Advertisement

by Distruzio » Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:28 pm

by Central Slavia » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:48 am
Shaggai wrote:Big Jim P wrote:
The death penalty serves to eliminate a known dangerous animal.
While LwP does exactly the same, is able to be reversed if the accused is proven innocent, and costs less. Also, rehabilitation serves to also remove someone dangerous, while adding a productive citizen to society if possible and again, being able to allow innocents to go free.
Central Slavia wrote:First of all, just revenge is just. All you present in the post you linked is an absurd ad hominem argument - it'd make us in some way like them so it must be bad.
Second of all, death penalty doesn't increase crime - it's other features of the US law and overall social system which do. It probably doesn't decrease it either beyond removing a single perpetrator from the world - but that's not the point anyways.
Ah, that may not have been been clear from that post, but my point was that suffering is bad. Anything we can do to decrease overall suffering is good, and anything we can do to increase it is wrong.
This is a feature of my personal moral system and may, unfortunately, not be agreed with by you. But if something can reduce the overall number of murders, and increase the number of people who add something to society, I will advocate for that. The death penalty does neither. (Also, the context was not the death penalty, it was someone who stated that some people need to "suffer at any cost." So some of the arguments may have been inapplicable here)
As for "just revenge": When does revenge become unjust? When does it become just? What is the line of justice? "An eye for an eye?" Gandhi and Jesus had a few things to say about that.
Edit: Actually, I linked to the wrong post. A much better version can be found here. Again, somewhat context-sensitive.
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by Shnercropolis » Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:20 am

by The Truth and Light » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:46 am
Distruzio wrote:Stupidity, itself, only harms those possessed of it.

by Risottia » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:49 am
Quintium wrote:Risottia wrote:He is, as MP.
He's also being prosecuted for having sex with a minor, and he's under a decadence process from the Senate for being sentenced guilty of tax fraud. Plus other stuff. Both charges entail a ban from holding office, so... looks like Silvio won't have his parliamentary immunity shielding him from incitement charges very soon. Just like everyone else.
He'll better watch his mouth.
Soon, two out of the three biggest parties in Italy will have leaders who are unable to hold office.
Good old Italy - so, how's the 'Ndrangheta?

by Darussalam » Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:05 am


by New Socialist South Africa » Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:16 am
Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

by Distruzio » Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:32 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Ethel mermania, Flykine, Greater Miami Shores 3, Habsburg Mexico, Hidrandia, Hispida, Hubaie, Ifreann, Juansonia, Necroghastia, Nilokeras, Point Blob, Port Caverton, Spy balloons, The Crimson Isles, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat
Advertisement