So you got nothing?
Advertisement

by Third Mexican Empire » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:06 pm

by Aravea » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:08 pm

by Siaos » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:10 pm
Aravea wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/09/politics/nsa-documents-scope
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world ... 658369.htm
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/201 ... nsa-spying
http://rt.com/usa/nsa-willfully-skirted ... dmits-928/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html
Zottistan wrote:Like voltage, the only practical way to measure freedom is relatively speaking.
Absolute freedom would be a terrible, terrible thing.

by Aravea » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:12 pm

by Gauthier » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:12 pm
Siaos wrote:Pope Joan wrote:
Stand Your Ground? SCOTUS enabled race-based redistricting? GOP takeover of NC state government? Legal attacks on civil rights laws?
Racism is resurgent, and it is well funded and well organized.
1. Stand your ground isn't racist. At all. Its just a poorly thought out law by idiot gun enthusiasts.
2. That is bad
3. GOP isn't racist, no matter how much you say it is. Believe it or not, wanting to be on equal footing with minorities rather than them getting special treatment isn't racist.
4. There are always legal attacks on civil rights laws of all types. It has little to do with racism.

by Third Mexican Empire » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:13 pm
Aravea wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/09/politics/nsa-documents-scope
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world ... 658369.htm
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/201 ... nsa-spying
http://rt.com/usa/nsa-willfully-skirted ... dmits-928/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html

by Aravea » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:14 pm
Third Mexican Empire wrote:Aravea wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/09/politics/nsa-documents-scope
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world ... 658369.htm
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/201 ... nsa-spying
http://rt.com/usa/nsa-willfully-skirted ... dmits-928/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html
So blame Obama for what Congress allowed to happen?

by The Old South » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:15 pm
Third Mexican Empire wrote:Aravea wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/09/politics/nsa-documents-scope
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world ... 658369.htm
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/201 ... nsa-spying
http://rt.com/usa/nsa-willfully-skirted ... dmits-928/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html
So blame Obama for what Congress allowed to happen?

by Gauthier » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:18 pm

by Aravea » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:19 pm
Gauthier wrote:The Old South wrote:The boss is always ultimately responsible. Obama is no exception. Frankly, he's a disappointment now.
Clearly if Obama wasn't in the Oval Office to begin with the House Republicans wouldn't be provoked into sitting on their asses doing nothing. Therefore Obama should resign and put on a butler suit to fix the problem like a good darkie. *nod*


by The Old South » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:23 pm
Gauthier wrote:The Old South wrote:The boss is always ultimately responsible. Obama is no exception. Frankly, he's a disappointment now.
Clearly if Obama wasn't in the Oval Office to begin with the House Republicans wouldn't be provoked into sitting on their asses doing nothing. Therefore Obama should resign and put on a butler suit to fix the problem like a good darkie. *nod*

by Frisivisia » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:24 pm
The Old South wrote:Gauthier wrote:
Clearly if Obama wasn't in the Oval Office to begin with the House Republicans wouldn't be provoked into sitting on their asses doing nothing. Therefore Obama should resign and put on a butler suit to fix the problem like a good darkie. *nod*
Exactly, clearly the only people who hold Obama responsible for his job are racists. Everyone who is fair and balanced understands that Obama's every accomplishment is a victory over the Racist Republicans, and everything that goes wrong isn't his fault. *nod*

by The Old South » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:25 pm
Frisivisia wrote:The Old South wrote:Exactly, clearly the only people who hold Obama responsible for his job are racists. Everyone who is fair and balanced understands that Obama's every accomplishment is a victory over the Racist Republicans, and everything that goes wrong isn't his fault. *nod*
I'd say that's a fairly accurate description of the situation.

by Nazi Flower Power » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:27 pm
Gunstan wrote:Am I the only person whowhen I heard the name of the restraunt was named Wild Wings? 25 black people, Wild wings?
![]()
![]()
I am assuming Wild Wings is a Chicken restraunt.

by Spartan Philidelphia » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:28 pm

by Frisivisia » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:29 pm

by The Old South » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:29 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Gunstan wrote:Am I the only person whowhen I heard the name of the restraunt was named Wild Wings? 25 black people, Wild wings?
![]()
![]()
I am assuming Wild Wings is a Chicken restraunt.
I've never understood why there is a stereotype about black people eating chicken or why it is supposed to be funny. Of course black people eat chicken, but so do most other people too.

by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:30 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Gunstan wrote:Am I the only person whowhen I heard the name of the restraunt was named Wild Wings? 25 black people, Wild wings?
![]()
![]()
I am assuming Wild Wings is a Chicken restraunt.
I've never understood why there is a stereotype about black people eating chicken or why it is supposed to be funny. Of course black people eat chicken, but so do most other people too.

by The Old South » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:32 pm

by Aravea » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:33 pm
The Old South wrote:Nazi Flower Power wrote:
I've never understood why there is a stereotype about black people eating chicken or why it is supposed to be funny. Of course black people eat chicken, but so do most other people too.
It's a strange stereotype. Virtually all of the food-stereotypes related to black people are all things that are equally popular with whites in the South. Fried chicken, watermelon, etc.

by The Old South » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:34 pm

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:35 pm
Blasveck wrote:Frisivisia wrote:The first statement isn't really accurate, but most of Obama's accomplishments are victories over the Republicans in Congress and you're lying to me if him being black doesn't motivate some white reactionaries to oppose him.
I'm sure it does, but you might be overestimating just how many of them do that.
I'm sorry to tell you that the Republican Party isn't made entirely of racists.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, I always choose the longest answer, Necroghastia, Torisakia
Advertisement