Being interested in the wellbeing of your people only half of the time.
Advertisement

by Sanguinea » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:35 pm

by Nuverikstan » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:49 pm

by Czechanada » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:52 am

by Independent Wessex » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:29 am

by The USOT » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:40 am
Independent Wessex wrote:A fascist Anglican theocracy


by Belique » Thu Nov 28, 2013 6:27 am

by Duvniask » Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:15 am

by Kumrann » Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:27 am

by Arcturus Novus » Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:31 am

by Kumrann » Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:34 am
Arcturus Novus wrote:I would like some sort of a midway between a parliamentary republic and a Roman-style republic. MPs are elected by the masses, two PMs/presidents serve simultaneously, and positions like aediles, praetors, and quasetors (all officials from the Roman Republic) are appointed by their fellow MPs.

by Belique » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:27 pm

by Siaos » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:41 pm
Zottistan wrote:Like voltage, the only practical way to measure freedom is relatively speaking.
Absolute freedom would be a terrible, terrible thing.

by The Great University of Planet » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:46 pm
Icamera wrote:A Plato-style government of philosopher-kings would be nice, if it didn't automatically entail gradual devolution into tyranny... to be perfectly honest, I don't think there is such a thing as an ideal form of government.


by Duvniask » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:48 pm
Siaos wrote:Weird how communism got so many votes, I'm surprised. There are plenty of socialists on here, but I don't see many communists in the General Section.

by Siaos » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:52 pm
Duvniask wrote:Siaos wrote:Weird how communism got so many votes, I'm surprised. There are plenty of socialists on here, but I don't see many communists in the General Section.
It may not be immediately obvious.
Besides, one can still think communism would be the perfect form of government without actually being a communist.
Zottistan wrote:Like voltage, the only practical way to measure freedom is relatively speaking.
Absolute freedom would be a terrible, terrible thing.

by The Great University of Planet » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:55 pm

by Threlizdun » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:57 pm
Siaos wrote:Duvniask wrote:It may not be immediately obvious.
Besides, one can still think communism would be the perfect form of government without actually being a communist.
True, I just hope they realize communism can not exist in its "perfect" form. Even if everything went well and they created their "utopia" there are inherent flaws to the system which keeps it from being a true utopia.

by Siaos » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:03 pm
Threlizdun wrote:Siaos wrote:True, I just hope they realize communism can not exist in its "perfect" form. Even if everything went well and they created their "utopia" there are inherent flaws to the system which keeps it from being a true utopia.
I've never met a communist who believed communism was a utopia. Almost everyone accepts that a utopia is impossible. Communists simply believe the communism is the best system we can implement, not necessarily a perfect one. It can definitely exist as theorized however, as it has an does exist as theorized. It was the dominant political system until relatively recently.
Zottistan wrote:Like voltage, the only practical way to measure freedom is relatively speaking.
Absolute freedom would be a terrible, terrible thing.

by Duvniask » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:05 pm
Siaos wrote:Threlizdun wrote:I've never met a communist who believed communism was a utopia. Almost everyone accepts that a utopia is impossible. Communists simply believe the communism is the best system we can implement, not necessarily a perfect one. It can definitely exist as theorized however, as it has an does exist as theorized. It was the dominant political system until relatively recently.
It was never the dominant political system. The "Communism" created in Cuba, Russia, and China wasn't communism at all. The fact that the government officials were obviously of a higher class than the "peasants" who worked the collective farms in China and Russia showed they weren't really trying to create a communist or socialist utopia, they just managed to convince the populace that they were.
And you've never come across those psuedo-communist teenagers who don't really understand communism but act like they do?

by Lux Invicta » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:05 pm

by Siaos » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:06 pm
Duvniask wrote:Siaos wrote:It was never the dominant political system. The "Communism" created in Cuba, Russia, and China wasn't communism at all. The fact that the government officials were obviously of a higher class than the "peasants" who worked the collective farms in China and Russia showed they weren't really trying to create a communist or socialist utopia, they just managed to convince the populace that they were.
And you've never come across those psuedo-communist teenagers who don't really understand communism but act like they do?
I believe they were referring to primitive communism.
Zottistan wrote:Like voltage, the only practical way to measure freedom is relatively speaking.
Absolute freedom would be a terrible, terrible thing.

by Kumrann » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:28 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Escalia, Fractalnavel, Galactic Powers, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Necroghastia, Rary, The Astral Mandate, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Valyxias
Advertisement