Advertisement
by Cameroi » Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:02 pm
by Condunum » Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:03 pm
Cameroi wrote:not so much a myth, as a phrase invented for propaganda purposes, to belittle real morality.
by Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:29 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:Let's be honest with ourselves: Conservative carpring about political correctness is largely an effort to avoid getting called out for being racist, sexist, or homophobic. It's as if Conservative America is telling the rest of us, "Look, if I want to call a black man 'nigger', a woman 'slut', and a gay man 'faggot", that's not my problem — it's yours. Grow a pair, accept my right to offend you, AND DON'T TALK BACK."
Thus, my response to criticism of "political correctness": If you want to be a racist, sexist, homophobic, or religious bigot, go ahead — shoot off your mouth. Use whatever hateful language and vile epithets you want; that IS indeed your right.
But don't whine when I rhetorically tear you a bloody new asshole, calling you out for your small-minded hatefulness and unsuitability as even a poor facsimile of a human being. If you're going to reserve the right to be insensitive to others around you, then I'm going to reserve the right to make your asshattery abundantly clear to the world, and ride you off into the sunset like a broken quarterhorse until you can't stand the sound of my voice in your ear.
Because if you insist on exercising your God-given right to bring discomfort and misery to the loves of others, then I'm going to make it my Karmic mission to bring discomfort and misery to yours. First Amendment, bitches.
by Kumrann » Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:51 pm
by Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:58 pm
Kumrann wrote:I hate rudeness and I think the idea behind political correctness is (in the words of Stewart Lee) to create a form of organised politeness. Whilst I think its good that we try not to offend people It's bad when it gets to the stage were people feel unable to express themselves because they fear saying something that will have them labeled as some sort of bigot. This of course seriously limits political discourse and our ability to have debates about sensitive issues - to the extent were our elected politicians refuse to talk about them. To the truth of the matter is I would rather live in country with free speech which sometimes offended listeners than one were peoples speech is limited.
by Warda » Sun Nov 03, 2013 6:26 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Kumrann wrote:I hate rudeness and I think the idea behind political correctness is (in the words of Stewart Lee) to create a form of organised politeness. Whilst I think its good that we try not to offend people It's bad when it gets to the stage were people feel unable to express themselves because they fear saying something that will have them labeled as some sort of bigot. This of course seriously limits political discourse and our ability to have debates about sensitive issues - to the extent were our elected politicians refuse to talk about them. To the truth of the matter is I would rather live in country with free speech which sometimes offended listeners than one were peoples speech is limited.
If people fear being labeled some sort of bigot, and they aren't bigoted, then they should be able to explain why. "That's bigoted" doesn't need to be the end of the discussion. It can be the beginning. Of course, for those who believe that there may be some truth to the charge, I can see why they'd be reluctant to confront the label.
Las Palmeras wrote:Decent enough for the Middle East.
by Sealand of America » Sun Nov 03, 2013 6:39 pm
by Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Nov 03, 2013 6:41 pm
Warda wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
If people fear being labeled some sort of bigot, and they aren't bigoted, then they should be able to explain why. "That's bigoted" doesn't need to be the end of the discussion. It can be the beginning. Of course, for those who believe that there may be some truth to the charge, I can see why they'd be reluctant to confront the label.
Your expecting people to actually follow information and not just follow buzz words.
by Pandeeria » Sun Nov 03, 2013 6:53 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Nov 03, 2013 6:57 pm
Pandeeria wrote:You can be politically correct and still have free and uncensored discussion. Though I do admit PCness has gotten a bit out of hand lately.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:23 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Pandeeria » Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:23 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:45 pm
by Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:47 pm
by Hallistar » Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:56 pm
by Nazi Flower Power » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:04 pm
by Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:09 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:I think people should be allowed to say when they're offended, but that it should not be assumed that they are right to be offended or that whoever offended them needs to shut up. People need to be more willing to stand their ground when expressing controversial opinions. The only reason why political correctness shuts down debate is because people allow themselves to be shut down. Just because someone regurgitates a pedantic lecture about institutional racism and white privilege doesn't mean you have to stop talking and bow down to the lesbian Lizardwomen.
by Nazi Flower Power » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:35 pm
Pandeeria wrote:Same goes for if I use the word black instead of African American. Etc.
by Nazi Flower Power » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:39 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Nazi Flower Power wrote:I think people should be allowed to say when they're offended, but that it should not be assumed that they are right to be offended or that whoever offended them needs to shut up. People need to be more willing to stand their ground when expressing controversial opinions. The only reason why political correctness shuts down debate is because people allow themselves to be shut down. Just because someone regurgitates a pedantic lecture about institutional racism and white privilege doesn't mean you have to stop talking and bow down to the lesbian Lizardwomen.
Exactly my point, except for the lesbian LIzardwomen. I have no clue what that's about, but now I'm going to go see how far this Rule 34 thing goes.
by Regnum Dominae » Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:04 pm
by Nervium » Sun Nov 03, 2013 10:58 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:Quintium wrote:My signature has a very sensible point on political correctness. The subjects for political correctness may have changed since the early 1940s, but the ways in which it is generally carried out have not. It's not so much overt government censorship - which is a shame, because then people couldn't deny it - but rather a sickening, deceptive form of self-censorship by those genuinely afraid of offending someone or something they're afraid to offend.
Let's be honest with ourselves: Conservative carpring about political correctness is largely an effort to avoid getting called out for being racist, sexist, or homophobic. It's as if Conservative America is telling the rest of us, "Look, if I want to call a black man 'nigger', a woman 'slut', and a gay man 'faggot", that's not my problem — it's yours. Grow a pair, accept my right to offend you, AND DON'T TALK BACK."
Thus, my response to criticism of "political correctness": If you want to be a racist, sexist, homophobic, or religious bigot, go ahead — shoot off your mouth. Use whatever hateful language and vile epithets you want; that IS indeed your right.
But don't whine when I rhetorically tear you a bloody new asshole, calling you out for your small-minded hatefulness and unsuitability as even a poor facsimile of a human being. If you're going to reserve the right to be insensitive to others around you, then I'm going to reserve the right to make your asshattery abundantly clear to the world, and ride you off into the sunset like a broken quarterhorse until you can't stand the sound of my voice in your ear.
Because if you insist on exercising your God-given right to bring discomfort and misery to the loves of others, then I'm going to make it my Karmic mission to bring discomfort and misery to yours. First Amendment, bitches.
by Hathradic States » Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:41 pm
by Nationstatesology » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:38 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0cala, Ecclesia Catholico Romanum, Norse Inuit Union, Ors Might, Plan Neonie, Rusozak, Shrillland, Socialist Lop, Statesburg
Advertisement