
by Southern Babylonia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:44 am

by Ashmoria » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:54 am

by Lost heros » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:54 am
Southern Babylonia wrote:So, a hypothetical question for you guys:
Let's say it was declared tomorrow that the United States needed to become a constitutional monarchy, and everyone agreed to this proposition. Congress, the Senate, etc. would work the exact same way, the only difference being the position of a figurehead who could do nothing but give the royal seal of approval. In the end, they decided to allow every American to vote on who the first monarch would be. From that moment onwards, the position would be hereditary.
1. Now, supposing there was no voter fraud, who do you think would be elected to the office? Would it be a politician? A singer? An actor/actrice? Would this be the beginning of the Bradjolinian dynasty?
2. Regardless of whether or not you think they WOULD be elected, supposing you personally had to appoint one, who would it be? Would you at all be inclined to give yourself the position? If so, why would you want it?
3. Do you think, given a good degree of acceptance of the citizens of the US, that this monarchy could last? How do you think the international community would react? Would they want to influence the choice?
4. If it was simply decreed today, without any foregone conclusions about the general American population being more or less in favour of it, what do you think THEIR reaction would be? Would they be (obviously many would be) furious? Angered? Disconcerted? Apathetic? Content? Glad? Enthusiastic?
Personally, I have no idea who I think would be elected, or who would be best for a figurehead position. I'm of the opinion that their wouldn't be much of a kerfuffle internationally, but in the US, if it were simply declared right now, it'd definitely have huge consequences. That said, some of those into British royal pageantry and the viewing thereof might actually be really excited. Though I don't think it'd spark a civil war, I'm sure there'd be some armed resistance, somewhere. That said, I'm not American.
Well, your move, NSG.
EDIT: And no, for the record, I don't think this should happen. At least, not unless it also got many more people more interested in real politics.

by Farnhamia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:55 am
Ashmoria wrote:I think a Koch brother would be elected. money talks, eh?
I think it should be the descendant of a great native American chief. the great grandson of Geronimo, crazy horse or Tecumseh.

by Legist Union » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:05 am

by JAYMALL LAND » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:14 am
Ashmoria wrote:I think a Koch brother would be elected. money talks, eh?

by Atorea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:17 am


by Blouman Empire » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:19 am

by Lost heros » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:20 am
Atorea wrote:Id be king......

by Atorea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:23 am

by Placken » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:31 am

by Orthaethaczil » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:33 am

by Atorea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:35 am

by Constaniana » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:36 am
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.

by Lost heros » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:39 am

by Murbleflip » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:40 am
Greater Istanistan wrote:the Eldar, an ancient race, had too much sex and woke a dark god.
The UK in Exile wrote: It's perfectly logical if you hit yourself several times round the head with the daily mail.
United British Union wrote:Never talk to me again

by Atorea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:41 am

by Surfistan » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:43 am

by Placken » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:44 am
Orthaethaczil wrote:The US is already ruled by the rich:
1. The rich own the media. While they dont control them openly and directly, they can hire and promote whoever represents their opinion best and fire whoever doesnt.
2. The media control to large amounts what the two parties do.
3. Thus the two parties do in large parts the same things under different rhetoric. Thanks to majority vote, other parties like the green party have no influence.
4. Also, there isnt a single important US politician that is NOT a millionaire.
-> The rich have all the power in the USA.

by Bezombia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:49 am
Southern Babylonia wrote:So, a hypothetical question for you guys:
Let's say it was declared tomorrow that the United States needed to become a constitutional monarchy, and everyone agreed to this proposition. Congress, the Senate, etc. would work the exact same way, the only difference being the position of a figurehead who could do nothing but give the royal seal of approval. In the end, they decided to allow every American to vote on who the first monarch would be. From that moment onwards, the position would be hereditary.
1. Now, supposing there was no voter fraud, who do you think would be elected to the office? Would it be a politician? A singer? An actor/actrice? Would this be the beginning of the Bradjolinian dynasty?
2. Regardless of whether or not you think they WOULD be elected, supposing you personally had to appoint one, who would it be? Would you at all be inclined to give yourself the position? If so, why would you want it?
3. Do you think, given a good degree of acceptance of the citizens of the US, that this monarchy could last? How do you think the international community would react? Would they want to influence the choice?
4. If it was simply decreed today, without any foregone conclusions about the general American population being more or less in favour of it, what do you think THEIR reaction would be? Would they be (obviously many would be) furious? Angered? Disconcerted? Apathetic? Content? Glad? Enthusiastic?
Personally, I have no idea who I think would be elected, or who would be best for a figurehead position. I'm of the opinion that their wouldn't be much of a kerfuffle internationally, but in the US, if it were simply declared right now, it'd definitely have huge consequences. That said, some of those into British royal pageantry and the viewing thereof might actually be really excited. Though I don't think it'd spark a civil war, I'm sure there'd be some armed resistance, somewhere. That said, I'm not American.
Well, your move, NSG.
EDIT: And no, for the record, I don't think this should happen. At least, not unless it also got many more people more interested in real politics.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Fordorsia wrote:mfw Beano is my dad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSWiMoO8zNE
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies

by Regnum Dominae » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:01 am

by Cetacea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:05 am
Bezombia wrote:1. Electorate Monarchy? That's a new one. Anyway, I really can't say..

by Vazdania » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:06 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Galloism, Google [Bot], Port Caverton, Primitive Communism, Saor Alba, Senscaria, Techocracy101010, The Selkie, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement