NATION

PASSWORD

Gay marriage to be allowed in NJ

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should gay marriage be allowed?

Yes- It is essential to human rights
183
63%
Yes- Why not?
57
20%
No- A marriage is between a man and a woman
31
11%
No- God disapproves of this
6
2%
Indifferent
13
4%
 
Total votes : 290

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:26 pm

Yankeesse wrote:
Besides, there are certain benefits that married couples receive, that gay couples do not, if they are not allowed to marry.

Such as?

  • Spouse sponsorship for immigration
  • Filing joint tax returns
  • Tax breaks
  • So much more, here's a list
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:26 pm

IamJohnGalt wrote:
Liriena wrote:Myopic? Oh, you want me to see the bigger picture? I can do that!

Let's see the big picture... oh, yeah, have I mentioned how the legal rights that come with civil marriage simplify family-building and monogamy, and on top of that they have long term positive effects on public health and the economy?


Very good. "Legal" rights as opposed to a natural rights (life, liberty, property).

Ugh... don't ever set a single foot in law school. The iusnaturalists and positivists will tear you to shreds.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:26 pm

Yankeesse wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Hospital visitation rights, burial rights, and about 999 other benefits granted to marred couples, IIRC.


Fine give them those benefits in a civil union then.

Why not just give them those benefits in the form of marriage so as to not needlessly segregate couples based on sexual orientation?
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
Orcoa
Senator
 
Posts: 4455
Founded: Jul 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Orcoa » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:27 pm

Yankeesse wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Hospital visitation rights, burial rights, and about 999 other benefits granted to marred couples, IIRC.


Fine give them those benefits in a civil union then.

No, how about we give them what they deserve, what every straight couple gets when they get married and be equal.

If you don't like that, tough rocks
Long Live The Wolf Emperor!
This is the song I sing to those who screw with me XD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXnFhnpEgKY
"this is the Internet: The place where religion goes to die." Crystalcliff Point

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:27 pm

IamJohnGalt wrote:
Liriena wrote:Myopic? Oh, you want me to see the bigger picture? I can do that!

Let's see the big picture... oh, yeah, have I mentioned how the legal rights that come with civil marriage simplify family-building and monogamy, and on top of that they have long term positive effects on public health and the economy?


Very good. "Legal" rights as opposed to a natural rights (life, liberty, property).

Natural rights don't exist. All rights are legal rights
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45970
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:27 pm

Liriena wrote:
IamJohnGalt wrote:
Very good. "Legal" rights as opposed to a natural rights (life, liberty, property).

Ugh... don't ever set a single foot in law school. The iusnaturalists and positivists will tear you to shreds.


That and the law bears.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:27 pm

Yankeesse wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Hospital visitation rights, burial rights, and about 999 other benefits granted to marred couples, IIRC.


Fine give them those benefits in a civil union then.

Why install a convoluted "separate but equal" policy when you already have marriage available?
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:28 pm

IamJohnGalt wrote:
Liriena wrote:Myopic? Oh, you want me to see the bigger picture? I can do that!

Let's see the big picture... oh, yeah, have I mentioned how the legal rights that come with civil marriage simplify family-building and monogamy, and on top of that they have long term positive effects on public health and the economy?


Very good. "Legal" rights as opposed to a natural rights (life, liberty, property).

There is no such thing as a natural right. Without the state, you have no rights.
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:28 pm

The Nuclear Fist wrote:
Yankeesse wrote:
Fine give them those benefits in a civil union then.

Why not just give them those benefits in the form of marriage so as to not needlessly segregate couples based on sexual orientation?


Because Jesus.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:28 pm

Yankeesse wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Hospital visitation rights, burial rights, and about 999 other benefits granted to marred couples, IIRC.


Fine give them those benefits in a civil union then.


Why not call it a marriage?
Forever a Communist

User avatar
IamJohnGalt
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 43
Founded: Oct 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby IamJohnGalt » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:28 pm

Liriena wrote:
IamJohnGalt wrote:
CORRECT!

In other words, the world's legal system will fall apart as billions of married couples automatically lose countless rights and only those few who are resourceful and educated enough to get those individual rights privately will be able to save themselves from the socioeconomic clusterfuck, and in the meantime lawyers will take advantage of said unregulated socioeconomic clusterfuck and swindle the unwary and penniless couples of the world into atrocious alternatives to marriage licenses?

Delightful. Totally looking forward to it.


Yes only the Great and Powerful State can save us from this inevitable melt down. Hyperbole much?

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:28 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
IamJohnGalt wrote:
CORRECT!
Enjoy being prevented from seeing your dying loved one in the hospital, having no joint adoption rights, not being able to see your children being born, and not knowing if any tragedy befalls them until you see them in the obituaries.

But... my (sociopathic concept of) freedom!
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:29 pm

Yankeesse wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Hospital visitation rights, burial rights, and about 999 other benefits granted to marred couples, IIRC.


Fine give them those benefits in a civil union then.

Then what would be the point of keeping the two institutions separate?
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:29 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Yankeesse wrote:
Fine give them those benefits in a civil union then.


Why not call it a marriage?

Because then they don't get to officially recognize them as second-class citizens
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Neo Rome Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5363
Founded: Dec 27, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Neo Rome Republic » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:29 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Why not just give them those benefits in the form of marriage so as to not needlessly segregate couples based on sexual orientation?


Because Jesus.


But some Churches allow gay marriage, and this is a Secular country not a Christian Theocracy, despite what many Right-wing extremists want.
Last edited by Neo Rome Republic on Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ethical and Metaphysical: (Pan) Humanist and Naturalist.
Political Views Sum: Centrist on social issues, Market Socialist on economic, and Radical Civic universalist on political governance.
This nation DOES(for most part) represent my OOC views.
''A rich man complaining about regulation and taxes, is like the drunkard at a party, complaining about not having enough to drink.'',

"An empty mind is a mind without a filter, the mind of a gullible fool. A closed mind is the mind unwilling to look at the reality outside its bubble. An open mind is one that is cautious, flexible yet balanced; looking at both the reality and the possibility."
OOC Info Page Pros And Cons Political Ideology

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13989
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:29 pm

IamJohnGalt wrote:Yes only the Great and Powerful State can save us from this inevitable melt down.

Yes.
Republic of Nakong | 內江共和國 | IIwiki · Map · Kylaris
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45970
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:29 pm

IamJohnGalt wrote:
Liriena wrote:Myopic? Oh, you want me to see the bigger picture? I can do that!

Let's see the big picture... oh, yeah, have I mentioned how the legal rights that come with civil marriage simplify family-building and monogamy, and on top of that they have long term positive effects on public health and the economy?


Very good. "Legal" rights as opposed to a natural rights (life, liberty, property).


Are natural rights homeopathic? I for one haven't bumped into any, so I was wondering if they might be diluted but remembered somewhere in a garden pond.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:30 pm

IamJohnGalt wrote:
Liriena wrote:In other words, the world's legal system will fall apart as billions of married couples automatically lose countless rights and only those few who are resourceful and educated enough to get those individual rights privately will be able to save themselves from the socioeconomic clusterfuck, and in the meantime lawyers will take advantage of said unregulated socioeconomic clusterfuck and swindle the unwary and penniless couples of the world into atrocious alternatives to marriage licenses?

Delightful. Totally looking forward to it.


Yes only the Great and Powerful State can save us from this inevitable melt down. Hyperbole much?


Actually, yes. It's not hyperbole. That would likely be the inevitable outcome of such a dramatic shift in legal status.

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:30 pm

Liriena wrote:
IamJohnGalt wrote:
CORRECT!

In other words, the world's legal system will fall apart as billions of married couples automatically lose countless rights and only those few who are resourceful and educated enough to get those individual rights privately will be able to save themselves from the socioeconomic clusterfuck, and in the meantime lawyers will take advantage of said unregulated socioeconomic clusterfuck and swindle the unwary and penniless couples of the world into atrocious alternatives to marriage licenses?

Delightful. Totally looking forward to it.

Yup, only the rich, job-creating Übermensch will be able to afford marriage. Too bad for the lazy, parasitic moochers but they deserve it!
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:30 pm

IamJohnGalt wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Civil marriage is the government's way of recognizing that commitment and ensuring that those benefits are granted.


Civil marriage is the government's way of recognizing that commitment and ensuring that the loot is granted.

Ya know just calling everything 'loot' shows a rather black and white view.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:30 pm

NEO Rome Republic wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Because Jesus.


But some Churches allow gay marriage, and this is a Secular country not a Christian Theocracy, despite what many Right-wing extremists want.


Because American Jesus.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:30 pm

IamJohnGalt wrote:
Liriena wrote:In other words, the world's legal system will fall apart as billions of married couples automatically lose countless rights and only those few who are resourceful and educated enough to get those individual rights privately will be able to save themselves from the socioeconomic clusterfuck, and in the meantime lawyers will take advantage of said unregulated socioeconomic clusterfuck and swindle the unwary and penniless couples of the world into atrocious alternatives to marriage licenses?

Delightful. Totally looking forward to it.


Yes only the Great and Powerful State can save us from this inevitable melt down. Hyperbole much?
In a world where all marriage rights suddenly vanish, then yes, shit goes bad really fast.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:30 pm

Genivaria wrote:
IamJohnGalt wrote:
Civil marriage is the government's way of recognizing that commitment and ensuring that the loot is granted.

Ya know just calling everything 'loot' shows a rather black and white view.


Yeah, Objectivists don't see that as a bad thing.

User avatar
Yankeesse
Envoy
 
Posts: 266
Founded: Sep 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yankeesse » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:31 pm

The Nuclear Fist wrote:
Yankeesse wrote:
Fine give them those benefits in a civil union then.

Why not just give them those benefits in the form of marriage so as to not needlessly segregate couples based on sexual orientation?

Because there have been cases of Clergymen refusing to perform such "marriages as it is against their beleifs ad they get sued over it.

Because Marriage is about setting up the foundations of a family which same sex couples cannot do in any natural way.

Why should people want to take part in a tradition of Union when it has historically excluded them anyway?
"Fascism combats, and must combat, without respite or pity, not intelligence, but intellectualism—which is, as I have indicated, a sickness of the intellect" - Giovanni Gentile

A people becomes aware of its existence when it becomes aware of its entirety, not only of its component parts and their individual interests. - Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

----
Self Identifies as MtM trannsexual butch lesbian genderfluid omniheterosexual genderbender genderqueer gendergender.

User avatar
Neo Rome Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5363
Founded: Dec 27, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Neo Rome Republic » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:31 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
NEO Rome Republic wrote:
But some Churches allow gay marriage, and this is a Secular country not a Christian Theocracy, despite what many Right-wing extremists want.


Because American Jesus.

:rofl: Some 'Murcian churches allow gay marriage
Ethical and Metaphysical: (Pan) Humanist and Naturalist.
Political Views Sum: Centrist on social issues, Market Socialist on economic, and Radical Civic universalist on political governance.
This nation DOES(for most part) represent my OOC views.
''A rich man complaining about regulation and taxes, is like the drunkard at a party, complaining about not having enough to drink.'',

"An empty mind is a mind without a filter, the mind of a gullible fool. A closed mind is the mind unwilling to look at the reality outside its bubble. An open mind is one that is cautious, flexible yet balanced; looking at both the reality and the possibility."
OOC Info Page Pros And Cons Political Ideology

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Dumb Ideologies, Elwher, Ferelith, General TN, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Magical Hypnosis Border Collie of Doom, Maximum Imperium Rex, Mergold-Aurlia, Merien, Plan Neonie, Sarduri, The Apollonian Systems, Tungstan, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads