NATION

PASSWORD

GOP wants to ban foodstamp-purchased junk food

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Is this a good idea?

THIS IS A FUCKING GREAT IDEA! I CAN'T BELIEVE IT TOOK US SO LONG TO GET HERE!
122
42%
THIS! IS! A! BAD! IDEA!
96
33%
breasts
75
26%
 
Total votes : 293

User avatar
Bezombia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29250
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

GOP wants to ban foodstamp-purchased junk food

Postby Bezombia » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:40 pm

...from being purchased with food stamps.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/go ... 58768.html

Newly proposed legislation in Congress would ban recipients of food stamps from buying junk food.

The Hill reports that a bill proposed by Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn., would require food stamp recipients to purchase only healthy food.

The Healthy Food Choices Act, H.R. 3073 is the latest salvo from Republican members of Congress who have criticized the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps or the Women, Infants and Children program (WIC).

In August, it was reported that House Republicans hoped to cut some $40 billion from future SNAP budgets.

Roe’s legislation is specifically in response to a 2012 study, which showed that recipients from the food stamp fund spend approximately $2 billion a year on junk food.

“As a physician, I realize the importance of healthy eating, and as an obstetrician, I’ve seen how the WIC program helps empower families receiving assistance to use taxpayer dollars to purchase healthy, wholesome foods,” Roe said in a statement published on his congressional site. “If these guidelines are good and healthy enough for women and children, then SNAP recipients should also benefit from adhering to the same standards.”

In June, Roe voted in favor of proposed legislation that would apply work to welfare standards to food stamp fund recipients.

Critics of Roe’s proposal say that the tighter nutritional requirements would actually be more of a burden for low-income individuals and families who rely on SNAP funds. They also point out that Roe previously opposed efforts by first lady Michelle Obama to improve national school lunch nutritional standards.

Roe’s bill would require SNAP food purchases to adhere to the same nutritional guidelines required under the WIC program. But some critics have said that even WIC’s requirements are not based on science and need fine-tuning to ensure they are nutritionally sound.

Still, Roe said his intention is to improve the health of SNAP recipients by helping to ensure that they eat more nutritious meals with their funds.

“Already states like Wisconsin and South Carolina have shown interest in improving the healthfulness of choices in their SNAP programs,” Roe said. “By giving SNAP recipients more nutritious choices, we can take a meaningful step towards ending hunger in America.”


I can see the logic here, but personally I believe that there are bigger fights to be fought right now and that I really have to question why this is being proposed now.
Last edited by Dread Lady Nathicana on Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:13 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Reason: Let's be somewhat honest in topic titles, please.
Our weary eyes still stray to the horizon...but down this road we've been so many times...
Please, call me Benomia. Post count +14623, founded Oct. 23, 2012.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies
I'm a poet. Come read my poems!

User avatar
Alex the Philosopher
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 137
Founded: Sep 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alex the Philosopher » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:49 pm

I don't see any problem with it. If you want junk food, buy it with your own money.
This is the only recent GOP ruling on welfare and such that is sane. Why would you be opposed?
Last edited by Alex the Philosopher on Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am that I am.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:51 pm

1. Aren't they all about "Freedom to choose!" Shit or whatever?

2. WHY IS MY OWN CONGRESS MAKING STUPID BILLS LIKE THIS AND TRYING TO REPEAL OBAMACARE FOR THE 47TH TIME? YOU WERE ELECTED TO GOVERN. START GOVERNING SHIT.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Bezombia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29250
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bezombia » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:56 pm

Alex the Philosopher wrote:I don't see any problem with it. If you want junk food, buy it with your own money.
This is the only recent GOP ruling on welfare and such that is sane. Why would you be opposed?


I'm not inherently opposed to the bill itself, and in fact a part of me wants to support it, but I'd rather they focus on shit that actually matters rather than...this.
Our weary eyes still stray to the horizon...but down this road we've been so many times...
Please, call me Benomia. Post count +14623, founded Oct. 23, 2012.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies
I'm a poet. Come read my poems!

User avatar
Alex the Philosopher
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 137
Founded: Sep 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alex the Philosopher » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:57 pm

Blasveck wrote:1. Aren't they all about "Freedom to choose!" Shit or whatever?

They also don't want there to be any welfare, since real Americans can somehow magically hoist themselves out of poverty and all poor people are just lazy. This seems to be some sort of compromise, which is somehow sensible, for once.

Blasveck wrote:2. WHY IS MY OWN CONGRESS MAKING STUPID BILLS LIKE THIS AND TRYING TO REPEAL OBAMACARE FOR THE 47TH TIME? YOU WERE ELECTED TO GOVERN. START GOVERNING SHIT.

Hey, at least they're getting something done. Usually they either bicker pointlessly or sit there with their thumbs up their asses.
I am that I am.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:57 pm

Alex the Philosopher wrote:I don't see any problem with it. If you want junk food, buy it with your own money.
This is the only recent GOP ruling on welfare and such that is sane. Why would you be opposed?

Isn't this the kind of legislation that Conservatives say Liberals do? :eyebrow:

User avatar
Alex the Philosopher
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 137
Founded: Sep 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alex the Philosopher » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:58 pm

Bezombia wrote:
Alex the Philosopher wrote:I don't see any problem with it. If you want junk food, buy it with your own money.
This is the only recent GOP ruling on welfare and such that is sane. Why would you be opposed?


I'm not inherently opposed to the bill itself, and in fact a part of me wants to support it, but I'd rather they focus on shit that actually matters rather than...this.

Considering the alternative is the big nothing they've been doing usually, I prefer this. At least something gets done.

Besides, this is actually a sensible bill. That's a bit hard to come by these days.
I am that I am.

User avatar
Zavea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 609
Founded: Apr 20, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Zavea » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:59 pm

there is zero evidence that doing this would help the poor at all.

this is just another bog standard effort by conservatives to dismantle food assistance programs while framing themselves as defenders of the poor and hungry (even though republicans will always do everything in their power to blame and destroy the poor)

just ugh.
is it pronounced zay-vee-uh or zuh-vay-uh? i can't decide

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:59 pm

Yet again the GOP shows that it has absolutely no idea what financing is like for those that require programs such as food stamps to survive. Buying healthy is luxury that simply cannot be afforded by much of the lower class. People should certainly be encouraged to eat healthy, though the acceptable way to go about this would be actually ensuring that people are capable of eating healthy without fear of the expense
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Bezombia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29250
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bezombia » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:02 pm

Threlizdun wrote:Yet again the GOP shows that it has absolutely no idea what financing is like for those that require programs such as food stamps to survive. Buying healthy is luxury that simply cannot be afforded by much of the lower class. People should certainly be encouraged to eat healthy, though the acceptable way to go about this would be actually ensuring that people are capable of eating healthy without fear of the expense


Playing devil's advocate here, but the right could argue that if people are no longer using food stamps to get junk food, the cost of junk food would go down.

Of course I don't believe it, just covering our bases here.
Our weary eyes still stray to the horizon...but down this road we've been so many times...
Please, call me Benomia. Post count +14623, founded Oct. 23, 2012.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies
I'm a poet. Come read my poems!

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:02 pm

I'm sorry what was that about the GOP supporting 'economic freedom'?

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:03 pm

Genivaria wrote:I'm sorry what was that about the GOP supporting 'economic freedom'?

Economic freedom for the ones that deserve it. i.e. the rich.
*nods*
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Cameroi
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15788
Founded: Dec 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Cameroi » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:03 pm

if the gop were to actually ban all junk food impartially, wouldn't its own members starve to death and thus cease to exist?
truth isn't what i say. isn't what you say. isn't what anybody says. truth is what is there, when no one is saying anything.

"economic freedom" is "the cake"
=^^=
.../\...

User avatar
Bezombia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29250
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bezombia » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:04 pm

Cameroi wrote:if the gop were to actually ban all junk food impartially, wouldn't its own members starve to death and thus cease to exist?


^^this guy didn't read the op
Our weary eyes still stray to the horizon...but down this road we've been so many times...
Please, call me Benomia. Post count +14623, founded Oct. 23, 2012.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies
I'm a poet. Come read my poems!

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:04 pm

Bezombia wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:Yet again the GOP shows that it has absolutely no idea what financing is like for those that require programs such as food stamps to survive. Buying healthy is luxury that simply cannot be afforded by much of the lower class. People should certainly be encouraged to eat healthy, though the acceptable way to go about this would be actually ensuring that people are capable of eating healthy without fear of the expense


Playing devil's advocate here, but the right could argue that if people are no longer using food stamps to get junk food, the cost of junk food would go down.

Of course I don't believe it, just covering our bases here.

And in the meantime the poor starve. I prefer letting people eat than getting cheaper chips.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Alex the Philosopher
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 137
Founded: Sep 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alex the Philosopher » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:04 pm

Genivaria wrote:I'm sorry what was that about the GOP supporting 'economic freedom'?

Conservatives see welfare as the poor stealing their money, so they would argue that they get to choose how it is spent.

Honestly, though, banning the use of food stamps in purchasing junk food makes sense. Everyone deserves a square meal, but if you want junk food, spend your own money on it.
I am that I am.

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:05 pm

The Party of Small Government, ladies and gentlemen!
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:05 pm

Bezombia wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:Yet again the GOP shows that it has absolutely no idea what financing is like for those that require programs such as food stamps to survive. Buying healthy is luxury that simply cannot be afforded by much of the lower class. People should certainly be encouraged to eat healthy, though the acceptable way to go about this would be actually ensuring that people are capable of eating healthy without fear of the expense


Playing devil's advocate here, but the right could argue that if people are no longer using food stamps to get junk food, the cost of junk food would go down.

Of course I don't believe it, just covering our bases here.


Well you can counter that with a sugar tax, or something.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Saint Kitten
Senator
 
Posts: 4436
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Kitten » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:05 pm

Hmm, should I use my stamps on healthy food, or shit?
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination."
-Mark Twain
I Side With
Political Compass
Dear Future Generations

User avatar
Ruridova
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15860
Founded: Jun 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruridova » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:05 pm

Blasveck wrote:1. Aren't they all about "Freedom to choose!" Shit or whatever?

2. WHY IS MY OWN CONGRESS MAKING STUPID BILLS LIKE THIS AND TRYING TO REPEAL OBAMACARE FOR THE 47TH TIME? YOU WERE ELECTED TO GOVERN. START GOVERNING SHIT.

This.
Республіка Рюрідова - Королівство Вілкія
"For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited me in; I needed clothes and you clothed me; I was sick and you looked after me; I was in prison and you came to visit me... Truly, whatever you did for one of the least of my brothers and sisters, you did for me."
- the Gospel of Matthew, 25:35-40

User avatar
Releign
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7696
Founded: Apr 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Releign » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:05 pm

You should really specify in the title food stamps.
I was about to get off my ass and go do something. Jeeze!

User avatar
Tsmida Eri
Diplomat
 
Posts: 811
Founded: May 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsmida Eri » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:06 pm

I approve.
I am a devout Christian, a Fascist, a Conservative, and a Patriotic American. Get over it.
Fascism, Autocracy, Absolute Monarchy, Authoritarianism, State Capitalism, Plutocracy, Christian Theocracy, Cultural Conservatism, Totalitarianism, Zionism, Ecumenism, Greater Israel, Greater Armenia, Megali Idea, Christofascism, Controlled Immigration, Christian Fundamentalism, Enosis, Greater Serbia, Corporatism
Liberalism, Libertarianism, Communism, Socialism, Nazism, Ottomanism, Radical Islam, Anti-Semitism, Homosexuality, Transsexualism, Conspiracy Theories, Democracy, Racism, Palestine, Constitutional Monarchy, Radicalism, Ethnic Nationalism, Militant Atheism, Bisexuality, Prostitution, Minarchy, Anarchy, Christophobia, Sharia Law

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:06 pm

Makes good sense, provided they are willing to issue more stamps and higher limit food cards to cover the increased cost.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:06 pm

Alex the Philosopher wrote:
Genivaria wrote:I'm sorry what was that about the GOP supporting 'economic freedom'?

Conservatives see welfare as the poor stealing their money, so they would argue that they get to choose how it is spent.

Honestly, though, banning the use of food stamps in purchasing junk food makes sense. Everyone deserves a square meal, but if you want junk food, spend your own money on it.

Seeing as how unhealthy food tends to be cheaper then healthy food this is only going to make things worse for poor people.

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:06 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:Makes good sense, provided they are willing to issue more stamps and higher limit food cards to cover the increased cost.

...Except you know they're not.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Antrantica, Dazchan, Kastopoli Salegliari, Keltionialang, Kostane, Majestic-12 [Bot]

Advertisement

Remove ads