NATION

PASSWORD

Seven Year Old "Too Young" For Puberty Blockers

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:50 am

Luveria wrote:
Third Mexican Empire wrote:I knew I was a boy when I was seven

We're not asking this girl any dfficult questions, and I'm sure the mother did not decide to take this action after just one episode. Apparently it got so bad the child actually wanted to die.

Why are you misgendering the child?


Because it's a she? :eyebrow:

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:52 am

Distruzio wrote:
Olthar wrote:So, fuck knowledge and experience; might means right?


Unfortunately, yes. If the parents choose a path of ignorance then I'd have to, lamentable, side with them. It's their right to do so. The professional, no matter his education, has no rights to their child.

You know, there's a reason why we have things like Child Services. Parents do not have complete domination over their kids, and they are legally required to care for their children or else risk losing them. Unlike you, I am not willing to condemn a child to a life of suffering just because they have horrible parents.
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:52 am

Olthar wrote:
The Tundra wrote:i don't want doctors making decision for what is best with my kid, i am the parent, its my mistake to make

How arrogant and selfish of you. The well-being of your child is secondary to your ego? I pity your poor offspring and the inevitably terrible life they'll have.


How arrogant and selfish of you to think you have the right to decide what happens to another person's kid.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:52 am

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Luveria wrote:Why are you misgendering the child?


Because it's a she? :eyebrow:

He's a person. Not an "it". If you had read the OP, you would notice the child identifies as a male, and it's dickish to intentionally misgender a child of all people. It's bad enough when it's done to transgender adults.

User avatar
Tsuntion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1939
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsuntion » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:53 am

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Luveria wrote:Why are you misgendering the child?


Because it's a she? :eyebrow:


He has expressed his gender to be male.
I'm not a roleplayer, but check these out: The United Defenders League and The Versutian Federation.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!

CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:53 am

The Tundra wrote:
Olthar wrote:So, fuck knowledge and experience; might means right?

i don't want doctors making decision for what is best with my kid, i am the parent, its my mistake to make


Two words.

Faith healing.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:53 am

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Olthar wrote:How arrogant and selfish of you. The well-being of your child is secondary to your ego? I pity your poor offspring and the inevitably terrible life they'll have.


How arrogant and selfish of you to think you have the right to decide what happens to another person's kid.


>implying society does not on a regular basis decide what happens to kids against the parents wishes

fake edit: you might learn this in school, where you will be forced to go if your parents can't teach you this themselves
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:54 am

Luveria wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
Because it's a she? :eyebrow:

He's a person. Not an "it". If you had read the OP, you would notice the child identifies as a male, and it's dickish to intentionally misgender a child of all people. It's bad enough when it's done to transgender adults.


Wasn't referring to the child as an "it."
He is a she because like it or not, she has female genitalia and female body.

User avatar
Bob Campustan
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Sep 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bob Campustan » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:54 am

Cetacea wrote:what kind of society even exists where gender identity is an issue that would even be within a 7 year olds purview let only the notion that gender can be reassigned through medical intervention?


Its not an "issue". Its how you feel. Your mind can just tell that it wants to be the opposite gender that your body was born as. (Maybe I just miss-read your comment)

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:55 am

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Olthar wrote:How arrogant and selfish of you. The well-being of your child is secondary to your ego? I pity your poor offspring and the inevitably terrible life they'll have.


How arrogant and selfish of you to think you have the right to decide what happens to another person's kid.

If I'm more willing and/or able to care for and support the child than their parents, then yes.
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
The Tundra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1228
Founded: Sep 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tundra » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:55 am

Olthar wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
Unfortunately, yes. If the parents choose a path of ignorance then I'd have to, lamentable, side with them. It's their right to do so. The professional, no matter his education, has no rights to their child.

You know, there's a reason why we have things like Child Services. Parents do not have complete domination over their kids, and they are legally required to care for their children or else risk losing them. Unlike you, I am not willing to condemn a child to a life of suffering just because they have horrible parents.


hormone blocking isn't permanent, you just stop taking the the pills and you generally revert back to normal. there is plenty of time for the child to reverse her decisions.

its not like the penis inside out surgery
I suffer from many communicative disorders with the written word do to brain damage sustained during surgery, i apologies for appalling grammar and spelling.
Conservative Conservationists wrote:Too many puns and bad media lines
Must... Stop.... Self....

Stuff it

Despite anal probe, no crack found by police
Anal probe was shitty
Implements inserted for a crap reason
Man seeking a rears for police brutality
Man sues asses for penetrating his own
Police demand to spread went too far
Long arm of law goes inside
Lesson: Only stick it up there with permission.


Jormengand wrote:If you wish to continue this banal line of thought about the whys and the wherefores, the wall is over there and is very interested in what you have to say

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:57 am

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Olthar wrote:How arrogant and selfish of you. The well-being of your child is secondary to your ego? I pity your poor offspring and the inevitably terrible life they'll have.


How arrogant and selfish of you to think you have the right to decide what happens to another person's kid.


Yeah, fuck child protection services. It's a parents right to abuse their children. No one should have any say in what happens to another person's child.

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Luveria wrote:He's a person. Not an "it". If you had read the OP, you would notice the child identifies as a male, and it's dickish to intentionally misgender a child of all people. It's bad enough when it's done to transgender adults.


Wasn't referring to the child as an "it."
He is a she because like it or not, she has female genitalia and female body.


Do you get something out of being so ignorant about gender? Does it make you feel good about yourself to be malicious to people who already get shit all over by society every day?

http://www.apa.org/topics/sexuality/transgender.aspx

Gender identity refers to a person’s internal sense of being male, female, or something else


But if you feel so highly qualified to dismiss psychiatrists, go right ahead. That makes you no different than a flat earther who dismisses the claims of scientists who would know better.

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:57 am

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Luveria wrote:He's a person. Not an "it". If you had read the OP, you would notice the child identifies as a male, and it's dickish to intentionally misgender a child of all people. It's bad enough when it's done to transgender adults.


Wasn't referring to the child as an "it."
He is a she because like it or not, she has female genitalia and female body.

He is a he because that is what he desires to be called.
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
Tsuntion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1939
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsuntion » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:58 am

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Luveria wrote:He's a person. Not an "it". If you had read the OP, you would notice the child identifies as a male, and it's dickish to intentionally misgender a child of all people. It's bad enough when it's done to transgender adults.


Wasn't referring to the child as an "it."
He is a she because like it or not, she has female genitalia and female body.


You said "it's a she". "It's a she" means "the child is a she". Thus, "it" means "the child". You were absolutely calling him an it.

Unless you are intending to do anything to those genitalia, which I certainly hope you aren't, they are of no relevance and he is a he because his brain is a he brain.
I'm not a roleplayer, but check these out: The United Defenders League and The Versutian Federation.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!

CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

User avatar
The Tundra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1228
Founded: Sep 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tundra » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:58 am

Luveria wrote:
The Tundra wrote:i don't want doctors making decision for what is best with my kid, i am the parent, its my mistake to make


Two words.

Faith healing.

relying on faith healing is like betting all your money on 31 black on a Roulette table
I suffer from many communicative disorders with the written word do to brain damage sustained during surgery, i apologies for appalling grammar and spelling.
Conservative Conservationists wrote:Too many puns and bad media lines
Must... Stop.... Self....

Stuff it

Despite anal probe, no crack found by police
Anal probe was shitty
Implements inserted for a crap reason
Man seeking a rears for police brutality
Man sues asses for penetrating his own
Police demand to spread went too far
Long arm of law goes inside
Lesson: Only stick it up there with permission.


Jormengand wrote:If you wish to continue this banal line of thought about the whys and the wherefores, the wall is over there and is very interested in what you have to say

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23841
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Distruzio » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:58 am

Olthar wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
Unfortunately, yes. If the parents choose a path of ignorance then I'd have to, lamentable, side with them. It's their right to do so. The professional, no matter his education, has no rights to their child.

You know, there's a reason why we have things like Child Services. Parents do not have complete domination over their kids, and they are legally required to care for their children or else risk losing them. Unlike you, I am not willing to condemn a child to a life of suffering just because they have horrible parents.


Indeed. And where neglectful parents fail in their responsibility, CP should intervene. However, the children do not have dominion over themselves yet. Neither does the government possess complete dominion over the parents. I'm not willing to dismiss the parents out of hand because I disagree with their parenting style.
Eastern Orthodox Christian

Anti-Progressive
Conservative

Anti-Feminist
Right leaning Distributist

Anti-Equity
Western Chauvanist

Anti-Globalism
Nationalist

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:58 am

Olthar wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
Wasn't referring to the child as an "it."
He is a she because like it or not, she has female genitalia and female body.

He is a he because that is what he desires to be called.


Well that's nice, but living in a fantasy world shouldn't affect reality.

