Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Welp.
This is far more complicated than I thought it was going to be.
Of course it is, when has anything concerning the Middle East been anything but complicated.
Advertisement
by The Godly Nations » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:21 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Welp.
This is far more complicated than I thought it was going to be.
by Alien Space Bats » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:21 pm
Abasha wrote:Assad is a pretty wily politician and leader...
by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:23 pm
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:25 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:Abasha wrote:Assad is a pretty wily politician and leader...
Yep. Assad is a genius and Obama is an idiot.
<pause>
Obama Derangement Syndrome has gone global.
Do you think it's because he's black? I mean, we all know that Africans are stupid, right? Not like Europeans or Asians or Arabs...
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Alien Space Bats » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:25 pm
New Chalcedon wrote:Don't hold back, ASB: tell us what you really think about the Fourth Estate.
by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:26 pm
by Agritum » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:27 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:Abasha wrote:Assad is a pretty wily politician and leader...
Yep. Assad is a genius and Obama is an idiot.
<pause>
Obama Derangement Syndrome has gone global.
Do you think it's because he's black? I mean, we all know that Africans are stupid, right? Not like Europeans or Asians or Arabs...
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:27 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Welp.
This is far more complicated than I thought it was going to be.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Vetalia » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:27 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:This one almighty flow chart holds the key to peace in the Middle East.
I think it's buried under all the arrows though.
Edit: Spoiler'd
by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:28 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:What has Assad done to earn the name "asshat"?
Not trying to challenge you I'm srsly confused about the whole thing???
Everyone (well, most folks anyhow) agrees Assad's dictatorial powers and domination of Syrian politics is what precipitated the revolution. So by that standard he's kind of a jerk.
Nobody can really decide if the rebels would be/are any better though (or even if they could form a functioning government at all).
It's a mess, I guess is what it boils down to.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.
by The Godly Nations » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:29 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Welp.
This is far more complicated than I thought it was going to be.
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:30 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Welp.
This is far more complicated than I thought it was going to be.
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:30 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:Everyone (well, most folks anyhow) agrees Assad's dictatorial powers and domination of Syrian politics is what precipitated the revolution. So by that standard he's kind of a jerk.
Nobody can really decide if the rebels would be/are any better though (or even if they could form a functioning government at all).
It's a mess, I guess is what it boils down to.
Yeah I guess that's my confusion, like everyone is against Assad, but also everyone seems to be against the rebels where I live so I have no clue what to do except stand in the corner and drool on myself while I sob.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:33 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Yeah I guess that's my confusion, like everyone is against Assad, but also everyone seems to be against the rebels where I live so I have no clue what to do except stand in the corner and drool on myself while I sob.
Some are against the rebels because it is divided in several factions, some of which are extremist in nature. Basically, in a way, this is a forebearing of the same flaw in Iraq: somehow, after we topple down Assad, there will be a clusterfuck of different factions which will be trying to get power to get rid of the others. Or so one of the predictions go.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:37 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
No, I get that.
I don't get why Sarah and her family has been having a fucking meltdown for these past however many years.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Frisivisia » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:37 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Welp.
This is far more complicated than I thought it was going to be.
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:38 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Some are against the rebels because it is divided in several factions, some of which are extremist in nature. Basically, in a way, this is a forebearing of the same flaw in Iraq: somehow, after we topple down Assad, there will be a clusterfuck of different factions which will be trying to get power to get rid of the others. Or so one of the predictions go.
If I was Shirley, I would take a vacation and when I come back, see which one of Sarah's family isn't dead.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Frisivisia » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:38 pm
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
No, I get that.
I don't get why Sarah and her family has been having a fucking meltdown for these past however many years.
by The Godly Nations » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:39 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
When those "stinkbombs" are actually releasing carbon monoxide which kills Sarah's little sister and Shirley is the only police officer in town, Shirley intervening to prevent Sarah, who we now know is fucking insane and enjoys carbon monoxiding people, from carbon monoxiding more people looks a little bit better than it does in your rather loaded analogy.
by Agritum » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:40 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
When those "stinkbombs" are actually releasing carbon monoxide which kills Sarah's little sister and Shirley is the only police officer in town, Shirley intervening to prevent Sarah, who we now know is fucking insane and enjoys carbon monoxiding people, from carbon monoxiding more people looks a little bit better than it does in your rather loaded analogy.
by Frisivisia » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:41 pm
The Godly Nations wrote:Frisivisia wrote:When those "stinkbombs" are actually releasing carbon monoxide which kills Sarah's little sister and Shirley is the only police officer in town, Shirley intervening to prevent Sarah, who we now know is fucking insane and enjoys carbon monoxiding people, from carbon monoxiding more people looks a little bit better than it does in your rather loaded analogy.
Again, we don't know that for sure, nor does the analogy fit because the government and the rebels are in a war, unlike that family, which does involve killing people to achieve their objectives, making Sarah not insane, but extreme.
by Frisivisia » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:41 pm
Agritum wrote:Frisivisia wrote:When those "stinkbombs" are actually releasing carbon monoxide which kills Sarah's little sister and Shirley is the only police officer in town, Shirley intervening to prevent Sarah, who we now know is fucking insane and enjoys carbon monoxiding people, from carbon monoxiding more people looks a little bit better than it does in your rather loaded analogy.
And this is how you turn a teen drama into an action movie.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:43 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
When those "stinkbombs" are actually releasing carbon monoxide which kills Sarah's little sister and Shirley is the only police officer in town, Shirley intervening to prevent Sarah, who we now know is fucking insane and enjoys carbon monoxiding people, from carbon monoxiding more people looks a little bit better than it does in your rather loaded analogy.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by The Godly Nations » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:43 pm
Frisivisia wrote:The Godly Nations wrote:
Again, we don't know that for sure, nor does the analogy fit because the government and the rebels are in a war, unlike that family, which does involve killing people to achieve their objectives, making Sarah not insane, but extreme.
If Sarah is fighting with her husband and kills their daughter, and unrelated and innocent party, with carbon monoxide, I'm cool with intervention.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:44 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Like my professor in Foreign Policy said: "Foreign Relations are like relationships"
Relationships are complicated.
But here, let me put it in relationship style <puts glasses on>:
Basically let's say Shirley (US) is pissed at her best friend Sarah (Syria) for using stink bombs against her own family, when Shirley adviced Sarah that was such a stupid idea. Then Katerina (Russia) and Ming (China) are actually backing up Sarah because in their opinion she is completely cool and they pretty much want Shirley to fuck off.
Shirley refuses to accept this and goes and tries to convince her family she is right in doing it and have their backup in case she does need it. They don't really trust her because she has done prior fuck ups which have drained them emotionally as well as economically, and they see that her mishaps have also done damage to other people they didn't intend to piss off, so really and truly her family thinks is mixed: some want to still back her up while some just want to leave everything alone and fuck Sarah, why? Because she is acting like a complete bitch and somehow they feel Shirley is better than that.
I guess that's as best as I can put it in a layman sense.
When those "stinkbombs" are actually releasing carbon monoxide which kills Sarah's little sister and Shirley is the only police officer in town, Shirley intervening to prevent Sarah, who we now know is fucking insane and enjoys carbon monoxiding people, from carbon monoxiding more people looks a little bit better than it does in your rather loaded analogy.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Boris Cult, Cerespasia, Eahland, Google [Bot], Highway Eighty-Eight, Ineva, Majestic-12 [Bot], New Temecula, Nusan-tara, The Black Forrest, The Lone Alliance, The Orson Empire, The Xenopolis Confederation, Tungstan, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement