Not really.
Advertisement

by Liriena » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:12 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Yes Im Biop » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:13 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by Kepler-22 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:14 pm

by The Tovian Way » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:17 pm
Liriena wrote:The Tovian Way wrote:
1. I deny that it is bullshit.
2. This is tautologous; nothing which can qualify as an opinion can be factual, and vice versa.
3. I deny this, and maintain that all rights are absolute. The consequences are secondary.
4. My cognition is quite harmonious, but I thank you for the concern.
1. That's all you've done for the past couple of ours: deny. Not argue, not propose any alternative. Only deny. Deny medical and legal definitions of terms you want to use for your own emotionally manipulative means. Deny legal and ethical conventions to falsely validate your philosophy.
2. Perhaps, but for a moment I thought it required clarification, seeing how you insist on expressing opinions that are factually untrue.
3. Read (1)
4. That seems unlikely, given that you deny the existence of positive rights, despite them being recognized as such by both international organizations and dozens of countries, yet you claim your views are well acquainted with reality.

by Vindex Nation » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:19 pm
Kepler-22 wrote:Vindex Nation wrote:But you know what is going to happen it is no misstery.
Actually, no one can know for certain what will happen when you enter into a sexual encounter with another person. Condoms sure are not perfect. That and some people might not even know if they are sterile or not. So no, there is a level of mystery in sexual encounters.

by Yes Im Biop » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:21 pm
Vindex Nation wrote:Kepler-22 wrote:
Actually, no one can know for certain what will happen when you enter into a sexual encounter with another person. Condoms sure are not perfect. That and some people might not even know if they are sterile or not. So no, there is a level of mystery in sexual encounters.
Ya well they should still take in the consequences and know the risk
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
by Zottistan » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:22 pm
Vindex Nation wrote:Kepler-22 wrote:
Actually, no one can know for certain what will happen when you enter into a sexual encounter with another person. Condoms sure are not perfect. That and some people might not even know if they are sterile or not. So no, there is a level of mystery in sexual encounters.
Ya well they should still take in the consequences and know the risk

by Vindex Nation » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:24 pm

by Hurdegaryp » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:24 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Vindex Nation » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:24 pm

by Vindex Nation » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:26 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Yes Im Biop wrote:Consensuses: 18 years of debt, Wasted time, Extreme pain, Emotional Trauma
Action: Condom broke
Punishment to fit the crime right? People like ya make me sic k
They claim it's all about the protection of unborn life, when in reality it is just a borderline sociopathic lack of empathy and blunt misogynistic tendencies.

by Kepler-22 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:26 pm
The Tovian Way wrote:Liriena wrote:1. That's all you've done for the past couple of ours: deny. Not argue, not propose any alternative. Only deny. Deny medical and legal definitions of terms you want to use for your own emotionally manipulative means. Deny legal and ethical conventions to falsely validate your philosophy.
2. Perhaps, but for a moment I thought it required clarification, seeing how you insist on expressing opinions that are factually untrue.
3. Read (1)
4. That seems unlikely, given that you deny the existence of positive rights, despite them being recognized as such by both international organizations and dozens of countries, yet you claim your views are well acquainted with reality.
1. I have indeed proposed an alternative: Respecting the absolute rights of all human beings in allowing them to exercise those rights in any way they see fit that does not infringe upon another's. I have not denied the legal definition, I have argued that the legal definition is improper and should be changed, hence changing the law.
2. No one may express any opinion that is factually untrue. If it is an opinion, it is neither factually true nor untrue. If it is factually true or untrue, it is not an opinion.
3. This is a primary source of contention, in that you do not believe that rights are absolute, whereas I do.
4. I do indeed deny the existence of positive rights. I'm well aware that they are recognized by international organizations and the governments of countries; these bodies are just as liable to be wrong as any individual is. The mere recognition of a right by a person or persons does not entail the existence of a right any more than the recognition of an entity by a person or persons entails the existence of that entity.

by Yes Im Biop » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:26 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by Bottle » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:27 pm
Vindex Nation wrote:Kepler-22 wrote:
Actually, no one can know for certain what will happen when you enter into a sexual encounter with another person. Condoms sure are not perfect. That and some people might not even know if they are sterile or not. So no, there is a level of mystery in sexual encounters.
Ya well they should still take in the consequences and know the risk

by Vindex Nation » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:28 pm

by Vindex Nation » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:28 pm
by Zottistan » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:28 pm

by Vindex Nation » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:29 pm
Zottistan wrote:Vindex Nation wrote:Correct there mistake by what? Killing another human? That's a mistake in itself
And screwing up their own lives, their interpersonal relationships, the life of the child they give birth to, causing a buttload of expenses, etc... to force them into allowing a person inhabit them that they don't even want inside them aren't mistakes?
You should not be entitled to exist at the expense of another person.

by Kepler-22 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:29 pm
by Zottistan » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:29 pm

by Immoren » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:30 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Yes Im Biop » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:30 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by Bottle » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:31 pm

by Kepler-22 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:31 pm
Vindex Nation wrote:Zottistan wrote:And screwing up their own lives, their interpersonal relationships, the life of the child they give birth to, causing a buttload of expenses, etc... to force them into allowing a person inhabit them that they don't even want inside them aren't mistakes?
You should not be entitled to exist at the expense of another person.
Adoption is the answer to that
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Anglaunia, Aquarii, Duvniask, Fractalnavel, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Hollibourn, Myrensis, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Shrillland, Tarsonis, Umeria, Valyxias, Washington Resistance Army, Wrekstaat, Xind, Zurkerx
Advertisement