NATION

PASSWORD

Is It Correct To Be Politically Correct?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:59 pm

Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:Please tell me when I used the word "silence". Can't find it? Do you know why? Because I did not say anything you are accusing me of. Don't base an assumption of an inferance.

Oh please.
Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:@Ceannairceach (sorry, I can't quote you for some odd reason)

How is publicly opposing gay marriage wrong? Does the First Amendment not apply to those who don't like gay marriage? Or are you bigoted to those who have different beliefs?

User avatar
Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5724
Founded: Oct 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic » Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:05 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:Please tell me when I used the word "silence". Can't find it? Do you know why? Because I did not say anything you are accusing me of. Don't base an assumption of an inferance.

You questioned if the first amendment applies to those who are against homosexuality. That implies that someone is trying to silence them.

No, it implies that I was asking you a question so you could elaborate yourself
Pro: LGBT rights, Capitalism, Libertarianism, Drug Legalization, Non-Interventionism, Free Immigration, Gun Rights, Secularism
Anti: Socialism, Totalitarianism, Big Government, Bigotry, Nationalism, Censorship, Capital Punishment
Pro: Modernism, Minimalism, International Style
Anti: Postmodernism, Excessive Building Codes, Urban Sprawl, Traditionalism.[/box]
Canador is a neutral Federal Libertarian Constitutional Republic.
What I look Like
The Black Keys, Arctic Monkeys, The Drums, Fleet Foxes, Godspeed You! Black Emperor, The Fratellis, Mr. Little Jeans, The Decemberists, Caught a Ghost, TV on the Radio
Blazers, Oxford Shoes/Boots, Waistcoats, Scarves, Skinny Jeans

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:07 pm

Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:You questioned if the first amendment applies to those who are against homosexuality. That implies that someone is trying to silence them.

No, it implies that I was asking you a question so you could elaborate yourself

You pointedly asked if I was a bigot and if I was interested in circumventing the constitution to silence those who disagree with me. That isn't a fair question.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
New Randia
Envoy
 
Posts: 273
Founded: May 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Randia » Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:10 pm

i think it is a good thing to speak without causing intentional offense unless someone has done something specifically to deserve it. I also note that i am quite often offensive for no good reason (and therefore not perfect).

i think it is a bad thing to allow political correctness to get in the way of factual information exchange, to allow being P/C to make certain topics off limits, or to allow people whom have an agenda to try to frame the conversation in their favor using "political correctness" without calling them on it.
μολὼν λαβέ (ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ)
Economic Right: 8.38
Social Libertarian: 3.74

"Lord, the money we do spend on Government and its not one bit better than the government we got for one-third the money twenty years ago." -Will Rogers

User avatar
Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5724
Founded: Oct 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic » Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:12 pm

Then you say "no" to both questions, and then explain yourself.
Pro: LGBT rights, Capitalism, Libertarianism, Drug Legalization, Non-Interventionism, Free Immigration, Gun Rights, Secularism
Anti: Socialism, Totalitarianism, Big Government, Bigotry, Nationalism, Censorship, Capital Punishment
Pro: Modernism, Minimalism, International Style
Anti: Postmodernism, Excessive Building Codes, Urban Sprawl, Traditionalism.[/box]
Canador is a neutral Federal Libertarian Constitutional Republic.
What I look Like
The Black Keys, Arctic Monkeys, The Drums, Fleet Foxes, Godspeed You! Black Emperor, The Fratellis, Mr. Little Jeans, The Decemberists, Caught a Ghost, TV on the Radio
Blazers, Oxford Shoes/Boots, Waistcoats, Scarves, Skinny Jeans

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:14 pm

Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:Then you say "no" to both questions, and then explain yourself.

Don't ask shitty questions, and I will.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5724
Founded: Oct 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic » Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:18 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:Then you say "no" to both questions, and then explain yourself.

Don't ask shitty questions, and I will.

Perhaps I wanted to know if those were the reasons why you have your beliefs? I did not intend to accuse you of anything.
Pro: LGBT rights, Capitalism, Libertarianism, Drug Legalization, Non-Interventionism, Free Immigration, Gun Rights, Secularism
Anti: Socialism, Totalitarianism, Big Government, Bigotry, Nationalism, Censorship, Capital Punishment
Pro: Modernism, Minimalism, International Style
Anti: Postmodernism, Excessive Building Codes, Urban Sprawl, Traditionalism.[/box]
Canador is a neutral Federal Libertarian Constitutional Republic.
What I look Like
The Black Keys, Arctic Monkeys, The Drums, Fleet Foxes, Godspeed You! Black Emperor, The Fratellis, Mr. Little Jeans, The Decemberists, Caught a Ghost, TV on the Radio
Blazers, Oxford Shoes/Boots, Waistcoats, Scarves, Skinny Jeans

User avatar
Mushet
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17410
Founded: Apr 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Mushet » Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:24 pm

Tulija wrote:No. The right to offend is an essential part of freedom of expression. Likewise, if people are spouting complete bullshit due to this, retorts and the public exposition of their idiocy is protected, conversely, by the freedom of expression. So the right itself is useful for all - bar those with such a thin skin, that they believe themselves infallible and so worthy of forcing their opinions of what is tasteful or not onto others.

And who ever saud we're going to use the law to censor people from saying offensive things, when people say extremely bigoted shit we tell them off for saying bigoted shit, who's forcing their opinions?
"what I believe is like a box, and we’re taking the energy of our thinking and putting into a box of beliefs, pretending that we’re thinking...I’ve gone through most of my life not believing anything. Either I know or I don’t know, or I think." - John Trudell

Gun control is, and always has been, a tool of white supremacy.

Puppet: E-City ranked #1 in the world for Highest Drug Use on 5/25/2015
Puppet Sacred Heart Church ranked #2 in the world for Nudest 2/25/2010
OP of a 5 page archived thread The Forum Seven Tit Museum
Previous Official King of Forum 7 (2010-2012/13), relinquished own title
First person to get AQ'd Quote was funnier in 2011, you had to have been there
Celebrating over a decade on Nationstates!

User avatar
Mushet
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17410
Founded: Apr 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Mushet » Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:34 pm

Galborg wrote:PCers assert there ain't no such thing as PC.
Riddle me ree: if Smoking Ban ain't PC, if cancelling Christmas and calling it "Winterval" ain't PC,
do that mean that smoking ban and winterval are Politically WRONG?

Ain't no such thing as PC gone mad. PC is a very efficient system for Aristocrats, Bankers, Priests etc to persecute Workers, Peasants etc. If PC ever favoured Peasants v Aristos, that would be PC gone mad. PC always supports Aristos so PC is always sane.

How is social pressure not to express bigoted views about underprivileged group not favoring the "peasants" and instead favoring the "Aristos"?
Last edited by Mushet on Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"what I believe is like a box, and we’re taking the energy of our thinking and putting into a box of beliefs, pretending that we’re thinking...I’ve gone through most of my life not believing anything. Either I know or I don’t know, or I think." - John Trudell

Gun control is, and always has been, a tool of white supremacy.

Puppet: E-City ranked #1 in the world for Highest Drug Use on 5/25/2015
Puppet Sacred Heart Church ranked #2 in the world for Nudest 2/25/2010
OP of a 5 page archived thread The Forum Seven Tit Museum
Previous Official King of Forum 7 (2010-2012/13), relinquished own title
First person to get AQ'd Quote was funnier in 2011, you had to have been there
Celebrating over a decade on Nationstates!

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:42 pm

Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:Then you say "no" to both questions, and then explain yourself.

You do not understand the First Amendment or how it is applied.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Galborg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Aug 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Galborg » Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:51 pm

Mushet wrote:
Galborg wrote:PCers assert there ain't no such thing as PC.
Riddle me ree: if Smoking Ban ain't PC, if cancelling Christmas and calling it "Winterval" ain't PC,
do that mean that smoking ban and winterval are Politically WRONG?

Ain't no such thing as PC gone mad. PC is a very efficient system for Aristocrats, Bankers, Priests etc to persecute Workers, Peasants etc. If PC ever favoured Peasants v Aristos, that would be PC gone mad. PC always supports Aristos so PC is always sane.

How is social pressure not to express bigoted views about underprivileged group not favoring the "peasants" and instead favoring the "Aristos"?


PC forbids Peasants to burn Tobacco.
PC encourages Priests to burn Witches.

PC is Aristo privilege.
The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is you can never be sure if they are real. - Mark Twain

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112550
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:57 pm

Galborg wrote:
Mushet wrote:How is social pressure not to express bigoted views about underprivileged group not favoring the "peasants" and instead favoring the "Aristos"?


PC forbids Peasants to burn Tobacco.
PC encourages Priests to burn Witches.

PC is Aristo privilege.

Wiki sayeth:

Political correctness (adjectivally, politically correct; both forms commonly abbreviated to PC) is a term that refers to language, ideas, or policies that address perceived or actual discrimination against or alienation of politically, socially or economically disadvantaged groups. The term usually implies that these social considerations are excessive or of a purely "political" nature. These groups most prominently include those defined by gender, race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation and disability.

Historically, the term was a colloquialism used in the early-to-mid 20th century by Communists and Socialists in political debates, referring pejoratively to the Communist "party line", which provided for "correct" positions on many matters of politics. The term was adopted in the later 20th century by the New Left, applied with a certain humour to condemn sexist or racist conduct as "not politically correct". By the early 1990s, the term was adopted by US conservatives as a pejorative term for all manner of attempts to promote multiculturalism and identity politics, particularly in terms of attempts to introduce new terms that sought to leave behind discriminatory baggage attached to older ones, and conversely to try to make older ones taboo. This phenomenon was driven by a combination of the linguistic turn in academia and the rise of identity politics both inside and outside it. These led to attempts to change social reality by changing language, with attempts at making language more culturally inclusive and gender-neutral. These attempts (associated with the political left) led to a backlash from the right, partly against the attempts to change language, and partly against the underlying identity politics itself. "Political correctness" became a convenient rightwing label for both of these things it rejected.

In contemporary usage, the terms PC, politically correct, and political correctness are pejorative descriptors, whereas, the term politically incorrect is used by opponents of PC as an implicitly positive self-description, as in the cases of the conservative, topical book-series The Politically Incorrect Guide, and the liberal, television talk-show program Politically Incorrect.

I don't see many Aristos and Peasants in there.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Mushet
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17410
Founded: Apr 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Mushet » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:02 pm

Galborg wrote:
Mushet wrote:How is social pressure not to express bigoted views about underprivileged group not favoring the "peasants" and instead favoring the "Aristos"?


PC forbids Peasants to burn Tobacco.
PC encourages Priests to burn Witches.

PC is Aristo privilege.

"PC" does not forbid "Peasants" to burn tobacco.

This talk of "peasants", "Aristos", complaining about "PC" and your nation category makes me wonder if you're one of those so called "socialists" that think that talking about any oppression other than proletarian vs bourgeouis is divisive, is this true?
"what I believe is like a box, and we’re taking the energy of our thinking and putting into a box of beliefs, pretending that we’re thinking...I’ve gone through most of my life not believing anything. Either I know or I don’t know, or I think." - John Trudell

Gun control is, and always has been, a tool of white supremacy.

Puppet: E-City ranked #1 in the world for Highest Drug Use on 5/25/2015
Puppet Sacred Heart Church ranked #2 in the world for Nudest 2/25/2010
OP of a 5 page archived thread The Forum Seven Tit Museum
Previous Official King of Forum 7 (2010-2012/13), relinquished own title
First person to get AQ'd Quote was funnier in 2011, you had to have been there
Celebrating over a decade on Nationstates!

User avatar
Conservative Idealism
Diplomat
 
Posts: 647
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative Idealism » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:03 pm

Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:These days one must be careful of what comes out of their mouths, and make an effort to be politically correct. Is it bad not to be politically correct, and vice versa? (when I say politically correct, I mean, for example, the public backlash a politician would recieved if he or she "offended someone through dialogue"). What is your opinion of political correctness? (regarding a statement by a none-bigoted individual)

You mean political correctness in the sense that everything said publicly must not offend that tiny minority capable of seeing offense in everything said publicly?

No, I do not believe that is correct. The concept of being offended offers too much power to dubiously-victimized people; that does not mean, however, that the concept of being offending should be ignored.

User avatar
Galborg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Aug 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Galborg » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:03 pm

PC: majority is verboten to persecute minority

That Virtue is twisted into Bankers are minority
Workers are majority
Therefore ALL law must enshrine Banker privileges.
The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is you can never be sure if they are real. - Mark Twain

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38272
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Rich Port » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:04 pm

... I thought "black" was politically correct.

Why do I get the feeling OP has no idea what political correctness is and what people actually want from it?
THOSE THAT SOW THORNS SHOULD NOT EXPECT FLOWERS
CONSERVATISM IS FEAR AND STAGNATION AS IDEOLOGY. ONLY MARCH FORWARD.

Pronouns: She/Her
The Alt-Right Playbook
Alt-right/racist terminology
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:06 pm

Galborg wrote:PC: majority is verboten to persecute minority

That Virtue is twisted into Bankers are minority
Workers are majority
Therefore ALL law must enshrine Banker privileges.

What is this even supposed to mean?
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Warda
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1898
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Warda » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:06 pm

The Rich Port wrote:... I thought "black" was politically correct.

Why do I get the feeling OP has no idea what political correctness is and what people actually want from it?

african-colored-negro-black-african american
Nation Described As
Las Palmeras wrote:Decent enough for the Middle East.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:07 pm

Warda wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:... I thought "black" was politically correct.

Why do I get the feeling OP has no idea what political correctness is and what people actually want from it?

african-colored-negro-black-african american

You're trying way too hard.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Warda
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1898
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Warda » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:09 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Warda wrote:african-colored-negro-black-african american

You're trying way too hard.

i was answering his question on the evolvement of the phrase used as accecptable to describe sub-saharan africans
Nation Described As
Las Palmeras wrote:Decent enough for the Middle East.

User avatar
The Remean Lordship
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 145
Founded: May 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Remean Lordship » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:09 pm

When it comes to free speech, I am pretty liberal, and I support what Voltaire's Ideas. He is famous for saying (I am paraphrasing here) "I don't agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to say it." but I think that being politically correct is a good thing that one is discouraged from insulting groups of ethnic minorities, as it supports cohesiveness in a society. Until all ethnic misgivings are gone, political correctness should say.
"No! No, you behave like this and we become just... savages in the street! The juries and executioners, they elect themselves! No, it is medieval! The rule of law, it must be held high and if it falls you pick it up and hold it even higher! For all of society, all civilized people will have nothing to shelter them if it is destroyed!"
—Hercule Poirot

KEEP GAR #2

User avatar
Old Appalachia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Aug 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Appalachia » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:12 pm

In short:
Politically Correct - associated with left wing thinking
Politically Incorrect - associated with right wing thinking

My definition of it is this:
Politically Correct - A term used for whiney, overly-sensitive pansies who need everything sugar-coated for them.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38272
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Rich Port » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:13 pm

Warda wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:... I thought "black" was politically correct.

Why do I get the feeling OP has no idea what political correctness is and what people actually want from it?

african-colored-negro-black-african american


Normal people still use "black".

I have never heard anyone in polite company use the term "African-American".

Besides, aren't there Africans who are also white?
THOSE THAT SOW THORNS SHOULD NOT EXPECT FLOWERS
CONSERVATISM IS FEAR AND STAGNATION AS IDEOLOGY. ONLY MARCH FORWARD.

Pronouns: She/Her
The Alt-Right Playbook
Alt-right/racist terminology
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Warda
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1898
Founded: Jun 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Warda » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:15 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Warda wrote:african-colored-negro-black-african american


Normal people still use "black".

I have never heard anyone in polite company use the term "African-American".

Besides, aren't there Africans who are also white?

Yup, but really if you use any of those your probably ok.
Nation Described As
Las Palmeras wrote:Decent enough for the Middle East.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:15 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Warda wrote:african-colored-negro-black-african american


Normal people still use "black".

I have never heard anyone in polite company use the term "African-American".

Besides, aren't there Africans who are also white?


South Africans, usually.
Forever a Communist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bienenhalde, Big Eyed Animation, Bovad, Corporate Collective Salvation, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Kelvenya, Kostane, Lycom, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, The Greater Ohio Valley, Zucksland

Advertisement

Remove ads