Spell check is your friend.
Advertisement
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:39 am
by Scholencia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:40 am
by Nazis in Space » Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:42 am
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:46 am
by Scholencia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:50 am
Farnhamia wrote:I've always been fond of the Idigna, the Tigris, it's a much livelier river than the slow, muddy Buranuna, the Euphrates. That writing was invented between the two makes them deserving of the highest marks. And they gave the Black-Headed People the mud on which to write, too, which is nothing to sniff at. I am fond of the Nile, the Iteru, though. Lived by her side for nigh on a millennium. Egyptian wine always gave me a headache, though.
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:52 am
Scholencia wrote:Farnhamia wrote:I've always been fond of the Idigna, the Tigris, it's a much livelier river than the slow, muddy Buranuna, the Euphrates. That writing was invented between the two makes them deserving of the highest marks. And they gave the Black-Headed People the mud on which to write, too, which is nothing to sniff at. I am fond of the Nile, the Iteru, though. Lived by her side for nigh on a millennium. Egyptian wine always gave me a headache, though.
The only worth rivers are where the Roman and European civilisation was created, all others are rivers of savage tribes and primitive cultures.
by Ponyfornia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:55 am
The Pan-Slavian Union wrote:Give a shotgun to a Gay, and he'll eventually find some way to mastrubate with it. Give a shotgun to a Russian, and he'll defend his country.
by Scholencia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:57 am
Farnhamia wrote:Scholencia wrote:The only worth rivers are where the Roman and European civilisation was created, all others are rivers of savage tribes and primitive cultures.
Not true in the least. You're entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts. Without Mesopotamia or Egypt, there is no Greece and there is no Rome.
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:01 am
Scholencia wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Not true in the least. You're entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts. Without Mesopotamia or Egypt, there is no Greece and there is no Rome.
Egypt is part of the Roman civilisation (at least its last phase). Except few inventions that the Greeks got from the Phonecians there is nothing significant coming from the middle eastern people.
by Free Sahara » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:17 am
by The Serbian Empire » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:20 am
Nazis in Space wrote:That's a seriously random thread.
I'm also randomly introducing the Rubicon. While it never had anywhere near the influence of other, greater rivers on the way humans live, and on how civilisation progressed, it has nonetheless managed to ingrain itself in our languages, becoming part of a near-global figure of speech.
by Nevanmaa » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:21 am
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:23 am
The Serbian Empire wrote:Nazis in Space wrote:That's a seriously random thread.
I'm also randomly introducing the Rubicon. While it never had anywhere near the influence of other, greater rivers on the way humans live, and on how civilisation progressed, it has nonetheless managed to ingrain itself in our languages, becoming part of a near-global figure of speech.
Indeed, don't cross the River Rubicon.
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:27 am
Neo Prutenia wrote:The Rhine; meeting point of two vastly different civilisation and culture types of the same large oikumene (Catholic/Protestant ; Germanic/Romance), place of origin of any modern notions of capitalism, finances, and banking (The Netherlands happen to be located here), a major artery of communication, transportation, and exchange smack in the middle of Europe, connecting the world's largest harbour with the interior of the largest common market in the world, the highest population density in Europe, the major concentration of industry on this planet, a connector for the major cities and institutions of the EU, with sassy Straßburg sitting right there in the middle, and the wine is really good, regardless on which side of the river you happen to be.
As far as I know, wine and currency is what human history has always been about, so...
Danube would be a close second, but nowadays we have the Rhine-Main-Danube canal connecting the extreme west with the extreme east of the continent, with the Rhine being the more dominant part of this waterway.
Why not the other ones? Well, because all the other rivers are part of larger monocultures - Tigris and Euphrates (Mesopotamia, i.e. all the historic versions of what is now Iraq, inc.), Nile (Egypt only), Yangtze/Yellow (China only), Indus/Ganges (India only). Not wanting to diminish their improtance on their part of history, but they are specific to one culture and mostly one ethnolinguistic group, none of which managed to "export" their values beyond their immediate area, unlike the Rhine (and connected rivers) which bring many different values and ideas together to form a greater whole, while exporting many of the values which did originate in that area. Capitalism and those lovely World Wars proved to be quite the global fad, didn't they?
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:37 am
Scholencia wrote:Farnhamia wrote:I've always been fond of the Idigna, the Tigris, it's a much livelier river than the slow, muddy Buranuna, the Euphrates. That writing was invented between the two makes them deserving of the highest marks. And they gave the Black-Headed People the mud on which to write, too, which is nothing to sniff at. I am fond of the Nile, the Iteru, though. Lived by her side for nigh on a millennium. Egyptian wine always gave me a headache, though.
The only worth rivers are where the Roman and European civilisation was created, all others are rivers of savage tribes and primitive cultures.
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:37 am
Ponyfornia wrote:Most Important? Euphrates.
Most Influential? Ganges.
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:38 am
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:38 am
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Arumdaum » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:43 am
Scholencia wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Not true in the least. You're entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts. Without Mesopotamia or Egypt, there is no Greece and there is no Rome.
Egypt is part of the Roman civilisation (at least its last phase). Except few inventions that the Greeks got from the Phonecians there is nothing significant coming from the middle eastern people.
There would be a Rome or Greece, maybe in a diferent form.
by Scholencia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:48 am
Farnhamia wrote:Scholencia wrote:Egypt is part of the Roman civilisation (at least its last phase). Except few inventions that the Greeks got from the Phonecians there is nothing significant coming from the middle eastern people.
Bullshit. A few inventions, like the alphabet, indeed, the entire idea of writing? The concept of zero in mathematics is not a western invention (it does come from farther east than what we call the Middle East). And Egypt had a long and rich history before the Ptolemies and Caesar Augustus. Really, you cannot dismiss entire civilizations like that. It's silly and flies in the face of history.
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:49 am
Scholencia wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Bullshit. A few inventions, like the alphabet, indeed, the entire idea of writing? The concept of zero in mathematics is not a western invention (it does come from farther east than what we call the Middle East). And Egypt had a long and rich history before the Ptolemies and Caesar Augustus. Really, you cannot dismiss entire civilizations like that. It's silly and flies in the face of history.
The Phoenecians invented the fonetic alphabet, the Sumerans invented only the pictogram. The two cultures had nothing in common. The first are the one who influenced the Greeks. In later years, the Phonecians adopted the Greek culture since it was superior to them.
Rome was establish in 753BC and it would still exist regard of the Middle Eastern civilisations.
by Shofercia » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:55 am
Alleniana wrote:Yes, it's a bit random, but it's NSG. So, what was it? The most important and influential river to homo sapiens' history, development and everything about them. Consider all factors; environmental, scientific, war, etc. However, only consider fairly direct effects; no pulling some prehistoric river out of your ass saying without it reptiles and therefore humans would never have been, or something like that.
Here's a list of rivers which I'm fairly sure will make it to the top:
Tigris
Euphrates
Rhine
Danube
Nile
Yangtze
Yellow
Ganges
Indus
I won't be choosing one, merely discussing, by the way. Poll will be up after there's an idea of the main candidates, which I am guessing will be those 9, plus an "Other" option, because the Po or the Rhone or the Mississippi and the Amazon probably aren't quite as important.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Antlandsia, Dumb Ideologies, Hidrandia, Infinitis, Jennismonaf, Kostane, New Heldervinia, New Temecula, Shidei, So uh lab here, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, The Black Forrest
Advertisement