosexual people can still reproduce, so not really an advantage from biological point of view.


Sterility is just one form of advantage.

That's the funny thing about biology, random shit happens and we have one or multiple variables. Homosexuality has existed since forever because it is advantageous to the population group of humans. Christianity on the other hand has placed a serious stigma on homosexuality, and as such we can conclude Christianity is unnatural.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fractalnavel, The Plough Islands

Advertisement

Remove ads