Beta Test wrote:New Democrats will win. They will ride in on Jack Layton's legacy but may form a minority government with the Liberals.
haha
Advertisement

by Transoxthraxia » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:37 pm
Beta Test wrote:New Democrats will win. They will ride in on Jack Layton's legacy but may form a minority government with the Liberals.
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Transoxthraxia confirmed for shit taste

by NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:37 pm
United Federation of Canada wrote:Thurask wrote:This probably isn't what he's thinking about, but from what I know of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, not much good can come out of it. Especially since Harper loves keeping important things concealed until they're ready to be ratified.
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/10/04 ... 39357.html
No..... I was referring to the new North American security perimeter. Last time I checked my affairs are not the business of the NSA, which they will be if this deal goes through.
by Ainin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:37 pm

by Beta Test » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:38 pm

by NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:38 pm

by Thurask » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:39 pm
Beta Test wrote:New Democrats will win. They will ride in on Jack Layton's legacy but may form a minority government with the Liberals.

by Beta Test » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:40 pm

by Oneracon » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:41 pm
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Thurask » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:42 pm

by United Federation of Canada » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:42 pm

by Thurask » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Seitonjin wrote:We need NDP in power in Ontario.

by NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:43 pm
by Ainin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:44 pm
Huntmar wrote:Ainin wrote:An example of such craziness would be?
No, just in general. They want to abolish the Senate. I know that you and most others probably agree with that, but I don't for personal reasons I don't want to speak of. Mulcair is crazy too, I liked Layton. I think Trudeau is the best candidate right now.

by Ublia » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:44 pm

by Seitonjin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:45 pm
Ainin wrote:Huntmar wrote:No, just in general. They want to abolish the Senate. I know that you and most others probably agree with that, but I don't for personal reasons I don't want to speak of. Mulcair is crazy too, I liked Layton. I think Trudeau is the best candidate right now.
It's not crazy to want to abolish an unelected and unaccountable upper house that is nothing but puppet storage for the government.

by NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:47 pm
by Ainin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:48 pm

by NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:49 pm

by Greater Istanistan » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:50 pm

by Thurask » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:50 pm
NorthEast Alliance wrote:Remember their will be 338 seats in the next election to deal with Alberta's growing population. I am glad because Alberta is very important for Canada's economy.
National Post wrote:Provincial breakdown
• Ontario: Will have 121 seats and 36.12% of seats in House of Commons with 38.91% of Canadian population. Under current seat distribution, it has 106 seats or 34.75% of seats in the Commons.
• Quebec: Will have 78 seats representing 23.28% of seats in Commons with 23.22% of population. Under current seat distribution, it has 75 seats or 23.28% of seats in the Commons.
• British Columbia: Will have 42 seats and 12.54% per cent of seats in Commons with 13.31 per cent of population. Under current seat distribution, it has 36 seats or 11.8% of seats in the Commons.
• Alberta: Will have 34 seats and 10.15% per cent of seats in Commons with 11% of population. Under current seat distribution, it has 28 seats or 10.15% of seats in the Commons.
• Manitoba: Maintains 14 seats and 4.18% of seats in the Commons with 3.64% of population. Under current seat distribution, it had 4.59 % of seats in the Commons.
• Saskatchewan: Maintains 14 seats and 4.18% of seats in the Commons with 3.08% of population. Under current seat distribution, it had 4.59% of seats in the Commons.
• Nova Scotia: Maintains 11 seats and 3.28% of seats in the Commons with 2.75% of population. Under current seat distribution, it had 3.61% of seats in the Commons.
• New Brunswick: Maintains 10 seats and 2.99% of seats in the Commons with 2.2% of population. Under current seat distribution, it had 3.28% of seats in the Commons.
• Newfoundland and Labrador: Maintains seven seats and 2.09% of seats in the Commons with 1.49% of population. Under current seat distribution, it had 2.3% of seats in the Commons.
• Prince Edward Island: Maintains four seats and 1.19% of seats in the Commons with 0.42% of population. Under current seat distribution, it had 1.31% of seats in the Commons.
by Ainin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:50 pm
NorthEast Alliance wrote:Remember their will be 338 seats in the next election to deal with Alberta's growing population. I am glad because Alberta is very important for Canada's economy.

by Seitonjin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:51 pm
NorthEast Alliance wrote:Ainin wrote:The opposition tried to make a coalition and bring down the government, but Harper just went lolnope and prorogued parliament.
It would not work in a thousand years the Liberals and the NDP are way to different to form a coalition together. If they did that in the next election the NDP would dominate the Liberals and the Liberals rising star Justin will object to that no doubt.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Aggicificicerous, Czechostan, Dakran, Eurocom, Fartsniffage, Herador, Lativs, Libertia-Columbia, Rary, Spirit of Hope, Valyxias
Advertisement