The cost in a death sentence isn't the execution itself, it's the appeals and trials that come before it, which makes it more expensive than life in prison.
Advertisement
by Ainin » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:01 pm
by Dragonic Outland » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:02 pm
by Ainin » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:05 pm
Dragonic Outland wrote:It depends on how many appeals are allowed.

by Death Metal » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:11 pm
-San Andreas wrote:Yes its should because its mainly the white people that insult the black people saying shit with their outrageous mouth

by Novikov » Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:07 pm

by Apollonesia » Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:20 pm
-San Andreas wrote:Yes its should because its mainly the white people that insult the black people saying shit with their outrageous mouth

by Empire of Vlissingen » Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:40 pm

by Freelanderness » Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:21 pm
. ♕ I am your LORD and saviour, for I am Jesus Christina Confess your sins, and ye shall be forgiven. ❤ .
One of Le Sexiest NSers 2013. Call me ₭¡††¥. Now a fascist because rape is bad, mmkay.
Meet the TET Pantheon"What I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you cry with you or kiss you, I love you." - Evey (V for Vendetta)

by ZadeXori » Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:39 pm

by Opuntia » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:06 am
America Libertaria wrote:This is a great idea! One step closer to true equality, next we have to make sure no one is smarter than anyone, stronger than anyone, or better looking than anyone. True equality for all!

by Opuntia » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:08 am
-San Andreas wrote:Yes its should because its mainly the white people that insult the black people saying shit with their outrageous mouth


by Nationalist State of Knox » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:10 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Opuntia » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:11 am
Red Team wrote:CHUCK N0RRIS wrote:I agree that it would get annoying if the message is repeatedly sent, so maybe it could serve as a "reminder."
As well, I think we might be going a bit off-topic. Anyways, if we were to allow free speech/expression/opinion, then we must have to bear racism. Suppressing it is equivalent to suppressing free speech/expression/opinion.
So true, so true. The last thing we want is some ideological inquisition enforcing anti-racism and political correctness.

by Narland » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:20 am

by Twenty-Fourth Reich » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:26 am

by Narland » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:40 am
Twenty-Fourth Reich wrote:Yes, we should ban all thoughtcrime, and double the sentences for crimes committed with thoughtcrime as a motive! If someone steals from me out of spite rather than greed, I want them locked away for twice as many years!!! It's completely logical!!


by Quintium » Sat Sep 14, 2013 1:56 am
Empire of Vlissingen wrote:If racism becomes a chargeable offense then you see black,asians and jews as different than white people.
So an Anti-racism law would cause more racism.
Empire of Vlissingen wrote:And we also have freedom of speech!

by Quintium » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:01 am
Saiwania wrote:That is where you're wrong. Perhaps I'm just an outlier, but nobody in my family taught me about racism. I observed that my skin color was different than some other people's and I proceeded to proactively teach myself about race and came to accept it, when I noticed that Whites are going to become the minority in the US.

by Wind in the Willows » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:05 am

by Big Jim P » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:12 am
Wind in the Willows wrote:It only seems to be a criminal offense if the victims are of colour for some reason. If a black man for example, walks up to a white man and starts shouting racial slurs like 'honky' and 'cracker' - nothing would be done.
However, if the white man walks up to the black man and starts shouting racial slurs, the left-wing media would go crazy and everybody would be crying racism.


by Grantica » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:14 am

by Grantica » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:21 am
Big Jim P wrote:Wind in the Willows wrote:It only seems to be a criminal offense if the victims are of colour for some reason. If a black man for example, walks up to a white man and starts shouting racial slurs like 'honky' and 'cracker' - nothing would be done.
However, if the white man walks up to the black man and starts shouting racial slurs, the left-wing media would go crazy and everybody would be crying racism.
Only whites can be racist, dontcha know?

by Big Jim P » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:22 am
Grantica wrote:
This is true. And calling only white people racist is not racist. It's truth-telling.
The fact is that all groups have their racist members, but on the whole, most people (including myself) just don't really care.
I'm actually tend to judge people based on intelligence. I guess I'm intelligencist. It's wrong, but at least I know it is a problem, right?
However, stinky people I always avoid... until they are no longer stinky.

by Central Slavia » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:42 am
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Applebania, Elejamie, The Astral Mandate, The Confederate States of America
Advertisement