Quite disturbing. Quite disturbing indeed.
Advertisement
by Grenartia » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:34 am
by Nevanmaa » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:36 am
by Grenartia » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:41 am
Nevanmaa wrote:It's a valid ideology with its own share of flaws, like most ideologies. Its most major flaws are the fact that fascism supports a left-wing syndicalist economic system which is utterly out of date and not applicable in a modern society.
Fascists are also kings of awesome uniforms, flags and symbols
by Lerodan Chinamerica » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:42 am
Pandeeria wrote:Pensalum wrote:Personally, I think the whole left-right view of politics is broken. It's too constricting, and doesn't define the forms of governments well enough. Fascism supports economic control by the state, which can be viewed as a left policy, however it also supports limiting rights, which is more right.
Under fascism there are still privately owned means if production. And as Mussolini said:
Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.
~Benito Mussolini
by Lerodan Chinamerica » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:43 am
Nevanmaa wrote:It's a valid ideology with its own share of flaws, like most ideologies. Its most major flaws are the fact that fascism supports a left-wing syndicalist economic system which is utterly out of date and not applicable in a modern society.
Fascists are also kings of awesome uniforms, flags and symbols
by Nevanmaa » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:45 am
Grenartia wrote:Nevanmaa wrote:It's a valid ideology with its own share of flaws, like most ideologies. Its most major flaws are the fact that fascism supports a left-wing syndicalist economic system which is utterly out of date and not applicable in a modern society.
Fascists are also kings of awesome uniforms, flags and symbols
How the hell can you, a person who supposedly loves America, express any degree of support for that wholly un-American ideology while absolutely refusing to even consider the positives of non-authoritarian forms of socialism and social democracy that totally mesh in with American values?
by Lerodan Chinamerica » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:46 am
Nevanmaa wrote:Grenartia wrote:
How the hell can you, a person who supposedly loves America, express any degree of support for that wholly un-American ideology while absolutely refusing to even consider the positives of non-authoritarian forms of socialism and social democracy that totally mesh in with American values?
Did I say that I support fascism? No, I did not. I said that it's a valid ideology with its flaws. Fascism is incompatible with American ideals due to its syndicalist left-wing economic policies, just like nearly all left-wing ideologies that are in conflict with Lockean ideas of life, liberty and property.
by Nevanmaa » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:51 am
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:Nevanmaa wrote:It's a valid ideology with its own share of flaws, like most ideologies. Its most major flaws are the fact that fascism supports a left-wing syndicalist economic system which is utterly out of date and not applicable in a modern society.
Fascists are also kings of awesome uniforms, flags and symbols
What the fucking fuck Hippo?! I thought that shit was below you... I guess I was wrong.
And I do hope you're joking about the 'awesome flags and symbols'.
by Nevanmaa » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:52 am
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:Nevanmaa wrote:Did I say that I support fascism? No, I did not. I said that it's a valid ideology with its flaws. Fascism is incompatible with American ideals due to its syndicalist left-wing economic policies, just like nearly all left-wing ideologies that are in conflict with Lockean ideas of life, liberty and property.
Is socialism a valid ideology with its flaws?
by Grenartia » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:54 am
Nevanmaa wrote:Grenartia wrote:
How the hell can you, a person who supposedly loves America, express any degree of support for that wholly un-American ideology while absolutely refusing to even consider the positives of non-authoritarian forms of socialism and social democracy that totally mesh in with American values?
1. Did I say that I support fascism? No, I did not. I said that it's a valid ideology with its flaws. 2. Fascism is incompatible with American ideals due to its syndicalist left-wing economic policies, just like nearly all left-wing ideologies that are in conflict with Lockean ideas of life, liberty and property.
by Lerodan Chinamerica » Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:57 am
by United British Union » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:08 am
by Verdum » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:11 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Utceforp wrote:I live in Canada, and as you probably know Newfoundland used to be separate from us. Should Newfoundlanders care about everyone in Canada, or just the people in Newfoundland? If they shouldn't care about the rest of Canada, well, why doesn't every country split into its component parts? Should people in northern Greece ignore their southern citizens because they don't live in what was once Macedon? Should the people in Japan go back into warring shogunates? Okay, so maybe little countries can join together to form larger countries, and they should do their best to support the new, larger country. In this case, why can't every country in the world simply become one big country? Would that finally get you to care about other people?
Not really, since that would contravene most of the point of national pride.
If anything, it'd probably work similar to the US, where you have the pride and rivalries between the States, though the single distinct federal entity of the United States.
by United British Union » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:11 am
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:Nevanmaa wrote:It's a valid ideology with its own share of flaws, like most ideologies. Its most major flaws are the fact that fascism supports a left-wing syndicalist economic system which is utterly out of date and not applicable in a modern society.
Fascists are also kings of awesome uniforms, flags and symbols
What the fucking fuck Hippo?! I thought that shit was below you... I guess I was wrong.
And I do hope you're joking about the 'awesome flags and symbols'.
by Grenartia » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:13 am
United British Union wrote:in Fascism sparked off killing sixty million people! I am all for (as a British Nationalist,) patriotism and critisising people, but to murder them in millions...
Hitler was a Fascist.
Mussolini was a Fascist.
Franco was a Fascist.
Lord Haw Haw was a Fascist.
Stalin acted like a Fascist.
by Asteriapoli » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:15 am
Yankeesse wrote:Asteriapoli wrote:Fascism is ultimately oppressive and authoritarian, and will always lead to lives being lost. I completely disagree with their nationalism, xenophobia and hatred in general. That being said, I have to admit that certain aspects of their economic policies are not that bad. They reject class struggle and instead support a cross-class form of consensual pragmatism. That is, in theory at least - in practice I guess it just ends up being totalitarian and centralised in the hands of one man anyway. So I consider it to be maybe 85% bad.
Your understanding of Fascism is where mine was 2 years ago, in others words very poor.
by Nevanmaa » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:16 am
by Draakonite » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:16 am
Grenartia wrote:United British Union wrote:in Fascism sparked off killing sixty million people! I am all for (as a British Nationalist,) patriotism and critisising people, but to murder them in millions...
Hitler was a Fascist.
Mussolini was a Fascist.
Franco was a Fascist.
Lord Haw Haw was a Fascist.
Stalin acted like a Fascist.
No, Stalin WAS a fascist. As were Mao, Kim Il-Sung, and Pol Pot, among others. Pretty much, any Warsaw Pact nation or other state modelled after and/or supported by the USSR, was fascist.
by Pensalum » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:18 am
Grenartia wrote:United British Union wrote:in Fascism sparked off killing sixty million people! I am all for (as a British Nationalist,) patriotism and critisising people, but to murder them in millions...
Hitler was a Fascist.
Mussolini was a Fascist.
Franco was a Fascist.
Lord Haw Haw was a Fascist.
Stalin acted like a Fascist.
No, Stalin WAS a fascist. As were Mao, Kim Il-Sung, and Pol Pot, among others. Pretty much, any Warsaw Pact nation or other state modelled after and/or supported by the USSR, was fascist.
by Verdum » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:18 am
by Pensalum » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:20 am
by Verdum » Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:21 am
Grenartia wrote:A primitive, shitty ideology based on fear mongering, hatred, and repression.
Fascism is bad, and its adherents should feel bad.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cavirfi, Corrian, Likhinia, Sigmacorp, The Seven levels of Heaven, Unmet Player, Valentine Z
Advertisement