NATION

PASSWORD

23% of men in parts of Asia admit to rape

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:51 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:And? When someone says no, you say "Alright." and go to sleep, or go home, or whatever works.


Hardly. You have a poor grasp of reality if you think initial responses should always just be accepted. As if people never, upon thinking a second time, change their minds. As if it's somehow a crime or wrong to ask again.


There is no harm in asking again, to be certain that is what someone desires. It is childish and servile to think otherwise.

EDIT: Not to mention, regardless of your views of asking again, it still doesn't make it rape.
Last edited by Aurora Novus on Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:52 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:And? When someone says no, you say "Alright." and go to sleep, or go home, or whatever works.


Hardly. You have a poor grasp of reality if you think initial responses should always just be accepted. As if people never, upon thinking a second time, change their minds. As if it's somehow a crime or wrong to ask again.


There is no harm in asking again, to be certain that is what someone desires. It is childish and servile. to think otherwise.

You're creepy as fuck. If someone tells you "No, I do not want to have sex with you" they have made their decision and you're a fucking weirdo for thinking otherwise. Seriously, is this how people really think?
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159079
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:53 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:"Have you ever had sex with your partner when you knew she didn't want to but you thought she should agree because she's your wife/ partner?"

If these are the kinds of questions they are asking, I'm skeptical of the results. After all, by this question, a man who's wife initially says no, but then changes her mind after he asks again, has just been raped.

The question says no such thing.

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:57 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:You're creepy as fuck.


There's that nonsense term I know you people love to throw about.


If someone tells you "No, I do not want to have sex with you" they have made their decision and you're a fucking weirdo for thinking otherwise. Seriously, is this how people really think?


Hardly. First of all, you're completely ignoring a whole facet of communication that involves playing coy or giving responses that one does not actually mean, in the hopes that someone will ask again and try to lull them into something. Whether or not you wish to accept it, that is a real behavioral act by some people. They want someone to try and convince them to say yes, so they say no initially. This doesn't just apply to sex. It can be anything. I've done it in the past myself.

Secondly, you're also ignoring the fact that people often don't have their minds made up when they give their initial response. People very often will give an initial response, but then think about things for a moment, and declare something different from what their initial statement was. Happens all the time.

Finally, you're acting as if trying to change someone's mind is a bad thing. Which is a ridiculously servile notion.
Last edited by Aurora Novus on Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:57 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:"Have you ever had sex with your partner when you knew she didn't want to but you thought she should agree because she's your wife/ partner?"

If these are the kinds of questions they are asking, I'm skeptical of the results. After all, by this question, a man who's wife initially says no, but then changes her mind after he asks again, has just been raped.

I have a feeling this questionnaire was biased in the way it asked it's questions. Which isn't uncommon for rape surveys unfortunately.

The question says "Did you have sex with her, even when she rejected?"
Not "When you asked ,Did your wife say no but then change her mind?"
Last edited by Saveyou Island on Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:59 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:"Have you ever had sex with your partner when you knew she didn't want to but you thought she should agree because she's your wife/ partner?"

If these are the kinds of questions they are asking, I'm skeptical of the results. After all, by this question, a man who's wife initially says no, but then changes her mind after he asks again, has just been raped.

I have a feeling this questionnaire was biased in the way it asked it's questions. Which isn't uncommon for rape surveys unfortunately.

It didn't ask if she changed her mind, it said she DID NOT WANT TO but YOU thought she should and so had sex with her anyway.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:59 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:"Have you ever had sex with your partner when you knew she didn't want to but you thought she should agree because she's your wife/ partner?"

If these are the kinds of questions they are asking, I'm skeptical of the results. After all, by this question, a man who's wife initially says no, but then changes her mind after he asks again, has just been raped.

I have a feeling this questionnaire was biased in the way it asked it's questions. Which isn't uncommon for rape surveys unfortunately.

The question says "Did you have sex with her, even when she rejected?"


Not quite. It says "did you have sex with her, when you knew she didn't want to". Someone who may not want to have sex, but is willing to have sex for the benefit of the other partner, out of love, a deal, ect., fits this category. That's not rape.

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:59 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:"Have you ever had sex with your partner when you knew she didn't want to but you thought she should agree because she's your wife/ partner?"

If these are the kinds of questions they are asking, I'm skeptical of the results. After all, by this question, a man who's wife initially says no, but then changes her mind after he asks again, has just been raped.

I have a feeling this questionnaire was biased in the way it asked it's questions. Which isn't uncommon for rape surveys unfortunately.

It didn't ask if she changed her mind, it said she DID NOT WANT TO but YOU thought she should and so had sex with her anyway.


"Did not want to" does not mean "did not consent".

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:01 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
Saveyou Island wrote:The question says "Did you have sex with her, even when she rejected?"


Not quite. It says "did you have sex with her, when you knew she didn't want to". Someone who may not want to have sex, but is willing to have sex for the benefit of the other partner, out of love, a deal, ect., fits this category. That's not rape.

No.
The question says "DID YOU HAVE SEX WITH HER AGAINST HER OWN WILL?"
If she is willing to have sex she GIVES HER CONSENT!
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:01 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:It didn't ask if she changed her mind, it said she DID NOT WANT TO but YOU thought she should and so had sex with her anyway.


"Did not want to" does not mean "did not consent".

What does equal "did not consent" exactly?
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:02 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
"Did not want to" does not mean "did not consent".

What does equal "did not consent" exactly?

I'm wondering the same thing here.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:02 pm

Oh... God... I... Jeez...

... I feel dirty.

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:04 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
Not quite. It says "did you have sex with her, when you knew she didn't want to". Someone who may not want to have sex, but is willing to have sex for the benefit of the other partner, out of love, a deal, ect., fits this category. That's not rape.

No.
The question says "DID YOU HAVE SEX WITH HER AGAINST HER OWN WILL?"


No, that's not what it asked. It asked, word for word, what I just typed. I literally used copy/paste.

"Didn't want to" does not mean "did not consent".

User avatar
Greater Vayland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 186
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Vayland » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:05 pm

F***ing hell. Although I'm disinclined to generalize, could it be because a large chunk of the developing third world is there? (crappy education or complete lack thereof, etc. etc. etc.)
The Neo-Latin Union of Vayana
Français | Português | Español | Italiano | Român
CVNCTI ADSINT MERITAEQVE EXPECTENT PRAEMIA PALMAE
This nation's name is Vayana; not Greater Vayland.

Dialogue in this color is spoken in French
Dialogue in this color is spoken in Portuguese
Dialogue in this color is spoken in Spanish
Dialogue in this color is spoken in Italian
Dialogue in this color is spoken in Romanian

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:06 pm

Greater Vayland wrote:F***ing hell. Although I'm disinclined to generalize, could it be because a large chunk of the developing third world is there? (crappy education or complete lack thereof, etc. etc. etc.)

Y'know, not all of foreign countries are a wasteland.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:07 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
"Did not want to" does not mean "did not consent".

What does equal "did not consent" exactly?


Someone can "not want" to do something, but still do it for the enjoyment of someone else.

As an example, I may "not want" to go shopping with my spouse, but that doesn't mean I did not consent to go shopping with her if I choose to willingly and informedly go with her to the mall for that purpose, because I knew it would make her happy to have me along. I may not "like" shopping, but that doesn't mean she's kidnapped me or holding me hostage.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:08 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:What does equal "did not consent" exactly?


Someone can "not want" to do something, but still do it for the enjoyment of someone else.

As an example, I may "not want" to go shopping with my spouse, but that doesn't mean I did not consent to go shopping with her if I choose to willingly and informedly go with her to the mall for that purpose, because I knew it would make her happy to have me along. I may not "like" shopping, but that doesn't mean she's kidnapped me or holding me hostage.

So you're not going to answer my question.
Last edited by The Parkus Empire on Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:08 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
Saveyou Island wrote:No.
The question says "DID YOU HAVE SEX WITH HER AGAINST HER OWN WILL?"


No, that's not what it asked. It asked, word for word, what I just typed. I literally used copy/paste.

"Didn't want to" does not mean "did not consent".

What's your point?
Did not consent= She was against having sexual intercourse with you, at that time, and doing so would be considered rape. Just like if it was a random person.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:09 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:What does equal "did not consent" exactly?


Someone can "not want" to do something, but still do it for the enjoyment of someone else.
.

Then they're allowing them to do so, which means giving consent.
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:10 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote::oops:
Aurora Novus wrote:
Someone can "not want" to do something, but still do it for the enjoyment of someone else.

As an example, I may "not want" to go shopping with my spouse, but that doesn't mean I did not consent to go shopping with her if I choose to willingly and informedly go with her to the mall for that purpose, because I knew it would make her happy to have me along. I may not "like" shopping, but that doesn't mean she's kidnapped me or holding me hostage.

So you're not going to answer my question.


...I just answered it. Literally in the post you just quoted. Unless I'm missing something, you're asking me to justify my distinction between "wanting/liking" something, and "consenting" to something. Well...there it is. Right there. You just quoted it.

User avatar
Mizrah
Diplomat
 
Posts: 821
Founded: Oct 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mizrah » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:11 pm

Different peoples have different cultures have different views. It is what it is.
Political Compass:
Economic Left: -10
Social Libertarian: -7

User avatar
Saveyou Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Saveyou Island » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:12 pm

Mizrah wrote:Different peoples have different cultures have different views. It is what it is.

So, are you saying rape is fucking acceptable in other cultures?
What... Please tell me I misunderstood that...
Ambassador Jack Fort, author of GA#264
Anything I posted before 2016 is stupid and should be ignored. That partially includes GA 264.

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:12 pm

Saveyou Island wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
Someone can "not want" to do something, but still do it for the enjoyment of someone else.
.

Then they're allowing them to do so, which means giving consent.


...Exactly. That's my point.

But by the wording of the question, according to the survey, this factors into their percentage of men who have "raped" someone. Hence my complaint and distrust of the results. My point is the survey tried to equate "lack of desire" to "lack of consent". Which is false.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:12 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote::oops:
So you're not going to answer my question.


...I just answered it. Literally in the post you just quoted. Unless I'm missing something, you're asking me to justify my distinction between "wanting/liking" something, and "consenting" to something. Well...there it is. Right there. You just quoted it.

No, you did not. You said what you think giving consent is, but you did not illustrate what you think not giving consent is.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32085
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Sep 10, 2013 8:13 pm

I suspect this is an issue for self proclaimed feminists to address after they've finally defeated the benign rape joke.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Dimetrodon Empire, Hidrandia, Hispida, Khardsland, La Xinga, Port Myreal, Stratonesia, Thermodolia, Uiiop, Upper Magica, Walikaistan, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads