Well played sir, well played indeed. Don't forget that Left 4 Dead 2 is in the South, that must be good for something.
Advertisement
by Bavin » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:09 pm
by Redslavia » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:09 pm
Bavin wrote:
Well played sir, well played indeed. Don't forget that Left 4 Dead 2 is in the South, that must be good for something.
by Bavin » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:10 pm
by F1-Insanity » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:12 pm
The opinion of Henry Brooks Adams, that I completely share:“Between the slave power and states' rights there was no necessary connection. The slave power, when in control, was a centralizing influence, and all the most considerable encroachments on states' rights were its acts. The acquisition and admission of Louisiana; the Embargo; the War of 1812; the annexation of Texas "by joint resolution" [rather than treaty]; the war with Mexico, declared by the mere announcement of President Polk; the Fugitive Slave Law; the Dred Scott decision — all triumphs of the slave power — did far more than either tariffs or internal improvements, which in their origin were also southern measures, to destroy the very memory of states' rights as they existed in 1789.
by Euro-Trash » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:13 pm
Skynyrd Nati0n wrote:Many people say that the Confederate flag stands for hate and that the KKK and the Nazis are part of the South. But those are all LIES. Lies that gave the South a bad reputation. Lies that that killed people. Im just telling the world of Nation States that The confederate flag doesnt stand for hate. IT'S HERITAGE NOT HATE!!!!!!!!!
by Neu California » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:13 pm
SdKfz 186 wrote:UAWC wrote:-sigh-
I think conservatism (okay, the southern states) in America needs to asplode. Seriously. I'm sick of it. And I don't even live there. Everything people hate about America comes from there - the militaristic attitude and foreign policy, the stupidity of citizens, the greed, the douchebaggery, the obnoxious individualism, and of couse...Bush. I said it. And don't tell me you didn't want to say it, too.
And don't forget who were the last ones to abolish slavery.
Lincoln only freed the slaves because he wanted them to revolt and join the northern military force to topple the south.
And the war was not about slavery, it was about state government rights and taxation.
by F1-Insanity » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:13 pm
by Hebalobia » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:13 pm
Skynyrd Nati0n wrote:Many people say that the Confederate flag stands for hate and that the KKK and the Nazis are part of the South. But those are all LIES. Lies that gave the South a bad reputation. Lies that that killed people. Im just telling the world of Nation States that The confederate flag doesnt stand for hate. IT'S HERITAGE NOT HATE!!!!!!!!!
by Bavin » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:13 pm
by Maurepas » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:14 pm
Bavin wrote:
Well played sir, well played indeed. Don't forget that Left 4 Dead 2 is in the South, that must be good for something.
by Euro-Trash » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:15 pm
by Bavin » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:16 pm
by Illithar » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:17 pm
by Bavin » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:17 pm
Neu California wrote:SdKfz 186 wrote:UAWC wrote:-sigh-
I think conservatism (okay, the southern states) in America needs to asplode. Seriously. I'm sick of it. And I don't even live there. Everything people hate about America comes from there - the militaristic attitude and foreign policy, the stupidity of citizens, the greed, the douchebaggery, the obnoxious individualism, and of couse...Bush. I said it. And don't tell me you didn't want to say it, too.
And don't forget who were the last ones to abolish slavery.
Lincoln only freed the slaves because he wanted them to revolt and join the northern military force to topple the south.
I've NEVER heard of this before. Do you have a source?And the war was not about slavery, it was about state government rights and taxation.
What state government rights? I asked this earlier in the thread and didn't get a response.
by F1-Insanity » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:17 pm
Zeppy wrote:Euro-Trash wrote:Skynyrd Nati0n wrote:Many people say that the Confederate flag stands for hate and that the KKK and the Nazis are part of the South. But those are all LIES. Lies that gave the South a bad reputation. Lies that that killed people. Im just telling the world of Nation States that The confederate flag doesnt stand for hate. IT'S HERITAGE NOT HATE!!!!!!!!!
This reminds me of the Swastika, perverted by the Nazi Germany created under the Third Reich. The Swastika was a Wholesome Symbol. It was an Asian Symbol of Piece! However, Hitler and the Third Reich used as their new nation's flag and made it the 'face' of the Holocaust. The Southern Flag is much the same way. It was Made as a Symbol for Inbreed Hicks and Rednecks, who, are, a stereotype in themselves. And what Inbreed Hicks and Rednecks symbolize is Racism, Hate, and Poor Ethics. Make sense?
The Finnish also had the Swastika as their machine badge. How weird must it have been when Germany invaded and fought the FAF?
by Buffett and Colbert » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:18 pm
Illithar wrote:This has nothing to do with anything, but I was on my high school debate team and during one of the practice debates we discussed this very issue.
My opponent made the claim that the Confederate flag pre-dated the constitution and therefore was not protected by the first amendment (free speech).
I won.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Maurepas » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:18 pm
Bavin wrote:
That is correct. At the time, weren't they trying to negotiate over the Federal Property in the South? Wasn't Lincoln just trying to supply the Fort with food?
by Illithar » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:18 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Illithar wrote:This has nothing to do with anything, but I was on my high school debate team and during one of the practice debates we discussed this very issue.
My opponent made the claim that the Confederate flag pre-dated the constitution and therefore was not protected by the first amendment (free speech).
I won.
You beat a moron. Amazing
Would you like a medal?
by Bavin » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:19 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Illithar wrote:This has nothing to do with anything, but I was on my high school debate team and during one of the practice debates we discussed this very issue.
My opponent made the claim that the Confederate flag pre-dated the constitution and therefore was not protected by the first amendment (free speech).
I won.
You beat a moron. Amazing
Would you like a medal?
by Bavin » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:20 pm
Maurepas wrote:Bavin wrote:
That is correct. At the time, weren't they trying to negotiate over the Federal Property in the South? Wasn't Lincoln just trying to supply the Fort with food?
Well, yes and no, Lincoln had begun raising troops already by that point(Robert E. Lee had in fact been asked to lead the army being raised, ironically enough)and there were no real negotiations on what to do with Federal Property, the States considered all land within its boundaries to be its own, just as the Federal Government considered all land to be its...
Now, yes, Lincoln was just resupplying the fort with food, but, when an Army's being raised to the north of you, thats not always obvious...to use a later example, see the Lusitania...
by Maurepas » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:23 pm
Bavin wrote:Maurepas wrote:Bavin wrote:
That is correct. At the time, weren't they trying to negotiate over the Federal Property in the South? Wasn't Lincoln just trying to supply the Fort with food?
Well, yes and no, Lincoln had begun raising troops already by that point(Robert E. Lee had in fact been asked to lead the army being raised, ironically enough)and there were no real negotiations on what to do with Federal Property, the States considered all land within its boundaries to be its own, just as the Federal Government considered all land to be its...
Now, yes, Lincoln was just resupplying the fort with food, but, when an Army's being raised to the north of you, thats not always obvious...to use a later example, see the Lusitania...
So its no one's fault, and this whole argument was rather pointless?
by Kynnytopia » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:25 pm
by F1-Insanity » Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:25 pm
Bavin wrote:Ya see, I thought Lincoln freed the slaves (in the south) to weaken them economically, while it is true that some African Americans joined Union Army units, I doubt that that was Lincoln's original intent.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Google [Bot], Kostane, La Paz de Los Ricos, Likhinia, Shrillland, Statesburg
Advertisement