Texas: Put Creationism In Every Textbook!!!

[Lunalia]

Genesis, and Leviticus, and Exodus :3

That is all Jewish Illuminati NWO conspiracy, you heretic bastard. Shame on you.

Hey, it's in the bible. And people seem to love citing it when arguing against gay marriage, so why can't I use it to prove the bible says we're all plant people?

[Utceforp]

But apparently some (Russians, for instance) are His favoured sons, am I right?

NO , i just thing russian is better than english . that doesnt refers if russians are his favourite sons, everyone is equal at the eyes of god

It's kind of interesting how much the bible promotes killing.

that pagues were maked to free the chosen

Apparently some "sons of God" aren't as good as others, and deserve to be systematically killed off in favour of God's favourite sons.

[Lost heros]

However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

this is the jew version

So?

[Opuntia]

Not the topic, Parkus. Neither is Christianity, per se, in its various kinds. The topic is the move by the Texas Board of Education's textbook review panel to approve only books giving equal time to creationism along with evolution. Let's get back to it, shall we?

Probably the best choice of action.

So, how bout that crazy proposal in Texas to teach creationism in school?

They are stupid to ignore reality in such a drastic way.

[Lunalia]

However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

this is the jew version

No, it's the Catholic version. Catholicism acknowledges the Old Testament as fact. Open up your bible, it is there.

[Johnny Bravo]

intelligent design has some scientific merit

Not it doesn't.

Your grammar needs some more intelligent design bro.

[Furious Grandmothers]

However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

this is the jew version

What about the Texan version in their textbooks? Come on, let's all calm down and get on topic. Nothing constructive is happening right now.

[Utceforp]

However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

this is the jew version

So you admit that the Bible isn't infallible.

[Farnhamia]

this is the jew version

No, it's the Catholic version. Catholicism acknowledges the Old Testament as fact. Open up your bible, it is there.

Back on topic, please.

[Divair]

Not it doesn't.

Your grammar needs some more intelligent design bro.

Amazing input.

[Blasveck]

Your lack of proper grammar and spelling is really starting to bother me.

Some people have English as their second (or third, or nth) language. I wonder how your grammar would look in Cantonese?

Try to look past the poor spelling/grammar, to the points that he's trying to make. It'll go much better for everyone than getting hung up on grammar.

Having said that, NeoSpanish Empire, your grammar in particular is quite poor. I suggest you try to structure your thoughts more clearly before committing them to the forum.

I understand that English is a difficult language to learn for many.

But his thoughts and arguments would come across clearer with a bit of help.

But that's just me.

[Edlichbury]

Probably the best choice of action.

So, how bout that crazy proposal in Texas to teach creationism in school?

They are stupid to ignore reality in such a drastic way.

Not only to do so, but also to demand that their children be taught to do the same. Can an entire state be brought up for harming minors?

[Genivaria]

No, it's the Catholic version. Catholicism acknowledges the Old Testament as fact. Open up your bible, it is there.

Back on topic, please.

Honestly I think we're long past the point of no return.

[Opuntia]

That is all Jewish Illuminati NWO conspiracy, you heretic bastard. Shame on you.

Hey, it's in the bible. And people seem to love citing it when arguing against gay marriage, so why can't I use it to prove the bible says we're all plant people?

Because we are not plants! There you go. All jewish zionist illuminati's doing. Your brain is as washed as YOUR MOM.

[Tyriece]

Not it doesn't.

Your grammar needs some more intelligent design bro.

I am sorry, but this is one of the funniest things i have ever read on here

[New Chalcedon]

However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

this is the jew version

Actually, it's part of the Old Testament, per the New Living Translation of the Bible. But if that's not good enough for you, I'll go with the official Roman Catholic Church's translation of the Bible (the New American Bible).

"Slaves, male and female, you may indeed possess, provided you buy them from among the neighboring nations. You may also buy them from among the aliens who reside with you and from their children who are born and reared in your land. Such slaves you may own as chattels, and leave to your sons as their hereditary property, making them perpetual slaves. But you shall not lord it harshly over any of the Israelites, your kinsmen.

[Utceforp]

Not it doesn't.

Your grammar needs some more intelligent design bro.

You have only posted one thing. Out of all the things you could have posted, you choose THIS. Either that, or you just joined NS to make that comment.

[Blasveck]

They are stupid to ignore reality in such a drastic way.

Not only to do so, but also to demand that their children be taught to do the same. Can an entire state be brought up for harming minors?

Can that be done?

Can you sue a state?

E: For something like this, I mean?

[Furious Grandmothers]

Back on topic, please.

Honestly I think we're long past the point of no return.

Can we return back to slightly within the point of no return?

[Lunalia]

Hey, it's in the bible. And people seem to love citing it when arguing against gay marriage, so why can't I use it to prove the bible says we're all plant people?

Because we are not plants! There you go. All jewish zionist illuminati's doing. Your brain is as washed as YOUR MOM.

But he's saying the part of the bible that supports creationism and says we're all plants is fact. Therefore we have to be plants!

[Opuntia]

They are stupid to ignore reality in such a drastic way.

Not only to do so, but also to demand that their children be taught to do the same. Can an entire state be brought up for harming minors?

Yes. Impeach Texas. Legalize evolution. Textbooks are theft. CHARLES DARWIN 1984

[Pavlostani]

Not only to do so, but also to demand that their children be taught to do the same. Can an entire state be brought up for harming minors?

Can that be done?

Can you sue a state?

It happened here in my home state. Griswold v. Connecticut.

[Edlichbury]

Not only to do so, but also to demand that their children be taught to do the same. Can an entire state be brought up for harming minors?

Can that be done?

Can you sue a state?

In the context, I think we'd only have to sue the specific board of education, which certainly can be done.

[Utceforp]

Not only to do so, but also to demand that their children be taught to do the same. Can an entire state be brought up for harming minors?

Yes. Impeach Texas. Legalize evolution. Textbooks are theft. CHARLES DARWIN 1984

If Darwin went into politics he'd probably be a communist. Not because he's part of the ebul librel conspiracy, more because of his enormous facial hair.

[Christian Union]

The variable would be carbon, or whatever medium was used to date any given object. To assume that the volume of carbon present in the atmosphere 100 million years ago is either A.) the same then as it is now, or B.) can somehow be estimated even though we weren't there, is the faulty assumption. Many "scientists" use such dating methods to "prove" that certain fossil samples are millions of years old, despite the inconsistencies of the dating (one test might say 50,000 years, the other might say 1 million, for example), and despite the obvious problem of making assumptions.

So you have no fucking idea what carbon dating does?
Cute.

You're the one with no idea, as you can't even articulate it here. Carbon dating is done by measuring the ratio of stable carbon to unstable radiocarbon in any given sample. The problem is that there's an inherent assumption that the ratio of stable to unstable carbon in the atmosphere has remained constant.