What is the Perfect Form of Government?

by **Belique** » Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:51 am

Dalluria wrote:Federal constitutional monarchy with proportional system and relatively high political and economic freedoms.

Yes, that would be quite a nice government! Maybe like Belgium or Liechtenstein?

by **Largistan** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:35 pm

Belique wrote:
Largistan wrote:I think a centrist government is best for everyone. While I am personally centre-left, it's only because of the current situation. Assuming everything goes according to plan, I choose centrism. But because it most likely won't, I have to go with leftism.

I believe that even if you were in a bad spot, you should vote right, as it benefits your country, not an individual person.

As in right-wing? No, that's not for me. I've had trouble with right and rightists in the past, not just Republicans.

by **Belburg** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:38 pm

Right wing democracy is the perfect one here. It gives people option to become rich or stay poor. Everyone depends on his own work not social serices.

by **Kumrann** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:46 pm

Well the ideal form of government differs on state demographics. If the proposed state has lots of different groups within it federalism, if not unitary. If a state suffers from political turmoil, natural disasters, poverty ETC you may want to have (perhaps temporarily) a single party state to sort stuff out. I guess if you don't consider that my ideal state would be ...

. Unitary
. Bicameral
. Constitutional Monarch
. FPTP electoral system
. Mixed Economy
. Safety net welfareism

by **Libertarian California** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:00 pm

Out of the ones on your list, Right-Wing Democracy.

by **Nuverikstan** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:44 pm

If I had to pick it would be Absolute Monarchy because if you have one man ruling the country you know who to blame your problems on. If you have a congress you don't know who is the enemy of the people. That is why I don't like America's system because you don't know who is for the people and who is against.

by **Sun Wukong** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:51 pm

Rule by cudgel-wielding monkey.

How is that not on the list?

by **Threlizdun** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:53 pm

Nuverikstan wrote:If I had to pick it would be Absolute Monarchy because if you have one man ruling the country you know who to blame your problems on. If you have a congress you don't know who is the enemy of the people. That is why I don't like America's system because you don't know who is for the people and who is against.

If you are designing your system based around the presumption that it is going to fail then you may wish to change your methods.

by **Revolutionary EU** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:03 pm

I would like to see similar system by USSR without the State Control over the economy but rather more Workers Management .

by **Distruzio** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:23 pm

Revolutionary EU wrote:I would like to see similar system by USSR without the State Control over the economy but rather more Workers Management .

How would the workers manage?

by **Revolutionary EU** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:33 pm

Distruzio wrote:
Revolutionary EU wrote:I would like to see similar system by USSR without the State Control over the economy but rather more Workers Management .

How would the workers manage?

Worker Commissions elected by Workers and those who got elected will run the business and some decisions could be made with all Workers vote for them .

by **Glorious Vladimir Putin** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:35 pm

Clearly a state where the government is modeled after my ideals would be the only state likely to succeed in the long run.

by **Yusova** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:40 pm

Is it really a crazy idiotic thing to support constitutional monarchy? This is the response I always get.

by **Kumrann** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:48 pm

Yusova wrote:Is it really a crazy idiotic thing to support constitutional monarchy? This is the response I always get.

No, a constitutional monarch who exists purely as a figurehead is excellent.

by **Yusova** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:53 pm

Kumrann wrote:
Yusova wrote:Is it really a crazy idiotic thing to support constitutional monarchy? This is the response I always get.

No, a constitutional monarch who exists purely as a figurehead is excellent.

THANK YOU!!!!

by **Nuverikstan** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:55 pm

Yusova wrote:
Kumrann wrote:
No, a constitutional monarch who exists purely as a figurehead is excellent.

THANK YOU!!!!

I still think absolute monarchy is better but if I have to pick a second choice, I pick your constitutional monarchy.

by **Kumrann** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:58 pm

Nuverikstan wrote:
Yusova wrote:
THANK YOU!!!!

I still think absolute monarchy is better but if I have to pick a second choice, I pick your constitutional monarchy.

Ok you gotta' be trolling me?

by **Pandeeria** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:30 pm

Nuverikstan wrote:
Yusova wrote:
THANK YOU!!!!

I still think absolute monarchy is better but if I have to pick a second choice, I pick your constitutional monarchy.

How is absolute monarchy good?

by **Dangelia** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:37 pm

Nuverikstan wrote:
Yusova wrote:
THANK YOU!!!!

I still think absolute monarchy is better but if I have to pick a second choice, I pick your constitutional monarchy.

No. The best form of government is an executive constitutional monarchy.

by **Gallup** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:38 pm

There is none. All are flawed, and all have benefits.

by **The USOT** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:42 pm

Distruzio wrote:
Revolutionary EU wrote:I would like to see similar system by USSR without the State Control over the economy but rather more Workers Management .

How would the workers manage?

Lots of coffee

by **Soled** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:34 pm

Here we go again...

But srsly, democratic socialism. It works great.

The worst one must be the way the United States works.

by **Belique** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:21 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Nuverikstan wrote:
I still think absolute monarchy is better but if I have to pick a second choice, I pick your constitutional monarchy.

How is absolute monarchy good?

Absolute Monarchy isn't good, it's great! If a small system of Nobles of the Sword elect the most compitent ruler from their ranks, then you pick the best leader out of a pool of people, in which all of them are groomed to be the best that they could be. Also, there would not be a stalling, slow, cumbersome legislature to abstruct policies and delay decisions.

by **Threlizdun** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:52 pm

Revolutionary EU wrote:I would like to see similar system by USSR without the State Control over the economy but rather more Workers Management .

In other words the USSR without the most basic element of what defined its society?

by **Threlizdun** » Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:54 pm

Belique wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
How is absolute monarchy good?

Absolute Monarchy isn't good, it's great! If a small system of Nobles of the Sword elect the most compitent ruler from their ranks, then you pick the best leader out of a pool of people, in which all of them are groomed to be the best that they could be. Also, there would not be a stalling, slow, cumbersome legislature to abstruct policies and delay decisions.

Yes, because absolute monarchs always are highly intelligent people with the interest of the people in mind that will always make the best decisions.

What is the Perfect Form of Government?

What is the Best Realistic Form of Government?

Who is online