Where's the picture of babies armed with assault rifles when you need it ...
Advertisement

by Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 8:59 pm

by Nigerian Kenya » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:01 pm

by Death Metal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:02 pm
Uieurnthlaal wrote:Compare this to the systems in Canada, UK, Australia, Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Cyprus, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Israel, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Oman, Botswana, Mongolia, Thailand, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, East Timor, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, Chile, Panama, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Cuba, Trinidad and Tobago, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, Portugal, Andorra, Switzerland, Italy, Tunisia, Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, a list that noticeably includes all developed countries except the US, and it becomes obvious that Obamacare, which only regulates the private healthcare industry, and doesn't nationalize it, is actually quite conservative.

by Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:07 pm

by Sibirsky » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:39 pm

by Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:43 pm
by Sibirsky » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:45 pm
Uieurnthlaal wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Lol.
You do understand that it is the regulations that allow big business to control the government and vice versa, correct?
If your going to make a statement that runs contrary to all common sense, you might as well back it up with evidence.
I'm waiting. Like always.

by Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:47 pm
Sibirsky wrote:Uieurnthlaal wrote:
If your going to make a statement that runs contrary to all common sense, you might as well back it up with evidence.
I'm waiting. Like always.
This is not contrary to common sense. It is, common sense.
Regulations are costly to comply with. Big business makes a fuss about it, just for show. But they want it, because it creates barriers to entry to the competition. Big business can afford to comply. Small business can't.

by The Free Kingdom of Proprius » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:49 pm
by Sibirsky » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:53 pm
Uieurnthlaal wrote:Sibirsky wrote:This is not contrary to common sense. It is, common sense.
Regulations are costly to comply with. Big business makes a fuss about it, just for show. But they want it, because it creates barriers to entry to the competition. Big business can afford to comply. Small business can't.
Common sense:
Regulations, by their very definition, restrict freedom. An absence of regulation, by its very definition, leaves freedom be.
I don't want a convoluted argument that may or may not be right. This isn't ancient Greece. I require a higher standard of evidence than speculative arguments.

by Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:53 pm
The Free Kingdom of Proprius wrote:A government shutdown? Debt Ceiling? Hmh?
Watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIbkoop4AYE
In case you can't watch, here's a summary.
Congress artificially creates a problem to solve. It solves it in the nick of time, looking like an action hero that solves the presidents problems. Rinse and repeat when we reach the debt ceiling again. There's no way the government's actually going to shut itself down, don't panic.

by The Free Kingdom of Proprius » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:56 pm
Uieurnthlaal wrote:There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.

by Death Metal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:58 pm
Uieurnthlaal wrote:The Free Kingdom of Proprius wrote:A government shutdown? Debt Ceiling? Hmh?
Watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIbkoop4AYE
In case you can't watch, here's a summary.
Congress artificially creates a problem to solve. It solves it in the nick of time, looking like an action hero that solves the presidents problems. Rinse and repeat when we reach the debt ceiling again. There's no way the government's actually going to shut itself down, don't panic.
We half shut down last time. Even though basic funding stayed in place, many of the other areas of funding, such as air traffic control, foreign embassy security (and the GOP blames Obama for Benghazi), etc. There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.

by Gauthier » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:58 pm
Uieurnthlaal wrote:The Free Kingdom of Proprius wrote:A government shutdown? Debt Ceiling? Hmh?
Watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIbkoop4AYE
In case you can't watch, here's a summary.
Congress artificially creates a problem to solve. It solves it in the nick of time, looking like an action hero that solves the presidents problems. Rinse and repeat when we reach the debt ceiling again. There's no way the government's actually going to shut itself down, don't panic.
We half shut down last time. Even though basic funding stayed in place, many of the other areas of funding, such as air traffic control, foreign embassy security (and the GOP blames Obama for Benghazi), etc. There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.

by Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:02 pm
Death Metal wrote:Uieurnthlaal wrote:We half shut down last time. Even though basic funding stayed in place, many of the other areas of funding, such as air traffic control, foreign embassy security (and the GOP blames Obama for Benghazi), etc. There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.
He does have a grain of truth in his statement, though. The debt ceiling should be done away with. That doesn't mean we should just throw money at everything without coming up with more revenue, mind, I'm basically saying that the ceiling has proven to be more trouble than it's worth.

by Death Metal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:05 pm
Uieurnthlaal wrote:Death Metal wrote:
He does have a grain of truth in his statement, though. The debt ceiling should be done away with. That doesn't mean we should just throw money at everything without coming up with more revenue, mind, I'm basically saying that the ceiling has proven to be more trouble than it's worth.
It is, after all, a useless measure, completely irrelevant to the actual problems associated with death, and put in place merely to comfort misguided fears about the supposed danger of a rising debt.
For more information, you can always check Krugman's article about the debt ceiling. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/opini ... ugman.html

by Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:06 pm
Death Metal wrote:Uieurnthlaal wrote:
It is, after all, a useless measure, completely irrelevant to the actual problems associated with death, and put in place merely to comfort misguided fears about the supposed danger of a rising debt.
For more information, you can always check Krugman's article about the debt ceiling. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/opini ... ugman.html
I assume you got auto-corrected with that "death" there, but yeah, pretty much in total agreement.

by Greed and Death » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:17 pm

by Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:18 pm
greed and death wrote:Well you can't always get the debt ceiling increase you want, and next year you likely wont get the budget you want either.
Just move on and accept the debt ceiling remains where it is and there wont be a budget in 2014.

by Greed and Death » Tue Sep 24, 2013 11:36 pm

by Uieurnthlaal » Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:51 am

by Cuttrejul » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:49 am
Sibirsky wrote:Uieurnthlaal wrote:
Common sense:
Regulations, by their very definition, restrict freedom. An absence of regulation, by its very definition, leaves freedom be.
I don't want a convoluted argument that may or may not be right. This isn't ancient Greece. I require a higher standard of evidence than speculative arguments.
See the edit. Evidence of how this happens was provided.
Yes, regulations restrict freedom. And cost money to comply with, as I already said.
Absence of regulations, means the government will not be controlled by corporations.
Fun fact. One of the first taxes Obama raised as president was the tobacco tax. The move was widely supported by Altria.
Explain to me why a manufacturer would support an increase in their product, without any of the extra revenue going to them, but instead, the federal government?

by Destiny Island » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:51 am

by Ashmoria » Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:06 am
Wikkiwallana wrote:Ashmoria wrote:I cannot imagine how very much the other congressional republicans must hate ted cruz.
the house passed its stupid CR and are busy pretending that if the senate doesn't pass it too then the senate is shutting down government. but if ted ego cruz scuttles it without getting the dems to act on it then its still THEM shutting down government.
And yet I heard some guy on talk radio this evening talking about how afraid Democrats are of Ted Cruz and how they want to silence him.

by Destiny Island » Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:08 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Forsher, Komarovo, Lord Dominator, Neu California, Rary, The Holy Therns, Umeria, Valrifall
Advertisement