NATION

PASSWORD

Stephen Harper: Tory Convention in Calgary

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What Party will win in the next Federal Election?

Conservative Party
30
33%
Liberal Party
34
37%
NDP
24
26%
Other
3
3%
 
Total votes : 91

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:29 pm

NorthEast Alliance wrote:As for 2013 Libya would make a better trading partner. (Sorry Americans your economy sucks right now.)

Ha ha ha h... I hope you aren't serious. Because that's just ridiculous.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
NorthEast Alliance
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Jul 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:29 pm

Oneracon wrote:
NorthEast Alliance wrote:
I understand you would think I am shallow, I just think it was the wrong move because America was and still is are biggest trading partner and when old Trudeua was off in Cuba or the USSR that Americans were not thrilled.


Pierre Trudeau recognized that relying almost entirely on the US for trade was a terrible idea, and it is thanks to him that Canada began pursuing diverse trading relationships. Can you imagine how much worse our economy would be right now if we were still almost exclusively hitched to the Americans?

NorthEast Alliance wrote:Dangerous in the fact that both parties borrow and borrow and spend and spend. The NDP destroyed the Yukon were my father lived for most of his life by high spending and taxation. Pretty soon they just throw their hands in the air and say, " Well the money has run out, elites in Ottawa give us more money!"


You realize that the political situations in provinces and territories are very different, right? Like how the territories have very little autonomy when compared to provinces, and rely largely on funding from the federal government to provide services to a large geographic area with very few citizens.


1. I get relying on one nation is bad but pissing off your main ally and wanting to trade with CUBA? The SOVIET UNION? It was the cold war and being "best friends" with far left dictators is not a good idea.

2. I get that but still the NDP played role in wrecking the economy. Same in BC to.
Proud Canadian Nationalist! Lets take back Canada from the globalized left!
Likes: Fiscal Conservatism, Fascism, Nationalism, Oligarchy, Monarchism, Atheism, Protectionism to a limited extent, Mixed Economics, State Capitalism, Sun News, Fox News, sane Republicans, Alberta, Oil Sands, guns, and heavy metal.
Dislikes: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Free Market Economics, planned economics, welfare, "green" politics, religion, CBC, MSNBC, Obama, the NDP, the EU, pop music, and political correctness.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:30 pm

NorthEast Alliance wrote:
Seitonjin wrote:Maybe because Nixon is and was an honest person ;) [Nixon fanboy sorry]

You are missing the point. If we rely on one nation for trade, it would bring us down (hey, that's what is happening now, whoops) sure USSR, Cuba, and the PRC aren't 100% reliable for trade, but it made more diversity for the Canadian foreign market.


"I am not a crook!" 8)

Harper is doing that right now with the EU and well China. But back in the Cold War era trade with our southern friends was vital.


No it was not "vital". If Trudeau had not made it clear back then that we weren't going to rely solely on the United States for trade, we would still be entirely dependent on the US economy and these trade agreements with the EU and China wouldn't exist.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Greater Istanistan
Senator
 
Posts: 4978
Founded: May 15, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Greater Istanistan » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:30 pm

NorthEast Alliance wrote:
Seitonjin wrote:Maybe because Nixon is and was an honest person ;) [Nixon fanboy sorry]

You are missing the point. If we rely on one nation for trade, it would bring us down (hey, that's what is happening now, whoops) sure USSR, Cuba, and the PRC aren't 100% reliable for trade, but it made more diversity for the Canadian foreign market.


"I am not a crook!" 8)

Harper is doing that right now with the EU and well China. But back in the Cold War era trade with our southern friends was vital. As for 2013 Libya would make a better trading partner. (Sorry Americans your economy sucks right now.)


Free trade is not always good trade. It'll hurt local industries, and we don't have much to export to Europe. It might help a couple business owners, but really Europe doesn't need our goods. We don't need theirs.

This is just because Harper wants a deal before the Americans and a couple votes.

Last I checked (Globe and Mail), this would cost the Ontario cheese ministry 8.7 billion or so.

