NATION

PASSWORD

US Government Shutdown? Not any more!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who To Blame?

Obama
62
12%
House Republicans
239
46%
House Democrats
21
4%
Senate Republicans
32
6%
Senate Democrats
39
8%
Speaker Boehner
124
24%
 
Total votes : 517

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 8:59 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Vazdania wrote: :p Improving would be arming every single baby with an AK-47. :rofl:

But that's hardly an improvement.


Give the NRA time. They'll get around to it.


Where's the picture of babies armed with assault rifles when you need it ...
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
Nigerian Kenya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 810
Founded: Jan 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nigerian Kenya » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:01 pm

Sedikal wrote:
Vazdania wrote: :palm: Romney is not president for reasons other than GOP obstructionism.

It's was that 47% comment that fucked him over. Showed the public his true colors.

Exactly. I maintain a fervent belief that that comment is what cost Mitt Romney the state of Florida, and possibly the states of Ohio & Virginia as well. The news media would have been right about the election being 2000/2004-close in the EC if Romney hadn't made the statement. Romney was behind in the polls before he made that comment, and that comment made it worse. All the first debate did at the end of the day was simply getting rid of the "make it worse" part - leaving behind the original Obama PV Lead.

When you practically proclaim that the Republican Party hates certain people (like Romney did with that statement), you don't get votes. Simple as that.

Now, Romney not saying the 47% statement probably wouldn't have resulted in a Romney Victory in the general election - changing one statement does not reverse history when you lose by as much as Romney did last year. But, while still undesirable, Obama winning 303-235 (Romney wins Florida), 290-248 (Romney wins Florida and Virginia), 285-253 (Romney wins Florida and Ohio), or 272-266 (Romney wins Virginia, Florida, and Ohio) all look a lot better than the 332-206 Obama win we actually saw last year.

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:02 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:Compare this to the systems in Canada, UK, Australia, Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Cyprus, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Israel, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Oman, Botswana, Mongolia, Thailand, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, East Timor, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, Chile, Panama, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Cuba, Trinidad and Tobago, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, Portugal, Andorra, Switzerland, Italy, Tunisia, Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, a list that noticeably includes all developed countries except the US, and it becomes obvious that Obamacare, which only regulates the private healthcare industry, and doesn't nationalize it, is actually quite conservative.


It really shows how fucked up the politics of our country has become, from the most liberal entity in the world to a country that calls a policy that's more conservative than the policy of a SHARIA LAW NATION "evil liberal socialism"
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:07 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
Give the NRA time. They'll get around to it.


Where's the picture of babies armed with assault rifles when you need it ...


Eh, this is good enough (not really an assault rifle, but who cares) :

Image
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:39 pm

Condunum wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:No, somehow he managed to spout nonsense.

No... You really just didn't understand what he said. Deregulation would allow businesses to worm their way back into more power in congress.

Lol.

You do understand that it is the regulations that allow big business to control the government and vice versa, correct?
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:43 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Condunum wrote:No... You really just didn't understand what he said. Deregulation would allow businesses to worm their way back into more power in congress.

Lol.

You do understand that it is the regulations that allow big business to control the government and vice versa, correct?


If your going to make a statement that runs contrary to all common sense, you might as well back it up with evidence.

I'm waiting. Like always.
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:45 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Lol.

You do understand that it is the regulations that allow big business to control the government and vice versa, correct?


If your going to make a statement that runs contrary to all common sense, you might as well back it up with evidence.

I'm waiting. Like always.

This is not contrary to common sense. It is, common sense.

Regulations are costly to comply with. Big business makes a fuss about it, just for show. But they want it, because it creates barriers to entry to the competition. Big business can afford to comply. Small business can't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
Last edited by Sibirsky on Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:47 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Uieurnthlaal wrote:
If your going to make a statement that runs contrary to all common sense, you might as well back it up with evidence.

I'm waiting. Like always.

This is not contrary to common sense. It is, common sense.

Regulations are costly to comply with. Big business makes a fuss about it, just for show. But they want it, because it creates barriers to entry to the competition. Big business can afford to comply. Small business can't.


Common sense:
Regulations, by their very definition, restrict freedom. An absence of regulation, by its very definition, leaves freedom be.

I don't want a convoluted argument that may or may not be right. This isn't ancient Greece. I require a higher standard of evidence than speculative arguments.
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
The Free Kingdom of Proprius
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 462
Founded: Aug 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Kingdom of Proprius » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:49 pm

A government shutdown? Debt Ceiling? Hmh?

Watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIbkoop4AYE

In case you can't watch, here's a summary.
Congress artificially creates a problem to solve. It solves it in the nick of time, looking like an action hero that solves the presidents problems. Rinse and repeat when we reach the debt ceiling again. There's no way the government's actually going to shut itself down, don't panic.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:53 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:This is not contrary to common sense. It is, common sense.

Regulations are costly to comply with. Big business makes a fuss about it, just for show. But they want it, because it creates barriers to entry to the competition. Big business can afford to comply. Small business can't.


Common sense:
Regulations, by their very definition, restrict freedom. An absence of regulation, by its very definition, leaves freedom be.

I don't want a convoluted argument that may or may not be right. This isn't ancient Greece. I require a higher standard of evidence than speculative arguments.

See the edit. Evidence of how this happens was provided.

Yes, regulations restrict freedom. And cost money to comply with, as I already said.

Absence of regulations, means the government will not be controlled by corporations.

Fun fact. One of the first taxes Obama raised as president was the tobacco tax. The move was widely supported by Altria.

Explain to me why a manufacturer would support an increase in their product, without any of the extra revenue going to them, but instead, the federal government?
Last edited by Sibirsky on Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:53 pm

The Free Kingdom of Proprius wrote:A government shutdown? Debt Ceiling? Hmh?

Watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIbkoop4AYE

In case you can't watch, here's a summary.
Congress artificially creates a problem to solve. It solves it in the nick of time, looking like an action hero that solves the presidents problems. Rinse and repeat when we reach the debt ceiling again. There's no way the government's actually going to shut itself down, don't panic.

We half shut down last time. Even though basic funding stayed in place, many of the other areas of funding, such as air traffic control, foreign embassy security (and the GOP blames Obama for Benghazi), etc. There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
The Free Kingdom of Proprius
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 462
Founded: Aug 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Kingdom of Proprius » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:56 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.


That's actually a really good point. It is possible that they'll get lost in political maneuvering and get part of the government shut down for a while.

It would suck if you work for the post office, I guess. However, it won't create a dystopian nightmare with no police force.

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:58 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:
The Free Kingdom of Proprius wrote:A government shutdown? Debt Ceiling? Hmh?

Watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIbkoop4AYE

In case you can't watch, here's a summary.
Congress artificially creates a problem to solve. It solves it in the nick of time, looking like an action hero that solves the presidents problems. Rinse and repeat when we reach the debt ceiling again. There's no way the government's actually going to shut itself down, don't panic.

We half shut down last time. Even though basic funding stayed in place, many of the other areas of funding, such as air traffic control, foreign embassy security (and the GOP blames Obama for Benghazi), etc. There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.


He does have a grain of truth in his statement, though. The debt ceiling should be done away with. That doesn't mean we should just throw money at everything without coming up with more revenue, mind, I'm basically saying that the ceiling has proven to be more trouble than it's worth.
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:58 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:
The Free Kingdom of Proprius wrote:A government shutdown? Debt Ceiling? Hmh?

Watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIbkoop4AYE

In case you can't watch, here's a summary.
Congress artificially creates a problem to solve. It solves it in the nick of time, looking like an action hero that solves the presidents problems. Rinse and repeat when we reach the debt ceiling again. There's no way the government's actually going to shut itself down, don't panic.

We half shut down last time. Even though basic funding stayed in place, many of the other areas of funding, such as air traffic control, foreign embassy security (and the GOP blames Obama for Benghazi), etc. There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.


And the faction that can't stand a black man in the White House who isn't taking cues from Forrest Whittaker has increasingly dominated the Republican Party, much to the alarm of the establishment that would very much be the "they won't let government shut itself down" crowd.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:02 pm

Death Metal wrote:
Uieurnthlaal wrote:We half shut down last time. Even though basic funding stayed in place, many of the other areas of funding, such as air traffic control, foreign embassy security (and the GOP blames Obama for Benghazi), etc. There's always the possibility that they go so far that they don't pass a bill in time.


He does have a grain of truth in his statement, though. The debt ceiling should be done away with. That doesn't mean we should just throw money at everything without coming up with more revenue, mind, I'm basically saying that the ceiling has proven to be more trouble than it's worth.


It is, after all, a useless measure, completely irrelevant to the actual problems associated with debt, and put in place merely to comfort misguided fears about the supposed danger of a rising debt.
For more information, you can always check Krugman's article about the debt ceiling. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/opini ... ugman.html
Last edited by Uieurnthlaal on Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:05 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:
Death Metal wrote:
He does have a grain of truth in his statement, though. The debt ceiling should be done away with. That doesn't mean we should just throw money at everything without coming up with more revenue, mind, I'm basically saying that the ceiling has proven to be more trouble than it's worth.


It is, after all, a useless measure, completely irrelevant to the actual problems associated with death, and put in place merely to comfort misguided fears about the supposed danger of a rising debt.
For more information, you can always check Krugman's article about the debt ceiling. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/opini ... ugman.html


I assume you got auto-corrected with that "death" there, but yeah, pretty much in total agreement.
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:06 pm

Death Metal wrote:
Uieurnthlaal wrote:
It is, after all, a useless measure, completely irrelevant to the actual problems associated with death, and put in place merely to comfort misguided fears about the supposed danger of a rising debt.
For more information, you can always check Krugman's article about the debt ceiling. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/opini ... ugman.html


I assume you got auto-corrected with that "death" there, but yeah, pretty much in total agreement.


Yep. I must have typed an h instead of a b. Stupid autocorrect.
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:17 pm

Well you can't always get the debt ceiling increase you want, and next year you likely wont get the budget you want either.

Just move on and accept the debt ceiling remains where it is and there wont be a budget in 2014.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:18 pm

greed and death wrote:Well you can't always get the debt ceiling increase you want, and next year you likely wont get the budget you want either.

Just move on and accept the debt ceiling remains where it is and there wont be a budget in 2014.


Ergo, a government shutdown.
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Sep 24, 2013 11:36 pm

Uieurnthlaal wrote:
greed and death wrote:Well you can't always get the debt ceiling increase you want, and next year you likely wont get the budget you want either.

Just move on and accept the debt ceiling remains where it is and there wont be a budget in 2014.


Ergo, a government shutdown.

It is better than the alternative.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:51 am

greed and death wrote:
Uieurnthlaal wrote:
Ergo, a government shutdown.

It is better than the alternative.


Consider the last time we had a government shut down, in 1995. All non-essential services were cut automatically.
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
Cuttrejul
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Sep 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Cuttrejul » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:49 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Uieurnthlaal wrote:
Common sense:
Regulations, by their very definition, restrict freedom. An absence of regulation, by its very definition, leaves freedom be.

I don't want a convoluted argument that may or may not be right. This isn't ancient Greece. I require a higher standard of evidence than speculative arguments.

See the edit. Evidence of how this happens was provided.

Yes, regulations restrict freedom. And cost money to comply with, as I already said.

Absence of regulations, means the government will not be controlled by corporations.

Fun fact. One of the first taxes Obama raised as president was the tobacco tax. The move was widely supported by Altria.

Explain to me why a manufacturer would support an increase in their product, without any of the extra revenue going to them, but instead, the federal government?


Lol, no reply. But what do you expect from liberals when presented with evidence and logic that contradicts their ideology?

User avatar
Destiny Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2317
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Destiny Island » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:51 am

*Still waiting for Texas to secede*
The game.
Kirby Delauter.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:06 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:I cannot imagine how very much the other congressional republicans must hate ted cruz.

the house passed its stupid CR and are busy pretending that if the senate doesn't pass it too then the senate is shutting down government. but if ted ego cruz scuttles it without getting the dems to act on it then its still THEM shutting down government.

And yet I heard some guy on talk radio this evening talking about how afraid Democrats are of Ted Cruz and how they want to silence him. :roll:

lol

I think hes gonna go nowhere. he is too much of a demagogue and too little of a team player.
whatever

User avatar
Destiny Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2317
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Destiny Island » Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:08 am

Oh wait I forgot something.

Thanks Obama.
The game.
Kirby Delauter.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Forsher, Komarovo, Lord Dominator, Neu California, Rary, The Holy Therns, Umeria, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads