NATION

PASSWORD

Does equality ever go too far?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:32 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Liriena wrote:If that is the case, then what are transgender people supposed to do?

Hold it until they get home, I guess.


To be fair, depending where you're at, that might be the better option regardless of what gender you are or with what gender you identify with.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:37 am

Leningrad Union wrote:Does equality ever go too far?
What do you think?

No.
Thus ends another episode of short answers for stupid questions.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Caltarania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12931
Founded: Feb 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Caltarania » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:39 am

No.

But people claiming to want equality, in order to be more-equal than others, that is wrong.
I'M FROM KYLARIS, AND I'M HERE TO HELP!

User avatar
Castille de Italia
Minister
 
Posts: 2580
Founded: Mar 22, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby Castille de Italia » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:40 am

Yes.
The Castillian Federation | La Fédération Castillia
Fraternité sous notre Fédération

Main Directory | Dramatis Personae | Pan Dienstadi World Airways | Latest Political Crisis

User avatar
Shaggai
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9342
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shaggai » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:03 am

Castille de Italia wrote:Yes.

How?
piss

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:09 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck8ipUWKeYc

Here is how equality goes too far.

Otherwise, no. Never.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:18 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck8ipUWKeYc

Here is how equality goes too far.

Otherwise, no. Never.


What the fuck did I just watch...

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:18 am

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck8ipUWKeYc

Here is how equality goes too far.

Otherwise, no. Never.


What the fuck did I just watch...


Communism in action :p
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:21 am

Leningrad Union wrote:Does equality ever go too far?

For example:
Special needs and handicapped kids at public schools possibly being a distraction.

No. If you aren't mature enough to consider handicapped classmates as any other classmate, you're the problem.

Transgender students using their chosen gender's bathroom.

Neither. Why do you have to peep at other people's genitalia, unless invited to do so?

The fact that you can make fun of any race you want, but if you say a thing about black people, you are toast.

Utter bullshit.
.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:55 am

Equality is fine, as long as I am more equal than everyone else.
[/sarcasm]
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Quackquackhonk
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 469
Founded: Jul 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Quackquackhonk » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:06 pm

Leningrad Union wrote:Does equality ever go too far?


...no? how could equality go to far?

For example:
Special needs and handicapped kids at public schools possibly being a distraction.


not an example of equality?

Transgender students using their chosen gender's bathroom.


is a problem because?

The fact that you can make fun of any race you want, but if you say a thing about black people, you are toast.


the second part of what you said undermines the first. your non-clear thought is a sign you really don't know what you're saying.

I personally believe that racism is unacceptable in all forms even against "crackas", but still wrong against blacks.


good for you?

I'm neutral about the transgender bathroom situation.


and no explanation is given as to why.

When I was in middle school the special needs students did distract me, all they did was walk around the school all day and it bothered me during a test. That isn't the main reason I was frustrated, I thought that they needed some sort of education besides walking around the school.


wtf is the above, i don't understand it at all.

What do you think?


your opening post is unclear. what are we supposed to be discussing, if enforcing equality among people ever goes too far? if that's the case, why don't you show some examples of equality going too far.

User avatar
Surfistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1700
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Surfistan » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:07 pm

No? Otherwise it's not true equality?!

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:08 pm

Risottia wrote:No. If you aren't mature enough to consider handicapped classmates as any other classmate, you're the problem.

If any other classmate moaned and drooled during class they would be thrown out.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Leningrad Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6184
Founded: Jul 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Leningrad Union » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:43 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Risottia wrote:No. If you aren't mature enough to consider handicapped classmates as any other classmate, you're the problem.

If any other classmate moaned and drooled during class they would be thrown out.

They weren't in my class, they roamed the hallways moaning and groaning. I considered them as fellow classmates, but let's be realistic. They were a distraction and needed a better education plan.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163908
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:45 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Leningrad Union wrote:Does equality ever go too far?
What do you think?

No.
Thus ends another episode of short answers for stupid questions.

Ninja'd
Ifreann wrote:
Leningrad Union wrote:Does equality ever go too far?

No.

Short answers, stupid questions, etc.

:P
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:46 pm

Leningrad Union wrote:They weren't in my class, they roamed the hallways moaning and groaning. I considered them as fellow classmates, but let's be realistic. They were a distraction and needed a better education plan.


How much do you know about their education plans? Mine had a focus on "life skills" they learned to clean and cook and understand basic emotional responses because that was how they were going to become functioning members of society. Sure they often weren't in a classroom but they were learning.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Lithosano
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lithosano » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:49 pm

Leningrad Union wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:If any other classmate moaned and drooled during class they would be thrown out.

They weren't in my class, they roamed the hallways moaning and groaning. I considered them as fellow classmates, but let's be realistic. They were a distraction and needed a better education plan.


The way your phrase it implies that the special needs students were wandering the hallways without any sort of supervision or purpose.

If that was the case, then the problem is with your school and their seeming inability to handle their special needs students.
Learn Things AND Feed the Hungry!
Pro: Social Democracy, Humanism, Equality, Roosevelt, Free science, US Dollar Coin, Renewable and Nuclear Energy
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.77
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Gay Male

User avatar
Leningrad Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6184
Founded: Jul 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Leningrad Union » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:50 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Leningrad Union wrote:They weren't in my class, they roamed the hallways moaning and groaning. I considered them as fellow classmates, but let's be realistic. They were a distraction and needed a better education plan.


How much do you know about their education plans? Mine had a focus on "life skills" they learned to clean and cook and understand basic emotional responses because that was how they were going to become functioning members of society. Sure they often weren't in a classroom but they were learning.

They were doing chores around the school, still a possible learning experience. But wouldn't it be better for them to go to a special school and have 1 on 1 time with a teacher learning mathematics and language skills?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:52 pm

Leningrad Union wrote:They were doing chores around the school, still a possible learning experience. But wouldn't it be better for them to go to a special school and have 1 on 1 time with a teacher learning mathematics and language skills?


No. Because that isn't what they need. Being developmentally disabled means you have a hard time developing basic skills. Learning responsibility, learning to preform basic tasks, and basic life skills are all things that normal people pick up without any fuss. Their learning objectives aren't absent they are just different from yours.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Leningrad Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6184
Founded: Jul 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Leningrad Union » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:53 pm

Lithosano wrote:
Leningrad Union wrote:They weren't in my class, they roamed the hallways moaning and groaning. I considered them as fellow classmates, but let's be realistic. They were a distraction and needed a better education plan.


The way your phrase it implies that the special needs students were wandering the hallways without any sort of supervision or purpose.

If that was the case, then the problem is with your school and their seeming inability to handle their special needs students.

Half of the time, they weren't supervised. Apparently, in the bathroom they screamed and intimidated some of my friends when they were just trying to take a piss. A friend of mine started crying because he thought that they were unpredictable. (Remember, this was around 6th grade and my friend was 11) There should at least be a teacher standing next to the bathroom doorway.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:54 pm

South American Indochina wrote:
Liriena wrote:If that is the case, then what are transgender people supposed to do?

Their biological sex determines it.

So...send trans girls to men's restrooms? Brilliant!
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:55 pm

Liriena wrote:So...send trans girls to men's restrooms? Brilliant!


Why not?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:57 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Liriena wrote:So...send trans girls to men's restrooms? Brilliant!


Why not?

Because they will look like girls, act like girls, and be checked out like girls are.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Lithosano
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lithosano » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:58 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Liriena wrote:So...send trans girls to men's restrooms? Brilliant!


Why not?


Because a trans* woman in the boy's restroom is liable to get bullied, beaten up, or worse.

Seriously, can you imagine what would happen if a trans* woman who dresses in female clothes, carries a purse, and generally presents herself as female walks into a man's restroom? At best she will get some strange looks. At worst... see above.
Learn Things AND Feed the Hungry!
Pro: Social Democracy, Humanism, Equality, Roosevelt, Free science, US Dollar Coin, Renewable and Nuclear Energy
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.77
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Gay Male

User avatar
Lithosano
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lithosano » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:58 pm

Lost heros wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Why not?

Because they will look like girls, act like girls, and be checked out like girls are.


Until the boys find out she isn't an "actual girl."
Learn Things AND Feed the Hungry!
Pro: Social Democracy, Humanism, Equality, Roosevelt, Free science, US Dollar Coin, Renewable and Nuclear Energy
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.77
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Gay Male

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arnarquilandia, Bear Stearns, British Arzelentaxmacone, Haganham, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Maximum Imperium Rex, Philjia, Shearoa, Tarsonis, Tungstan, Western Theram, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads