Texas: Put Creationism In Every Textbook!!!

[Genivaria]

Texas is theft.

Impeach Jesus?

Nuke Jesus.

[Opuntia]

And to respond to the people who just reiterated their same arguments, "scholarly" sources and all, let me reiterate mine: Just because a majority of contemporary scientific consensus holds the view that evolutionary theory is fact in all its facets, does not make it so. If the internet were around in the dark ages, I'm sure that the pro-Vatican crowd would post source after source of evidence proving that the earth was flat, sources right from the Pope's blog I'm sure. The fact remains that there are many in the scientific community who aren't eating or promoting the fruit of evolutionary theory. Whether or not they're supported by the mainstream shouldn't be a factor considering the history of the masses going along with whatever their overlords tell them.

Scientific reality exists independent of people's thoughts, beliefs, faiths and opinions. Science evolves with people. Science is what measures reality.

Evolution has been proven numerous fucking times to be reality by science. Anyone suggesting otherwise believes in fairy tales.

[Gauthier]

It was a sarcastic joke.

That's what you think.

Not like Texas wouldn't nuke itself if it could.

[Pandeeria]

It was a sarcastic joke.

That's what you think.

You're serious?

[Nationalist State of Knox]

Impeach Jesus?

I thought we did when we killed him?

Shhh, the final preparations are almost complete.

[European Socialist Republic]

And to respond to the people who just reiterated their same arguments, "scholarly" sources and all, let me reiterate mine: Just because a majority of contemporary scientific consensus holds the view that evolutionary theory is fact in all its facets, does not make it so. If the internet were around in the dark ages, I'm sure that the pro-Vatican crowd would post source after source of evidence proving that the earth was flat, sources right from the Pope's blog I'm sure. The fact remains that there are many in the scientific community who aren't eating or promoting the fruit of evolutionary theory. Whether or not they're supported by the mainstream shouldn't be a factor considering the history of the masses going along with whatever their overlords tell them.

The Vatican didn't use the scientific method to arrive at its conclusion. Your comparison fails.

[Edlichbury]

And to respond to the people who just reiterated their same arguments, "scholarly" sources and all, let me reiterate mine: Just because a majority of contemporary scientific consensus holds the view that evolutionary theory is fact in all its facets, does not make it so. If the internet were around in the dark ages, I'm sure that the pro-Vatican crowd would post source after source of evidence proving that the earth was flat, sources right from the Pope's blog I'm sure. The fact remains that there are many in the scientific community who aren't eating or promoting the fruit of evolutionary theory. Whether or not they're supported by the mainstream shouldn't be a factor considering the history of the masses going along with whatever their overlords tell them.

Because ignoring actual evidence in favor of delusional, contradictory stories is totally the sign of a rational, critical-thinking person.

[Democratic Republic of Sapientia]

And to respond to the people who just reiterated their same arguments, "scholarly" sources and all, let me reiterate mine: Just because a majority of contemporary scientific consensus holds the view that evolutionary theory is fact in all its facets, does not make it so. If the internet were around in the dark ages, I'm sure that the pro-Vatican crowd would post source after source of evidence proving that the earth was flat, sources right from the Pope's blog I'm sure. The fact remains that there are many in the scientific community who aren't eating or promoting the fruit of evolutionary theory. Whether or not they're supported by the mainstream shouldn't be a factor considering the history of the masses going along with whatever their overlords tell them.

Even if by some strange turn of events the vast majority of scientists in multiple disciplines were wrong and evolution is not true, that would not make young earth creationism true. The burden of proof is on you.

[Indira]

I want you to refute every single link. If you cannot, don't bother replying.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/evolve/evolve_3.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
http://www.txtwriter.com/backgrounders/ ... tents.html
http://bioweb.cs.earlham.edu/9-12/evolu ... /live.html
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... 0/lines_01
http://www.nature.com/nature/newspdf/evolutiongems.pdf
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... _tiktaalik
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... /devitt_01
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... history_23
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar ... history_16
http://www.allaboutcreation.org/evidenc ... lution.htm
http://www.nyu.edu/projects/fitch/cours ... dence.html
http://www.imls.uzh.ch/research/noll/pu ... 73_785.pdf
http://www.cell.com/developmental-cell/ ... 0703003253
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... =pmcentrez
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... =pmcentrez
http://www.gate.net/~rwms/hum_ape_chrom.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/07/scien ... .html?_r=1
http://jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/91/3/221
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 1006000526
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/310/5746/287
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... =pmcentrez
http://www.evolutionpages.com/chromosome_2.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-WAHpC0Ah0
http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/lessons/molb.ws.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... =pmcentrez
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4 ... 331a0.html
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 050603.php
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 071801.php
http://www.scripps.edu/newsandviews/e_20060327/evo.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... =pmcentrez
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... =pmcentrez
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... =pmcentrez
http://scienceray.com/biology/zoology/a ... maritimus/
http://facstaff.gpc.edu/~pgore/geology/ ... vation.pdf
http://www.nmsr.org/nylon.htm
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc ... l#atavisms

Divair, piss off. You are a rude little shit, and I have no intention of engaging in any sort of debate with you, civil or no. Anyone who disagrees with you is subject to your bastard superiority complex, and I'm not listening to it. Go out on the street and talk to someone in the condescending manner you do on the internet and see how fast you get your ass beat.

In other words, you run away from the debate. Refute him or acknowledge he's right. There's nothing condescending about his post

[Utceforp]

Texas is theft.

Impeach Jesus?

Legalize resurrection.

[Genivaria]

That's what you think.

Not like Texas wouldn't nuke itself if it could.

Ugh so many creationists down here who want the world to end that statement is more true then you think.
Brrrrr.

[Divair]

That's what you think.

You're serious?

Absolutely.


No.

[Imperializt Russia]

Ban Texas.

Nuke Texas.

It'd almost be safe!

[Pavlostani]

I'm with this guy.

*Grabs torch*

youre a bunch of fanatical atheists telling lies instead of facts

ahem.

BWWAHAHA, HAHAHAHA, oh dear, HAHAHA!

You know, the real funny thing about this is that that's coming from a Christian fundie. I am beginning to run out of fucks to give about you not understanding sarcasm.

[Gauthier]

And to respond to the people who just reiterated their same arguments, "scholarly" sources and all, let me reiterate mine: Just because a majority of contemporary scientific consensus holds the view that evolutionary theory is fact in all its facets, does not make it so. If the internet were around in the dark ages, I'm sure that the pro-Vatican crowd would post source after source of evidence proving that the earth was flat, sources right from the Pope's blog I'm sure. The fact remains that there are many in the scientific community who aren't eating or promoting the fruit of evolutionary theory. Whether or not they're supported by the mainstream shouldn't be a factor considering the history of the masses going along with whatever their overlords tell them.

The Vatican didn't use the scientific method to arrive at its conclusion. Your comparison fails.

LIES!! They tried Galileo based on objectively scientific evidence!!

[The Holy NeoSpanish Empire]

"To sustain the belief that there is no God, atheism would have to show infinite knowledge, it would be the same to say: I have infinite knowledge to say that there is a being with infinite knowledge

Yes, God cannot be proven or disproven without infinite knowledge. But you have the burden of proof. You need to prove God exists, or we should just assume he doesn't.

"Unfortunately for scientific minds God can not be discovered or demonstrable by purely scientific methods. But this does not prove anything, just that they are using the wrong tools for the job."

[Utceforp]

I'm with this guy.

*Grabs torch*

youre a bunch of fanatical atheists telling lies instead of facts

Says the guy who thinks the bible is a source.

[Kingdoms of Cal]

I'm with this guy.

*Grabs torch*

youre a bunch of fanatical atheists telling lies instead of facts

Ok let's do, falsifiable theories.

please provide.

[Edlichbury]

The Vatican didn't use the scientific method to arrive at its conclusion. Your comparison fails.

LIES!! They tried Galileo based on objectively scientific evidence!!

Trial by ordeal was fairly common, but hardly scientific.

[Luziyca]

Thank God I live in Canada, where we don't put creationism on textbooks.

[Nationalist State of Knox]

I'm with this guy.

*Grabs torch*

youre a bunch of fanatical atheists telling lies instead of facts

Wait, how did you work out that we're lying?

[Opuntia]

Impeach Jesus?

Nuke Jesus.

No, not Jesus! He had swag! Plus he's dead.

[Lost heros]

And to respond to the people who just reiterated their same arguments, "scholarly" sources and all

By "scholarly" I'm pretty sure you mean those sources supported by facts and experiments.

, let me reiterate mine: Just because a majority of contemporary scientific consensus holds the view that evolutionary theory is fact in all its facets, does not make it so

What about the mounds of evidence? Are we not supposed to listen to experts?

. If the internet were around in the dark ages, I'm sure that the pro-Vatican crowd would post source after source of evidence proving that the earth was flat, sources right from the Pope's blog I'm sure

Anecdotal evidence is not evidence.

The fact remains that there are many in the scientific community who aren't eating or promoting the fruit of evolutionary theory.

What?

Whether or not they're supported by the mainstream shouldn't be a factor considering the history of the masses going along with whatever their overlords tell them.

What?

[The Corparation]

Nuke Texas.

It'd almost be safe!

Bit of fallout reaches Arkansas. I think its an acceptable sacrifice.

[The Holy NeoSpanish Empire]

youre a bunch of fanatical atheists telling lies instead of facts

Says the guy who thinks the bible is a source.

says the guy who thinks darwins book instead of what god said itself