Yet alcohol is somehow a no-go?
Advertisement

by Pacifornia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:53 pm

by Luveria » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:56 pm

by Pacifornia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Luveria wrote:Pacifornia wrote:He was vehemently against alcohol but somehow not against that good kush? Strange.
You must not know a lot of potheads. I've come across so many who babble about the evils of alcohol while smokin' dat kush.Islamic Shia Order of Dagestan wrote:drugs should be legal hell I wanna smoke a joint
If you believe drugs should be legal, then why you do you want to ban the drug alcohol?

by Luveria » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:08 pm
Pacifornia wrote:Luveria wrote:You must not know a lot of potheads. I've come across so many who babble about the evils of alcohol while smokin' dat kush.
If you believe drugs should be legal, then why you do you want to ban the drug alcohol?
That's true sister. The three potheads I know would tell me that the drink is more dangerous than the herb but they don't compare to our friend Dagestan here.

by Immoren » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:13 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by The Electoral College » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:15 pm

by Immoren » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:16 pm
Islamic Shia Order of Dagestan wrote:This should be captiol punishment for this poison to be soldmi could see smoking but beer and wine and that crap needs to go drinking and driving getting wasted and shit faced needs to end NOW! I want a international ban on liquor and Acholhol
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by The Satanic Schoolgirls in Chains » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:16 pm
Confederate People of the United States wrote:I do not think so. But there are some nuts out there that think that alcohol is deadly poison after one sip and want to ban it. Should it be Illegal?

by Immoren » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:18 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Draakonite » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:18 pm
The Electoral College wrote:If it could be effectively banned, I would find no problem with prohibition. Consumption of alcohol serves only to detriment the health of individuals, and its continued use stands largely as a testament to social pressure and conformity.
It and drugs are entirely pointless and serve no beneficial purpose to humanity, but rather service detriment in health costs, lost productivity, deaths, legal and psychological issues caused by the state of intoxication, and various other issues that are the product of the needlesly impaired human mind.
The sad fact is that blanket prohibition doesn't seem to work in that the target users of alcohol are far too extensive to enforce. Therefore, I'd instead support the increased price of alcohol, its removal from public restaurants (or at least requiring that it be restricted to a separate building dedicated as a bar, just as liquor stores are separated from regular grocery stores in some blue law states), regulating alcohol advertisement on television (but not sponsorship) and maintaining current regulations.
Immoren wrote:Islamic Shia Order of Dagestan wrote:This should be captiol punishment for this poison to be soldmi could see smoking but beer and wine and that crap needs to go drinking and driving getting wasted and shit faced needs to end NOW! I want a international ban on liquor and AcholholIslamic Shia Order of Dagestan wrote:drugs should be legal hell I wanna smoke a joint
Ethanol is a drug.
What is considered a drug rather than a food varies between cultures, and distinctions between drugs and foods and between kinds of drug are enshrined in laws which vary between jurisdictions and aim to restrict or prevent drug use

by Pacifornia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:18 pm
Immoren wrote:Keep yer greasy hands of me mead!

by Luveria » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:19 pm
The Electoral College wrote:If it could be effectively banned, I would find no problem with prohibition. Consumption of alcohol serves only to detriment the health of individuals, and its continued use stands largely as a testament to social pressure and conformity.
The Electoral College wrote:It and drugs are entirely pointless and serve no beneficial purpose to humanity, but rather service detriment in health costs, lost productivity, deaths, legal and psychological issues caused by the state of intoxication, and various other issues that are the product of the needlesly impaired human mind.
The Electoral College wrote:The sad fact is that blanket prohibition doesn't seem to work in that the target users of alcohol are far too extensive to enforce. Therefore, I'd instead support the increased price of alcohol, its removal from public restaurants (or at least requiring that it be restricted to a separate building dedicated as a bar, just as liquor stores are separated from regular grocery stores in some blue law states), regulating alcohol advertisement on television (but not sponsorship) and maintaining current regulations.

by Immoren » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:20 pm
Draakonite wrote:The Electoral College wrote:If it could be effectively banned, I would find no problem with prohibition. Consumption of alcohol serves only to detriment the health of individuals, and its continued use stands largely as a testament to social pressure and conformity.
It and drugs are entirely pointless and serve no beneficial purpose to humanity, but rather service detriment in health costs, lost productivity, deaths, legal and psychological issues caused by the state of intoxication, and various other issues that are the product of the needlesly impaired human mind.
The sad fact is that blanket prohibition doesn't seem to work in that the target users of alcohol are far too extensive to enforce. Therefore, I'd instead support the increased price of alcohol, its removal from public restaurants (or at least requiring that it be restricted to a separate building dedicated as a bar, just as liquor stores are separated from regular grocery stores in some blue law states), regulating alcohol advertisement on television (but not sponsorship) and maintaining current regulations.
Try that in Germany, and you will be lynched...Immoren wrote:
Ethanol is a drug.What is considered a drug rather than a food varies between cultures, and distinctions between drugs and foods and between kinds of drug are enshrined in laws which vary between jurisdictions and aim to restrict or prevent drug use
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Kumrann » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:20 pm


by The allied states of Jesus » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:22 pm
The Electoral College wrote:If it could be effectively banned, I would find no problem with prohibition. Consumption of alcohol serves only to detriment the health of individuals, and its continued use stands largely as a testament to social pressure and conformity.
It and drugs are entirely pointless and serve no beneficial purpose to humanity, but rather service detriment in health costs, lost productivity, deaths, legal and psychological issues caused by the state of intoxication, and various other issues that are the product of the needlesly impaired human mind.
The sad fact is that blanket prohibition doesn't seem to work in that the target users of alcohol are far too extensive to enforce. Therefore, I'd instead support the increased price of alcohol, its removal from public restaurants (or at least requiring that it be restricted to a separate building dedicated as a bar, just as liquor stores are separated from regular grocery stores in some blue law states), regulating alcohol advertisement on television (but not sponsorship) and maintaining current regulations.

by The Satanic Schoolgirls in Chains » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:22 pm

by Yes Im Biop » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:22 pm
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by New Lesbos » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:23 pm

by The Electoral College » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:24 pm
Luveria wrote:The Electoral College wrote:If it could be effectively banned, I would find no problem with prohibition. Consumption of alcohol serves only to detriment the health of individuals, and its continued use stands largely as a testament to social pressure and conformity.
Doesn't prohibition stand as a testament to social pressure, as it was lobbied for by a moralist movement?
The Electoral College wrote:It and drugs are entirely pointless and serve no beneficial purpose to humanity, but rather service detriment in health costs, lost productivity, deaths, legal and psychological issues caused by the state of intoxication, and various other issues that are the product of the needlesly impaired human mind.
This is so wrong. You do know drugs have lot of uses in medicine, right? :/
The Electoral College wrote:The sad fact is that blanket prohibition doesn't seem to work in that the target users of alcohol are far too extensive to enforce. Therefore, I'd instead support the increased price of alcohol, its removal from public restaurants (or at least requiring that it be restricted to a separate building dedicated as a bar, just as liquor stores are separated from regular grocery stores in some blue law states), regulating alcohol advertisement on television (but not sponsorship) and maintaining current regulations.
The war on drugs isn't exactly working as intended either. But hey, if prohibitionist policies have been failing for eight decades, why stop now?

by Pacifornia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:25 pm
The Satanic Schoolgirls in Chains wrote:Pacifornia wrote:Get your hands off my shot of Bacardi!
Damn straight! Listen, how could I stand life without liqour! Last night, I drank two bottles of Nighttrain, and crashed out in an abandonded building. Today, there is a skinny as hell stray cat looking at me when I woke up in the abandond house. Gave me a head ache. So I went scraping ( pulling bottles out of the dumpster and combining them) and got me some hooch. That damn cat gave me a strange look. Huh.


by The Satanic Schoolgirls in Chains » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:25 pm
New Lesbos wrote:Maybe (I know someone who totally scares and angers me when they're drunk), but I watched a documentary about this fruit in the savannah givng animals the same effect. It's just to remove the elitism of humanity if we banned it, but I guess it might benefit human society somehow.

by Lunas Legion » Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:27 pm
The Electoral College wrote:The Electoral College wrote:The sad fact is that blanket prohibition doesn't seem to work in that the target users of alcohol are far too extensive to enforce. Therefore, I'd instead support the increased price of alcohol, its removal from public restaurants (or at least requiring that it be restricted to a separate building dedicated as a bar, just as liquor stores are separated from regular grocery stores in some blue law states), regulating alcohol advertisement on television (but not sponsorship) and maintaining current regulations.
The war on drugs isn't exactly working as intended either. But hey, if prohibitionist policies have been failing for eight decades, why stop now?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Adamede, Aguaria Major, Attempted Socialism, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Elejamie, Germanic Templars, La Xinga, Necroghastia, Spirit of Hope, Washington Resistance Army, Zurkerx
Advertisement