You have the values of the average Californian or West Coast resident?

Advertisement

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:51 pm


by Scholencia » Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:54 pm
Libertarian California wrote:Has anyone ever watched video clips from the 1950s, or listened to any sort of audio from the 1950s? Because when you do, you may notice that the accents sound quite different to the accents we* here today.
*I'm talking about Americans and Canadians mainly.
Did people in the 1950s actually sound different or is that just the "TV" or "Transatlantic" accent that we hear?
Either way, I think it's a cool accent.

by Libertarian California » Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:56 pm

by Tulmania » Sat Sep 21, 2013 11:11 pm

by Mushet » Sat Sep 21, 2013 11:39 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:18 am
Libertarian California wrote:Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:You have the values of the average Californian or West Coast resident?
You never mentioned average.
Also, the when it comes to political views, Californians are actually very varied. Most of the states interior is conservative, and its northern regions are similar to the Mountain states.
The whole state is not just San Francisco and Los Angeles.

by Grenartia » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:20 am
Austro-German Prussia wrote:Polvia wrote:One word: McCarthyism. *shudders*
1. McCarthyism was a great institution that focused on 2. vetting people who were traitors and spies in their own nation. It was a commendable effort and I am saddened to see that people today look back and see it just as bad as slavery.
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:It was a real nice time, but no era has been 'utopian'. I like Ike, but he continued the New Deal and didn't cut the exorbitant taxation rates that FDR emplaced. As for greatest decades of the 20th Century, I'd rank it third behind the 1920s and the 1980s.
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:Death Metal wrote:
The 20s sucked ass...
No. It was an era of inventions, of consumerism, of prices falling, of a heavier tax burden being placed on the rich through fewer taxes... Although I assume you're hooked on the baseless 'under-consumption' thesis and the 'herpdercapitalismcausedtehgreatdepressionherpderp' theory that's popular with ill-informed socialists. I'd go more into this issue, but it's real late for and I'll post a thread about this sooner or later.and the only good thing about the 1980s was the heavy metal and the AHNALD movies.
The cultural quality was excellent. I love everything 80s in that regard: fashion, movies, music, technology. The Reagan Revolution brought computers, mobile phones, more gadgets, etc. Consumerism, basically, that fuelled the Dot-Com Bubble and the Clinton Boom.
Minarchist States wrote:Utopic? Nah...
I could probably pass as the dominate social class though. Depends how much they accepted integrated Slavs.
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:Death Metal wrote:
If you only emphasize unemployment. Combine the two and 1938 was the return year, with a minimal bust in 1939, a recovery in 1940, another bust during the war (42 I think) with a recovery that was hampered by mass unemployment after WWII (because, again, the skilled workforce were fighting the war, replacing more than a few jobs with women who weren't regularly part of the American workforce at the time, and there just wasn't enough jobs to go around).
Alright, I'll give you that. But my point was that FDR's regressive taxes and destructive programs exacerbated what could have been a short recession. It could've been over a helluva lot sooner.
Death Metal wrote:Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:Alright, I'll give you that. But my point was that FDR's regressive taxes and destructive programs exacerbated what could have been a short recession.
Hardly. It was because of the New Deal that it was over as early as it was. It's true most of the New Deal jobs were essentially welfare, but this gave Americans a paycheck, and with that paycheck came the means to consume products more readily than they were before. The real reason the Depression lasted as long as it did was because during the Hoover era, consumerism was so dismally low because the working class couldn't afford to be consumers. FDR reversed that trend.
Siaos wrote:The Scientific States wrote:It was great so long as you were white, upper class, Christian, not a ebul commie, had "family values" and weren't homosexual it would've been great for you.
Otherwise life would probably suck for you.
In other words, if you were a Lesbian arabic anarcho-communist free-love muslim woman, you're screwed.

by The Batorys » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:21 am
Castille de Italia wrote:So NSG, I got to do some of that dangerous late-night thinking, and I thought about what it would be like to live in the 1950s, a time portrayed as somewhat of a Golden Age in American history. The time of sock hops and pink carnations, the 1950s economically and somewhat socially a prosperous time for America, after victories over Nazism and Imperial Japan, emerging out of the Great Depression as a world superpower.
The 1950s are generally portrayed as peaceful, carefree, and wonderful time in the media, when most everyone lived by the same ethics and standards. I personally do not think of the 1950s America as a Utopia, going by exact definition, given the social policies of the US and the looming threat of a nuclear war, but I'm curious to see NSG's opinion.
So, what is it? A Utopia, or just a period of prosperity in American history?

by Dakini » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:22 am
Libertarian California wrote:Dakini wrote:Of course, you just said that they were helping the Allies and neglected that they were also hurting the Allies.
And? Their net contribution to the Allies was still positive.And what the fuck is the relevance of that?
Considering that we started on this tangent because you acted like Canada (or the UK or France or the Allies who were in it before your country got off its collective ass) didn't matter, do you think the USSR is relevant here?
The relevance is that I was making a comparison to the Russians.
And are you really that dense? I thought that repeated use of's would imply that I was joking when making comments about Canada and such.
Did you seriously get mad over what was obviously a sarcastic comment? You actually believe that I think the UK and Canada did not contribute?
Wow...

by Immoren » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:23 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Arglorand » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:29 am

by Avaerilon » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:33 am

by Rurmastadt » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:36 am

by Neo-Mlytoria » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:37 am

by Grenartia » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:39 am
Neo-Mlytoria wrote:"A utopia /juːˈtoʊpiə/ is a community or society possessing highly desirable or perfect qualities."
Everything's highly desirable/perfect for someone. Freaking Syria is a utopia in some eyes.

by Pacifornia » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:41 am
Neo-Mlytoria wrote:"A utopia /juːˈtoʊpiə/ is a community or society possessing highly desirable or perfect qualities."
Everything's highly desirable/perfect for someone. Freaking Syria is a utopia in some eyes.

by New Chalcedon » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:41 am
Castille de Italia wrote:So NSG, I got to do some of that dangerous late-night thinking, and I thought about what it would be like to live in the 1950s, a time portrayed as somewhat of a Golden Age in American history. The time of sock hops and pink carnations, the 1950s economically and somewhat socially a prosperous time for America, after victories over Nazism and Imperial Japan, emerging out of the Great Depression as a world superpower.
The 1950s are generally portrayed as peaceful, carefree, and wonderful time in the media, when most everyone lived by the same ethics and standards. I personally do not think of the 1950s America as a Utopia, going by exact definition, given the social policies of the US and the looming threat of a nuclear war, but I'm curious to see NSG's opinion.
So, what is it? A Utopia, or just a period of prosperity in American history?

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:43 am

by Arglorand » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:46 am

by Nevanmaa » Sun Sep 22, 2013 1:05 am

by Bloco De Esquerda » Sun Sep 22, 2013 1:47 am
Nevanmaa wrote:Economic policies practiced in the 1950s were awful, the top 1% tax bracket was somewhere around 90% and the regulation was just awful. FDR's legacy on entitlement still hovered over America like a poisonous cloud as well.
Society-wise, I see the 1950s as an ideal time. Values like family, tradition and anti-communism were respected, and those are the values that we need now more than ever to combat the degeneracy of the 21st century society. If only there was a way to restore 1950s cultural values..
In my ideal society, the cultural values would be from the 50s and economic policies would be from the 80s.

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sun Sep 22, 2013 1:54 am

by Trotskylvania » Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:01 am
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A m e n r i a, Alvecia, Fahran, Fartsniffage, Han Tom Alechia, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Morlencey, New Treyland, Pizza Friday Forever91, Point Blob, Saiwana, The Archregimancy, Valyxias, WE EAT HORSES, Western Theram
Advertisement