Funny thing - that's about 8x the size of the Gas Plant thing.
ASK ME ABOUT HARUHIISM

DYNASTIES ARE THEFT/IMPEACH REINHARD/YANG WENLI 2020

"I am not a champion of lost causes, but of causes not yet won." - Norman Thomas

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:31 pm

NorthEast Alliance wrote:
Seitonjin wrote:Dude. That is why he 'slept' with leftist dictators. It was so we don't have to rely on the big ole lumbering... thing to the south of us.


Yes because the Soviet Union and Cuba were reliable trading partners right? Fidel made Nixon look like an honest person.

Trading partners, yes. Political partners, no, which is why Trudeau never tried to do that.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Seitonjin
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6876
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seitonjin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:31 pm

NorthEast Alliance wrote:
Oneracon wrote:
Pierre Trudeau recognized that relying almost entirely on the US for trade was a terrible idea, and it is thanks to him that Canada began pursuing diverse trading relationships. Can you imagine how much worse our economy would be right now if we were still almost exclusively hitched to the Americans?



You realize that the political situations in provinces and territories are very different, right? Like how the territories have very little autonomy when compared to provinces, and rely largely on funding from the federal government to provide services to a large geographic area with very few citizens.


1. I get relying on one nation is bad but pissing off your main ally and wanting to trade with CUBA? The SOVIET UNION? It was the cold war and being "best friends" with far left dictators is not a good idea.

2. I get that but still the NDP played role in wrecking the economy. Same in BC to.

1. They weren't pissed off. Trudeau held his ground.

2. Still better than Liberals for the time being.
Seitonjin Jesangkut

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:34 pm

Ainin wrote:
NorthEast Alliance wrote:As for 2013 Libya would make a better trading partner. (Sorry Americans your economy sucks right now.)

Ha ha ha h... I hope you aren't serious. Because that's just ridiculous.

:rofl: I can't believe he doesn't understand how screwed the economies of countries that have recently experienced civil wars are.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Seitonjin
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6876
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seitonjin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:34 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Ainin wrote:Ha ha ha h... I hope you aren't serious. Because that's just ridiculous.

:rofl: I can't believe he doesn't understand how screwed the economies of countries that have recently experienced civil wars are.

He supports zee Tories

duh /smacked and thrown down a well
Seitonjin Jesangkut

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:36 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Ainin wrote:Ha ha ha h... I hope you aren't serious. Because that's just ridiculous.

:rofl: I can't believe he doesn't understand how screwed the economies of countries that have recently experienced civil wars are.

Even at its peak, Libya has never surpassed the US in economic terms.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Seitonjin
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6876
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seitonjin » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:37 pm

Ainin wrote:
Geilinor wrote: :rofl: I can't believe he doesn't understand how screwed the economies of countries that have recently experienced civil wars are.

Even at its peak, Libya has never surpassed the US in economic terms.

They did end up surpassing Saudi Arabia for like, a year I think.
Seitonjin Jesangkut

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:38 pm

NorthEast Alliance wrote:I get relying on one nation is bad but pissing off your main ally and wanting to trade with CUBA? The SOVIET UNION?


The USSR had large scale industrial facilities, and good relationships with Cuba gave Canada a foot in the door to affairs in the Caribbean.

It was the cold war and being "best friends" with far left dictators is not a good idea.

No, that is precisely why it was a good idea. Trudeau's actions showed that we were going to make our own decisions regarding international relations, and have resulted in Canada now having an incredibly positive and productive relationship with Cuba.

Cuba is Canada's largest market in the Caribbean and Central America region (bilateral trade of over $1 billion annually) and Canadian companies have significant interests in the Cuban agriculture, mining, oil/gas, and tourism industries.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Greater Istanistan
Senator
 
Posts: 4978
Founded: May 15, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Greater Istanistan » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Never had an economy like the US. But who needs an economy when you have SWAG?

Image
ASK ME ABOUT HARUHIISM

DYNASTIES ARE THEFT/IMPEACH REINHARD/YANG WENLI 2020

"I am not a champion of lost causes, but of causes not yet won." - Norman Thomas

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:43 pm

NorthEast Alliance wrote:
Oneracon wrote:
Pierre Trudeau recognized that relying almost entirely on the US for trade was a terrible idea, and it is thanks to him that Canada began pursuing diverse trading relationships. Can you imagine how much worse our economy would be right now if we were still almost exclusively hitched to the Americans?



You realize that the political situations in provinces and territories are very different, right? Like how the territories have very little autonomy when compared to provinces, and rely largely on funding from the federal government to provide services to a large geographic area with very few citizens.


wanting to trade with CUBA? The SOVIET UNION?

The US traded with the Soviet Union too, just not that much. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_trade_of_the_Soviet_Union#United_States
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
NorthEast Alliance
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Jul 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:47 pm

The Libya and US comparsion was obviously an exaggeration on my part. I am just saying the USA has much more to offer than some other countries.
Proud Canadian Nationalist! Lets take back Canada from the globalized left!
Likes: Fiscal Conservatism, Fascism, Nationalism, Oligarchy, Monarchism, Atheism, Protectionism to a limited extent, Mixed Economics, State Capitalism, Sun News, Fox News, sane Republicans, Alberta, Oil Sands, guns, and heavy metal.
Dislikes: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Free Market Economics, planned economics, welfare, "green" politics, religion, CBC, MSNBC, Obama, the NDP, the EU, pop music, and political correctness.

User avatar
Rex Lucian
Attaché
 
Posts: 81
Founded: May 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

I still want to join the army.

Postby Rex Lucian » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:49 pm

Marcurix wrote:
Ainin wrote:Yeah, right. He's as reactionary as a Canadian politician gets.


Not even close.


The Senate is a waste of money.
Elected King Alban Campbell
War V/D count 0-2.
The RexIsland civil war-Defeated
The Berdanvian and Drenvian war-Defeated

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:50 pm

Geilinor wrote:
NorthEast Alliance wrote:
wanting to trade with CUBA? The SOVIET UNION?

The US traded with the Soviet Union too, just not that much. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_trade_of_the_Soviet_Union#United_States

NorthEast Alliance, would you consider addressing this, by any chance? Even the US traded with the Soviets.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
NorthEast Alliance
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Jul 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Geilinor wrote:The US traded with the Soviet Union too, just not that much. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_trade_of_the_Soviet_Union#United_States

NorthEast Alliance, would you consider addressing this, by any chance? Even the US traded with the Soviets.


Like I said many trade partners are a good thing, I am just saying side lining your greatest ally is foolish and unwise.
Proud Canadian Nationalist! Lets take back Canada from the globalized left!
Likes: Fiscal Conservatism, Fascism, Nationalism, Oligarchy, Monarchism, Atheism, Protectionism to a limited extent, Mixed Economics, State Capitalism, Sun News, Fox News, sane Republicans, Alberta, Oil Sands, guns, and heavy metal.
Dislikes: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Free Market Economics, planned economics, welfare, "green" politics, religion, CBC, MSNBC, Obama, the NDP, the EU, pop music, and political correctness.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:53 pm

NorthEast Alliance wrote:
Geilinor wrote:NorthEast Alliance, would you consider addressing this, by any chance? Even the US traded with the Soviets.


I am just saying side lining your greatest ally is foolish and unwise.

It turned out fine for Canada.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Rex Lucian
Attaché
 
Posts: 81
Founded: May 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rex Lucian » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:55 pm

Oneracon wrote:
NorthEast Alliance wrote:
"I am not a crook!" 8)

Harper is doing that right now with the EU and well China. But back in the Cold War era trade with our southern friends was vital.


No it was not "vital". If Trudeau had not made it clear back then that we weren't going to rely solely on the United States for trade, we would still be entirely dependent on the US economy and these trade agreements with the EU and China wouldn't exist.



