It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?
Advertisement
by Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:12 am
by Divair » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:12 am
Distruzio wrote:Blasveck wrote:
Why?
If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?
That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.
It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?
by Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:13 am
by Blasveck » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:13 am
Distruzio wrote:Blasveck wrote:
Why?
If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?
That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.
It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?
by Olivaero » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:13 am
Distruzio wrote:Duvniask wrote:Why would you want that?Blasveck wrote:
Why?
If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?
That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.
It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?
by Olivaero » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:14 am
Distruzio wrote:Duvniask wrote:Why would you want that?Blasveck wrote:
Why?
If the debt ceiling isn't raised, all those government employees (And there's quite a few of them) won't get a paycheck, right?
That seems pretty bad for a recovering economy.
It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?
by Blasveck » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:15 am
Olivaero wrote:Distruzio wrote:
It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?
I think you overestimate the citizens of the US. Half of them would blame the republicans the other half would blame the democrats. And they'd still vote the same way.
by Greed and Death » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:16 am
by Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:18 am
Blasveck wrote:Distruzio wrote:
It would be. Catastrophic even. But... it'd force the public to become mindful of who the hell they put into office for a while, wouldn't it?
Of course.
You know my political leanings Dis.
Granted, I doubt anybody would learn anything. I tend to take an apathetic view of humanity concerning politics, economics, the debt ceiling, etc.
by Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:19 am
Olivaero wrote:I think you overestimate the citizens of the US. Half of them would blame the republicans the other half would blame the democrats. And they'd still vote the same way.
by Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:21 am
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Blasveck » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:23 am
Distruzio wrote:Blasveck wrote:
Of course.
You know my political leanings Dis.
Granted, I doubt anybody would learn anything. I tend to take an apathetic view of humanity concerning politics, economics, the debt ceiling, etc.
Similar disposition here although mine tends towards cynicism. I just want a shock to, perhaps, rattle the cage a bit. Then again, I'm not one of those bleeding hearts who believes everything will magically work better if partisans bickering is set aside and we all just get along. Adversity garners strength. If democracy's greatest attribute is the opportunity for prosperity through the adversity endemic to it, then we should, I think, hope for a better facilitation of that adversity. Not raising the debt ceiling may do just that.
by Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:23 am
Olivaero wrote:In 6 weeks (this is a rough number) from today, the US Government will be down to anything from 0$ to 50 billion (witch would last for less then a single day)
Congress seems to have few options
1. Let the government run out of money.
2. Raise debt ceiling (Nice way to say, we will deal with this later, when the problem is worse.)
3. There is no option 3 really, I suppose if worse came to worse the government could just start selling land,old military hardware,gold (assuming the gold is still there.)
So, what do you guys think the government should do?
Personnally, I think we need to end it and restart it.
The US government isn't a fucking computer you know, you can't turn it off and turn it back on again.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:24 am
Trotskylvania wrote:Gunstan wrote:
Dont forget about the 11 reccesions since 1913, including the Great Depression idioto.
See, here's the thing. With the exception of the Great Depression, where the Fed Reserve acted stupidly and caused a deflationary spiral (i.e., the exact same things you want our monetary policy to do), those recessions have been mild. Nearly all of the recessions prior to the existence of the Federal Reserve were depressions, and quite severe ones.
by Olivaero » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:25 am
by Nigerian Kenya » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:29 am
by Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:34 am
Distruzio wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:See, here's the thing. With the exception of the Great Depression, where the Fed Reserve acted stupidly and caused a deflationary spiral (i.e., the exact same things you want our monetary policy to do), those recessions have been mild. Nearly all of the recessions prior to the existence of the Federal Reserve were depressions, and quite severe ones.
What, would you say, the difference is between the two?
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Distruzio » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:44 am
Trotskylvania wrote:Distruzio wrote:
What, would you say, the difference is between the two?
The role that monetary policy plays in macroeconomic events.
Without a central banking institution, it is impossible to guarantee price stability. So, as a result, prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve there were wild swings between inflation and deflation, and this ruined business confidence.
by Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:50 am
Distruzio wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:The role that monetary policy plays in macroeconomic events.
Without a central banking institution, it is impossible to guarantee price stability. So, as a result, prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve there were wild swings between inflation and deflation, and this ruined business confidence.
Yes... I'm aware of that. I'm curious what you believe the difference between recession and depression is. If price instability and a diminished business confidence is the parameter you perceive, then what is the threshold?
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Olivaero » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:55 am
by Greed and Death » Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:02 am
Trotskylvania wrote:Distruzio wrote:
Yes... I'm aware of that. I'm curious what you believe the difference between recession and depression is. If price instability and a diminished business confidence is the parameter you perceive, then what is the threshold?
I thought you were asking what resulted in the difference. The most common definition of a depression is a recession that results in a 10 percent decline in real GDP, or last more than two years.
by Trotskylvania » Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:32 am
greed and death wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:I thought you were asking what resulted in the difference. The most common definition of a depression is a recession that results in a 10 percent decline in real GDP, or last more than two years.
The historical difference in reference to recessions or depressions is after the great depression the public became scared of the term depression, so politicians created the term recession. Historians refer to Pre 1930's depressions by their contemporary usage, because we simply lack the data to determine if they would meet the modern definition of depression (with the exception of the long depression).
Spurious Volatility in Historical Unemployment Data by Christina Romer touches on the problem of claiming that prior recessions were more severe then present and her methodology suggest they are about the same.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Ancientania, El Lazaro, Floofybit, Plan Neonie, Rominalos, Siluvia, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest
Advertisement