Same
.Advertisement

by Kamchastkia » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:26 pm
Same
.
by Sollis » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:26 pm

by Common Territories » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:35 pm
Blasveck wrote:Common Territories wrote:
You must not know what Socialism is good sir. Im not and I know these three are all signs of it.
Socialism is the worker ownership of the means of production.
so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
1.
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

by Blasveck » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:43 pm
Common Territories wrote:Blasveck wrote:
Socialism is the worker ownership of the means of production.
so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
1.
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
Oh, nice spin. OK then. Let me explain then.
1: Obama's tax increase (not including the Obamacare tax related increases for now, only the increases to higher earners) is a form of redistribution. As you know, taking tax money to "help the smaller earners" is redistribution (your "distribution") of wealth. In this form also is the nanny state for which he is creating.
2: Production. You mean his handling of helping green companies with funds and support while doing anything he can to stop oil companies? Unless you don't this socialist enough, let me explain simply: He is supporting green companies with money and other support while stopping oil profits growth. Or if this example isn't enough for you, how about the unlimited amounts of regulations his administration (Obama's) is making annually?
3: So without going into more with the Nanny state and increase in taxes (and redistribution), lets provide this definition of Socialism: "An economic and political system based on public or collective ownership of the means of production. Socialism emphasizes equality rather than achievement, and values workers by the amount of time they put in rather than by the amount of value they produce. It also makes individuals dependent on the state for everything from food to health care. China, Vietnam and Cuba are examples of modern-day socialist societies. Twentieth-century socialist governments were overthrown in Czechoslovakia, East Germany and the U.S.S.R." provided from here, http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialism.asp, rather than Google search.

by Mkuki » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:48 pm
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Pacifornia » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:49 pm
Blasveck wrote:Common Territories wrote:
Oh, nice spin. OK then. Let me explain then.
1: Obama's tax increase (not including the Obamacare tax related increases for now, only the increases to higher earners) is a form of redistribution. As you know, taking tax money to "help the smaller earners" is redistribution (your "distribution") of wealth. In this form also is the nanny state for which he is creating.
2: Production. You mean his handling of helping green companies with funds and support while doing anything he can to stop oil companies? Unless you don't this socialist enough, let me explain simply: He is supporting green companies with money and other support while stopping oil profits growth. Or if this example isn't enough for you, how about the unlimited amounts of regulations his administration (Obama's) is making annually?
3: So without going into more with the Nanny state and increase in taxes (and redistribution), lets provide this definition of Socialism: "An economic and political system based on public or collective ownership of the means of production. Socialism emphasizes equality rather than achievement, and values workers by the amount of time they put in rather than by the amount of value they produce. It also makes individuals dependent on the state for everything from food to health care. China, Vietnam and Cuba are examples of modern-day socialist societies. Twentieth-century socialist governments were overthrown in Czechoslovakia, East Germany and the U.S.S.R." provided from here, http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialism.asp, rather than Google search.
1. Redistribution of wealth =/= socialism
2. Favoring green companies over oil companies =/= socialism
3. China, Vietnam, Cuba, and the USSR? Socialist?![]()
Do you need the dictionary definition again, or do you want more?

by The Scientific States » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:50 pm
Mkuki wrote:Socialism is good and all, but I prefer social democracy.

by The Scientific States » Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:53 pm

by Mkuki » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:01 pm
The Scientific States wrote:Mkuki wrote:Socialism is good and all, but I prefer social democracy.
A few months ago I was strongly in favor of social democracy, but I've found my views have shifted to democratic socialism, after realizing that, in my opinion, democratic socialism is more fair and equal for all.
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by The Scientific States » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:05 pm
Mkuki wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
A few months ago I was strongly in favor of social democracy, but I've found my views have shifted to democratic socialism, after realizing that, in my opinion, democratic socialism is more fair and equal for all.
Would you mind explaining just what democratic socialism is?* I've heard posters say on NSG that the term "democratic socialism" is redundant.
*Beyond the Wikipedia definition that is.

by Mkuki » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:06 pm
The Scientific States wrote:Mkuki wrote:Would you mind explaining just what democratic socialism is?* I've heard posters say on NSG that the term "democratic socialism" is redundant.
*Beyond the Wikipedia definition that is.
It has a vague definition, but the wikipedia definition does a decent job summing it up, it's essentially reaching socialism through anti-elitist decentralized and grassroots means. The word democratic comes from using democracy to reach socialism, but also democracy in the workplace and the economy.
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by The Scientific States » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:09 pm
Mkuki wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
It has a vague definition, but the wikipedia definition does a decent job summing it up, it's essentially reaching socialism through anti-elitist decentralized and grassroots means. The word democratic comes from using democracy to reach socialism, but also democracy in the workplace and the economy.
How does it differ from social democracy?

by Trotskylvania » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:10 pm
Mkuki wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
It has a vague definition, but the wikipedia definition does a decent job summing it up, it's essentially reaching socialism through anti-elitist decentralized and grassroots means. The word democratic comes from using democracy to reach socialism, but also democracy in the workplace and the economy.
How does it differ from social democracy?
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

by Mkuki » Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:11 pm
The Scientific States wrote:Mkuki wrote:
How does it differ from social democracy?
Social democracy uses the capitalist market system, democratic socialism does not.
I would also like to point out that social democracy is supposed to lead to democratic socialism, or at least according to the original social democrats.
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Slobozhanshchyna » Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:05 am
Mkuki wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
Social democracy uses the capitalist market system, democratic socialism does not.
I would also like to point out that social democracy is supposed to lead to democratic socialism, or at least according to the original social democrats.
Ah. I see. Don't know if I'd like that. Where would I be without Paradox Interactive? He said half-jokingly.

by Mkuki » Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:08 am
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Slobozhanshchyna » Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:15 am

by Mkuki » Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:18 am
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Collective America » Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:22 am

by Cameroi » Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:25 am

by Slobozhanshchyna » Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:57 am
Cameroi wrote:think removing all ideological barriers to governments doing the right things. to justifying their existence in moral, useful, and reasonable ways.
to loving all their people and their environments and not seeking to harm each other.
that is the same dream that has motivated the formation of all organized religion. it is one, well within the human capacity, to achieve.
this is not a reaction nor an opposition, but only what is natural and reasonable.

by The Parkus Empire » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:00 am
Collective America wrote:Real socialists are pro-gun. Im also against big government.
Anti-statism anti-capitalism


by Mkuki » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:08 am
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
by Sibirsky » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:11 am
Slobozhanshchyna wrote:MOD EDIT: Removed "Leftists Only" from the title. Really, we don't do exclusive threads here.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Arval Va, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, EnragedMaldivians, Fahran, Fartsniffage, Hiram Land, In-dia, Khardsland, Neo-American States, Primitive Communism, Valyxias, Washington Resistance Army, Yasuragi
Advertisement