Yes, the only non-plastic part is the firing pin (and a block inserted for compliance with the Undetectable Firearms Act).
But they tend to fail quite spectacularly fairly quickly.
Advertisement

by Occupied Deutschland » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:19 pm

by Sociobiology » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:19 pm
GWACA wrote:Sociobiology wrote:bringing a firearm on a plane?
I can't bring my rock hammer or pocket knife on a plane and they are essential tools.
a hammer and a knife (though not intended to be) can realistically be used as weapons. A plastic firearm without bullets is like a car without gas you can't do anything practical or realistic with it.

by GWACA » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:21 pm
Sociobiology wrote:GWACA wrote:a hammer and a knife (though not intended to be) can realistically be used as weapons. A plastic firearm without bullets is like a car without gas you can't do anything practical or realistic with it.
I cant bring an empty chainsaw either.
which is still the funniest sign at the airport.

by Chernoslavia » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:21 pm

by Chernoslavia » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:23 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
My friend's liberator's plastic barrel withstood over 100 shots from .380 brass ammo. I think it can withstand plastic ammo....if you could get the little shits to go off
you realize "brass" is the key word in that sentence. the brass creates a resistant air tight chamber, if you tired a caseless round it would explode.

by Sociobiology » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:24 pm
GWACA wrote:Sociobiology wrote: I cant bring an empty chainsaw either.
which is still the funniest sign at the airport.
That's another silly rule, if you're willing to pay the money to bring it onboard you should be able to bring an empty chainsaw without fuel oil or bar oil. Believe it or not that has caused problems for me, I had to DRIVE my chainsaw from my childhood home in Kokomo indiana, to my current home, in Nome Alaska.

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:25 pm

by Chernoslavia » Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:33 pm

by Firmador » Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:22 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:Yes, the only non-plastic part is the firing pin (and a block inserted for compliance with the Undetectable Firearms Act).
But they tend to fail quite spectacularly fairly quickly.
Well, depending what quality plastic your making them from. They can last from two shots to a hundred.
Gallia- wrote:The difference between stupidity and bravery is often the outcome.

by Genesis Era » Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:36 am
Firmador wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
Well, depending what quality plastic your making them from. They can last from two shots to a hundred.
No.
They work, with regular ammunition, up to like six shots.
Weaker ammunition, is obviously higher but has its own drawbacks.
I would not be surprised if in twenty years we could produce a completely combat-quality firearm entirely from the 3D printing press (I assume that's what you guys are talking about?) or some other variant.

by Firmador » Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:39 am
Genesis Era wrote:Firmador wrote:
No.
They work, with regular ammunition, up to like six shots.
Weaker ammunition, is obviously higher but has its own drawbacks.
I would not be surprised if in twenty years we could produce a completely combat-quality firearm entirely from the 3D printing press (I assume that's what you guys are talking about?) or some other variant.
...Which would throw out all attempts to restrict gun sales through high prices. Because, let's face it: one wouldn't need to pay over the nose for a custom-made, 3D-printed gun, be it a Magnum replica or a M4 complete with shotgun shells. Eventually, technology will catch up from cruddy plastic guns that break apart to fully functional magazines, triggers, all the independent gun parts that fit together perfectly. All at an affordable price.
Only a matter of time. And tech.
Gallia- wrote:The difference between stupidity and bravery is often the outcome.

by Grinning Dragon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:23 am
Firmador wrote:Genesis Era wrote:
...Which would throw out all attempts to restrict gun sales through high prices. Because, let's face it: one wouldn't need to pay over the nose for a custom-made, 3D-printed gun, be it a Magnum replica or a M4 complete with shotgun shells. Eventually, technology will catch up from cruddy plastic guns that break apart to fully functional magazines, triggers, all the independent gun parts that fit together perfectly. All at an affordable price.
Only a matter of time. And tech.
That's going to be a while, those 3D techs are expensive. Thus economics of scale (even in 20 years), one man will likely produce on order. Illegal order. He will be hunted by the DEA, probably as a ter-rosdtist and that makes it particularly easier.
But the day a 3D printer is in every home, and we can start materializing delicious food from our daily waste the entire idea of Scarcity and Economics will be made moot and Communism will be the only way to go.
Crazy shit man.

by Imperializt Russia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:02 am
Ayreonia wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:
Ahh but what about police? Because I can tell you that I have outshot police officers on a couple of occasions and I generally only get to go to the range a couple of times a year. But that is all besides the point of talking about gun control, as this thread is supposed to talk about.
Outshooting someone at the range does not mean you're a better shot in an actual firefight.
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Gauthier wrote:Looks like Undetectable Firearms Act is scheduled to expire in December unless Congress actually does something.
Undetectable Firearms Act: Rep. Steve Israel Pushes For Renewal As Defense Distributed Pulls Prank
What won't be a surprise if we have people on NSG who are going to bitch about Gubmint infringing on an individual's right to possess undetectable firearms that can evade conventional airport security measures.
Wow, a politician pushing for a gun control bill that has no connection to realistic happenings by appealing to ignorance.
...
What a non-surprise.
GWACA wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
It shows that it's useless to ban plastic guns that will be extremely expensive to make. Boxcutters are of metal, they managed to get through. Also, ammunition still has to be metal.
case less rounds aren't metal and ceramic or glass projectiles could be used.... it's grasping at straws and highly unlikely, but still plausible.
Sociobiology wrote:GWACA wrote:a hammer and a knife (though not intended to be) can realistically be used as weapons. A plastic firearm without bullets is like a car without gas you can't do anything practical or realistic with it.
I cant bring an empty chainsaw either.
which is still the funniest sign at the airport.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Ayreonia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:05 am
Sinovet wrote:I recommend the European approach.
Ban civilian gun ownership.
Problem Solved...no more gang shootouts, no more accidental gun deaths, no more, no more.
It just saves so much time money, paperwork, and of course, lives.

by Len Hyet » Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:26 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Please can you post the picture.

by Sevvania » Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:17 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:
A 3D printer was recently seized in Manchester (England), along with pre-built parts for firearms.
It's happening.

by Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:18 pm
Sevvania wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:
A 3D printer was recently seized in Manchester (England), along with pre-built parts for firearms.
It's happening.
The "pre-built parts for firearms" were actually 3D printer parts.
http://gigaom.com/2013/10/24/uk-police- ... omponents/
http://www.popsci.com/article/technolog ... rinted-gun
http://rt.com/news/3d-printer-seized-uk-728/

by Imperializt Russia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:22 pm
Sevvania wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:
A 3D printer was recently seized in Manchester (England), along with pre-built parts for firearms.
It's happening.
The "pre-built parts for firearms" were actually 3D printer parts.
http://gigaom.com/2013/10/24/uk-police- ... omponents/
http://www.popsci.com/article/technolog ... rinted-gun
http://rt.com/news/3d-printer-seized-uk-728/
The arrested man, who has since been bailed, said: "It's nothing to do with a gun whatsoever.
"I have no idea why they think it is part of a gun. It's designed by the company that makes the printer to go in the printer to make it better."
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Gun Manufacturers » Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:40 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Sevvania wrote:The "pre-built parts for firearms" were actually 3D printer parts.
http://gigaom.com/2013/10/24/uk-police- ... omponents/
http://www.popsci.com/article/technolog ... rinted-gun
http://rt.com/news/3d-printer-seized-uk-728/
The BBC lied to me.
Looking up the article, it seems it has been updated.
I find this defence interestingly worded:The arrested man, who has since been bailed, said: "It's nothing to do with a gun whatsoever.
"I have no idea why they think it is part of a gun. It's designed by the company that makes the printer to go in the printer to make it better."
...
Eloquent.
However, of concern:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22464360
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

by Firmador » Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:36 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:Firmador wrote:
That's going to be a while, those 3D techs are expensive. Thus economics of scale (even in 20 years), one man will likely produce on order. Illegal order. He will be hunted by the DEA, probably as a ter-rosdtist and that makes it particularly easier.
But the day a 3D printer is in every home, and we can start materializing delicious food from our daily waste the entire idea of Scarcity and Economics will be made moot and Communism will be the only way to go.
Crazy shit man.
Why would a person be hunted down by the moronic DEA? I would think it would be by those jack booted thugs the bATFe (and really big fires) for printing firearms.
Gallia- wrote:The difference between stupidity and bravery is often the outcome.

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:03 pm
Ifreann wrote:Sevvania wrote:The "pre-built parts for firearms" were actually 3D printer parts.
http://gigaom.com/2013/10/24/uk-police- ... omponents/
http://www.popsci.com/article/technolog ... rinted-gun
http://rt.com/news/3d-printer-seized-uk-728/
3D printers that make 3D printers are a far more terrifying notion.


by Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:05 pm
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Ifreann wrote:3D printers that make 3D printers are a far more terrifying notion.
We've opened Pandora's fly!
One of the neat things about 3D printing, though, is that you can print something that's already fully assembled. So in the quite-distant future, when we move around in Jetsons cars (lol 60s lol) and engineers do finite element modeling of entire structures because we have the processing power to do it, you could print a fully-functioning gun and rack the slide when you take it out of the machine.
Or you could mass-produce a number of robots and take over the world. So, really, I don't get why 3D printed guns are an issue when we really should be focusing on Skynet.

by Gauthier » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:07 pm
Ifreann wrote:Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:
We've opened Pandora's fly!
One of the neat things about 3D printing, though, is that you can print something that's already fully assembled. So in the quite-distant future, when we move around in Jetsons cars (lol 60s lol) and engineers do finite element modeling of entire structures because we have the processing power to do it, you could print a fully-functioning gun and rack the slide when you take it out of the machine.
Or you could mass-produce a number of robots and take over the world. So, really, I don't get why 3D printed guns are an issue when we really should be focusing on Skynet.
I'll just 3D print Arnie.

by Libertarian California » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:08 pm

by Firmador » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:09 pm
Libertarian California wrote:How is that Canada has relatively lax gun laws when compared to most of the developed world (most guns that one can legally purchase in the US can legally be purchased in Canada), yet barely has any mass shootings?

Gallia- wrote:The difference between stupidity and bravery is often the outcome.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Escalia, Eternal Algerstonia, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Greater Qwerty, Grinning Dragon, Necroghastia, Rary, The Astral Mandate, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Valyxias
Advertisement