Letters and numbers are confusing, OK? And are basically the same thing!

Advertisement

by Unionist State of Scotland » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:06 am
Patriarch wrote:Britanno wrote:If you throw a load of funding into Manchester, Salford and Manchester can merge to create a brilliant city. Although it would take a lot of funding to have decent buildings connecting the two.
Everyone knows they're one city already. It's just a pretence on the part of Salford to say otherwise.

by Caltarania » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:07 am

by Aquafireland » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:11 am

by Azaflaza » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:11 am
Caltarania wrote:
That program literally makes me think "I really need to invest in a shotgun..." So that I can put those students out of their misery O.O
As a student myself, I can say that the school I go to (Wetherby High) isn't that back. Or at least, we know the difference between letters and numbers. O.O
Shaved them all off.
by Angleter » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:11 am

by Glasgia » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:12 am
Unionist State of Scotland wrote:Glasgia wrote:1) Glasgow
2) Glasgow
3) Give them all tents while we built a shitton of council houses in the south-east, to balance out the poverty levels, and around major cities.
Wooh! Weegies, unite! Nice to see another, though I'll have to ask if you're hun or taig?
On the underground...
Hun, but try to stay the hell away from that whole thing if you know what I mean.
Seriously, it's no more than religion and football, and for me just the latter. I moved to the south coast a few years ago and if I met anyone from Hampshire online, I'd ask 'Scummer or Scate?'
by Napkiraly » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:13 am
Caltarania wrote:
That program literally makes me think "I really need to invest in a shotgun..." So that I can put those students out of their misery O.O
As a student myself, I can say that the school I go to (Wetherby High) isn't that back. Or at least, we know the difference between letters and numbers. O.O


by Rio Cana » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:15 am

by Napkiraly » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:17 am
Rio Cana wrote:A new capital city would need to be built. One that meets todays and future standards. Chances are it would not be has big and would consist of mostly middle to wealth people. Working class and low income would be spread around in towns outside the Capital city.
So the new Capital should be built on the Isle of Wright. It would be the Singapore of Europe/
Location of the island. Large map.
http://mapsofworld.himmera.com/maps/Eng ... _2_big.gif
Large map of the island.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Isle_ ... ta_map.png

by Caltarania » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:18 am
Rio Cana wrote:A new capital city would need to be built. One that meets todays and future standards. Chances are it would not be has big and would consist of mostly middle to wealthy people. Working class and low income would be spread around in towns outside the Capital city.
So the new Capital should be built on the Isle of Wright. It would be the Singapore of Europe since its location is strategic.
Location of the island. Large map.
http://mapsofworld.himmera.com/maps/Eng ... _2_big.gif
Large map of the island.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Isle_ ... ta_map.png


by Glasgia » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:18 am
Rio Cana wrote:A new capital city would need to be built. One that meets todays and future standards. Chances are it would not be has big and would consist of mostly middle to wealth people. Working class and low income would be spread around in towns outside the Capital city.
So the new Capital should be built on the Isle of Wright. It would be the Singapore of Europe/
Location of the island. Large map.
http://mapsofworld.himmera.com/maps/Eng ... _2_big.gif
Large map of the island.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Isle_ ... ta_map.png

by Glasgia » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:19 am
Aquafireland wrote:Why is there a choice for Glasgow? All the way up there? The weather is bad enough...I just don't picture it as the best place for the capital of England.

by Caltarania » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:20 am

by Forsakia » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:22 am
Caltarania wrote:Britanno wrote:If you throw a load of funding into Manchester, Salford and Manchester can merge to create a brilliant city. Although it would take a lot of funding to have decent buildings connecting the two.
You could do the same thing with Leeds and Bradford, with much less funding, because they basically are one city already. (Hence Leeds-Bradford Airport, etc)


by Glasgia » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:23 am
Caltarania wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Just saw this. Please say this is a joke.
#Leeds4Capital
Seriously though. Glasgow would be a logistical nightmare for a capital. Leeds is central on the island of Great Britain. Either we get it, or the Manx do. And considering that the Isle of Mann is a Crown Dependency...
Aquafireland wrote:Why is there a choice for Glasgow? All the way up there? The weather is bad enough...I just don't picture it as the best place for the capital of England.

by Britanno » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:24 am

by Caltarania » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:26 am
Glasgia wrote:Caltarania wrote:
#Leeds4Capital
Seriously though. Glasgow would be a logistical nightmare for a capital. Leeds is central on the island of Great Britain. Either we get it, or the Manx do. And considering that the Isle of Mann is a Crown Dependency...
Glasgow is about as far north as London is south, so I seriously doubt your logistical problems, but that's not my point:Aquafireland wrote:Why is there a choice for Glasgow? All the way up there? The weather is bad enough...I just don't picture it as the best place for the capital of England.
)
by Forsakia » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:29 am
Caltarania wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Glasgow is about as far north as London is south, so I seriously doubt your logistical problems, but that's not my point:
Ah, understood. I hate incorrect terminology also.
But that raises an important point, where would the de jure capital of England, the constituent country, be? Leeds, or York.
You say that, but Leeds Rhino's are actually pretty good (I think, sport isn't my forte)
And, Leeds is one of the largest economic areas outside of London. With Bradford too, it's only going to grow.

by Napkiraly » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:31 am

by Caltarania » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:33 am
Napkiraly wrote:Another reason that Birmingham is good is because it's near Coventry. Coventry has an ice hockey team. Bam, capital makes ice hockey popular in the UK, thus raising it's standard of living considerably.

Forsakia wrote:Caltarania wrote:
Ah, understood. I hate incorrect terminology also.
But that raises an important point, where would the de jure capital of England, the constituent country, be? Leeds, or York.
You say that, but Leeds Rhino's are actually pretty good (I think, sport isn't my forte)
And, Leeds is one of the largest economic areas outside of London. With Bradford too, it's only going to grow.
They are but it's the wrong sort of rugby. Leeds (Tykes? Carnegie?) are not all that alas.

by Glasgia » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:35 am
Caltarania wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Glasgow is about as far north as London is south, so I seriously doubt your logistical problems, but that's not my point:
Ah, understood. I hate incorrect terminology also.
But that raises an important point, where would the de jure capital of England, the constituent country, be? Leeds, or York.
Caltarania wrote:
You say that, but Leeds Rhino's are actually pretty good (I think, sport isn't my forte)
And, Leeds is one of the largest economic areas outside of London. With Bradford too, it's only going to grow.

by Caltarania » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:43 am
Glasgia wrote:Pah, Rugby League. "Six seconds of tickling! Three, two, one... That's it! Break it up!"
Anyway, Glasgow's bigger in terms of population and, thanks to the docks and financial district, probably a lot larger economically.

by Greater Polynesia » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:46 am

by Patriarch » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:48 am
Glasgia wrote:Pah, Rugby League. "Six seconds of tickling! Three, two, one... That's it! Break it up!"
Anyway, Glasgow's bigger in terms of population and, thanks to the docks and financial district, probably a lot larger economically.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Applebania, Fartsniffage, Grinning Dragon, The Astral Mandate, The Confederate States of America
Advertisement