So far witnessess say one of the shooters was carrying a handgun. Also, if the law worked to stop them from getting a semi auto rifle in DC but didnt stop them from bringing them into DC, how does that make sense?
It doesn't.
Advertisement
by Chernoslavia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:44 pm
by Chernoslavia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:45 pm
by Gauthier » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:46 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Gauthier wrote:
I mean, it's not like the shooter(s) was unable to buy banned weapons outside of DC if any were used. I mean, how implausible is that?
So far witnessess say one of the shooters was carrying a handgun. Also, if the law worked to stop them from getting a semi auto rifle in DC but didnt stop them from bringing them into DC, how does that make sense?
It doesn't.
by Petrovsegratsk » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:46 pm
Yandere Schoolgirls wrote:Capitalism is the most moral and effective system for bringing wealth to countries that man has ever devised or known
Hippostania wrote:I live in the second largest metropolitan area in the country (with a grand population of 300,000 :p) and as a lifelong city dweller, I have no skills to survive in the wild whatsoever. To put it mildly, I'd be royally fucked.
The Ben Boys wrote:They are so cute. It's like a toddler trying to wrestle a bear, except the toddler is retarded, doesn't have any teeth, and poops way too much.
by Ifreann » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:49 pm
by Chernoslavia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:50 pm
by Ifreann » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:54 pm
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:58 pm
by Distruzio » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:00 pm
Vitaphone Racing wrote:These mass shootings are getting more and more frequent by the year it seems.
by Uberman » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:00 pm
by Chernoslavia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:03 pm
by TaQud » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:04 pm
by New Octopucta » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:08 pm
Souriya Al-Assad wrote:
There is certainly an abnormal pattern in all of these. Not to mention the enigma surrounding the 'suspects' of the Boston bombings.
Adding to your list, should be Woolwich.
On another note, these are certainly odd, some have raised the idea of false flags on alternative media, others have pointed a different possibility: http://www.eutimes.net/2013/08/switzerl ... ment-74262
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1694.htm
by Chernoslavia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:09 pm
by Minarchist States » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:11 pm
Tule wrote:Vitaphone Racing wrote:These mass shootings are getting more and more frequent by the year it seems.
America has actually had remarkably few mass shootings this year.
Over a period of 8 1/2 months there have been 3 mass shootings with a combined death toll of 15.
by Chernoslavia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:12 pm
Gauthier wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
So far witnessess say one of the shooters was carrying a handgun. Also, if the law worked to stop them from getting a semi auto rifle in DC but didnt stop them from bringing them into DC, how does that make sense?
It doesn't.
Because hey, DC is enclosed by borders and checkpoints and every single incoming vehicle is stopped and searched for illegal weapons.
by Kouralia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:13 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Of course not. They're the Navy's guns, they don't let people just carry them around.
1. And who pays for those guns? That's right. The people do, including me. And we supply them to the Navy, so technically they belong to We the people.
2. Also, they should let them carry their weapons on base, they are in the NAVY afterall. Look what just happened, if they were armed they would've taken these perps down and saved some lives.
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:13 pm
Minarchist States wrote:Tule wrote:
America has actually had remarkably few mass shootings this year.
Over a period of 8 1/2 months there have been 3 mass shootings with a combined death toll of 15.
15 people died! Quick, ban the guns!
by Neu California » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:14 pm
by Chernoslavia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:18 pm
Kouralia wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
1. And who pays for those guns? That's right. The people do, including me. And we supply them to the Navy, so technically they belong to We the people.
2. Also, they should let them carry their weapons on base, they are in the NAVY afterall. Look what just happened, if they were armed they would've taken these perps down and saved some lives.
>People running about on a naval base in 'military-style uniforms'
>Best solution is to have more people running about on a naval base in 'military-style uniforms'
by Kouralia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:19 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Kouralia wrote:>People running about on a naval base in 'military-style uniforms'
>Best solution is to have more people running about on a naval base in 'military-style uniforms'
Here's something that makes more sense.
>People running about on a naval base in 'military-style uniforms' unarmed.
>Best solution is to have people running about on a naval base in 'military-style uniforms' armed.
by Ifreann » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:20 pm
That's right. The people do, including me. And we supply them to the Navy, so technically they belong to We the people.
2. Also, they should let them carry their weapons on base, they are in the NAVY afterall.
Look what just happened, if they were armed they would've taken these perps down and saved some lives.
by Chernoslavia » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:23 pm
by New Octopucta » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:25 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Czechostan, Dazchan, Floofybit, Godular, Homalia, Kubra, Likhinia, New Temecula, Saiwana, Theodorable, Tungstan
Advertisement