NATION

PASSWORD

Miley Cyrus VMA performance and modern views on sex and race

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:20 pm

Trotskylvania wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:But she grew up on our TV, ergo we own her in some weird way even if we admit we were never fans or ever meant to be.

This.

I can understand the racism angle...from the description it does sound like a 21st century minstrel show, but the sexualization angle is just ridiculous.

The sexualization is just a symptom of the racism, in the sense that her show equates blackness with hypersexuality.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tahar Joblis » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:23 pm

Jinkx Monsoon wrote:Her performance got exactly what she wanted, everyone talking about it. It pushed her single up to #1 in iTunes sales too, regardless of what people thought of the performance.

This. So very much this.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41597
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:24 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:But she grew up on our TV, ergo we own her in some weird way even if we admit we were never fans or ever meant to be.


We are the audience, target or not.

Nope. If you're not the target audience you are not her audience and your disdain is at best meaningless and worst an endorsement. "Audience" is not universal and trying to appeal to all audiences is both futile and compromising to the point of banality. Even 'pop' artists are not this dedicated as to think that everyone everywhere is their customer.
The Rich Port wrote:She lives or dies, prospers or suffers by us.

She prospers or suffers by her audience, or the audience that will follow her down her chosen path (or the paths chosen for her). Whether I am outraged or nonplussed by her performance effects her sales and merchandizing in no way, I wasn't a customer before and I'm not one now. If she had given a tame or 'approved' performance, I would not have even been aware that she was on the VMAs or that the VMAs were on or even still a thing. Any self-righteousness I feel in condemning her performance is largely meaningless to her prosperity.

Further, I think we should be careful about where the line is drawn regarding how much we get to demand from performers. We can like or not like the things that they put out, buy them or not buy them, but when we get to demand who they are its a bit too far.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:24 pm

Personally, I just think she's a shitty singer and her performances are terrible and tasteless, be they musical or theatrical or whatever.

But that's just my two cents.
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:25 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
Jinkx Monsoon wrote:Her performance got exactly what she wanted, everyone talking about it. It pushed her single up to #1 in iTunes sales too, regardless of what people thought of the performance.

This. So very much this.


But of course. She's a fucking performer. People are reading so much into this.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Forsakia
Minister
 
Posts: 3076
Founded: Nov 14, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Forsakia » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:27 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote::palm:
Miley Cyrus is not a slut and twerking is not cultural appropriation.

I'm going to disagree with you there. Twerking does not belong to white people.

And twerking is not just ass-shaking, guys. Quit that ignorance.


Twerking doesn't belong to white people in the same way that blues music doesn't belong to white people.

The "it's fine to use black backup dancers in a sexualised way if you're a black male, but not if you're a white woman" seems a stretch to me.
Member of Arch's fan club.

User avatar
Thanatttynia
Senator
 
Posts: 3609
Founded: Nov 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Thanatttynia » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:29 pm

It's a really catchy song and I do kind of like her.
I read an article which used the fact that she had black 'African-American" dancers around her and her, a white person in the centre as a show of racism. I don't think it's racism, more just having her as the centre of everything.
Last edited by Thanatttynia on Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Syng I wolde, butt, alas! decendunt prospera grata.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:32 pm

greed and death wrote:I actually did not watch the VMAs however with accusations of too raunchy, and counter accusations of slut shaming I became curious what all the hoopla was about. And I finally watched the performance after reading the accusations that her performance was a minstrel show.

Slut shaming source and counter source
http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertain ... story.html ;

http://perezhilton.com/2013-08-26-miley ... uY90b.dpbs

Minstrel show source and counter source:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... ropriation ;

http://flavorwire.com/412010/in-defense ... erformance

Youtube of the performance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1WDEfJBZXg


So there are a lot of accusations, too sexual, slut shaming, then further we have accusations of cultural appropriation even some people claiming the performance was a minstrel show. So what of these labels if any fit ?

My view is that her performance left a lot to be desired she seemed too stiff and out of her element. I also do not personally find her performance objectionable on sexuality however I could see those who felt the performance was more raunchy than should be on what was billed as an all ages show.

For the issue of race I find the performance while an appropriation of some typically African American dance, music, and terms falls short of being a minstrel show.


I don't know about race. I guess ill let an African American make that case if he chooses to.

but DAYAM the choreographer of that bit needs to be horsewhipped. it was awful. the costume designer should be shot. or at least never work in the industry again. miley cyrus's dad ought to be fired as dad. what was he thinking not objecting to her being dressed as if she were in a "barely legal" porn shoot? she is too young to know that this is not the way to establish herself as an adult. --if she wants to be regarded as an adult she needs to be dressed as an adult, that can be sexy/sleazy too but NOT slutty Lolita.

and she should stick to singing. she sucks as a dancer and her twerking was an embarrassment.
whatever

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:33 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
We are the audience, target or not.

Nope. If you're not the target audience you are not her audience and your disdain is at best meaningless and worst an endorsement. "Audience" is not universal and trying to appeal to all audiences is both futile and compromising to the point of banality. Even 'pop' artists are not this dedicated as to think that everyone everywhere is their customer.
The Rich Port wrote:She lives or dies, prospers or suffers by us.

She prospers or suffers by her audience, or the audience that will follow her down her chosen path (or the paths chosen for her). Whether I am outraged or nonplussed by her performance effects her sales and merchandizing in no way, I wasn't a customer before and I'm not one now. If she had given a tame or 'approved' performance, I would not have even been aware that she was on the VMAs or that the VMAs were on or even still a thing. Any self-righteousness I feel in condemning her performance is largely meaningless to her prosperity.

Further, I think we should be careful about where the line is drawn regarding how much we get to demand from performers. We can like or not like the things that they put out, buy them or not buy them, but when we get to demand who they are its a bit too far.


That's a very narrow view of it, sure, but equally valid, I guess.

Agree to disagree.

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:38 pm

I bet she's never going to suffer a major, celebrity-edition of a nervous breakdown.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:40 pm

Herskerstad wrote:I bet she's never going to suffer a major, celebrity-edition of a nervous breakdown.


shes already doing better than Brittney spears and Lindsay lohan.
whatever

User avatar
Nazis in Space
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11714
Founded: Aug 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazis in Space » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:42 pm

Ashmoria wrote:[...]miley cyrus's dad ought to be fired as dad. what was he thinking not objecting to her being dressed as if she were in a "barely legal" porn shoot? she is too young to know that this is not the way to establish herself as an adult.[...]
She's 21 years old, and I'm afraid the times when women remained under the guardianship of their parents until they married are over.

User avatar
Thanatttynia
Senator
 
Posts: 3609
Founded: Nov 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Thanatttynia » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:42 pm

Herskerstad wrote:I bet she's never going to suffer a major, celebrity-edition of a nervous breakdown.


How do you know that?
Syng I wolde, butt, alas! decendunt prospera grata.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:47 pm

Nazis in Space wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:[...]miley cyrus's dad ought to be fired as dad. what was he thinking not objecting to her being dressed as if she were in a "barely legal" porn shoot? she is too young to know that this is not the way to establish herself as an adult.[...]
She's 21 years old, and I'm afraid the times when women remained under the guardianship of their parents until they married are over.

he was working on the vmas. sure he doesn't control her anymore but someone needs to tell her that there is a difference between looking like an adult and looking like jailbait. her dad is a really good person to make that call.
whatever

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:59 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Nazis in Space wrote:She's 21 years old, and I'm afraid the times when women remained under the guardianship of their parents until they married are over.

he was working on the vmas. sure he doesn't control her anymore but someone needs to tell her that there is a difference between looking like an adult and looking like jailbait. her dad is a really good person to make that call.

No, the principle still applies. She's not a minor anymore, she has her own career, and gee whiz she just made a good career move. This moral condemnation is starting to look frighteningly reactionary.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Nailed to the Perch
Minister
 
Posts: 2137
Founded: Dec 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nailed to the Perch » Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:10 pm

So, after hearing all the fuss about this over the last couple of days, I finally got around watching the performance in question, and I must admit that my reaction was pretty much, "…that's it?"

Cyrus's appropriation of so-called "ratchet" culture and her use of black women's bodies as sexualized props deserves criticism. That, however, seems to be receiving far less attention than people pearl-clutching about "breaking news: young woman in profession where overt, over-the-top sexiness is constantly demanded of young women acts sexy in overt, over-the-top manner!" Young female pop stars in our culture are placed in a ridiculous double-bind where their entire careers are predicated upon performing sexiness for us, but when they do, we shriek about how they're dirty sluts.
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

User avatar
The Andromeda Islands
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1962
Founded: May 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Andromeda Islands » Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:52 pm

I haven't watched the VMAs in years & have little interest in "Music Television," but based on what I have seen and read, the Cyrus family is jacked up.

Billy Ray Cyrus is a bad father.
The Andromeda Islands Factbook
http://iiwiki.com/wiki/The_Andromeda_Islands

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:53 pm

The Andromeda Islands wrote:I haven't watched the VMAs in years & have little interest in "Music Television," but based on what I have seen and read, the Cyrus family is jacked up.

Billy Ray Cyrus is a bad father.

Nobody says the same thing about Robin Thicke's parents, though. I wonder why? Is it because people like you view women as property and men as full human beings? Yeah, that's actually exactly it.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Seriong
Minister
 
Posts: 2158
Founded: Aug 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seriong » Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:54 pm

The idea of her "appropriating black culture" is simply silly, and the idea that overtly sexual and raunchy dancing are a "black thing" is racist in itself. She's not racist.

As for slut shaming, or it being too sexual, in my opinion, she's a 20 year old doing stupid things, it happens.
Lunalia wrote:
The Independent States wrote:Um, perhaps you haven't heard that mercury poisons people? :palm:

Perhaps you've heard that chlorine is poisonous and sodium is a volatile explosive?

Drawkland wrote:I think it delegitimizes true cases of sexual assault, like real dangerous cases being dismissed, "Oh it's only sexual assault"
Like racism. If everything's "racist," then you can't tell what really is racist.

Murkwood wrote:As a trans MtF Bi Pansexual Transautistic CAMAB Demiplatonic Asensual Better-Abled Planetkin Singlet Afro-Centric Vegan Socialist Therian, I'm immune from criticism.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:55 pm

Seriong wrote:The idea of her "appropriating black culture" is simply silly, and the idea that overtly sexual and raunchy dancing are a "black thing" is racist in itself. She's not racist.

As for slut shaming, or it being too sexual, in my opinion, she's a 20 year old doing stupid things, it happens.

THAT IS THE POINT

SHE IS ASSOCIATING BLACKNESS WITH BEING OVERTLY SEXUAL AND THAT IS RACIST

I AM GLAD YOU AGREE WITH US
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Seriong
Minister
 
Posts: 2158
Founded: Aug 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seriong » Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:59 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Seriong wrote:The idea of her "appropriating black culture" is simply silly, and the idea that overtly sexual and raunchy dancing are a "black thing" is racist in itself. She's not racist.

As for slut shaming, or it being too sexual, in my opinion, she's a 20 year old doing stupid things, it happens.


SHE IS ASSOCIATING BLACKNESS WITH BEING OVERTLY SEXUAL AND THAT IS RACIST


How is she doing that? That makes no sense what so ever.
Lunalia wrote:
The Independent States wrote:Um, perhaps you haven't heard that mercury poisons people? :palm:

Perhaps you've heard that chlorine is poisonous and sodium is a volatile explosive?

Drawkland wrote:I think it delegitimizes true cases of sexual assault, like real dangerous cases being dismissed, "Oh it's only sexual assault"
Like racism. If everything's "racist," then you can't tell what really is racist.

Murkwood wrote:As a trans MtF Bi Pansexual Transautistic CAMAB Demiplatonic Asensual Better-Abled Planetkin Singlet Afro-Centric Vegan Socialist Therian, I'm immune from criticism.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36762
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Aug 28, 2013 2:01 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Seriong wrote:The idea of her "appropriating black culture" is simply silly, and the idea that overtly sexual and raunchy dancing are a "black thing" is racist in itself. She's not racist.

As for slut shaming, or it being too sexual, in my opinion, she's a 20 year old doing stupid things, it happens.

THAT IS THE POINT

SHE IS ASSOCIATING BLACKNESS WITH BEING OVERTLY SEXUAL AND THAT IS RACIST

I AM GLAD YOU AGREE WITH US


Which isn't relevant to todays world since the media is acting out of its parasitic need from FOMO.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
The Andromeda Islands
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1962
Founded: May 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Andromeda Islands » Wed Aug 28, 2013 2:03 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Nobody says the same thing about Robin Thicke's parents, though. I wonder why? Is it because people like you view women as property and men as full human beings? Yeah, that's actually exactly it.


Nice try.

I've seen one of Billy Ray's sons. The dude looks like the poster child for tattoos and piercings. The moment I saw this monstrosity, I thought to myself "Billy Ray Cyrus is a bad father."

As for Miley, I understand wanting to shed the Hannah Montana image, but what she's doing isn't working for her. Her father was a successful country and music singer. Maybe he could have given her some better advice.

As for Robin Thicke... I can't speak on Robin Thicke, because I didn't actually watch the awards.
The Andromeda Islands Factbook
http://iiwiki.com/wiki/The_Andromeda_Islands

User avatar
Nailed to the Perch
Minister
 
Posts: 2137
Founded: Dec 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nailed to the Perch » Wed Aug 28, 2013 2:18 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Seriong wrote:The idea of her "appropriating black culture" is simply silly, and the idea that overtly sexual and raunchy dancing are a "black thing" is racist in itself. She's not racist.

As for slut shaming, or it being too sexual, in my opinion, she's a 20 year old doing stupid things, it happens.

THAT IS THE POINT

SHE IS ASSOCIATING BLACKNESS WITH BEING OVERTLY SEXUAL AND THAT IS RACIST

I AM GLAD YOU AGREE WITH US


Yup. I think trying to explain the sociological implications of fetishizing black women's bodies (and specifically their bottoms) while connecting those bodies to out-of-control, animalistic sexuality may go a bit over the heads of NSG, though. On this site, "there is a black woman there whose entire function in the performance is to be a large ass for Ms. Cyrus to smack" cannot possibly count as racially insensitive unless Cyrus follows it up by saying, "ALSO I AM TOTALLY RACIST, Y'ALL. FUCK BLACK PEOPLE, TEE HEE."
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Wed Aug 28, 2013 2:19 pm

Can we all at least agree that whoever did her hair should be killed as a warning to others?
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Empire of Donner land, I always choose the longest answer, Necroghastia, Torisakia

Advertisement

Remove ads