Advertisement

by Kingdom of Israel » Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:07 am

by Al Meajilia » Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:14 am
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:47 am


by The National Socialist Philippines » Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:21 am

by Quintium » Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:47 am

by Napkiraly » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:03 am
Quintium wrote:You have Afrikaans, but not Dutch? That's like having 'Australian', but not English. As much as they want to be special, Afrikaners just speak a dialect of Dutch.
Dutch being my first fluent language.
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:08 am
Napkiraly wrote:Quintium wrote:You have Afrikaans, but not Dutch? That's like having 'Australian', but not English. As much as they want to be special, Afrikaners just speak a dialect of Dutch.
Dutch being my first fluent language.
Afrikaans is actually a separate language. While there is a large amount of mutual intelligibility, it's not a dialect.
Anyway, for me it's English.

by Immoren » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:09 am
Napkiraly wrote:Quintium wrote:You have Afrikaans, but not Dutch? That's like having 'Australian', but not English. As much as they want to be special, Afrikaners just speak a dialect of Dutch.
Dutch being my first fluent language.
Afrikaans is actually a separate language. While there is a large amount of mutual intelligibility, it's not a dialect.
Anyway, for me it's English.

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Empire of Vlissingen » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:09 am
Napkiraly wrote:Quintium wrote:You have Afrikaans, but not Dutch? That's like having 'Australian', but not English. As much as they want to be special, Afrikaners just speak a dialect of Dutch.
Dutch being my first fluent language.
Afrikaans is actually a separate language. While there is a large amount of mutual intelligibility, it's not a dialect.
Anyway, for me it's English.

by The United Colonies of Earth » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:20 am

by Hopeless » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:35 am

by Hopeless » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:37 am
Quintium wrote:You have Afrikaans, but not Dutch? That's like having 'Australian', but not English. As much as they want to be special, Afrikaners just speak a dialect of Dutch.
Dutch being my first fluent language.

by Hopeless » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:38 am
Empire of Vlissingen wrote:Napkiraly wrote:Afrikaans is actually a separate language. While there is a large amount of mutual intelligibility, it's not a dialect.
Anyway, for me it's English.
No they speak Dutch like old Dutch farmers. If they would live in rural areas like Zeeland (Province of the Netherlands) people would understand them.

by Lindenholt » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:39 am

by Neo-Latin Rome » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:40 am
Duvniask wrote:The incredibly confusing and weird accent language of Danish.

by Hopeless » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:41 am
Lindenholt wrote:My first language was Dutch,
also OP could you add that language instead of Afrikaans? Dutch would actually make more sense since Afrikaans is technically Dutch

by Iuronia » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:44 am
Hopeless wrote:Lindenholt wrote:My first language was Dutch,
also OP could you add that language instead of Afrikaans? Dutch would actually make more sense since Afrikaans is technically Dutch
He can add Dutch, distinct language. That is practically postulating that we should name most languages Latin as it branched into two branches, one leading to French/Spanish/Italian while the other went Dutch/German/English. Romantic and Germanic languages and all that.

by Duvniask » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:44 am

by Hopeless » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:47 am
Iuronia wrote:Russian.Hopeless wrote:He can add Dutch, distinct language. That is practically postulating that we should name most languages Latin as it branched into two branches, one leading to French/Spanish/Italian while the other went Dutch/German/English. Romantic and Germanic languages and all that.
Uhh, what? The Germanic languages evolved from a completely different language. Unless that's what you're saying, in which case I didn't get that.
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:48 am
Hopeless wrote:Lindenholt wrote:My first language was Dutch,
also OP could you add that language instead of Afrikaans? Dutch would actually make more sense since Afrikaans is technically Dutch
He can add Dutch and leave Afrikaans there, distinct language. That is practically postulating that we should name most languages Latin as it branched into two branches, one leading to French/Spanish/Italian while the other went Dutch/German/English. Romantic and Germanic languages and all that.
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:49 am
Iuronia wrote:Russian.Hopeless wrote:He can add Dutch, distinct language. That is practically postulating that we should name most languages Latin as it branched into two branches, one leading to French/Spanish/Italian while the other went Dutch/German/English. Romantic and Germanic languages and all that.
Uhh, what? The Germanic languages evolved from a completely different language. Unless that's what you're saying, in which case I didn't get that.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Emotional Support Crocodile, Freedomanica, Nilokeras, Picairn, Techocracy101010, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement