by Nevanmaa » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:03 am
by Cosmopoles » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:10 am
Nevanmaa wrote:trying to "prevent" menstruation using tampons and such is oppressive to women
heck, this might even include a tampon! remember, this is about you and what’s comfortable for you
by Zottistan » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:12 am
by Conscentia » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:13 am
Nevanmaa wrote:Our dear friends, the third wave feminists, have come up with an idea that's guaranteed to go make you go "they're gonna do WHAT?!"
Basically, some feminists have decided that trying to "prevent" menstruation using tampons and such is oppressive to women. Luckily these clever little feminists have come up with a solution: free bleeding. Basically, letting themselves bleed all over the place as a sign of female empowerment. Tampons are a symbol of evil patriarchy after all.
Here's some more info: http://community.feministing.com/2012/0 ... ves-bleed/
So, what do you think of the concept of free bleeding (if you're a male) and would you consider bleeding all over the place (if you're female)?
I obviously think that this is ridiculous, but I enjoy the fact that fucked up ideas like these destroy the credibility of feminists as awhole. Thus, I must say that I like embrace things new ideas like this.
heck, this might even include a tampon! remember, this is about you and what’s comfortable for you
Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
by Novislavia » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:28 am
Work in progress: Socialst Republic of Novislavia (IIwiki)
by Arumdaum » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:33 am
by Priory Academy USSR » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:33 am
by Wind in the Willows » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:34 am
Arumdaum wrote:What's so wrong about it anyway?
by Tubbsalot » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:34 am
Nevanmaa wrote:I obviously think that this is ridiculous, but I enjoy the fact that fucked up ideas like these destroy the credibility of feminists as awhole. Thus, I must say that I like embrace things new ideas like this.
by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:35 am
by Nevanmaa » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:39 am
Tubbsalot wrote:Nevanmaa wrote:I obviously think that this is ridiculous, but I enjoy the fact that fucked up ideas like these destroy the credibility of feminists as awhole. Thus, I must say that I like embrace things new ideas like this.
Just out of curiosity, the point of deleting nations is to reduce this sort of thing, right?
Where by "this sort of thing" I mean inflammatory posting at best and trolling at worst?
I do hope the mods are keeping an eye on you.
by Novislavia » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:41 am
Arumdaum wrote:What's so wrong about it anyway?
Work in progress: Socialst Republic of Novislavia (IIwiki)
by Hurdegaryp » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:42 am
Agritum wrote:....it's just an idea. A provocative idea.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:43 am
Novislavia wrote:Arumdaum wrote:What's so wrong about it anyway?
As much as I like to criticize Nevanmaa for always making mountains out of molehills, it still is kind of gross.
Just a smidgen.
At least from this young, heterosexual, adult male's perspective.
It seems like a stunt being pulled by radical feminists if anything and probably shouldn't be taken to heart. Though, again, I don't see this as really a big deal and it probably doesn't deserve a thread all in its own.
by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:44 am
by Wind in the Willows » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:45 am
by Nevanmaa » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:46 am
by Novislavia » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:48 am
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Novislavia wrote:As much as I like to criticize Nevanmaa for always making mountains out of molehills, it still is kind of gross.
Just a smidgen.
At least from this young, heterosexual, adult male's perspective.
It seems like a stunt being pulled by radical feminists if anything and probably shouldn't be taken to heart. Though, again, I don't see this as really a big deal and it probably doesn't deserve a thread all in its own.
From this panromantic "curious" homosexual just-adult slightly-non-binary male perspective, perhaps even more.
Yeah. Radical feminists tend to be transphobic as fuck. I'd support giving some of them hate group status.
Work in progress: Socialst Republic of Novislavia (IIwiki)
by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:48 am
by Priory Academy USSR » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:49 am
by The Grey Wolf » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:49 am
by Hurdegaryp » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:50 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:51 am
Novislavia wrote:They're probably no more of an issue than full-blown whatever the opposite of them are. Radical masculinists? Like this topic, it's not too much of an issue.
by Novislavia » Sat Sep 07, 2013 3:52 am
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Novislavia wrote:They're probably no more of an issue than full-blown whatever the opposite of them are. Radical masculinists? Like this topic, it's not too much of an issue.
Radical masculinists are fucking dangerous in some areas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_de_Jan ... l_shooting
In the Portuguese Wikipedia article you can see sources for the guy's links to the Brazilian ultra-conservative masculinist movements. He converted to Islam, was some reject fuck and a schizo, and our equivalent to Columbine happened (only young teenager girls were purposefully killed).
Work in progress: Socialst Republic of Novislavia (IIwiki)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Almighty Biden, Ancientania, Deblar, Eahland, Ethel mermania, General TN, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ifreann, Maximum Imperium Rex, Neocortexia, Polles, Sarduri, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement