NATION

PASSWORD

23% of men in parts of Asia admit to rape

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:27 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Mizrah wrote:
If it is accepted as regular or commonplace in another culture, then leave it be. If the people of that culture don't like it, they'll change it.

If it is accepted as regular or commonplace in another culture, then do something about it.

It all boils down to respecting other people's culture.

"People of culture A rape so it's all good!"
Yeah. No.

Seems pretty solid to me.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Mizrah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 821
Founded: Oct 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mizrah » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:27 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
Saveyou Island wrote:No it's saying that the man said "Screw her opinion shes my wife" and raped her.


No, it's not. The wording is quite clear for you. It's posted, there. Right above your post.

According to the quote, the following scenario is rape:

1) Husband suggests sex.
2) Wife declines.
3) Husband requests again, noting they are spouses, and uses some form of reasoning that appeals to this.
4) Wife changes her mind and decides she will have sex with him, though reaffirming she doesn't particularly want to, but is willing to if it will make him happy.


According to the wording of the question, that's rape.


No. It's not. She consented by deciding she will have sex with him. We consent to things, doesn't mean we like it.
Political Compass:
Economic Left: -10
Social Libertarian: -7

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32117
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:27 pm

The Rich Port wrote:Oh, take your shitty routine to a downtown bombers' dive bar where it belongs: in the gutter.



Am I to interpret that as the lack of response.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:27 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Why don't you go think about that for a while?

I'm not. I'd die.

That's the joke.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:28 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:Oh, take your shitty routine to a downtown bombers' dive bar where it belongs: in the gutter.



Am I to interpret that as the lack of response.


There's nothing TO respond to except a retarded joke.

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:28 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Saveyou Island wrote:I'm not. I'd die.

That's the joke.

I'm well aware of that.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:29 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
No, it's not. The wording is quite clear for you. It's posted, there. Right above your post

According to the quote, the following scenario is rape:

1) Husband suggests sex.
2) Wife declines.
3) Husband requests again, noting they are spouses, and uses some form of reasoning that appeals to this.
4) Wife changes her mind and decides she will have sex with him, though reaffirming she doesn't particularly want to, but is willing to if it will make him happy.


According to the wording of the question, that's rape.

That's...not at all what the question states...


That's PRECISELY what it states. You have to be completely ignoring the way the quedtion is worded to think otherwise. I will, again, show you.

Have you ever had sex with your partner when you knew she didn't want to but you thought she should agree because she's your wife/ partner?


Nowhere does it insinuate a lack of consent. No where does it say the man went and had sex with her against her will. All it states is (1) the wife didn't want to, and (2) the man thought they should, because they were married.

That's all it states. It states nothing about a lack of consent. Just a lack of desire. It's attempting to conflate lack of desire with lack of consent.

If you don't see this, you're completely blind, and nothing I say will convince you otherwise. I can't put it any simpler for you.
Last edited by Aurora Novus on Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:29 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:That's the joke.

I'm well aware of that.

Then you're awfully bad at being a part of comedy.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:30 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Saveyou Island wrote:I'm well aware of that.

Then you're awfully bad at being a part of comedy.

No, it's just that it wasn't funny.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32117
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:30 pm

The Rich Port wrote:There's nothing TO respond to except a retarded joke.


I said nothing disingenuous, I issued comment and opened myself to the appraisal of that comment by the community.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:30 pm

Mizrah wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
No, it's not. The wording is quite clear for you. It's posted, there. Right above your post.

According to the quote, the following scenario is rape:

1) Husband suggests sex.
2) Wife declines.
3) Husband requests again, noting they are spouses, and uses some form of reasoning that appeals to this.
4) Wife changes her mind and decides she will have sex with him, though reaffirming she doesn't particularly want to, but is willing to if it will make him happy.


According to the wording of the question, that's rape.


No. It's not. She consented by deciding she will have sex with him. We consent to things, doesn't mean we like it.


That's precisely my point!

The question, however, insinuates otherwise. By the wording of the question, that scenario is rape. The question is attempting to conflate "lack of desire" with "lack of consent".

Which is why, to relate back to my original post, I said I was skeptical of the results.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:31 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Then you're awfully bad at being a part of comedy.

No, it's just that it wasn't funny.

I sure thought it was funny. You're very bad at saving face.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:32 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Saveyou Island wrote:No, it's just that it wasn't funny.

I sure thought it was funny. You're very bad at saving face.

Well just because you thought it was funny doesn't necessarily mean it's funny.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:33 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:I sure thought it was funny. You're very bad at saving face.

Well just because you thought it was funny doesn't necessarily mean it's funny.

Sure does for me.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:34 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Saveyou Island wrote:Well just because you thought it was funny doesn't necessarily mean it's funny.

Sure does for me.

Sure doesn't for me.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:34 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Sure does for me.

Sure doesn't for me.

I don't care about you.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:35 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Saveyou Island wrote:Sure doesn't for me.

I don't care about you.

Never said you had to.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Mizrah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 821
Founded: Oct 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mizrah » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:38 pm

The Republic of Llamas wrote:
Mizrah wrote:
If it is accepted as regular or commonplace in another culture, then leave it be. If the people of that culture don't like it, they'll change it.

If it is not accepted as regular or commonplace in another culture, then do something about it.

It all boils down to respecting other people's culture.

But we don't have to respect the woman? So, you're basically saying that a tradition is worth more than a human being. In that case, slavery should never have been outlawed in the US because it was part of the South's culture.

Also, it's not considered OK in Asia. I'd assume that it's related to Asia's higher poverty rate and the fact that police aren't very well-funded.


Refer to the Line 2.
Political Compass:
Economic Left: -10
Social Libertarian: -7

User avatar
Mizrah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 821
Founded: Oct 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mizrah » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:40 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
Mizrah wrote:
No. It's not. She consented by deciding she will have sex with him. We consent to things, doesn't mean we like it.


That's precisely my point!

The question, however, insinuates otherwise. By the wording of the question, that scenario is rape. The question is attempting to conflate "lack of desire" with "lack of consent".

Which is why, to relate back to my original post, I said I was skeptical of the results.


Well yes. A major part of surveys is how the question is worded and what the person administering the surveys is going to claim as rape. A feminist would claim the above scenario as rape. Someone else wouldn't. It is a problem in statistics.
Political Compass:
Economic Left: -10
Social Libertarian: -7

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:41 pm

Mizrah wrote:
The Republic of Llamas wrote:But we don't have to respect the woman? So, you're basically saying that a tradition is worth more than a human being. In that case, slavery should never have been outlawed in the US because it was part of the South's culture.

Also, it's not considered OK in Asia. I'd assume that it's related to Asia's higher poverty rate and the fact that police aren't very well-funded.


Refer to the Line 2.

...

As for line one, that's most certainly false. Does one allow the people of another culture to be violently oppressed simply because it's the way that culture is?
password scrambled

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:41 pm

Mizrah wrote:
The Republic of Llamas wrote:But we don't have to respect the woman? So, you're basically saying that a tradition is worth more than a human being. In that case, slavery should never have been outlawed in the US because it was part of the South's culture.

Also, it's not considered OK in Asia. I'd assume that it's related to Asia's higher poverty rate and the fact that police aren't very well-funded.


Refer to the Line 2.


And then you say in line 3 that we need to respect other cultures.

Make up your mind.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:41 pm

Frisivisia wrote:Personally, I think we should castrate all men. Who's with me?

I think that the Irish should eat their children myself.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Luziyca
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38036
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Luziyca » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:41 pm

Christ. I hope it is either an error, or an incentive to reduce rape levels altogether..
|||The Kingdom of Rwizikuru|||
Your feeble attempts to change the very nature of how time itself has been organized by mankind shall fall on barren ground and bear no fruit
IIwikiFacebookKylaris: the best region for eight years runningAbout meYouTubePolitical compass

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:43 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:No, you did not. You said what you think giving consent is, but you did not illustrate what you think not giving consent is.


Ah.

Well, unless you're trying to make some point here, I don't see how that's relevant.

Because it will show whether or not you can wrap your head around the same shit the rest of us can and if we should even bother with you. Your reluctance in this very simple matter indicates that the answer is no.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Dragonic Outland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1993
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dragonic Outland » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:44 pm

Is India challenging with South Africa for the title of "Rape Capital of the World"?


Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either.
-Albert Einstein

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Bradfordville, Dimetrodon Empire, Dtn, Eternal Algerstonia, Ethel mermania, Gallade, Heavenly Assault, Isla of Maktoy, New Ciencia, Nilokeras, Old Temecula, Raskana, The Jamesian Republic, The Notorious Mad Jack, Urkennalaid, Utquiagvik, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads