The problem with Caligula was he started out really good and then just went full retard.
Advertisement

by Tlaceceyaya » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:18 pm
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by The Parkus Empire » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:18 pm
Vazdania wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Are in no way legal documents that entitle the highest non-government proprietor of the land to supersede the government, its ultimate proprietor; the deed holder is merely the manager. You may make a case that your ancestor or whatever got "tricked" into paying for the deed and didn't know this, but I'd have an easier time swallowing pizza crust without chewing.
![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allodial_title

by Vazdania » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:19 pm

by Frisivisia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:20 pm

by Shnercropolis » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:20 pm
Rather, he went full crazy goddamn whacko.

by Vazdania » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:20 pm

by Tlaceceyaya » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:20 pm
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by The Parkus Empire » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:21 pm

by Vazdania » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:21 pm

by Wintersun » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:21 pm
Vazdania wrote:Wintersun wrote:
I can find a few thousands Native Americans who'd like a word with you...
Well the land was acquired via war conquest and then sold.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_conquest

by Minarchist States » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:21 pm
Vazdania wrote:Wintersun wrote:
I can find a few thousands Native Americans who'd like a word with you...
Well the land was acquired via war conquest and then sold.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_conquest

by The Parkus Empire » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:22 pm
Vazdania wrote:Wintersun wrote:
I can find a few thousands Native Americans who'd like a word with you...
Well the land was acquired via war conquest and then sold.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_conquest

by Vazdania » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:22 pm

by Warda » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:22 pm
Las Palmeras wrote:Decent enough for the Middle East.

by Frisivisia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:23 pm
Warda wrote:Frisivisia wrote:Perhaps he was just doing it because "lol im emperor yo i can do wat i want"
Theres the im gawd on teh earf!!!! and forcing a person to view their husband chained to a wall being eaten by rats with gangrene oozing out funness, and then having sex with the person on the dining table and forcing everyone to watch.

by Seleucas » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:23 pm
Minarchist States wrote:Wasn't Reagan a Minarcho-Monarchist? I forgot.Well, that seems to pretty much jettison the notion of the social contract. If the rules are determined simply by the numbers on each side, rather than the consent of both parties, then there's absolutely nothing contractual about it.
Exactly! The social contract is absurd.

by Tlaceceyaya » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:23 pm
The page I linked to wrote:A group or culture historically owns a piece of land and distributes it among its members, through the relevant authority.
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by Warda » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:25 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Warda wrote:Theres the im gawd on teh earf!!!! and forcing a person to view their husband chained to a wall being eaten by rats with gangrene oozing out funness, and then having sex with the person on the dining table and forcing everyone to watch.
That last one is kinky and sounds nice if you're into exhibitionism.
Las Palmeras wrote:Decent enough for the Middle East.

by Shnercropolis » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:26 pm

by Frisivisia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:26 pm
Seleucas wrote:Minarchist States wrote:Wasn't Reagan a Minarcho-Monarchist? I forgot.
Exactly! The social contract is absurd.
To me, it is the most thoroughly moronic political theory, absolutely bereft of any redeeming value. There are even parts of Marxism that I agree with/find interesting, but the idea of the state being some kind of monist embodiment of the people to which everyone implicitly consents (regardless of their explicit actions) is so clearly full of holes that I don't understand why anyone would use it to justify any government.
If one had to justify government, I think the most logical argument would have to be that the state has the power, and thus if you do not want to be harmed you must obey its decisions. I would not do so, but one could argue that this would be beneficial to those who are made to obey without having to make up nonsense about people secretly consenting to their treatment or the government being the interest of everyone, as opposed to its own specific interest.

by Frisivisia » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:27 pm

by Wintersun » Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:28 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Seleucas wrote:
To me, it is the most thoroughly moronic political theory, absolutely bereft of any redeeming value. There are even parts of Marxism that I agree with/find interesting, but the idea of the state being some kind of monist embodiment of the people to which everyone implicitly consents (regardless of their explicit actions) is so clearly full of holes that I don't understand why anyone would use it to justify any government.
If one had to justify government, I think the most logical argument would have to be that the state has the power, and thus if you do not want to be harmed you must obey its decisions. I would not do so, but one could argue that this would be beneficial to those who are made to obey without having to make up nonsense about people secretly consenting to their treatment or the government being the interest of everyone, as opposed to its own specific interest.
You live in the land, you accept public services and agree to pay for them. You also get to vote for people and things. It's pretty straightforward and hardly "moronic".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bahrimontagn, Eternal Algerstonia, Floofybit, Greater Cesnica, Ifreann, La Cocina del Bodhi, Necroghastia, Neu California, Novaya Equestria, Ors Might, Port Caverton, Shrillland, Sorcery, Sovereign Island of Pimland, Tarsonis, The Crimson Isles, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, Unitarian Universalism, Washington Resistance Army, Western Theram, Xenti, Zurkerx
Advertisement