NATION

PASSWORD

"Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should the phrase "under God" be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance?

Yes
429
62%
No
260
38%
 
Total votes : 689

User avatar
Kington Langley
Minister
 
Posts: 3039
Founded: Nov 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kington Langley » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:37 am

They should get rid of the pledge of allegiance in schools full stop. It seems a bit like state-endorsed propaganda/brainwashing from my humble British perspective. When I first learnt about it, at first I didn't believe it, it put me in mind of Nazi Germany and the Hitler Youth. Coming from a nation where a politician would probably be branded racist if they even suggested such a thing, to me, it sounds like something out of an authoritarian state.
Nationality: British (English)
Age: 23
Gender: Male
Political compass:
- Economic Left/Right: -4.25
- Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
Leader of the Commonwealth of Kington Langley
Founder of the Universal Broadcasting Union
View our extensive and informative collection of NSWiki articles
Our embassy programme here
Grand Duke: Thomas II
Prime Minister: Kevin Darling
Capital city: Kingsmouth
National anthem: Kington Langley Forever
Demonym: Kingtonian
WA status: Non-member

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:37 am

Condunum wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:SCotUS has been wrong before, as they are this time. Declaring the addition of "under god" to be "ceremonial deism" is ridiculous. All you have to do to see that that never was the intention of the addition is look at the history of its addition.

Changes to the pledge have almost always been fueled by xenophobia. Case in point: 1923, the clarification of the "United States of America" was added in fear that immigrants do bad things or something of that nature.

That was added on so as to remove confusion as to what flag they were swearing fealty to... Or at least that is the reason that was given for the change.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:39 am

Kington Langley wrote:They should get rid of the pledge of allegiance in schools full stop. It seems a bit like state-endorsed propaganda/brainwashing from my humble British perspective. When I first learnt about it, at first I didn't believe it, it put me in mind of Nazi Germany and the Hitler Youth. Coming from a nation where a politician would probably be branded racist if they even suggested such a thing, to me, it sounds like something out of an authoritarian state.

I agree that it should be gotten rid of entirely. Barring that happening, the least that should be done is eliminating the "under god" from it.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57856
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:39 am

Kington Langley wrote:They should get rid of the pledge of allegiance in schools full stop. It seems a bit like state-endorsed propaganda/brainwashing from my humble British perspective. When I first learnt about it, at first I didn't believe it, it put me in mind of Nazi Germany and the Hitler Youth. Coming from a nation where a politician would probably be branded racist if they even suggested such a thing, to me, it sounds like something out of an authoritarian state.


I agree.
It is a bit weird.
Either racist or trying too hard to be patriotic, in a "What are you hiding? Are you secretly a spy?" kind of way.
Like when people decide to be SUPER HETERO, and the immediate thought is "Huh. They must be gay."
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:40 am

Warda wrote:1. You don't have to say it
2. God can refer to any god
3. I think it sounds better with it in it

It doesn't quite refer to any god.
Especially in a country that professes itself to be so Christian-centric as the States.

If you openly substituted "another" God in there, you'd probably cop flak.
Especially since most religions consider other religions to be false deities.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Nuclear Death Land
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Apr 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nuclear Death Land » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:42 am

Warda wrote:1. You don't have to say it
2. God can refer to any god
3. I think it sounds better with it in it



Good point. I'll stick with him.
Join bowling plz.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57856
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:42 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Warda wrote:1. You don't have to say it
2. God can refer to any god
3. I think it sounds better with it in it

It doesn't quite refer to any god.
Especially in a country that professes itself to be so Christian-centric as the States.

If you openly substituted "another" God in there, you'd probably cop flak.
Especially since most religions consider other religions to be false deities.


In addition, it's an endorsement of monotheism, and it precludes goddesses.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:43 am

Nuclear Death Land wrote:
Warda wrote:1. You don't have to say it
2. God can refer to any god
3. I think it sounds better with it in it



Good point. I'll stick with him.

It clearly endorses monotheism when the government shouldn't be endorsing any religious view.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Nuclear Death Land
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Apr 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nuclear Death Land » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:44 am

Kington Langley wrote:They should get rid of the pledge of allegiance in schools full stop. It seems a bit like state-endorsed propaganda/brainwashing from my humble British perspective. When I first learnt about it, at first I didn't believe it, it put me in mind of Nazi Germany and the Hitler Youth. Coming from a nation where a politician would probably be branded racist if they even suggested such a thing, to me, it sounds like something out of an authoritarian state.


If you live in the US, chances are you want to be somewhat loyal?
Oh well, it's your opinion, and I'll respect that.
Join bowling plz.

User avatar
Altarak
Envoy
 
Posts: 312
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Altarak » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:44 am

Genivaria wrote:
Nuclear Death Land wrote:

Good point. I'll stick with him.

It clearly endorses monotheism when the government shouldn't be endorsing any religious view.

Agreed.

America should aso change In God We Trust.
Góðu um föðurland, dýrð þjóð okkar.

Hello there, estimated [[add your name here]]. Gimme cookiez.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:45 am

Nuclear Death Land wrote:
Warda wrote:1. You don't have to say it
2. God can refer to any god
3. I think it sounds better with it in it



Good point. I'll stick with him.

1. Tell that to the school system,
2. Yes, but it doesn't.
3. And if we took it, in ten years people will think it sounds better without it.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:45 am

Nuclear Death Land wrote:
Kington Langley wrote:They should get rid of the pledge of allegiance in schools full stop. It seems a bit like state-endorsed propaganda/brainwashing from my humble British perspective. When I first learnt about it, at first I didn't believe it, it put me in mind of Nazi Germany and the Hitler Youth. Coming from a nation where a politician would probably be branded racist if they even suggested such a thing, to me, it sounds like something out of an authoritarian state.


If you live in the US, chances are you want to be somewhat loyal?
Oh well, it's your opinion, and I'll respect that.

Not sure what you're trying to say.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:47 am

Genivaria wrote:
Nuclear Death Land wrote:
If you live in the US, chances are you want to be somewhat loyal?
Oh well, it's your opinion, and I'll respect that.

Not sure what you're trying to say.

I am similarly confused.

I'm trying desperately not to take "Nazism is fine because Nationalism" from this.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57856
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:48 am

Nuclear Death Land wrote:
Kington Langley wrote:They should get rid of the pledge of allegiance in schools full stop. It seems a bit like state-endorsed propaganda/brainwashing from my humble British perspective. When I first learnt about it, at first I didn't believe it, it put me in mind of Nazi Germany and the Hitler Youth. Coming from a nation where a politician would probably be branded racist if they even suggested such a thing, to me, it sounds like something out of an authoritarian state.


If you live in the US, chances are you want to be somewhat loyal?
Oh well, it's your opinion, and I'll respect that.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxHKObRq-iE

For the same reason that these men are patriots for burning the flag on a regular basis, i'd think it would be patriotic to refuse to recite the pledge.
The country is nothing without the rights of it's citizens.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:49 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Condunum wrote:Changes to the pledge have almost always been fueled by xenophobia. Case in point: 1923, the clarification of the "United States of America" was added in fear that immigrants do bad things or something of that nature.

That was added on so as to remove confusion as to what flag they were swearing fealty to... Or at least that is the reason that was given for the change.

Which is really a polite way of saying that they want immigrants to pledge to their flag. I get the motive, it's just that the pledge almost never changes for any reason besides, "ONO OUTSIDE SOMETHING THREATEN US"
password scrambled

User avatar
New Capria
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: May 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Capria » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:53 am

The original Pledge of Allegiance was written by a Baptist minister and he felt no need to include "Under God".

User avatar
Altarak
Envoy
 
Posts: 312
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Altarak » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:54 am

New Capria wrote:The original Pledge of Allegiance was written by a Baptist minister and he felt no need to include "Under God".

So?

People might not believe in God, and as some pointed out, the "Under God" part violates parts of the US constitution?
Góðu um föðurland, dýrð þjóð okkar.

Hello there, estimated [[add your name here]]. Gimme cookiez.

User avatar
Malfyria
Envoy
 
Posts: 254
Founded: Jun 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Malfyria » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:55 am

Remove it to further weaken the monotheistic dogma that has infiltrated the administration of your country.

User avatar
Killzone35
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Mar 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Killzone35 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:56 am

Malfyria wrote:Remove it to further weaken the monotheistic dogma that has infiltrated the administration of your country.
how bout you shut up

User avatar
Altarak
Envoy
 
Posts: 312
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Altarak » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:57 am

Killzone35 wrote:
Malfyria wrote:Remove it to further weaken the monotheistic dogma that has infiltrated the administration of your country.
how bout you shut up

?

You believe the Under God part should remain?
Góðu um föðurland, dýrð þjóð okkar.

Hello there, estimated [[add your name here]]. Gimme cookiez.

User avatar
Killzone35
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Mar 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Killzone35 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:57 am

Altarak wrote:
Killzone35 wrote: how bout you shut up

?

You believe the Under God part should remain?
yeah

User avatar
Altarak
Envoy
 
Posts: 312
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Altarak » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:58 am

Killzone35 wrote:
Altarak wrote:?

You believe the Under God part should remain?
yeah

Could you please say why?
Góðu um föðurland, dýrð þjóð okkar.

Hello there, estimated [[add your name here]]. Gimme cookiez.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:58 am

Killzone35 wrote:
Malfyria wrote:Remove it to further weaken the monotheistic dogma that has infiltrated the administration of your country.
how bout you shut up


What, you deny that such a dogma exists and is extraordinarily influential at all levels of government within the US?
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:00 pm

Killzone35 wrote:
Malfyria wrote:Remove it to further weaken the monotheistic dogma that has infiltrated the administration of your country.
how bout you shut up

Don't flame.

User avatar
Neo Rome Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5363
Founded: Dec 27, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Neo Rome Republic » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:01 pm

Killzone35 wrote:
Malfyria wrote:Remove it to further weaken the monotheistic dogma that has infiltrated the administration of your country.
how bout you shut up


How about no, we all have a right give our opinions, and some of us want your God, out of the pledge.
Last edited by Neo Rome Republic on Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:16 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Ethical and Metaphysical: (Pan) Humanist and Naturalist.
Political Views Sum: Centrist on social issues, Market Socialist on economic, and Radical Civic universalist on political governance.
This nation DOES(for most part) represent my OOC views.
''A rich man complaining about regulation and taxes, is like the drunkard at a party, complaining about not having enough to drink.'',

"An empty mind is a mind without a filter, the mind of a gullible fool. A closed mind is the mind unwilling to look at the reality outside its bubble. An open mind is one that is cautious, flexible yet balanced; looking at both the reality and the possibility."
OOC Info Page Pros And Cons Political Ideology

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bradfordville, Kechainia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Phage, Saiwana, South Africa3, Soveiniesberg, The Imagination Animals, The Panjshir Valley

Advertisement

Remove ads