Well circumcision does help protect against STD's.
Advertisement

by Vazdania » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:56 pm

by Vazdania » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:56 pm
Norstal wrote:Vazdania wrote:BAM Look at the vaccine you want.
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htmAny vaccine can cause side effects. For the most part these are minor (for example, a sore arm or low-grade fever) and go away within a few days.
OH MY FUCKING GOD A SORE ARM
WE MUST BAN LE VACCINES NAOW!diarrhea (about 1 person in 10)
fever (about 1 person in 100)
Severe Problems
More serious problems have been reported by about 1 person in 100, within 6 months of vaccination. These problems included:
blood in the urine or stool
pneumonia
inflammation of the stomach or intestines
Clearly 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 is such a stastically signficant amount of ratio that we must deem the argument "loads", loads being an unknown but gargantuan amount of number, of kids getting sick as a valid...nah, just kidding, that doesn't fit your argument at all.

by Norstal » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:57 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Farnhamia » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:57 pm

by The Serbian Empire » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:57 pm

by Vazdania » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:57 pm
Circumcised males can still has the secks.
by Norstal » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:58 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The Independent Isle of Wight wrote:Rituals that make no sense are less likely to survive than ones which offer earthly benefits.
Rituals like the Christian communion, which is a symbolic eating of the flesh of Jesus Christ? That one seems to have survived damn long, without offering a shred of earthly benefit.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by The Independent Isle of Wight » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:58 pm
A bit.

by Ifreann » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:59 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Early attempts at being hygienic, perhaps?
Perhaps. It is true that foreskins were collected from dead enemies on the battlefield in order to show how many were killed. Surrendering yours to a deity would be a measure of your submission to said being, I suppose. Never have understood it.
Luveria wrote:Ifreann wrote:Most Christians don't. An awful lot of Americans do, largely because it's traditional. I've heard that the practice originated in an attempt to prevent boys and young men from masturbating, but I couldn't swear to it.
John Harvey Kellogg (yeah, the cereal guy), was a very strong advocate of circumcising boys, teens, and young adults, and girls too to prevent them from masturbation.

by Vazdania » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:00 pm
I'm not saying all males should be circumcised


by Greed and Death » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:00 pm

by The Independent Isle of Wight » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:01 pm
I said less likely they don't all have to make sense.Farnhamia wrote:The Independent Isle of Wight wrote:Rituals that make no sense are less likely to survive than ones which offer earthly benefits.
Rituals like the Christian communion, which is a symbolic eating of the flesh of Jesus Christ? That one seems to have survived damn long, without offering a shred of earthly benefit.

by Farnhamia » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:01 pm
Ifreann wrote:Orangi wrote:
See that argument has some merit maybe 1,000 years ago.
And the idea got into someone's head long before that. You can't really fault ancient peoples for not being as knowledgeable as people who have access to Google.Farnhamia wrote:Perhaps. It is true that foreskins were collected from dead enemies on the battlefield in order to show how many were killed. Surrendering yours to a deity would be a measure of your submission to said being, I suppose. Never have understood it.
I can only really guess, myself.Luveria wrote:
John Harvey Kellogg (yeah, the cereal guy), was a very strong advocate of circumcising boys, teens, and young adults, and girls too to prevent them from masturbation.
Well, at least he made good cereal.

by The Independent Isle of Wight » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:01 pm
I'm not saying you are.

by Vazdania » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:02 pm
greed and death wrote:They need a religious exception. Otherwise the religious practice will go underground and result in deaths from infection.

by Ifreann » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:02 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The Independent Isle of Wight wrote:Rituals that make no sense are less likely to survive than ones which offer earthly benefits.
Rituals like the Christian communion, which is a symbolic eating of the flesh of Jesus Christ? That one seems to have survived damn long, without offering a shred of earthly benefit.

by Luveria » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:02 pm

by The Independent Isle of Wight » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:03 pm
Or not, you know, we could go with the whole body sovereignty thing.

by Vazdania » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:03 pm


by Vazdania » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:03 pm

by The Independent Isle of Wight » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:04 pm
Are there any vaccines that make a sexually sensitive part of your body fall off?

by Nervium » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:04 pm
Luveria wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Someone should speak to him.
He was a doctor. Unfortunately, that meant members of the Seventh Day Adventist church he was a leading figure in were very eager to listen to his radical views and put their children through his measures which could easily be considered to be torture. But yes, that's when the late 1800s anti-masturbation movement began to use circumcision for its crusade, since in their view it was the "cure" for the problem of temptation.

by The Serbian Empire » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:05 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cachard Calia, Candesia, Cerespasia, Ifreann, Rary, Violetist Britannia
Advertisement