Best Presidents of the U.S.

by **Yumyumsuppertime** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:37 pm

New Corenea wrote:How does one remove this sick content???

It was reported, and removed the moment the mods saw it. Next time, just post a link in moderation, and don't give the troll the benefit of a reaction.

by **New Corenea** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:38 pm

God, that was disgusting.

by **Reploid Productions** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:38 pm

Summerfriend's been dealt with. If we missed somebody foolishly quoting that nonsense, please let us know over in moderation so we can finish the cleanup.

by **Rawrckia** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:43 pm

TaQud wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:I really can't find a fifth one I like.

not even Andrew Jackson or FDR?

FDR? lol

by **Rawrckia** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:43 pm

Republicans:
-Teddy Roosevelt
-Eisenhower
-Coolidge
-Nixon
-Lincoln

Democrats:
-Polk
-Jackson
-Kennedy
-Polk
-Polk

Jackson only takes second because he killed the wrong Indians. If he didn't force the Cherokee to move he would have been top president of all time.

Also Polk was awesome, did everything he said he would do and didn't even have to run for re-election because he already did everything.

by **New American world** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:18 pm

1 reagon
2 Lincon
3 Eisenhower
4 bush sr
5 t Roosevelt

1 JFK
2 fdr
3 Clinton
4 n/a
5 n/a

by **New American world** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:23 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Why does Kennedy get a place in so many lists? He was charming enough, sure, but he dragged his feet on civil rights despite giving it lip service, and started the American involvement in Vietnam

He did move civil rights which was hard enough and Cuban missle crisis and benefit of the doubt he would of done more if he could

by **Yumyumsuppertime** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:26 pm

New American world wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Why does Kennedy get a place in so many lists? He was charming enough, sure, but he dragged his feet on civil rights despite giving it lip service, and started the American involvement in Vietnam

He did move civil rights which was hard enough and Cuban missle crisis and benefit of the doubt he would of done more if he could

He gave lip service to civil rights, but didn't move much on it. LBJ did most of that. And while he's been portrayed as a hero during the missile crisis, the fact is that he took the world to the brink of nuclear war, and ended up having to give up American missiles in exchange for the Soviet ones, making it a draw at best.

by **New American world** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:10 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
New American world wrote:He did move civil rights which was hard enough and Cuban missle crisis and benefit of the doubt he would of done more if he could

He gave lip service to civil rights, but didn't move much on it. LBJ did most of that. And while he's been portrayed as a hero during the missile crisis, the fact is that he took the world to the brink of nuclear war, and ended up having to give up American missiles in exchange for the Soviet ones, making it a draw at best.

Civil rights was very unpopular and would of took time and he didnt take the world to the brink he could of been more drastic and invaded the island like lbj was in favor of

by **Frisivisia** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:18 pm

New American world wrote:1 reagon
2 Lincon
3 Eisenhower
4 bush sr
5 t Roosevelt

1 JFK
2 fdr
3 Clinton
4 n/a
5 n/a

Who is Reagon, I don't remember him being President, and I'm assuredly much older than you are.

by **The Great America** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:18 pm

Top 5 Republicans
1.Abraham Lincoln
2.Dwight D. Eisenhower
3.William Howard Taft
4.Theodore Roosevelt
5.George H. W. Bush
Top 5 Democrats
1.John F. Kennedy
2.Lyndon B. Johnson
3.Franklin D. Roosevelt
4.Harry S. Truman
5.Grover Cleveland
I want Rand Paul to win in 2016. He is a constitutionalist libertarian. Rand Paul 2016!

by **Yumyumsuppertime** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:19 pm

New American world wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
He gave lip service to civil rights, but didn't move much on it. LBJ did most of that. And while he's been portrayed as a hero during the missile crisis, the fact is that he took the world to the brink of nuclear war, and ended up having to give up American missiles in exchange for the Soviet ones, making it a draw at best.

Civil rights was very unpopular and would of took time and he didnt take the world to the brink he could of been more drastic and invaded the island like lbj was in favor of

JFK was openly annoyed by King despite having his political base in the civil rights friendly North, while LBJ advanced the civil rights agenda despite having his base in the South. JFK was frightened to lose the Dixiecrats, while LBJ willingly signed away the South for a generation of Democrats. JFK wrote Profiles In Courage, LBJ was a profile in courage.

by **Frisivisia** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:20 pm

The Great America wrote:Top 5 Republicans
1.Abraham Lincoln
2.Dwight D. Eisenhower
3.William Howard Taft
4.Theodore Roosevelt
5.George H. W. Bush
Top 5 Democrats
1.John F. Kennedy
2.Lyndon B. Johnson
3.Franklin D. Roosevelt
4.Harry S. Truman
5.Grover Cleveland
I want Rand Paul to win in 2016. He is a constitutionalist libertarian. Rand Paul 2016!

Rand Paul is a dickshit and hardly a libertarian.

by **Brewdomia** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:40 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
New American world wrote:Civil rights was very unpopular and would of took time and he didnt take the world to the brink he could of been more drastic and invaded the island like lbj was in favor of

JFK was openly annoyed by King despite having his political base in the civil rights friendly North, while LBJ advanced the civil rights agenda despite having his base in the South. JFK was frightened to lose the Dixiecrats, while LBJ willingly signed away the South for a generation of Democrats. JFK wrote Profiles In Courage, LBJ was a profile in courage.

Fucking This^. LBJ had some god damn brass to help a group of people that had been disenfranchised since the country's founding and to tackle poverty with the full resources of the American Government. If he had won Vietnam, he would be considered better than FDR, and would be the standard bearer of the democratic party.

by **New American world** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:46 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
New American world wrote:1 reagon
2 Lincon
3 Eisenhower
4 bush sr
5 t Roosevelt

1 JFK
2 fdr
3 Clinton
4 n/a
5 n/a

Who is Reagon, I don't remember him being President, and I'm assuredly much older than you are.

1 it was either a typo or auto correct in on an iPhone 2 u don't know my age

by **Trotskylvania** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:59 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:It is? Since when? And do tell how these films "threaten the status of the constitution and the republic".

Encouraging people to commit crime is illegal. Promoting socialism encourages violation of the constitutional order and the liberties that the Constitution guarantees

Regnum Dominae wrote:Constitutional order? Liberties of the people?

What about the right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression, as established by the First Amendment to the Constitution?

Just like you shouldn't be able to say that you're going to perform a school shooting, promoting socialist views should not be allowed. It means that you're actively trying to violate the laws of the United States and ignore and violate the rights and liberties of your fellow citizens.

Why do you hate freedom?

by **Yumyumsuppertime** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:10 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:It is? Since when? And do tell how these films "threaten the status of the constitution and the republic".

Encouraging people to commit crime is illegal. Promoting socialism encourages violation of the constitutional order and the liberties that the Constitution guarantees

Regnum Dominae wrote:Constitutional order? Liberties of the people?

What about the right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression, as established by the First Amendment to the Constitution?

Just like you shouldn't be able to say that you're going to perform a school shooting, promoting socialist views should not be allowed. It means that you're actively trying to violate the laws of the United States and ignore and violate the rights and liberties of your fellow citizens.

I had a response typed out that refuted your points, but then I realized who I was talking to, so I'll just say this: Out of a history of astoundingly inane, thoughtless, and obtuse comments, this takes the cake. If you respect the Constitution so much, start with learning exactly what constitutes conspiracy to commit a crime, incitement to riot, and other crimes that actually rise to the level that you're talking about. ANY restrictions on speech, political activity, and belief must be subject to the most stringent tests.

You've stated in the past that you plan on moving to my country. I beg of you, for your sake and mine, before you do so, actually learn what the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights mean, why the amendments were placed there, and how a free society does not only mean that I get to say what I want, but that the asshole next to me also gets to say and believe what he wants so long as there is no threat of IMMEDIATE harm involved.

by **Revolutopia** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:11 pm

Democratic Presidents
1. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
2. Harry S Truman
3. James K. Polk
4. Lyndon B. Johnson
5. John F. Kennedy

Republican Presidents
1. Abraham Lincoln
2. Theodore Roosevelt
3. Dwight D. Eisenhower
4. William Howard Taft
5. William McKinley

by **Furious Grandmothers** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:18 pm

It's interesting how polarized views on Reagan are. I don't know any other president that sparks as much disagreement on NSG.

by **New Sapienta** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:20 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:It is? Since when? And do tell how these films "threaten the status of the constitution and the republic".

Encouraging people to commit crime is illegal. Promoting socialism encourages violation of the constitutional order and the liberties that the Constitution guarantees

This is low Hippo, even for you.

by **Yumyumsuppertime** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:20 pm

Furious Grandmothers wrote:It's interesting how polarized views on Reagan are. I don't know any other president that sparks as much disagreement on NSG.

The current one.

by **Lesbia** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:21 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Furious Grandmothers wrote:It's interesting how polarized views on Reagan are. I don't know any other president that sparks as much disagreement on NSG.

The current one.

What's his name again?

by **Occupied Deutschland** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:23 pm

Brewdomia wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
JFK was openly annoyed by King despite having his political base in the civil rights friendly North, while LBJ advanced the civil rights agenda despite having his base in the South. JFK was frightened to lose the Dixiecrats, while LBJ willingly signed away the South for a generation of Democrats. JFK wrote Profiles In Courage, LBJ was a profile in courage.

Fucking This^. LBJ had some god damn brass to help a group of people that had been disenfranchised since the country's founding and to tackle poverty with the full resources of the American Government. If he had won Vietnam, he would be considered better than FDR, and would be the standard bearer of the democratic party.

Oh yeah, how did both those things turn out again?

Oh that's right, we got our asses handed to us in Vietnam for little to no reason after LBJ manipulated the country into going in, and his super-duper special Great Society did jack-shit to alleviate poverty.

Hmm...I wonder what Simon Cowell would say about this.Oh, I know!

by **Forster Keys** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:25 pm

Harding
Coolidge
Hoover
Bush Jr
Tyler

Heroes of America.

by **Yumyumsuppertime** » Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:26 pm

Lesbia wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
The current one.

What's his name again?

Going by some of the names I've seen around here, I think he's called "That Kenyan Socialist".

Best Presidents of the U.S.

Who is online