I couldn't believe what I read once from some American, "The government of the US owns the Canadian armed forces" and some Canadians think we need the US for war and protection, they aren't the only country here and they act like Canada isn't here as well, even though they fought with the British to take Canada from the French and French really just wanted New Foundland's fishing rights.
Elected King Alban Campbell
War V/D count 0-2.
The RexIsland civil war-Defeated
The Berdanvian and Drenvian war-Defeated

User avatar
NorthEast Alliance
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Jul 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NorthEast Alliance » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:56 pm

Geilinor wrote:
NorthEast Alliance wrote:
I am just saying side lining your greatest ally is foolish and unwise.

It turned out fine for Canada.


Yeah after all the prime ministers after Trudeua had to fix diplomatic relations with the USA. Diverse trade is obviously good but he hated the USA because of his fixation with radical leftism and that diplomatically was a mistake, even his own party thought he was mistaken. He was brash and arragont, an edgy guy who thought he was cool because Yoko Ono said he was a good leader.
Proud Canadian Nationalist! Lets take back Canada from the globalized left!
Likes: Fiscal Conservatism, Fascism, Nationalism, Oligarchy, Monarchism, Atheism, Protectionism to a limited extent, Mixed Economics, State Capitalism, Sun News, Fox News, sane Republicans, Alberta, Oil Sands, guns, and heavy metal.
Dislikes: Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Free Market Economics, planned economics, welfare, "green" politics, religion, CBC, MSNBC, Obama, the NDP, the EU, pop music, and political correctness.

User avatar
The rebellious states of broken femuris
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The rebellious states of broken femuris » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:56 pm

despite what the nation I have created may suggest I am actually fairly left wing. I'm not much of a fan of the conservatives in any country. that being said. has a Canadian I really don't think anyone else can run the country.

User avatar
Transmaria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Nov 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Transmaria » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:58 pm

What I love is that no amount of angrily typing about Harper over the Internet will change the fact that the people the Liberals and NDP appeal to don't vote. On election day they'll smoke some dope and order a pizza.

The system works.
Economic Left/Right: -3.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 7.13

Transmaria is a heavily-forested, northern nation founded by Methodist explorers from Britain. Since 1966, Transmaria has been ruled over by a Fascist regime whose main tenets involve the promotion of traditional Christian values and practices, proletarian class consciousness, celebration of the virtues of rural, military and working-class life, anti-immigration and anti-globalism.
Proud Canadian, Christian, outdoorsman and firearms enthusiast. My nation is an exaggeration and extrapolation of my political beliefs.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:01 pm

Rex Lucian wrote:
Oneracon wrote:
No it was not "vital". If Trudeau had not made it clear back then that we weren't going to rely solely on the United States for trade, we would still be entirely dependent on the US economy and these trade agreements with the EU and China wouldn't exist.



I couldn't believe what I read once from some American, "The government of the US owns the Canadian armed forces" and some Canadians think we need the US for war and protection, they aren't the only country here and they act like Canada isn't here as well, even though they fought with the British to take Canada from the French and French really just wanted New Foundland's fishing rights.

What?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:02 pm

Transmaria wrote:What I love is that no amount of angrily typing about Harper over the Internet will change the fact that the people the Liberals and NDP appeal to don't vote. On election day they'll smoke some dope and order a pizza.

The system works.

Because clearly the Liberals and the NDP are the pot addicts...
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:05 pm

With any luck, Canada just needs two ideological wars, a baby boom, economic serendipity and a load of other fun things to drive it down America's dark, totalitarian, self-destructive path.
I am an American Liberal. Thus I, in full sarcasm, declare:
Go Stephen Harper and Canadian Conservatives 2013!!!!!
Last edited by The United Colonies of Earth on Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cachard Calia, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Comfed, Dayganistan, Doichtland, Fahran, Gun Manufacturers, Heavenly Assault, Jebslund, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Spirit of Hope, Washington Resistance Army, Western Theram

Advertisement

Remove ads