Page 1 of 23

Semiautomatic rifles to be Assault Weapons in CA

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 12:19 am
by Rich and Corporations

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 12:20 am
by Dravaklia
Liberals, typical.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 12:21 am
by Nazeroth
Rich and Corporations wrote:http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB374

ARRRGGGGGGGGGGGG.
:o :eek: :mad:



fuck... :(

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:04 am
by Sommorragh
Not yet signed by Jerry Brown. But you can bet it'll happen one of these days. There are only around 100,000 registered gun owners in Cali.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:12 am
by Nationalist State of Knox
What's the problem?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:20 am
by Nazeroth
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:What's the problem?


liberalism...

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:25 am
by Big Jim P
Nazeroth wrote:
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:What's the problem?


liberalism...


Says it all in one word. :clap:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:33 am
by Nationalist State of Knox
Nazeroth wrote:
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:What's the problem?


liberalism...

How witty.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:34 am
by Nazeroth
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
liberalism...

How witty.


Thanks 8)

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:37 am
by Stahn
If you are in favor of restricting gun ownership, are you then still a liberal?

It would mean less liberty, would it not?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:37 am
by Mkuki
Meh. California is want to do what California wants.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:40 am
by Nazeroth
Stahn wrote:If you are in favor of restricting gun ownership, are you then still a liberal?

It would mean less liberty, would it not?


Liberalism has nothing to do with freedom in my opinion all it is in my eyes in special interests, regulations for the sake of the "greater good" and feel-good ideas.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:41 am
by Mkuki
Nazeroth wrote:
Stahn wrote:If you are in favor of restricting gun ownership, are you then still a liberal?

It would mean less liberty, would it not?


Liberalism has nothing to do with freedom in my opinion all it is in my eyes in special interests, regulations for the sake of the "greater good" and feel-good ideas.

That's liberalism? :blink: I'd better go change my ideological beliefs then.

*sigh* Liberalism has a definition, y'know.

Liberalism (from the Latin liberalis)[1] is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[2][3]

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:43 am
by Nazeroth
Mkuki wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
Liberalism has nothing to do with freedom in my opinion all it is in my eyes in special interests, regulations for the sake of the "greater good" and feel-good ideas.

That's liberalism? :blink: I'd better go change my ideological beliefs then.

*sigh* Liberalism has a definition, y'know.

Liberalism (from the Latin liberalis)[1] is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[2][3]


weird, the definition and the reality don't' seem to match up

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:45 am
by Mkuki
Nazeroth wrote:
Mkuki wrote:That's liberalism? :blink: I'd better go change my ideological beliefs then.

*sigh* Liberalism has a definition, y'know.



weird, the definition and the reality don't' seem to match up

How? Liberalism isn't an ideological monolith. Some liberals favor equality over liberty. Some favor liberty over equality. Others try to find a balance.

That said, your partisan attempts at being funny aren't all that funny.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:46 am
by Nazeroth
Mkuki wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
weird, the definition and the reality don't' seem to match up

How? Liberalism isn't an ideological monolith. Some liberals favor equality over liberty. Some favor liberty over equality. Others try to find a balance.

That said, your partisan attempts at being funny aren't all that funny.


I assure you, it is far to late in the night and im to tired to be comical

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:47 am
by Divair
Nazeroth wrote:
Mkuki wrote:How? Liberalism isn't an ideological monolith. Some liberals favor equality over liberty. Some favor liberty over equality. Others try to find a balance.

That said, your partisan attempts at being funny aren't all that funny.


I assure you, it is far to late in the night and im to tired to be comical

Making excuses. Typical.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:49 am
by Nazeroth
Divair wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
I assure you, it is far to late in the night and im to tired to be comical

Making excuses. Typical.


Whatever you say left-wing utopia

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:50 am
by Mkuki
Nazeroth wrote:
Mkuki wrote:How? Liberalism isn't an ideological monolith. Some liberals favor equality over liberty. Some favor liberty over equality. Others try to find a balance.

That said, your partisan attempts at being funny aren't all that funny.


I assure you, it is far to late in the night and im to tired to be comical

Right... :roll:

Whatever. I've threadjacked enough.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:50 am
by Divair
Nazeroth wrote:Whatever you say left-wing utopia

I'll always find it amusing that people think on General that nation classifications are relevant.


Spoilers: They very rarely represent people's beliefs. I'm not even a leftist.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:52 am
by Nazeroth
Divair wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:Whatever you say left-wing utopia

I'll always find it amusing that people think on General that nation classifications are relevant.


Spoilers: They very rarely represent people's beliefs. I'm not even a leftist.


meh...anyways yeah this new crap they are pulling sucks.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:52 am
by L Ron Cupboard
Nazeroth wrote:
Mkuki wrote:That's liberalism? :blink: I'd better go change my ideological beliefs then.

*sigh* Liberalism has a definition, y'know.



weird, the definition and the reality don't' seem to match up


That is because you are using it incorrectly.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:53 am
by Nazeroth
L Ron Cupboard wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
weird, the definition and the reality don't' seem to match up


That is because you are using it incorrectly.


Actually...they aren't using it correctly, otherwise Liberalism wouldn't be the monument of regulating the fun out of the world.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:54 am
by Big Jim P
Nazeroth wrote:
Divair wrote:I'll always find it amusing that people think on General that nation classifications are relevant.


Spoilers: They very rarely represent people's beliefs. I'm not even a leftist.


meh...anyways yeah this new crap they are pulling sucks.


At least they dropped the banning of rifles based on purely cosmetic features. It may not be right, but at least they are showing a bit more honesty.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:55 am
by Nazeroth
Big Jim P wrote:
Nazeroth wrote:
meh...anyways yeah this new crap they are pulling sucks.


At least they dropped the banning of rifles based on purely cosmetic features. It may not be right, but at least they are showing a bit more honesty.


I suppose there is a shitty brown lining in everything...