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:59 am

The Tundra wrote:
Olthar wrote:You know, there's a reason why we have things like Child Services. Parents do not have complete domination over their kids, and they are legally required to care for their children or else risk losing them. Unlike you, I am not willing to condemn a child to a life of suffering just because they have horrible parents.


hormone blocking isn't permanent, you just stop taking the the pills and you generally revert back to normal. there is plenty of time for the child to reverse her decisions.

its not like the penis inside out surgery

Um...did you quote the wrong person? :unsure:
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
Tsuntion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1939
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsuntion » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:00 am

The Tundra wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Two words.

Faith healing.

relying on faith healing is like betting all your money on 31 black on a Roulette table


Do you think that parents should be allowed to forgo medical treatment for their child in favor of faith healing?

If so, you contribute to child illness and death.
If not, you think the parent does not always get to decide.
I'm not a roleplayer, but check these out: The United Defenders League and The Versutian Federation.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!

CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:00 am

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Olthar wrote:He is a he because that is what he desires to be called.


Well that's nice, but living in a fantasy world shouldn't affect reality.


You're the one living in a fantasy world in which the APA and other psychiatry organizations are wrong because you said so.

http://www.apa.org/topics/sexuality/transgender.aspx

Gender identity refers to a person’s internal sense of being male, female, or something else
Last edited by Luveria on Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23841
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Distruzio » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:00 am

Luveria wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
Unfortunately, yes. If the parents choose a path of ignorance then I'd have to, lamentable, side with them. It's their right to do so. The professional, no matter his education, has no rights to their child.


You realize that denying blockers to a transgender child is child abuse?


No. I didn't. If that be the case, then I'd favor CP involvement over a parent's right to their child.
Eastern Orthodox Christian

Anti-Progressive
Conservative

Anti-Feminist
Right leaning Distributist

Anti-Equity
Western Chauvanist

Anti-Globalism
Nationalist

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:01 am

Tsuntion wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
Wasn't referring to the child as an "it."
He is a she because like it or not, she has female genitalia and female body.


You said "it's a she". "It's a she" means "the child is a she". Thus, "it" means "the child". You were absolutely calling him an it.


Not in the way they were thinking of.

User avatar
The Tundra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1228
Founded: Sep 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tundra » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:01 am

Olthar wrote:
The Tundra wrote:
hormone blocking isn't permanent, you just stop taking the the pills and you generally revert back to normal. there is plenty of time for the child to reverse her decisions.

its not like the penis inside out surgery

Um...did you quote the wrong person? :unsure:

well, from what i'm gleaning from your conversation, you are against the parents because you think hormone treatments are permanent
I suffer from many communicative disorders with the written word do to brain damage sustained during surgery, i apologies for appalling grammar and spelling.
Conservative Conservationists wrote:Too many puns and bad media lines
Must... Stop.... Self....

Stuff it

Despite anal probe, no crack found by police
Anal probe was shitty
Implements inserted for a crap reason
Man seeking a rears for police brutality
Man sues asses for penetrating his own
Police demand to spread went too far
Long arm of law goes inside
Lesson: Only stick it up there with permission.


Jormengand wrote:If you wish to continue this banal line of thought about the whys and the wherefores, the wall is over there and is very interested in what you have to say

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23841
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Distruzio » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:01 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
Unfortunately, yes. If the parents choose a path of ignorance then I'd have to, lamentable, side with them. It's their right to do so. The professional, no matter his education, has no rights to their child.


actually there are various times when professionals do have right to tell parents to fuck off in the paths they choose for their children and while this might be a bit troublesome to argue denying medical treatment counts. well, unless you're religious of course, then you can just let your kid fucking die of cancer and the law won't give two shits.


Would the case in question be considered one of those times?
Eastern Orthodox Christian

Anti-Progressive
Conservative

Anti-Feminist
Right leaning Distributist

Anti-Equity
Western Chauvanist

Anti-Globalism
Nationalist

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:02 am

Distruzio wrote:
Luveria wrote:
You realize that denying blockers to a transgender child is child abuse?


No. I didn't. If that be the case, then I'd favor CP involvement over a parent's right to their child.

Unfortunately it's not legally considered that, and it causes a lot of problems for children and teens who wish they could go on blockers but their parents won't let them. Denying any child medical treatments is child abuse. Even more so when it comes down to a parent attempting to force their child to live as a gender they aren't.
Last edited by Luveria on Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Bienenhalde, Dod Resa, Dreria, Fractalnavel, Mutualist Chaos, Necroghastia, NOAHDONY, Rary, Risottia, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Tur Monkadzii, Uiiop, Valles Marineris Mining co

Advertisement

Remove ads