NATION

PASSWORD

Political Pipedreams?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
GrandKirche
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1488
Founded: Jan 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby GrandKirche » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:51 am

Aeken wrote:
GrandKirche wrote:
It wouldn't be much of a war. A short invasion followed by a well resourced rebuild & rule. Compare what is now Pakistan under us to Obama's drones.

Pakistan has not gotten better. Sure, bad people were killed. But so were innocents. It wouldn't be such a short invasion. It'd be bloody. A foreign invasion would kill way more civilians and destroy much more infrastructure than not intervening at all.


You're assuming the Commonwealth (which includes Pakistan btw) would face serious opposition in building up infrastructure and improving security.

Like most of the world's problem spots, America being kept out and the British being left in charge would resolve about 85% of the problems immediately and allow work on the rest.
Read "A Man For All Seasons". That explains most of what I believe in. Except the Catholic bits.

Outside of here I do lead a rather unusual and colourful life. As a Spinster.

I just want a nice man with a good accent and the manners of a Royal.

British, a really cliché G in LGBTQ gentleman a lot of the time.

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:52 am

GrandKirche wrote:
Aeken wrote:Pakistan has not gotten better. Sure, bad people were killed. But so were innocents. It wouldn't be such a short invasion. It'd be bloody. A foreign invasion would kill way more civilians and destroy much more infrastructure than not intervening at all.


You're assuming the Commonwealth (which includes Pakistan btw) would face serious opposition in building up infrastructure and improving security.

Like most of the world's problem spots, America being kept out and the British being left in charge would resolve about 85% of the problems immediately and allow work on the rest.

Because the British being in charge worked so well in the past?

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Baltic Finland
Envoy
 
Posts: 348
Founded: Nov 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltic Finland » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:54 am

Britannia and Hiberniam wrote:
Baltic Finland wrote:


Oh, our dear Thatcherite and lunatic Hippo.

That guy's Hippo? Dang, he's one tough nutjob.
Call me either Itämerensuomi or Läänemeresoome. I'm a pragmatic, consumerist and minarchist market socialist.

My favorite thinkers include Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Henry George, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.

Constitution ~ Dialects ~ Parties ~ Regions

User avatar
Indira
Minister
 
Posts: 3339
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Indira » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:54 am

Tony Blair and Dubya actually going to jail for their illegal invasion of Iraq. Europe actually deciding to leave the EU together and reform it into a trading block only. The Republican party becoming more liberal. So much to choose from

User avatar
Aeken
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17135
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aeken » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:56 am

GrandKirche wrote:
Aeken wrote:Pakistan has not gotten better. Sure, bad people were killed. But so were innocents. It wouldn't be such a short invasion. It'd be bloody. A foreign invasion would kill way more civilians and destroy much more infrastructure than not intervening at all.


You're assuming the Commonwealth (which includes Pakistan btw) would face serious opposition in building up infrastructure and improving security.

Like most of the world's problem spots, America being kept out and the British being left in charge would resolve about 85% of the problems immediately and allow work on the rest.

Yes, I do. Do you actually think Pakistan of all places is happy with the Commonwealth?

Oh really.

User avatar
GrandKirche
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1488
Founded: Jan 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby GrandKirche » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:58 am

Hathradic States wrote:
GrandKirche wrote:
You're assuming the Commonwealth (which includes Pakistan btw) would face serious opposition in building up infrastructure and improving security.

Like most of the world's problem spots, America being kept out and the British being left in charge would resolve about 85% of the problems immediately and allow work on the rest.

Because the British being in charge worked so well in the past?


Better than now. You could go shopping in Lahore without having to keep an eye open for bombers.

Equally, A Commonwealth federal government would have legitimacy and resources. The best way to encourage peace is prosperity. Not bombs.
Read "A Man For All Seasons". That explains most of what I believe in. Except the Catholic bits.

Outside of here I do lead a rather unusual and colourful life. As a Spinster.

I just want a nice man with a good accent and the manners of a Royal.

British, a really cliché G in LGBTQ gentleman a lot of the time.

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 16569
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:00 pm

Hathradic States wrote:
GrandKirche wrote:
You're assuming the Commonwealth (which includes Pakistan btw) would face serious opposition in building up infrastructure and improving security.

Like most of the world's problem spots, America being kept out and the British being left in charge would resolve about 85% of the problems immediately and allow work on the rest.

Because the British being in charge worked so well in the past?

I certainly think so. :p
Image
Anglican monarchist, paternalistic conservative and Christian existentialist.
"It is spiritless to think that you cannot attain to that which you have seen and heard the masters attain. The masters are men. You are also a man. If you think that you will be inferior in doing something, you will be on that road very soon."
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
United Dependencies
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13659
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby United Dependencies » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:01 pm

Canada and the United States unite and become a commonwealth country.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.

Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

This is Nationstates we're here to help

Are you a native or resident of North Carolina?


User avatar
Havenburgh
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1910
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Havenburgh » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:04 pm

wow...

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:06 pm

GrandKirche wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Because the British being in charge worked so well in the past?


Better than now. You could go shopping in Lahore without having to keep an eye open for bombers.

Equally, A Commonwealth federal government would have legitimacy and resources. The best way to encourage peace is prosperity. Not bombs.

That didn't really work with India-Pakistan under the British before.

In fact, it kind of worked the opposite and birthed two nuclear states that hate each other's guts.
British rule exacerbated the 'bombs' problem.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:06 pm

A united socialist Europe.
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
Estado Paulista
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5791
Founded: Sep 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Estado Paulista » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:08 pm

Jinos wrote:Peru+Bolivia->Peru Bolivian Confederation


Argh, please no.
Your nation is like a son. What it does right is your merit, as well as what it does wrong is your fault. When you praise it, be lucid and avoid exaggeration. Praising it too much can make it indolent. On the other hand, when you criticize it, be harsh, but do not ridicule it. Do your best to improve it, not through derision or disdain, but through good examples and dedication.

User avatar
GrandKirche
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1488
Founded: Jan 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby GrandKirche » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:08 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
GrandKirche wrote:
Better than now. You could go shopping in Lahore without having to keep an eye open for bombers.

Equally, A Commonwealth federal government would have legitimacy and resources. The best way to encourage peace is prosperity. Not bombs.

That didn't really work with India-Pakistan under the British before.

In fact, it kind of worked the opposite and birthed two nuclear states that hate each other's guts.
British rule exacerbated the 'bombs' problem.


No, the End of British rule created the problem. Pre the Great Betrayal India was a pretty reasonable place, with development, much less corruption and war-mongering and minorities weren't treated like pinyatas.
Read "A Man For All Seasons". That explains most of what I believe in. Except the Catholic bits.

Outside of here I do lead a rather unusual and colourful life. As a Spinster.

I just want a nice man with a good accent and the manners of a Royal.

British, a really cliché G in LGBTQ gentleman a lot of the time.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 pm

Vicswampia wrote:
Divair wrote:Independent Cascadia.


You mean, pot smoking hippie land? :p

HEY, there'd be pot-smoking mormons (Idaho) and loggers (West Montana) too!

Which probably explains why it wouldn't work...
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:10 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Vicswampia wrote:
You mean, pot smoking hippie land? :p

HEY, there'd be pot-smoking mormons (Idaho) and loggers (West Montana) too!

Which probably explains why it wouldn't work...

Nah, they're being left out.

User avatar
Estado Paulista
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5791
Founded: Sep 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Estado Paulista » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:11 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:*sighs*

If you won't assume responsibility for your immediate descendants, we have to jump off the boat too.

Well, at least Rio de Janeiro if independent today would have the 23rd HDI of the whole world. -_-


I don't think you understand. We want to be independent because we don't want to sustain other regions with our wealth. It doesn't matter if they are culturally close to us or not.
Your nation is like a son. What it does right is your merit, as well as what it does wrong is your fault. When you praise it, be lucid and avoid exaggeration. Praising it too much can make it indolent. On the other hand, when you criticize it, be harsh, but do not ridicule it. Do your best to improve it, not through derision or disdain, but through good examples and dedication.

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:14 pm

Nevanmaa wrote:- Abolition of the Russian space program

- Closure of all nuclear power plants and a full ban on uranium mining

Also ban fire and wheels.
Mandatorise making everything with stone, wood and bone.
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:17 pm

Divair wrote:
Occupied Deutschland wrote:HEY, there'd be pot-smoking mormons (Idaho) and loggers (West Montana) too!

Which probably explains why it wouldn't work...

Nah, they're being left out.

Oh.
Well in that case, I guess pot-smoking hippie land is appropriate. Carry on.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Dread Lady Nathicana
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 26053
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dread Lady Nathicana » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:20 pm

Asigna wrote:
Arumdaum wrote: :shock:


I believe the Chinese sphere on influence must be annihilated in the whole of Southeast Asia. The last remnants of the Chinese must be removed.

Aeken, your comments could have been taken a whole world of wrong. Smileys aren't always enough to compensate or make clear your sarcasm - just for future reference.

As for Asigna, calls for genocide are not appropriate on these forums. Given your previously clean record, consider a *** Warning for Trolling *** as a heads up that you need to watch your method of debate. If you have questions as to limitations and rules, please see the One Stop Rule Shop in Moderation. Thanks.

User avatar
Souriya Al-Assad
Minister
 
Posts: 3280
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Souriya Al-Assad » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:21 pm

Britannia and Hiberniam wrote:
Baltic Finland wrote:


Oh, our dear Thatcherite and lunatic Hippo.


Oh, I almost forgot about that lol.

Human Beings are humans, not property.Corporations, (Corporate Property), is property; it is not a human being.Once we understand these two simple concepts, we can move on as a society. - Shofercia | What I believe besides agreeing with the above: Corporations/Conglomerates are vile scum that need to be nationalised, centralised, collectivised as well as redistributed directly back to the masses themselves to control via popular committees. Vive le Communisme! Vive l'idéologie Mathaba!
Imperialism makes monsters out of Man. - Comrade Ernesto Che Guevara.
Allah, Souriya, Bashar w bas! - EPIC
Basically, this. Our form of gov..
NS wars: 1/1/1/1.
USSR/Yugo HDIs 1992 - Haters are going to hate
EPIC 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hezbollah Compass TRUTH

User avatar
Aeken
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17135
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aeken » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:23 pm

Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:
Asigna wrote:
I believe the Chinese sphere on influence must be annihilated in the whole of Southeast Asia. The last remnants of the Chinese must be removed.

Aeken, your comments could have been taken a whole world of wrong. Smileys aren't always enough to compensate or make clear your sarcasm - just for future reference.

Noted. I do apologize for my behavior.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:25 pm

Asigna wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:No, but why does that matter?

that opinion is cray


China is not the China we loved anymore...it is an aggressive corrupt nation run by certain corrupt oligarchs. It does not deserve a sphere of influence.

I feel the same of much of the West.
I'm not inciting nuclear war or genocide.

Often.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:29 pm

Nevanmaa wrote:Greater Finland with borders that would look like this plus Meänmaa. Cleared of most Russians (at Russia's expense of course) who had illegitimately settled in these traditional Finnic lands and based on 20s and 30s conservative right-wing values with communism and socialism banned and White Guards enforcing public order.

It would be so beautiful to fill the dreams of the old Fennomans and finally reunify the kindred peoples oppressed by Russians with Finland.

Another pipe dream I have is that Russia would finally be held responsible for the crimes that they have commited. Here would be my demands to Russia:
- Returning areas stolen by the Soviet Union to their rightful owners:

From Russia:
- TO FINLAND: Karelia, Salla, Petsamo and Gulf of Finland islands
- TO ESTONIA: Petseri County and Jaanilinn
- TO LATVIA: Abrene District
- TO JAPAN: Kuril Islands and Southern Sakhalin
- TO GERMANY: Kaliningrad

The following areas would be cleared of all Russians at Russia's expense, and proper compensation would be paid to all these countries. In case of Ukraine and Belarus, Ukrainians and Belarussians in lost areas would be
moved to eastern parts of these nations that are inhabited by a Russian majority. Russians in these eastern areas would then be moved to Russia at Russia's expense.

From Ukraine:
- TO SLOVAKIA: Carpathian Ruthenia
- To ROMANIA: Chernivtsi Oblast and southern Odessa Oblast including cities of Izmail and Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi
- TO POLAND: Parts of former pre-war Poland, including the city of Lvov

From Belarus:
- TO POLAND: Parts of former pre-war Poland, including cities of Brest and Hrodna

From Moldova:
- TO ROMANIA: Entire country, including Transnistria

- Granting independence to oppressed nations of Russia. All these nations would be given enough land to sustain themselves by Russia, and would be cleared of all Russians that didn't live
in the area before 1939 at Russia's expense. Russia would also be obligied to supply these new nations with necessary supplies such as oil as a compensation for centuries of oppression. The following
nations would be freed:

- REPUBLICS: Alania (to consist of Southern Kabardino-Balkaria and Southern Karachay-Cherkessia), Circassia (to consist of Adygea and Northern Kabardino-Balkaria and Northern Karachay-Cherkessia), Altai, Bashkortostan, Chechnya, Chuvashia,
Dagestan, Ingushetia, Kalmykia, Khakassia, Komi, Mari El, Mordovia, North Ossetia-Alania, Sakha, Tatarstan, Tuva, Udmurtia
- In addition, Republic of Karelia would be divided between Finland and Russia

- AUTONOMOUS OKRUGS: Chukotka, Khanty-Mansi, Nenetsia (to consist of Nenets AO and Yamalo-Nenets AO), Evenkia-Taymyria (to consist of Evenk AO and Taymyr AO)
- In addition, former Komi-Permyak AO would be merged with Komi, Koryak Okrug with Chukotka, and Ust-Orda Buryat AO & Agin-Buryat AO with Buryatia

- Apologizing to Georgia for violating its territorial sovereignty in 2008; providing assistance to the Georgian Armed Forces so they can restore
order in South Ossetia and Abkhazia

- Apologizing for suppressing freedom and democracy by abusing its UN security council seat; immidiate resignation from the UN security council

- Apologizing for unforgivable crimes committed by Russians, including massacre of Katyn, occupation of Baltic States and Winter War.

- Outlawing all political activity of former members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and former members of any Soviet intelligence agencies

- Outlawing United Russia, Communist Party, LDPP and A Just Russia and any parties and organizations affiliated with them. Property of these parties would be confiscated by the state.

- Outlawing display of all Soviet symbols, including the hammer and sickle, red star and portrayals of any Soviet leaders

- Outlawing promotion of communism and denial of any Soviet crimes.

- Strict limits on the size of the Russian Armed Forces: No conscription and no more than 400.000 active troops

- Closure of all bases in Transnistria, Belarus and Abkhazia

- Immidiate deactivation of Russian nuclear arsenal.

- Confiscation and destruction/sale of all ballistic missiles, long-range bombers, aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers and submarines. Russian Navy should not have any ship larger than a frigate.

- Abolition of the Russian space program

- Closure of all nuclear power plants and a full ban on uranium mining

- Trade treaty with EU and US guaranteeing affordable Russian oil and natural gas

- Legalization of gay marriage and adoption, repeal of any anti-gay "propaganda" laws

- Banning glorification of the occupation of Eastern Europe, including outlawing celebration of so-called "Victory" Day. The term "Great Patriotic War" would be replaced with "World War II"

- Russian anthem would be changed to Patrioticheskaya Pesnya

Seriously, the fuck is it with you and Russia?

Remember the last time people tried to do what you suggested to a Great Power? I believe the result was WWII.

The majority of your points, I just wish to address with "why". You're also somewhat ignorant. Great Patriotic War is, functionally, what the Russians term their involvement in the war. You're acting as though they don't recognise the term, "The Second World War", which we know from Shof that they do.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Tel
Diplomat
 
Posts: 818
Founded: Nov 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tel » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:33 pm

GrandKirche wrote:
Aeken wrote:Pakistan has not gotten better. Sure, bad people were killed. But so were innocents. It wouldn't be such a short invasion. It'd be bloody. A foreign invasion would kill way more civilians and destroy much more infrastructure than not intervening at all.


You're assuming the Commonwealth (which includes Pakistan btw) would face serious opposition in building up infrastructure and improving security.

Like most of the world's problem spots, America being kept out and the British being left in charge would resolve about 85% of the problems immediately and allow work on the rest.


Britain doesn't do 'in charge'. As shown with Uganda's war and Israel's current predicament, it runs away from what it's been tasked with and refuses to look at the problems it causes when it does so.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fahran, Hdisar, Ifreann, Kubra, LFPD Soveriegn, Neu California, Reich of the New World Order, Sagrea

Advertisement

Remove ads