It's almost like music is quite a subjective thing.
Advertisement

by Grenartia » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:10 pm
Forsakia wrote:Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Oh, it absolutely does. The trope of black-woman-as-jezebel is incredibly common in our culture in general and in music videos in particular. That said, the people who get frustrated with that, mostly black women, have been outraged about it all along. People are just paying slightly more attention to them than usual, because they're able to piggyback on the much larger contingent of people shrieking about how a girl had the temerity to grow into an attractive young woman and then behave precisely the way we demand that attractive young women behave.
How far are you going with your cultural appropriation line? In terms of the article you quoted talking about twerking as a cultural element that she's appropriating?

by Tahar Joblis » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:12 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:The trope of black-woman-as-jezebel is incredibly common in our culture in general and in music videos in particular.


by Grenartia » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:13 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Yup. I think trying to explain the sociological implications of fetishizing black women's bodies (and specifically their bottoms) while connecting those bodies to out-of-control, animalistic sexuality may go a bit over the heads of NSG, though. On this site, "there is a black woman there whose entire function in the performance is to be a large ass for Ms. Cyrus to smack" cannot possibly count as racially insensitive unless Cyrus follows it up by saying, "ALSO I AM TOTALLY RACIST, Y'ALL. FUCK BLACK PEOPLE, TEE HEE."
C'mon people, sociological analysis isn't exactly the same as teaching yourself ancient Egyptian. Take even one class and you can understand this stuff just fine.

by Gauthier » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:14 pm
Grenartia wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:C'mon people, sociological analysis isn't exactly the same as teaching yourself ancient Egyptian. Take even one class and you can understand this stuff just fine.
Except, none of it was associated with race, so it can't be racist. Was it stupid? Yes. Hell, I can even see the arguments for it being mysogynistic. But it wasn't racist.

by New England and The Maritimes » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:14 pm
Grenartia wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:C'mon people, sociological analysis isn't exactly the same as teaching yourself ancient Egyptian. Take even one class and you can understand this stuff just fine.
Except, none of it was associated with race, so it can't be racist. Was it stupid? Yes. Hell, I can even see the arguments for it being mysogynistic. But it wasn't racist.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Tahar Joblis » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:16 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Yup. I think trying to explain the sociological implications of fetishizing black women's bodies (and specifically their bottoms) while connecting those bodies to out-of-control, animalistic sexuality may go a bit over the heads of NSG, though. On this site, "there is a black woman there whose entire function in the performance is to be a large ass for Ms. Cyrus to smack" cannot possibly count as racially insensitive unless Cyrus follows it up by saying, "ALSO I AM TOTALLY RACIST, Y'ALL. FUCK BLACK PEOPLE, TEE HEE."
C'mon people, sociological analysis isn't exactly the same as teaching yourself ancient Egyptian. Take even one class and you can understand this stuff just fine.

by Aldheim » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:22 pm

by Tahar Joblis » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:27 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Except, none of it was associated with race, so it can't be racist. Was it stupid? Yes. Hell, I can even see the arguments for it being mysogynistic. But it wasn't racist.
It was associated with race, and Cyrus HERSELF said her sound was, paraphrasing "more black." Her backup dancers were predominantly black, and the one she drug out to use as a sex object on stage is included in that.

by Quackquackhonk » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:34 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:35 pm
Forsakia wrote:Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Oh, it absolutely does. The trope of black-woman-as-jezebel is incredibly common in our culture in general and in music videos in particular. That said, the people who get frustrated with that, mostly black women, have been outraged about it all along. People are just paying slightly more attention to them than usual, because they're able to piggyback on the much larger contingent of people shrieking about how a girl had the temerity to grow into an attractive young woman and then behave precisely the way we demand that attractive young women behave.
How far are you going with your cultural appropriation line? In terms of the article you quoted talking about twerking as a cultural element that she's appropriating?
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Tahar Joblis » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:36 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Forsakia wrote:
How far are you going with your cultural appropriation line? In terms of the article you quoted talking about twerking as a cultural element that she's appropriating?
If one dance move were the extent of her racial appropriation, I don't think anyone would be particularly put out. It's not. It is one element in a larger picture of problematic behavior.

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:39 pm
Aldheim wrote:How is appropriating something typically associated with a certain race, racist? Because that, for example, implies that early rock musicians were racist for incorporating elements of the black dominated jazz tradition into their music, which sounds pretty ridiculous.
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by New England and The Maritimes » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:44 pm
Tahar Joblis wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:C'mon people, sociological analysis isn't exactly the same as teaching yourself ancient Egyptian. Take even one class and you can understand this stuff just fine.
Has it occurred to you that a subject which can be understood "just fine" after one class might just not be the source of the One Great Font of TruthTM about society, and might instead contain a high volume of bullshit to empirically justifiable claims, leading to such things being widely disrespected?
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Forsakia » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:47 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Aldheim wrote:How is appropriating something typically associated with a certain race, racist? Because that, for example, implies that early rock musicians were racist for incorporating elements of the black dominated jazz tradition into their music, which sounds pretty ridiculous.
Are you serious? Early rock musicians have quite rightly taken a lot of flak from modern critics for their appropriation (read: outright theft in many cases) of black performers' music and musical styles. The only way that could sound "ridiculous" is if you've never read ANYTHING on the history of rock & roll.

by Ashmoria » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:49 pm
Trotskylvania wrote:Ashmoria wrote:he was working on the vmas. sure he doesn't control her anymore but someone needs to tell her that there is a difference between looking like an adult and looking like jailbait. her dad is a really good person to make that call.
No, the principle still applies. She's not a minor anymore, she has her own career, and gee whiz she just made a good career move. This moral condemnation is starting to look frighteningly reactionary.

by Ashmoria » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:51 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:The Andromeda Islands wrote:I haven't watched the VMAs in years & have little interest in "Music Television," but based on what I have seen and read, the Cyrus family is jacked up.
Billy Ray Cyrus is a bad father.
Nobody says the same thing about Robin Thicke's parents, though. I wonder why? Is it because people like you view women as property and men as full human beings? Yeah, that's actually exactly it.

by Grenartia » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:53 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Except, none of it was associated with race, so it can't be racist. Was it stupid? Yes. Hell, I can even see the arguments for it being mysogynistic. But it wasn't racist.
It was associated with race, and 1. Cyrus HERSELF said her sound was, paraphrasing "more black." 2. Her backup dancers were predominantly black, and the one she drug out to use as a sex object on stage is included in that.
Aldheim wrote:How is appropriating something typically associated with a certain race, racist? Because that, for example, implies that early rock musicians were racist for incorporating elements of the black dominated jazz tradition into their music, which sounds pretty ridiculous.

by The Truth and Light » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:58 pm

by Condunum » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:58 pm
Tahar Joblis wrote:Nailed to the Perch wrote:
If one dance move were the extent of her racial appropriation, I don't think anyone would be particularly put out. It's not. It is one element in a larger picture of problematic behavior.
Let's say Cyrus wants to be black.
Is her wanting to be black actually a problem?

by New England and The Maritimes » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:59 pm
The Truth and Light wrote:Isn't sharing between cultures and races normally a good thing? I'm just thinking.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:59 pm
Grenartia wrote:Dontcha know? Artists incorporating elements from other art (which just so happens to be predominately dominated by a certain ethnic group) that they like into their work is racist.
ELVIS WAS A MEMBER OF TEH KKK!!!
Nailed to the Perch wrote: On this site, "there is a black woman there whose entire function in the performance is to be a large ass for Ms. Cyrus to smack" cannot possibly count as racially insensitive unless Cyrus follows it up by saying, "ALSO I AM TOTALLY RACIST, Y'ALL. FUCK BLACK PEOPLE, TEE HEE."
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:02 pm
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Grenartia » Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:06 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Grenartia wrote:Dontcha know? Artists incorporating elements from other art (which just so happens to be predominately dominated by a certain ethnic group) that they like into their work is racist.
ELVIS WAS A MEMBER OF TEH KKK!!!
Ah, I see we've reached the "shriek about how there are no options but 'not at all racist' and 'actively out to kill black people'" phase of the discussion. That's always fun.Nailed to the Perch wrote: On this site, "there is a black woman there whose entire function in the performance is to be a large ass for Ms. Cyrus to smack" cannot possibly count as racially insensitive unless Cyrus follows it up by saying, "ALSO I AM TOTALLY RACIST, Y'ALL. FUCK BLACK PEOPLE, TEE HEE."
Man, did I call it or what?
Sigh.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Empire of Donner land, Google [Bot], Necroghastia, Torisakia
Advertisement