NATION

PASSWORD

If the US became a monarchy?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

If the US became a monarchy, it would be...

An awesome thing and a sign of what other republics around the world must do
12
8%
A pretty decent improvement
11
7%
Generally better than the current situation, though I fear they may choose an idiot for the job
9
6%
It might help, but I fail to see how
5
3%
An event I'd simply disregard or not care about
5
3%
It may be harmful and it would certainly be disruptive, but it wouldn't cause long-term damage
8
5%
Probably a bad turn of events, as they'd likely choose a pretty horrible monarch
14
10%
A great leap in the wrong direction
40
27%
An utter and unforgivable violation of freedom that should be stomped out at all costs, by any means
29
20%
Good cause for us all to dive off a giant Kleenex box into a jar of lime pickle sauce mixed with whipped cream and Vladimir Putin's chewed erasers (i.e. I have no idea)
14
10%
 
Total votes : 147

User avatar
Southern Babylonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

If the US became a monarchy?

Postby Southern Babylonia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:44 am

So, a hypothetical question for you guys:

Let's say it was declared tomorrow that the United States needed to become a constitutional monarchy, and everyone agreed to this proposition. Congress, the Senate, etc. would work the exact same way, the only difference being the position of a figurehead who could do nothing but give the royal seal of approval. In the end, they decided to allow every American to vote on who the first monarch would be. From that moment onwards, the position would be hereditary.

1. Now, supposing there was no voter fraud, who do you think would be elected to the office? Would it be a politician? A singer? An actor/actrice? Would this be the beginning of the Bradjolinian dynasty?

2. Regardless of whether or not you think they WOULD be elected, supposing you personally had to appoint one, who would it be? Would you at all be inclined to give yourself the position? If so, why would you want it?

3. Do you think, given a good degree of acceptance of the citizens of the US, that this monarchy could last? How do you think the international community would react? Would they want to influence the choice?

4. If it was simply decreed today, without any foregone conclusions about the general American population being more or less in favour of it, what do you think THEIR reaction would be? Would they be (obviously many would be) furious? Angered? Disconcerted? Apathetic? Content? Glad? Enthusiastic?

Personally, I have no idea who I think would be elected, or who would be best for a figurehead position. I'm of the opinion that their wouldn't be much of a kerfuffle internationally, but in the US, if it were simply declared right now, it'd definitely have huge consequences. That said, some of those into British royal pageantry and the viewing thereof might actually be really excited. Though I don't think it'd spark a civil war, I'm sure there'd be some armed resistance, somewhere. That said, I'm not American.

Well, your move, NSG.

EDIT: And no, for the record, I don't think this should happen. At least, not unless it also got many more people more interested in real politics.
Last edited by Southern Babylonia on Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:13 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Impeach the Senate, Legalise Cap and Trade, Prorogations are theft. JACK LAYTON 2011

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -8.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.08
Alignment: Neutral Good
Yeh: Collectivism, Market Socialism, Environmentalism, Two-State Solution, QUILTBAG rights, abortion rights, permaculture, multiculturalism, CBC, public healthcare, NDP (Canada), SNP.
Meh: most religions, atheism, globalisation, gun rights.
Neh: Corporatocracy, neoliberalism, Maoism, bigotry, evangelism, militant anti-theism, fascism, pollution, Netanyahu, Hamas, tar sands, monoculturalism.
Need help with French? Je peux aider!
Proud Nova Scotian.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:54 am

I think a Koch brother would be elected. money talks, eh?

I think it should be the descendant of a great native American chief. the great grandson of Geronimo, crazy horse or Tecumseh.
whatever

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:54 am

Southern Babylonia wrote:So, a hypothetical question for you guys:

Let's say it was declared tomorrow that the United States needed to become a constitutional monarchy, and everyone agreed to this proposition. Congress, the Senate, etc. would work the exact same way, the only difference being the position of a figurehead who could do nothing but give the royal seal of approval. In the end, they decided to allow every American to vote on who the first monarch would be. From that moment onwards, the position would be hereditary.

1. Now, supposing there was no voter fraud, who do you think would be elected to the office? Would it be a politician? A singer? An actor/actrice? Would this be the beginning of the Bradjolinian dynasty?

2. Regardless of whether or not you think they WOULD be elected, supposing you personally had to appoint one, who would it be? Would you at all be inclined to give yourself the position? If so, why would you want it?

3. Do you think, given a good degree of acceptance of the citizens of the US, that this monarchy could last? How do you think the international community would react? Would they want to influence the choice?

4. If it was simply decreed today, without any foregone conclusions about the general American population being more or less in favour of it, what do you think THEIR reaction would be? Would they be (obviously many would be) furious? Angered? Disconcerted? Apathetic? Content? Glad? Enthusiastic?

Personally, I have no idea who I think would be elected, or who would be best for a figurehead position. I'm of the opinion that their wouldn't be much of a kerfuffle internationally, but in the US, if it were simply declared right now, it'd definitely have huge consequences. That said, some of those into British royal pageantry and the viewing thereof might actually be really excited. Though I don't think it'd spark a civil war, I'm sure there'd be some armed resistance, somewhere. That said, I'm not American.

Well, your move, NSG.

EDIT: And no, for the record, I don't think this should happen. At least, not unless it also got many more people more interested in real politics.

1. Obama
2. I wouldn't even bother voting.
3. The monarchy wouldn't last, because no one wants it.
4. They would be like, "I guess I'm not voting for (insert name of current senator/representative) next election."
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:55 am

Ashmoria wrote:I think a Koch brother would be elected. money talks, eh?

I think it should be the descendant of a great native American chief. the great grandson of Geronimo, crazy horse or Tecumseh.

Except the concept of a monarchy was kind of foreign to those great Native Americans.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Legist Union
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Aug 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Legist Union » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:05 am

I'm perfect for the job, I'm the only one who can remain silent for more than five minutes. I'll even refrain from taking all your rights, since I doubt I could accomplish it (let alone without empowering corruption).
Last edited by Legist Union on Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:09 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
JAYMALL LAND
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 472
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby JAYMALL LAND » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:14 am

Ashmoria wrote:I think a Koch brother would be elected. money talks, eh?


That's probably the best bet.
Reform Party Member
Senator Jamal Omar, PhD
Philadelphia Eagles Fan
I believe theirs a god above me I'm just the god of everything else.
'If babies had guns they wouldn't be aborted.' -Rep. Stockman

User avatar
Atorea
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1106
Founded: Jun 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Atorea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:17 am

Id be king...... :bow:
Colonies: The Dominion of The Colony of Atorea, and The Community of Colonial State of Atorea
If you have an RP, and you want members, I will gladly like for you to TG me!!!!!
[Surl=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=262602]Member of the Western Coalition[/url]

User avatar
Blouman Empire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16184
Founded: Sep 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Blouman Empire » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:19 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:I think a Koch brother would be elected. money talks, eh?

I think it should be the descendant of a great native American chief. the great grandson of Geronimo, crazy horse or Tecumseh.

Except the concept of a monarchy was kind of foreign to those great Native Americans.


So how were leaders determined?
You know you've made it on NSG when you have a whole thread created around what you said.
On the American/United Statesian matter "I'd suggest Americans go to their nation settings and change their nation prefix to something cooler." - The Kangaroo Republic
http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Blouman_Empire

DBC26-Winner

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:20 am

Atorea wrote:Id be king...... :bow:

I'd never elect a monarch who ignores the rules of grammar.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Atorea
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1106
Founded: Jun 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Atorea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:23 am

Lost heros wrote:
Atorea wrote:Id be king...... :bow:

I'd never elect a monarch who ignores the rules of grammar.



I'd be King. And I wont be elected *Maniac Smile.
Last edited by Atorea on Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Colonies: The Dominion of The Colony of Atorea, and The Community of Colonial State of Atorea
If you have an RP, and you want members, I will gladly like for you to TG me!!!!!
[Surl=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=262602]Member of the Western Coalition[/url]

User avatar
Placken
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Placken » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:31 am

The creation of an American monarch would be a difficult thing, many people, even those who adore Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, are taught in school that Monarchy equals tyranny etc. http://www.historytoday.com/frank-prochaska/american-monarchy There are however some American monarchists, and they would desire a constitutional monarch like from Europe. Identity politics would play a part. More traditionalist monarchs might look to a European dynasty. I suspect that Catholics might support the Jacobite pretender: Franz, Duke of Bavaria. Blacks might support a member of an African dynasty (like that Nigerian Prince that keeps emailing?). If there was a politician who was universally seen as a Father of the Nation still alive, he might have a chance. A British Prince would be favoured by the WASPs.

You would have to change the executive branch a bit. If you don't want a parliamentary system, I guess you split the jobs of the president, between the vice-president (as President of the Senate) and the monarch. I suppose each state could also have a monarchy.

I like the Native chief idea (I see it as having broad appeal), if one candidate could be found that would stick out above the others. There is of course the Hawaiian Royal Family. Of course, this could be seen as giving to much power to a special interest group.
Home States
Republic of Landana (in a state of anarchy)
Duchy of Ostbär
Principality of Arbour
Bishopric of Nunnendorf
Republic of Casque

Overseas States
Emirate of Seeri
Federation of Placken Asia
The Condominium of Mani

User avatar
Orthaethaczil
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 399
Founded: Jul 06, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Orthaethaczil » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:33 am

The US is already ruled by the rich:

1. The rich own the media. While they dont control them openly and directly, they can hire and promote whoever represents their opinion best and fire whoever doesnt.

2. The media control to large amounts what the two parties do.

3. Thus the two parties do in large parts the same things under different rhetoric. Thanks to majority vote, other parties like the green party have no influence.

4. Also, there isnt a single important US politician that is NOT a millionaire.

-> The rich have all the power in the USA.
Be fruitful and multiply.

User avatar
Astograth
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1593
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Astograth » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:34 am

Blouman Empire wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Except the concept of a monarchy was kind of foreign to those great Native Americans.


So how were leaders determined?

Chiefdom, whether elected or hereditary, is not quite the same as a monarchy.

User avatar
Atorea
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1106
Founded: Jun 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Atorea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:35 am

LITTLE KNOWN FACT: USA almost had a monarch before the revoulutionary war, but he didnt want to come to USA.
Colonies: The Dominion of The Colony of Atorea, and The Community of Colonial State of Atorea
If you have an RP, and you want members, I will gladly like for you to TG me!!!!!
[Surl=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=262602]Member of the Western Coalition[/url]

User avatar
Constaniana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25813
Founded: Mar 10, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Constaniana » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:36 am

We all know who would be crowned. Stephen Colbert.
Join Elementals 3, one of P2TM's oldest high fantasy roleplays, full of adventure, humour, and saving the world. Winner of the Best High Fantasy RP of P2TM twice in a row Choo Choo
Pro: Jesus Christ, Distributism, The Shire, House Atreides
Anti: The Antichrist, Communism, Mordor, House Harkonnen
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.

Kudos.

User avatar
Everia
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: May 07, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Everia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:38 am

You could always just separate the Presidency from Head of State and make that position Emperor and Empress.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:39 am

Atorea wrote:
Lost heros wrote:I'd never elect a monarch who ignores the rules of grammar.



I'd be king ,and I won't be elected *Maniac Smile.

No king of mine will blatantly ignore the rules of grammar.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Murbleflip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1404
Founded: Jan 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Murbleflip » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:40 am

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II should become joint monarch of the UK and the USA.
Last edited by Murbleflip on the day when the swirly creatures invaded the earth, edited too many times to count.

Ximea wrote:This is somepony's fetish, but I don't know whose...

It turned out to be the Time Alliance's.
Greater Istanistan wrote:the Eldar, an ancient race, had too much sex and woke a dark god.
The UK in Exile wrote: It's perfectly logical if you hit yourself several times round the head with the daily mail.

I shall approach the art of bantering with renewed vigour. - Mr Stevens, The Remains of the Day

United British Union wrote:Never talk to me again

User avatar
Atorea
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1106
Founded: Jun 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Atorea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:41 am

Lost heros wrote:
Atorea wrote:

I'd be king ,and I won't be elected *Maniac Smile.

No king of mine will blatantly ignore the rules of grammar.



I'd be a King. Also, I will not get elected. Also I am not your King.


King does not need to be capitalized, as long as its not God, or Jesus, we are good.
Colonies: The Dominion of The Colony of Atorea, and The Community of Colonial State of Atorea
If you have an RP, and you want members, I will gladly like for you to TG me!!!!!
[Surl=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=262602]Member of the Western Coalition[/url]

User avatar
Surfistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1700
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Surfistan » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:43 am

Emperor Norton II of these United States, Elected by His People, and Protector of their Liberties, joined by a double monarch, Tecumseh II, who shall rule all of the North, a King of the North if you wish.
Last edited by Surfistan on Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Placken
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Jul 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Placken » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:44 am

Orthaethaczil wrote:The US is already ruled by the rich:

1. The rich own the media. While they dont control them openly and directly, they can hire and promote whoever represents their opinion best and fire whoever doesnt.

2. The media control to large amounts what the two parties do.

3. Thus the two parties do in large parts the same things under different rhetoric. Thanks to majority vote, other parties like the green party have no influence.

4. Also, there isnt a single important US politician that is NOT a millionaire.

-> The rich have all the power in the USA.


The Rich are a large group of people, the opposite of a monarchy. Are you saying Bill Gates should be King?
Home States
Republic of Landana (in a state of anarchy)
Duchy of Ostbär
Principality of Arbour
Bishopric of Nunnendorf
Republic of Casque

Overseas States
Emirate of Seeri
Federation of Placken Asia
The Condominium of Mani

User avatar
Bezombia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29250
Founded: Apr 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bezombia » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:49 am

Southern Babylonia wrote:So, a hypothetical question for you guys:

Let's say it was declared tomorrow that the United States needed to become a constitutional monarchy, and everyone agreed to this proposition. Congress, the Senate, etc. would work the exact same way, the only difference being the position of a figurehead who could do nothing but give the royal seal of approval. In the end, they decided to allow every American to vote on who the first monarch would be. From that moment onwards, the position would be hereditary.

1. Now, supposing there was no voter fraud, who do you think would be elected to the office? Would it be a politician? A singer? An actor/actrice? Would this be the beginning of the Bradjolinian dynasty?

2. Regardless of whether or not you think they WOULD be elected, supposing you personally had to appoint one, who would it be? Would you at all be inclined to give yourself the position? If so, why would you want it?

3. Do you think, given a good degree of acceptance of the citizens of the US, that this monarchy could last? How do you think the international community would react? Would they want to influence the choice?

4. If it was simply decreed today, without any foregone conclusions about the general American population being more or less in favour of it, what do you think THEIR reaction would be? Would they be (obviously many would be) furious? Angered? Disconcerted? Apathetic? Content? Glad? Enthusiastic?

Personally, I have no idea who I think would be elected, or who would be best for a figurehead position. I'm of the opinion that their wouldn't be much of a kerfuffle internationally, but in the US, if it were simply declared right now, it'd definitely have huge consequences. That said, some of those into British royal pageantry and the viewing thereof might actually be really excited. Though I don't think it'd spark a civil war, I'm sure there'd be some armed resistance, somewhere. That said, I'm not American.

Well, your move, NSG.

EDIT: And no, for the record, I don't think this should happen. At least, not unless it also got many more people more interested in real politics.


1. Electorate Monarchy? That's a new one. Anyway, I really can't say.
2. Roger Waters. He (mostly) shares my political views and is a damn good musician.
3. No, poorly, yes.
4. Negative, yes, yes, yes, no, no, no.
Our weary eyes still stray to the horizon...but down this road we've been so many times...
Please, call me Benomia. Post count +14623, founded Oct. 23, 2012.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben
Verdum wrote:Hey girl, is your name Karl Marx? Because your starting an uprising in my lower classes.
Black Hand wrote:New plan is to just make thousands of disposable firearms and dump them out of cargo planes with tiny drag chutes attached.
Spreewerke wrote:The metric system is the only measurement system that truly meters.
Spreewerke wrote:Salt the women, rape the earth.
Equestican wrote:Ben is love, Ben is life.
Sediczja wrote:real eyes realize real lies
I'm a poet. Come read my poems!

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:01 am

Goodbye California, hello Canada.
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Cetacea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6539
Founded: Apr 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cetacea » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:05 am

Bezombia wrote:1. Electorate Monarchy? That's a new one. Anyway, I really can't say..


Nah Elected Monarchies is an old one and pretty common. Malaysia and Cambodia still use the system, William and Mary in England were appointed by Parliament too.

weren't the Kennedys classically described as American Royalty? Then theres Paul Washington the oldest living male descendant of almost King George Washington. My moneys on a business Tycoon however perhaps His Imperial Majesty Donald Trump Emperor of the United Commonwealth States of America or perhaps Her Imminence the Esteemed Empress Oprah, maybe even Warren Buffet
Last edited by Cetacea on Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:06 am

I'd vote for Distruzio.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Galloism, Google [Bot], Port Caverton, Primitive Communism, Saor Alba, Senscaria, Techocracy101010, The Selkie, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads