NATION

PASSWORD

GUN CONTROL!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Yusova
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 354
Founded: Oct 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yusova » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:25 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if I told you that gun control should still happen even if criminals were all to mysteriously abandon the use of firearms?



So you're saying that, even if gun crime was non-existent, you still have a problem with people using certain firearms for the sole purpose of shooting paper, collecting, etc.?

Yeah, what is the problem with guns with no gun crime?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159122
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:29 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if I told you that gun control should still happen even if criminals were all to mysteriously abandon the use of firearms?



So you're saying that, even if gun crime was non-existent, you still have a problem with people using certain firearms for the sole purpose of shooting paper, collecting, etc.?

Do guns stop being dangerous when you hang them on the wall or shoot at paper targets? No? Then there should still be restrictions on the ownership and use of firearms, i.e. gun control.

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:33 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:Except it has been proven that most criminals get there weapons illegally, and is some ways that are hard to deter without taking away legal citizens right to own or us firearms.

Except we're not talking about taking guns from people who should have 2d Amendment access to them.

We're talking about controlling access to people like the Washington Navy Yard shooter, who purchased the gun legally because of poorly managed Gun Control laws.

Stop conflating Gun Control and Gun Bans.


Perhaps things would get back on track if the discussion was steered back toward what would be more ideal in terms of gun control laws and their execution?

I honestly am not quite as knowledgable on what is legal and not and where within the U.S. as some of my rifle-toting bretheren, but there should be a list of what may prevent someone from owning certain classes of weapons. Mental health issues certainly, but the problem here is defining these issues to ensure that some who are no more a danger to themselves and others with such weapons, like mild autistics with proper firearm training, still have access to them while those with deeper issues that most definitely do make them dangerous do not. If it's easy to change the definition of who is fit and unfit to possess a firearm based on political pressures, simply by definining such-and-such a mental illness, someone on one side or another is likely to be upset.
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:42 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Novakaira wrote:
Not religious, not an NRA member.
And I posted some sources. Have fun with those.

Three links to news agencies speaking about mental health, and a book written by an individual who has his studies funded by the NRA.

Not really great sources, mate.


It's funny how the same side that rants about mental illness being the real problem instead of unregulated gun purchases also happens to be the one that wants to shut down national health care that would cover said mental illnesses.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Yusova
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 354
Founded: Oct 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yusova » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:45 pm

Gauthier wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Three links to news agencies speaking about mental health, and a book written by an individual who has his studies funded by the NRA.

Not really great sources, mate.


It's funny how the same side that rants about mental illness being the real problem instead of unregulated gun purchases also happens to be the one that wants to shut down national health care that would cover said mental illnesses.

"Cause national healthcare would make us communists, like Saudi Iraq "

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:46 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:

So you're saying that, even if gun crime was non-existent, you still have a problem with people using certain firearms for the sole purpose of shooting paper, collecting, etc.?

Do guns stop being dangerous when you hang them on the wall or shoot at paper targets? No? Then there should still be restrictions on the ownership and use of firearms, i.e. gun control.


Does a traditional, classroom stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.
Last edited by Spreewerke on Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:47 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Do guns stop being dangerous when you hang them on the wall or shoot at paper targets? No? Then there should still be restrictions on the ownership and use of firearms, i.e. gun control.


Does a stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.


Too much Steven King?
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:47 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Do guns stop being dangerous when you hang them on the wall or shoot at paper targets? No? Then there should still be restrictions on the ownership and use of firearms, i.e. gun control.


Does a stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.

In 100 out of 100 cases, nobody was shot in a location that did not have a gun in that location.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:48 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
Does a stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.

In 100 out of 100 cases, nobody was shot in a location that did not have a gun in that location.



In 100 out of 100 of those same cases, nobody died without having first been alive. Ban life.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:49 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 100 out of 100 cases, nobody was shot in a location that did not have a gun in that location.



In 100 out of 100 of those same cases, nobody died without having first been alive. Ban life.


Yet you want abortions banned.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:49 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 100 out of 100 cases, nobody was shot in a location that did not have a gun in that location.



In 100 out of 100 of those same cases, nobody died without having first been alive. Ban life.

We tried. Unfortunately the same people who masturbate to guns, masturbate to a twisted interpretation of the Christian Bible.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:50 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:

In 100 out of 100 of those same cases, nobody died without having first been alive. Ban life.


Yet you want abortions banned.



Where did I ever say that?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:52 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
Yet you want abortions banned.



Where did I ever say that?


Figure it's a right wing package. No gun control, no social services, no abortion.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:52 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:

Where did I ever say that?


Figure it's a right wing package. No gun control, no social services, no abortion.



Glad to see you don't stereotype anyone.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159122
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:56 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Do guns stop being dangerous when you hang them on the wall or shoot at paper targets? No? Then there should still be restrictions on the ownership and use of firearms, i.e. gun control.


Does a traditional, classroom stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.

Why would I want to restrict the ownership and use of firearms if I thought they could act independent of a person? That wouldn't accomplish anything.

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:58 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
Does a traditional, classroom stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.

Why would I want to restrict the ownership and use of firearms if I thought they could act independent of a person? That wouldn't accomplish anything.


Watch what happens after a few more generations of drone development.
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:58 pm

Dracoria wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Why would I want to restrict the ownership and use of firearms if I thought they could act independent of a person? That wouldn't accomplish anything.


Watch what happens after a few more generations of drone development.

God damn it, who invented Skynet?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159122
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:59 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Dracoria wrote:
Watch what happens after a few more generations of drone development.

God damn it, who invented Skynet?

Obama.

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:00 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:God damn it, who invented Skynet?

Obama.


Only because Al Gore invented the internet for it to run on. You know, the pipes and stuff.
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

User avatar
Sociobiology
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18396
Founded: Aug 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sociobiology » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:01 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
Does a traditional, classroom stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.

Why would I want to restrict the ownership and use of firearms if I thought they could act independent of a person? That wouldn't accomplish anything.

for the same reason we require a permit to buy dynamite.

the potential abuse without restriction, far outweighs the loss of utility caused by restriction.
Last edited by Sociobiology on Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance. ~Reuben Blades

I got quite annoyed after the Haiti earthquake. A baby was taken from the wreckage and people said it was a miracle. It would have been a miracle had God stopped the earthquake. More wonderful was that a load of evolved monkeys got together to save the life of a child that wasn't theirs. ~Terry Pratchett

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:02 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
Does a traditional, classroom stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.

Why would I want to restrict the ownership and use of firearms if I thought they could act independent of a person? That wouldn't accomplish anything.



The context in which this was being discussed was that gun crime was suddenly non-existent. If you are implying some firearms are more susceptible to being fired accidentally than others, it tells me you have little to no experience with firearms at all. People have died from accidents involving bolt-action hunting rifles. Same for lever-action rifles. No gun is accident safe, but no gun is more prone to being used negligently more than any other gun. Whether or not the person is knowledgeable and responsible with a firearm is what's going to matter. Perhaps I am misreading and your restrictions are referring not to "what weapon" but instead "training before ownership"? If that is the case, I will not necessarily disagree there. I am under the personal belief that a basic firearms safety and responsibility course should be taught at some point in school. I don't believe everyone should own a gun (I know plenty of people do not wish to own one), but I feel like everyone should at least be capable of handling one safely if ever that knowledge is needed. I don't know if you feel the same in that regard, yourself, however.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:02 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if I told you that gun control should still happen even if criminals were all to mysteriously abandon the use of firearms?



So you're saying that, even if gun crime was non-existent, you still have a problem with people using certain firearms for the sole purpose of shooting paper, collecting, etc.?

No, he's saying that there should still be restrictions on who may own a gun. Gun control =/= gun ban.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Conservative Conservationists
Diplomat
 
Posts: 731
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative Conservationists » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:02 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Does a traditional, classroom stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.


A stapler is a tool for non-deadly purposes. Can a gun open a can (safely), cut some cloth, insert a nail etc etc
A gun is a tool designed for killing. Why would anyone be suprised when a tool is used for its purpose?

A car is a useful means of transportation, not death. A car is misused when someone dies from it (due to quality of driver or vehicle). A weapon is not misused when someone dies from it when both the weapon and individual performed their functions as intended.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:06 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:God damn it, who invented Skynet?

Obama.


Oh sure, all anyone remembers is a black man made Skynet and they immediately blame Obama.

Image
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:06 pm

Conservative Conservationists wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
Does a traditional, classroom stapler staple papers by itself? No? It's just a tool that acts only when a person is using it? Yes, just like a gun.


If you think a gun is dangerous by itself, I can only imagine the fears you have in a parking lot.


A stapler is a tool for non-deadly purposes. Can a gun open a can (safely), cut some cloth, insert a nail etc etc
A gun is a tool designed for killing. Why would anyone be suprised when a tool is used for its purpose?

A car is a useful means of transportation, not death. A car is misused when someone dies from it (due to quality of driver or vehicle). A weapon is not misused when someone dies from it when both the weapon and individual performed their functions as intended.


No, but I can make a chair, open a bottle, and brown toast with a firearm.

A firearm can also be used to hammer nails, cook bacon, enhance one's exercise regimen, and be used as a step ladder among other things.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arenial, Cannot think of a name, Dazchan, Dubroia, Hidrandia, Hurdergaryp, Likhinia, Newne Carriebean7, Ostoderstein, Petroli, Phage, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat

Advertisement

Remove ads