Attitudes of gays towards bisexuals

[Olthar]

This guy still hasn't answered my question. He probably backed down when I mentioned mixed fabrics and shellfish. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".

*Luveria wins the initiative roll and throws the first stone at you*

Sorry. I have the Improved Initiative feat. I sneak attack you with an unarmed strike and initiate a grapple check. :3

[Anachronous Rex]

*Luveria wins the initiative roll and throws the first stone at you*

Sorry. I have the Improved Initiative feat. I sneak attack you with an unarmed strike and initiate a grapple check. :3

*Uses "camera" for 4d10 sexy. Critical hit.*

[Distruzio]

*Luveria wins the initiative roll and throws the first stone at you*

Sorry. I have the Improved Initiative feat. I sneak attack you with an unarmed strike and initiate a grapple check. :3

I don't know what game this is you two play but where there are beautiful women grappling... I'm in!

[Pacifornia]

This guy still hasn't answered my question. He probably backed down when I mentioned mixed fabrics and shellfish. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".

*Luveria wins the initiative roll and throws the first stone at you*

Oww! That was uncalled for

[Pacifornia]

This guy still hasn't answered my question. He probably backed down when I mentioned mixed fabrics and shellfish. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".

No, Molsona just hits and runs. If you really want a response to your post, you've got to TG the link to him.

I presume you've had experience with him/her? I have no interest in debate, only pointing out hypocrisy and my pride in being a sinner

[Grenartia]

No, Molsona just hits and runs. If you really want a response to your post, you've got to TG the link to him.

I presume you've had experience with him/her? I have no interest in debate, only pointing out hypocrisy and my pride in being a sinner

More than I care to.

[Luveria]

*Luveria wins the initiative roll and throws the first stone at you*

Oww! That was uncalled for

Many things are uncalled for. That doesn't make it wrong.

*Luveria wins the initiative roll and throws the first stone at you*

Sorry. I have the Improved Initiative feat. I sneak attack you with an unarmed strike and initiate a grapple check. :3

*Luveria wins the grapple check and pins you down*

I chose Improved Grapple at my last level-up.

[Olthar]

Sorry. I have the Improved Initiative feat. I sneak attack you with an unarmed strike and initiate a grapple check. :3

*Luveria wins the grapple check and pins you down*

I chose Improved Grapple at my last level-up.

I guess this is why I should leave the grappling up to the fighters with a higher base attack bonus.

[Neutraligon]

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

[Olthar]

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

I think the general "consensus" is that pansexuals are merely bisexuals who are too edgy to call themselves bi. Or some nonsense like that.

[Luveria]

*Luveria wins the grapple check and pins you down*

I chose Improved Grapple at my last level-up.

I guess this is why I should leave the grappling up to the fighters with a higher base attack bonus.

Now you know.

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

Terribly.

[Luveria]

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

I think the general "consensus" is that pansexuals are merely bisexuals who are too edgy to call themselves bi. Or some nonsense like that.

That's what I've experienced.

[Neutraligon]

I think the general "consensus" is that pansexuals are merely bisexuals who are too edgy to call themselves bi. Or some nonsense like that.

That's what I've experienced.

Come to think about it, I've essentially faced the same thing, even if I've never actually said I am pansexual.

[Blasveck]

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

I think the general "consensus" is that pansexuals are merely bisexuals who are too edgy to call themselves bi. Or some nonsense like that.

Or that all bisexuals are pansexual who....can't decide or something.

[Olthar]

I guess this is why I should leave the grappling up to the fighters with a higher base attack bonus.

Now you know.

And knowing is half the battle! GI JOE!

[Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro]

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

I think the general "consensus" is that pansexuals are merely bisexuals who are too edgy to call themselves bi. Or some nonsense like that.

Well, bisexual refers to sex, while pansexual refer to gender. I imagine bisexuals might also be polysexual and "ambibinarisexual" (against homosexuals and heterosexuals, most often "monobinarisexual").

So in essence yes, pansexuals are bisexuals. G_G

[Luveria]

That's what I've experienced.

Come to think about it, I've essentially faced the same thing, even if I've never actually said I am pansexual.

Meh. I just now usually refrain from saying anything about it. If I have to, I'll say I'm attracted to femininity. If I'm pressed on it, I'll say I like femininity with penises. I don't know if poly is the right term, but pan is certainly closer than bi for me.

I think the general "consensus" is that pansexuals are merely bisexuals who are too edgy to call themselves bi. Or some nonsense like that.

Or that all bisexuals are pansexual who....can't decide or something.

Nah, pans are just the edgy hipsters of sexuality.

[Anachronous Rex]

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

I think the general "consensus" is that pansexuals are merely bisexuals who are too edgy to call themselves bi. Or some nonsense like that.

Admittedly it's a sort of nuanced distinction regarding a question usually intended as a quick and dirty overview.

[Menassa]

Or that all bisexuals are pansexual who....can't decide or something.

Nah, pans are just the edgy hipsters of sexuality.

Is there a difference between poly and pansexual?

[New haven america]

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

Everyone is pansexual.
No arguments, only agreement.

[Blasveck]

Nah, pans are just the edgy hipsters of sexuality.

Is there a difference between poly and pansexual?

Yes?

I think.

This is way too complicated.

[Menassa]

Is there a difference between poly and pansexual?

Yes?

I think.

This is way too complicated.

You know me and my complicated questions.

[Luveria]

Nah, pans are just the edgy hipsters of sexuality.

Is there a difference between poly and pansexual?

Poly = multiple genders
Pan = all

I only feel conflicted about it because I am attracted mostly to trans females and feminine males, so I don't know what I am except maybe futasexual.

Is there a difference between poly and pansexual?

Yes?

I think.

This is way too complicated.

Too complicated. Especially when liking femininity regardless of the genitalia, such as how Distruzio is.

[Olthar]

If there is such a bias against bisexuals, I can only imagine how people respond to pansexuals.

Everyone is pansexual.
No arguments, only agreement.

No matter how many times you repeat that, it won't magically become true.

[New haven america]

Everyone is pansexual.
No arguments, only agreement.

No matter how many times you repeat that, it won't magically become true.

Ah, but it is true, if you think about it.