NATION

PASSWORD

6 Weeks Left Congress

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:12 am

Duvniask wrote:
Distruzio wrote:They'll raise the ceiling. I'd rather they let shit hit the fan but... *meh*

Why would you want that?


Blasveck wrote:
Distruzio wrote:They'll raise the ceiling. I'd rather they let shit hit the fan but... *meh*


Why?

If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?

That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.


It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?
Last edited by Distruzio on Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:12 am

Distruzio wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Why?

If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?

That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.


It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?

No.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:13 am

Divair wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?

No.


*shrug*

Probably correct about that. Perhaps I've too much faith in the American public.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:13 am

Distruzio wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Why?

If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?

That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.


It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?


Of course.

You know my political leanings Dis.

Granted, I doubt anybody would learn anything. I tend to take an apathetic view of humanity concerning politics, economics, the debt ceiling, etc.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:13 am

Distruzio wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Why would you want that?


Blasveck wrote:
Why?

If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?

That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.


It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?

I think you overestimate the citizens of the US. Half of them would blame the republicans the other half would blame the democrats. And they'd still vote the same way.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:14 am

Distruzio wrote:
Divair wrote:No.


*shrug*

Probably correct about that. Perhaps I've too much faith in the American public.

It's ok. We've all been there.
*pats back*

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:14 am

Distruzio wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Why would you want that?


Blasveck wrote:
Why?

If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?

That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.


It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?

I think you overestimate the citizens of the US. Half of them would blame the republicans the other half would blame the democrats. And they'd still vote the same way.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:15 am

Olivaero wrote:
Distruzio wrote:


It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?

I think you overestimate the citizens of the US. Half of them would blame the republicans the other half would blame the democrats. And they'd still vote the same way.


I feel that quote about "anti-intellectualism" fits perfectly here.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:16 am

Let the government run out of money, but compromise and raise the debt ceiling if the personal mandate enforcement is defunded.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:18 am

Blasveck wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?


Of course.

You know my political leanings Dis.

Granted, I doubt anybody would learn anything. I tend to take an apathetic view of humanity concerning politics, economics, the debt ceiling, etc.



Similar disposition here although mine tends towards cynicism. I just want a shock to, perhaps, rattle the cage a bit. Then again, I'm not one of those bleeding hearts who believes everything will magically work better if partisans bickering is set aside and we all just get along. Adversity garners strength. If democracy's greatest attribute is the opportunity for prosperity through the adversity endemic to it, then we should, I think, hope for a better facilitation of that adversity. Not raising the debt ceiling may do just that.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:19 am

Divair wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
*shrug*

Probably correct about that. Perhaps I've too much faith in the American public.

It's ok. We've all been there.
*pats back*


Thanks, brother.

Olivaero wrote:I think you overestimate the citizens of the US. Half of them would blame the republicans the other half would blame the democrats. And they'd still vote the same way.


:(

*le sigh*
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:21 am

Gunstan wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Source all that please.

And please, don't forget about the two longest depressions in American history during that time period as well.




Dont forget about the 11 reccesions since 1913, including the Great Depression idioto.

See, here's the thing. With the exception of the Great Depression, where the Fed Reserve acted stupidly and caused a deflationary spiral (i.e., the exact same things you want our monetary policy to do), those recessions have been mild. Nearly all of the recessions prior to the existence of the Federal Reserve were depressions, and quite severe ones.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:23 am

Distruzio wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
Of course.

You know my political leanings Dis.

Granted, I doubt anybody would learn anything. I tend to take an apathetic view of humanity concerning politics, economics, the debt ceiling, etc.



Similar disposition here although mine tends towards cynicism. I just want a shock to, perhaps, rattle the cage a bit. Then again, I'm not one of those bleeding hearts who believes everything will magically work better if partisans bickering is set aside and we all just get along. Adversity garners strength. If democracy's greatest attribute is the opportunity for prosperity through the adversity endemic to it, then we should, I think, hope for a better facilitation of that adversity. Not raising the debt ceiling may do just that.


I doubt it.
I feel most would simply not care. If the economy turns to shambles after a decent recovery over the months, I feel most would simply give up, move, or not care.

Such is the way of modern society. We have iPhones, Luxury, and all the food we could want in America.

Brave New World-esque, If you will.

Not in the dystopic sense, but in the apathetic sense.
Last edited by Blasveck on Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:23 am

Olivaero wrote:
In 6 weeks (this is a rough number) from today, the US Government will be down to anything from 0$ to 50 billion (witch would last for less then a single day)

Congress seems to have few options

1. Let the government run out of money.

2. Raise debt ceiling (Nice way to say, we will deal with this later, when the problem is worse.)

3. There is no option 3 really, I suppose if worse came to worse the government could just start selling land,old military hardware,gold (assuming the gold is still there.)




So, what do you guys think the government should do?


Personnally, I think we need to end it and restart it.




The US government isn't a fucking computer you know, you can't turn it off and turn it back on again.

Usually when that happens we call it a revolution.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:24 am

Trotskylvania wrote:
Gunstan wrote:


Dont forget about the 11 reccesions since 1913, including the Great Depression idioto.

See, here's the thing. With the exception of the Great Depression, where the Fed Reserve acted stupidly and caused a deflationary spiral (i.e., the exact same things you want our monetary policy to do), those recessions have been mild. Nearly all of the recessions prior to the existence of the Federal Reserve were depressions, and quite severe ones.


What, would you say, the difference is between the two?
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:25 am

Blasveck wrote:
Olivaero wrote:I think you overestimate the citizens of the US. Half of them would blame the republicans the other half would blame the democrats. And they'd still vote the same way.


I feel that quote about "anti-intellectualism" fits perfectly here.

Hm I think Anti-Intellectualism plays a part but the Media also plays a massive part it takes the anti-intellectualism and capitalizes on it. Hence why we have a shit ton of people who believe that the national debt is just like a household one. Don't get me wrong I don't think a large national debt is a good thing but the prevalence of using verbatim the arguments repeated by talking heads or not even listening to any one and just making up conclusions from the large numbers is ridiculous.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Nigerian Kenya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 810
Founded: Jan 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nigerian Kenya » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:29 am

Obviously, we can't default on our debt, and shutting down the government isn't good either. Since we're already so close to the debt limit; we need emergency procedures. First, let's raise the debt ceiling without conditions to 17 trillion (an increase of about $300 billion) as a quick fix to buy time. We should also pass a "status quo" continuing resolution that lasts until the end of January or so. Next, we need to design a plan to balance the budget in 15 years, through a combination of closing tax loopholes (without lowering rates), raising the retirement age, and cutting defense spending to a level more comparable to what the rest of the world spends. The 15 year balance plan would also include a second increase in the debt ceiling, to a level of $20 trillion.

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:34 am

Distruzio wrote:
Trotskylvania wrote:See, here's the thing. With the exception of the Great Depression, where the Fed Reserve acted stupidly and caused a deflationary spiral (i.e., the exact same things you want our monetary policy to do), those recessions have been mild. Nearly all of the recessions prior to the existence of the Federal Reserve were depressions, and quite severe ones.


What, would you say, the difference is between the two?

The role that monetary policy plays in macroeconomic events.

Without a central banking institution, it is impossible to guarantee price stability. So, as a result, prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve there were wild swings between inflation and deflation, and this ruined business confidence.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:44 am

Trotskylvania wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
What, would you say, the difference is between the two?

The role that monetary policy plays in macroeconomic events.

Without a central banking institution, it is impossible to guarantee price stability. So, as a result, prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve there were wild swings between inflation and deflation, and this ruined business confidence.


Yes... I'm aware of that. I'm curious what you believe the difference between recession and depression is. If price instability and a diminished business confidence is the parameter you perceive, then what is the threshold?
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Vicswampia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1172
Founded: Aug 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vicswampia » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:46 am

And that's what happens when you mix weed with PCP, kids.

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:50 am

Distruzio wrote:
Trotskylvania wrote:The role that monetary policy plays in macroeconomic events.

Without a central banking institution, it is impossible to guarantee price stability. So, as a result, prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve there were wild swings between inflation and deflation, and this ruined business confidence.


Yes... I'm aware of that. I'm curious what you believe the difference between recession and depression is. If price instability and a diminished business confidence is the parameter you perceive, then what is the threshold?

I thought you were asking what resulted in the difference. The most common definition of a depression is a recession that results in a 10 percent decline in real GDP, or last more than two years.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:55 am

Trotskylvania wrote:
Olivaero wrote:


The US government isn't a fucking computer you know, you can't turn it off and turn it back on again.

Usually when that happens we call it a revolution.

It however wouldn't fix anything which was my point. And in fact if the new government didn't take up the responsibility for paying the old debt it would make the global economy a hell of a lot worse
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55273
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:57 am

Rutheinia wrote:
Bombadil wrote:Sell Florida..

Everyone knows this is the right answer.

Hey! And who exactly do you plan on selling us to?


Depends on how the auction goes, I guess.

Y DO U H8 TEH FREE MARKET? :lol:
.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:02 am

Trotskylvania wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
Yes... I'm aware of that. I'm curious what you believe the difference between recession and depression is. If price instability and a diminished business confidence is the parameter you perceive, then what is the threshold?

I thought you were asking what resulted in the difference. The most common definition of a depression is a recession that results in a 10 percent decline in real GDP, or last more than two years.


The historical difference in reference to recessions or depressions is after the great depression the public became scared of the term depression, so politicians created the term recession. Historians refer to Pre 1930's depressions by their contemporary usage, because we simply lack the data to determine if they would meet the modern definition of depression (with the exception of the long depression).
Spurious Volatility in Historical Unemployment Data by Christina Romer touches on the problem of claiming that prior recessions were more severe then present and her methodology suggest they are about the same.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:32 am

greed and death wrote:
Trotskylvania wrote:I thought you were asking what resulted in the difference. The most common definition of a depression is a recession that results in a 10 percent decline in real GDP, or last more than two years.


The historical difference in reference to recessions or depressions is after the great depression the public became scared of the term depression, so politicians created the term recession. Historians refer to Pre 1930's depressions by their contemporary usage, because we simply lack the data to determine if they would meet the modern definition of depression (with the exception of the long depression).
Spurious Volatility in Historical Unemployment Data by Christina Romer touches on the problem of claiming that prior recessions were more severe then present and her methodology suggest they are about the same.

That's ridiculous of her to focus on unemployment data. Looking at broader contexts of economic activity makes the clearly worse than most than post New Deal recessions. Unemployment is the main threat in a developed capitalist economy with stronger labor protections. But during the 1800s, far more people were self-employed, either in agriculture or in small scale artisan production or single proprietorships. Not only were employers more likely to slash wages then, but people who were self-employed but nonetheless still engaged in the system of commodity production would see declining living standards and income during a depression.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Ancientania, El Lazaro, Floofybit, Plan Neonie, Rominalos, Siluvia, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest

Advertisement

Remove ads