Therefor...we should ban property, good looks, intelligence, competition in any form, and vulnerability to other people's abuses?
Ok...
Advertisement
by Liriena » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:36 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Vulpae » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:36 pm
by Free Soviets » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:36 pm
by Blasveck » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:37 pm
Vulpae wrote:okay this is turning into one of those forums.
Allow me to sum up where we will be in a few pages....
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE LOL RABBLERAGERABBLE DAMNYOUATHIESTTROLL RABBLERABBLE DAMNYOUTOOBIBLETROLL RABBLERABBLERABBLERAGE FUK U RABBLERABBLE RABBLE
FORUM LOCKED
by Liriena » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:37 pm
Vulpae wrote:okay this is turning into one of those forums.
Allow me to sum up where we will be in a few pages....
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE LOL RABBLERAGERABBLE DAMNYOUATHIESTTROLL RABBLERABBLE DAMNYOUTOOBIBLETROLL RABBLERABBLERABBLERAGE FUK U RABBLERABBLE RABBLE
FORUM LOCKED
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Liriena » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:40 pm
Blasveck wrote:The problem of evil is certainly an interesting one to debate, that's for sure.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by The North Polish Union » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:40 pm
Blasveck wrote:The North Polish Union wrote:Why do we need scriptural indications at all in this case? That's just common sense.
Not necessarily. Since they were like God before they sinned (Genesis 1:27) they only needed to become capable of committing evil.
Since Adam and Eve apparently didn't wear clothes until they had sinned; that means that being naked is not, in itself, evil.
1. It's "common sense" if you assume that original sin isn't a fucked up concept in the first place.
2. If they were "like God" then wouldn't that mean that they were already capable of committing evil? I mean, God blaming the whole of humanity for A&E's mistakes seems pretty evil to me.
3. So why the fuck did they put clothes on? "Being naked isn't sinful!" "So lets put this verse mentioning them putting clothes on for no apparent reason!"
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by Free Soviets » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:41 pm
by Blasveck » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:41 pm
Liriena wrote:Blasveck wrote:The problem of evil is certainly an interesting one to debate, that's for sure.
The problem of evil has been done to death. Many Christians already have a wide array of mental contortionisms to justify it.
Now...the problem of our Universe being deadly and wasteful, almost completely hostile to human life, is an interesting, practically uncharted territory.
by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:42 pm
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.
by The North Polish Union » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:42 pm
Liriena wrote:The North Polish Union wrote:
No, because as sinful people, nudity often causes people to commit sins like lust and adultery.
We should try to avoid doing things that cause others to sin.
Therefor...we should ban property, good looks, intelligence, competition in any form, and vulnerability to other people's abuses?
Ok...
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by The North Polish Union » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:43 pm
Blasveck wrote:Liriena wrote:The problem of evil has been done to death. Many Christians already have a wide array of mental contortionisms to justify it.
Now...the problem of our Universe being deadly and wasteful, almost completely hostile to human life, is an interesting, practically uncharted territory.
True.
The problem of "The Universe was created FOR US!" Isn't much to debate though.
I mean, it can kill us at any moment. Whoop-dee-doo. I'm surprised we haveń been wiped out already.
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by Blasveck » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:43 pm
The North Polish Union wrote:Blasveck wrote:
1. It's "common sense" if you assume that original sin isn't a fucked up concept in the first place.
2. If they were "like God" then wouldn't that mean that they were already capable of committing evil? I mean, God blaming the whole of humanity for A&E's mistakes seems pretty evil to me.
3. So why the fuck did they put clothes on? "Being naked isn't sinful!" "So lets put this verse mentioning them putting clothes on for no apparent reason!"
1.) And why exactly is original sin "a fucked up concept?"
2.) No, because God does not break His own laws, and God's laws prohibit evil. Also, due to the fact that when Adam and Eve sinned, their nature became sinful. Thus, all their children were born with a sinful nature.
3.) See my reply to Liriena's post.
by The North Polish Union » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Blasveck wrote:The North Polish Union wrote:1.) And why exactly is original sin "a fucked up concept?"
2.) No, because God does not break His own laws, and God's laws prohibit evil. Also, due to the fact that when Adam and Eve sinned, their nature became sinful. Thus, all their children were born with a sinful nature.
3.) See my reply to Liriena's post.
1. Do you have a grandad that committed a crime? Or an uncle that beat his wife? Have any of your older family members ever commit a crime and were jailed for it?
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by Blasveck » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:45 pm
The North Polish Union wrote:Blasveck wrote:
True.
The problem of "The Universe was created FOR US!" Isn't much to debate though.
I mean, it can kill us at any moment. Whoop-dee-doo. I'm surprised we haveń been wiped out already.
Your use of the letter "ń" leads me to believe that you must be Polish, and therefore awesome.
by Liriena » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:45 pm
The North Polish Union wrote:Blasveck wrote:
1. It's "common sense" if you assume that original sin isn't a fucked up concept in the first place.
2. If they were "like God" then wouldn't that mean that they were already capable of committing evil? I mean, God blaming the whole of humanity for A&E's mistakes seems pretty evil to me.
3. So why the fuck did they put clothes on? "Being naked isn't sinful!" "So lets put this verse mentioning them putting clothes on for no apparent reason!"
1.) And why exactly is original sin "a fucked up concept?"
2.) No, because God does not break His own laws, and God's laws prohibit evil. Also, due to the fact that when Adam and Eve sinned, their nature became sinful. Thus, all their children were born with a sinful nature.
3.) See my reply to Liriena's post.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Liriena » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:46 pm
Blasveck wrote:Liriena wrote:The problem of evil has been done to death. Many Christians already have a wide array of mental contortionisms to justify it.
Now...the problem of our Universe being deadly and wasteful, almost completely hostile to human life, is an interesting, practically uncharted territory.
True.
The problem of "The Universe was created FOR US!" Isn't much to debate though.
I mean, it can kill us at any moment. Whoop-dee-doo. I'm surprised we haveń been wiped out already.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Liriena » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:47 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Imsogone » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:48 pm
Prins Maurits wrote:This is a good question :
If God was completely good then he would want to stop all evil, if God was completely powerful then he could stop all evil, but evil exists....so does that mean that God is not completely good or not completely powerful, or does god not exist?
Please post your ideas about this question!
by The Parkus Empire » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:51 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:He could both want to do it and be capable of doing it, but does not for some reason we cannot understand.
by The North Polish Union » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:51 pm
Liriena wrote:The North Polish Union wrote:1.) And why exactly is original sin "a fucked up concept?"
2.) No, because God does not break His own laws, and God's laws prohibit evil. Also, due to the fact that when Adam and Eve sinned, their nature became sinful. Thus, all their children were born with a sinful nature.
3.) See my reply to Liriena's post.
1. Asides from the fact that it punishes newborns for the crimes of mythological ancestors from thousand of years ago? The "sin" itself was, really, mostly God's responsibility. That he was incapable or unwilling to foresee and/or prevent said sin, even though he himself provided that sin with its own context (humans capable of temptation, a forbidden tree, and a cunning and persuasive snake), makes God the driving force behind the original sin, and gives him no moral authority to punish anyone other than himself for it.
2. If God does not break his own laws...then why does the Biblical God constantly commit genocide? Or lie, while we are at it?
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by Tlaceceyaya » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:56 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:He could both want to do it and be capable of doing it, but does not for some reason we cannot understand.
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.
by Scholencia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Prins Maurits wrote:This is a good question :
If God was completely good then he would want to stop all evil, if God was completely powerful then he could stop all evil, but evil exists....so does that mean that God is not completely good or not completely powerful, or does god not exist?
Please post your ideas about this question!
by Imsogone » Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:59 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anarcopia, Google [Bot], Philjia, Senkaku
Advertisement