Chernoslavia wrote:Neu California wrote:
Because the gunman's target was in Washington DC, perhaps (speculation, of course, but so is your own point)? Seems more logical than what each place's gun laws are, IMO.
No matter the gun laws, crime will still remain the same. For example: On another thread in NSG someone claimed that the reason for the high gun crime rate in Chicago was because criminals are buying them from neighboring states, but if thats the case then why do the neighboring states have a lower gun crime rate?
And what does this have to do with your initial inquiry about why this particular shooting occurred in DC and not in a neighboring state?