Advertisement

by Chernoslavia » Sun Oct 20, 2013 5:11 pm

by Chernoslavia » Sun Oct 20, 2013 5:17 pm

by The Witch Queen » Mon Oct 21, 2013 12:35 am

by Starkiller101 » Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:25 am

by Olivaero » Mon Oct 21, 2013 10:17 am

by The UK in Exile » Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:21 pm
Olivaero wrote:General Gordon of Khartoum. He was so bloody close! Sure the guy was a little crazy but he had a history of victories where the numbers were against him and he sailed down the Nile with very few troupes, organized the evacuation of all British citizens from Khartoum, and organized a defence of the city with local troupes that held Khartoum for a year and fell just two days before the the government help arrived. Which he had been requesting pretty much constantly since he got there but which the British government was reluctant to provide.

by Olivaero » Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:28 pm
The UK in Exile wrote:Olivaero wrote:General Gordon of Khartoum. He was so bloody close! Sure the guy was a little crazy but he had a history of victories where the numbers were against him and he sailed down the Nile with very few troupes, organized the evacuation of all British citizens from Khartoum, and organized a defence of the city with local troupes that held Khartoum for a year and fell just two days before the the government help arrived. Which he had been requesting pretty much constantly since he got there but which the British government was reluctant to provide.
occupying a hopeless position after you've explicitly been told that re-enforcements won't be coming doesn't strike me as that smart.

by Ayreonia » Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:29 pm

by Confederacy of Ottomark » Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:33 am
The Witch Queen wrote:So many good ones from all the various time periods but I will settle on WWII. Even then there are several really good choices, but if I had to choose only one...
Dwight D. Eisenhower. He was the quintessential supreme commander. It is far too easy to conveniently forget just how many differences and even egos existed, especially considering how well he dealt with them all. Then, there was D-Day which was a logistical and espionage feat of great proportions due to the sheer complexity and need for secrecy, not so much for when they were going to land, but where since a landing on 'Fortress Europe' was considered inevitable. Eisenhower was a career staff officer and did not go the route of a battlefield commander. While many viewed this as an initial flaw, he made up for it with one incredible ability, namely, how to lead the men who actually knew how to fight.
That was a truly valuable skill and something in high demand.

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:43 am

by Umbra Ac Silentium » Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:45 am
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

by Calenhardon » Tue Oct 22, 2013 12:10 pm
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:I can't exactly decide which mass murder is my favorite. I mean this one got all rapey on the towns pillaged and this one tortured prisoners so I mean it's a real contest to decide which one I like best.

by Immoren » Tue Oct 22, 2013 12:10 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Oct 22, 2013 12:11 pm
Immoren wrote:General Calculus obviously.

by Umbra Ac Silentium » Tue Oct 22, 2013 12:14 pm
Calenhardon wrote:Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:I can't exactly decide which mass murder is my favorite. I mean this one got all rapey on the towns pillaged and this one tortured prisoners so I mean it's a real contest to decide which one I like best.
Personally, I'm a fan of the ones who put an end to a treasonous slaveocracy and defeated genocidal imperialists. In particular, the guys who made sure my grandfather didn't spend his life as a slave laborer are pretty cool.
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.

by The Witch Queen » Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:19 pm
Confederacy of Ottomark wrote:The Witch Queen wrote:So many good ones from all the various time periods but I will settle on WWII. Even then there are several really good choices, but if I had to choose only one...
Dwight D. Eisenhower. He was the quintessential supreme commander. It is far too easy to conveniently forget just how many differences and even egos existed, especially considering how well he dealt with them all. Then, there was D-Day which was a logistical and espionage feat of great proportions due to the sheer complexity and need for secrecy, not so much for when they were going to land, but where since a landing on 'Fortress Europe' was considered inevitable. Eisenhower was a career staff officer and did not go the route of a battlefield commander. While many viewed this as an initial flaw, he made up for it with one incredible ability, namely, how to lead the men who actually knew how to fight.
That was a truly valuable skill and something in high demand.
After really getting into the World War 2 series by Jeff Shaara, I would have to agree. It's interesting to note early in his military career he wanted nothing more then to take to the battlefield. What can I say? I like Ike!


by Seleucas » Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:59 pm

by Norjagen » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:08 pm
The Godly Nations wrote:Gen. William T. Sherman...a name that still send fear into the heart of Georgians over a century after his death.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:The shoe is the pie of the Middle East. The poor bastards. :(

by United American Lands » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:14 pm

by The National Socialist Philippines » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:17 pm


by Empire of Narnia » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:24 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Breizh-Veur, Breten, Calption, Cerespasia, Eternal Algerstonia, Fartsniffage, Galloism, Gravlen, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Hirota, Imperial New Teestonar, Lodhs beard, Lurinsk, Lysset, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Rapid Security Forces, Rary, Reich of the New World Order, Saiwana, The Huskar Social Union
Advertisement