NATION

PASSWORD

Islam/Muslim Discussion Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

To which branch of Islam do you belong?

Sunni
164
41%
Shia
53
13%
Ibadi
15
4%
Ahmadiyya
10
2%
Sufi
31
8%
Nondenominational
47
12%
Other
84
21%
 
Total votes : 404

User avatar
Personal Freedom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11257
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Personal Freedom » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:57 pm

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Nervium wrote:
The Samurai were Buddhists.

Just some of them. Some others were Shinto. A better example would be the Ikko Ikki.

Some of the Buddhist Emperors of India, I forget their names. Was it Akbar?
Economic Left/Right: -10.0 (previously -6.45)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18 (previously -4.72 )
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves;
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:59 pm

Personal Freedom wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Just some of them. Some others were Shinto. A better example would be the Ikko Ikki.

Some of the Buddhist Emperors of India, I forget their names. Was it Akbar?

Guess Buddhism is a trap then.

What about Australian Aboriginals?
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
Personal Freedom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11257
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Personal Freedom » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:01 pm

Personal Freedom wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Just some of them. Some others were Shinto. A better example would be the Ikko Ikki.

Some of the Buddhist Emperors of India, I forget their names. Was it Akbar?

Not Akbar, but yeah...
Economic Left/Right: -10.0 (previously -6.45)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18 (previously -4.72 )
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves;
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:07 pm

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Nervium wrote:
The Samurai were Buddhists.

Just some of them. Some others were Shinto. A better example would be the Ikko Ikki.

The two are not mutually exclusive. Zen Buddhism was basically part of the Samurai Creed in the Edo Era.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:08 pm

Sun Wukong wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Just some of them. Some others were Shinto. A better example would be the Ikko Ikki.

The two are not mutually exclusive. Zen Buddhism was basically part of the Samurai Creed in the Edo Era.

True, but it depends on the individual. Besides, Edo Samurai are stupid. Sengoku Jidai ftw.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
Neo Majapahitan Empire
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Majapahitan Empire » Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:12 am

Personal Freedom wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Just some of them. Some others were Shinto. A better example would be the Ikko Ikki.

Some of the Buddhist Emperors of India, I forget their names. Was it Akbar?


Was it Ashoka? because he's a buddhist.

User avatar
Omensa
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Aug 22, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Omensa » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:57 am

I'm looking to convert. Already know how to waiting for a bit

User avatar
Personal Freedom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11257
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Personal Freedom » Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:46 pm

Neo Majapahitan Empire wrote:
Personal Freedom wrote:Some of the Buddhist Emperors of India, I forget their names. Was it Akbar?


Was it Ashoka? because he's a buddhist.

Thar could be it. Anyway the point has been made.
Economic Left/Right: -10.0 (previously -6.45)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18 (previously -4.72 )
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves;
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

User avatar
Dasha Kovachevich
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 451
Founded: Jul 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Dasha Kovachevich » Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:47 pm

Omensa wrote:I'm looking to convert. Already know how to waiting for a bit

Mashallah, great news!
About Me: 17, Female, H.S. *~*SENIOR*~*, Bosnian, Muslim, Moderate, Conservative
Puppets: Slovenya Slovinka

User avatar
Islamic Commune
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Nov 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Re: Islam/Muslim Discussion Thread

Postby Islamic Commune » Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:17 pm

Omensa wrote:I'm looking to convert. Already know how to waiting for a bit


There's no formal rite of passage for Islam. All you have to do is declare that there is no divinity but God and that Muhammad was God's messenger. Then take a shower or something.

But be very careful about this decision. Do not do it without full certainty of what you ate doing. Read up on some of the practices of Islam and its ideas first. Just don't throw yourself into something without full knowledge of what you are doing.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:22 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:There's no formal rite of passage for Islam. All you have to do is declare that there is no divinity but God and that Muhammad was God's messenger. Then take a shower or something.

So if my lax Catholic grandmother recognizes Muhammad as a prophet alike a Catholic saint... she becomes a Muslim? e.e
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Personal Freedom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11257
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Personal Freedom » Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:39 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:
Omensa wrote:I'm looking to convert. Already know how to waiting for a bit


There's no formal rite of passage for Islam. All you have to do is declare that there is no divinity but God and that Muhammad was God's messenger. Then take a shower or something.

But be very careful about this decision. Do not do it without full certainty of what you ate doing. Read up on some of the practices of Islam and its ideas first. Just don't throw yourself into something without full knowledge of what you are doing.

Then I'm a Muslim again?
Economic Left/Right: -10.0 (previously -6.45)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18 (previously -4.72 )
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves;
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

User avatar
Islamic Commune
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Nov 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic Commune » Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:15 pm

So if my lax Catholic grandmother recognizes Muhammad as a prophet alike a Catholic saint... she becomes a Muslim? e.e


As long as your grandmother testifies that Muhammad was a Messenger that received divine revelation from God, and that only God has divinity, and no other object, animal or human (Like a Pope) is divine or has divine right, she is a Mu'mina, a term used to describe a Believer. Actually, I think I might have confused people.

So testifying in the above statement makes you a Believer. A Muslim by definition is one who Submits, which means someone who not only believes, but also follows the five pillars of Islam:
-Testifying
-Praying 5 times a day
-Paying Zakat (2.5% of your wealth every year goes to helping the poor or social programs)
-Fasting during Ramadan
-Pilgrimage to Makkah just once

All of those are conditional requirements. If a person is poor and cannot go to Makkah, for example, then they don't have to follow the last pillar.

In addition to those Five Pillars, a Submitter (Muslim) is an active reader of the Qur'an (Or seeker of its information), and seeks to fulfill all of the priorities expressed in the Qur'an.

So your Grandmother could definitely be a Believer, but I don't know if she does what it takes to be a Submitter.

I hope that solves Personal Freedom's question.
Last edited by Islamic Commune on Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:18 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Personal Freedom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11257
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Personal Freedom » Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:28 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:
So if my lax Catholic grandmother recognizes Muhammad as a prophet alike a Catholic saint... she becomes a Muslim? e.e


As long as your grandmother testifies that Muhammad was a Messenger that received divine revelation from God, and that only God has divinity, and no other object, animal or human (Like a Pope) is divine or has divine right, she is a Mu'mina, a term used to describe a Believer. Actually, I think I might have confused people.

So testifying in the above statement makes you a Believer. A Muslim by definition is one who Submits, which means someone who not only believes, but also follows the five pillars of Islam:
-Testifying
-Praying 5 times a day
-Paying Zakat (2.5% of your wealth every year goes to helping the poor or social programs)
-Fasting during Ramadan
-Pilgrimage to Makkah just once

All of those are conditional requirements. If a person is poor and cannot go to Makkah, for example, then they don't have to follow the last pillar.

In addition to those Five Pillars, a Submitter (Muslim) is an active reader of the Qur'an (Or seeker of its information), and seeks to fulfill all of the priorities expressed in the Qur'an.

So your Grandmother could definitely be a Believer, but I don't know if she does what it takes to be a Submitter.

I hope that solves Personal Freedom's question.

That is honestly the best definition of Islam I have encountered.
Economic Left/Right: -10.0 (previously -6.45)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18 (previously -4.72 )
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves;
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

User avatar
Islamic Commune
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Nov 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic Commune » Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:38 pm

I have a discussion question, if anyone wants to participate.

Because there is no compulsion in religion in Islam, is it correct to indoctrinate children into Islam? Should children make the final choice once they reach puberty once they want to be a Muslim or not?

I know in Islam, parents have to teach their children about the religion, but to force a child to follow Islam is really not in the ethics of Islam. If I raise a child, I will ask them once they reach 15 whether or not they want to follow Islam or not, and their choice I will accept. What do you guys think about this?

I find that when someone chooses to do something, they are more committed to it, and this applies to religion as well. Those who pledge themselves into Islam when they are mature enough are often more devout than those who were, "born into the faith".
Last edited by Islamic Commune on Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Anollasia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25633
Founded: Apr 05, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Anollasia » Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:41 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:
So if my lax Catholic grandmother recognizes Muhammad as a prophet alike a Catholic saint... she becomes a Muslim? e.e


As long as your grandmother testifies that Muhammad was a Messenger that received divine revelation from God, and that only God has divinity, and no other object, animal or human (Like a Pope) is divine or has divine right, she is a Mu'mina, a term used to describe a Believer. Actually, I think I might have confused people.

So testifying in the above statement makes you a Believer. A Muslim by definition is one who Submits, which means someone who not only believes, but also follows the five pillars of Islam:
-Testifying
-Praying 5 times a day
-Paying Zakat (2.5% of your wealth every year goes to helping the poor or social programs)
-Fasting during Ramadan
-Pilgrimage to Makkah just once

All of those are conditional requirements. If a person is poor and cannot go to Makkah, for example, then they don't have to follow the last pillar.

In addition to those Five Pillars, a Submitter (Muslim) is an active reader of the Qur'an (Or seeker of its information), and seeks to fulfill all of the priorities expressed in the Qur'an.

So your Grandmother could definitely be a Believer, but I don't know if she does what it takes to be a Submitter.

I hope that solves Personal Freedom's question.


I don't pray 5 times a day, fast during Ramadan (I'm too underweight), or go to Mecca.

Then again I'm still young.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:43 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:human (Like a Pope) is divine or has divine right

This probably is where Catholics are excluded, then. Not that she believes in humans, but does ask for certain saints to "intercede" for her and those around her.

(In Iberian culture people tend to ask favors for different saints. There are some asked by those seeking health, others seeking safety, others seeking blessings and others seeking even love or lost property; the power used is that of God, but they are seen as specific "messengers" for certain deeds.)
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Islamic Commune
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Nov 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic Commune » Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:47 pm

I don't pray 5 times a day, fast during Ramadan (I'm too underweight), or go to Mecca.

Then again I'm still young.

If you have not yet reached puberty, it's fine. Once you have hit puberty, you start to become accountable for all of your actions and inactions.

Brother, if you are a Muslim, then it is your best interest to try to uphold the five pillars. Of course, there are numerous exceptions.

You might not pray five times a day, probably because you don't know how to pray. That is okay, as long as you are making the effort to learn. There are several 'extras' you can add to prayer, like reciting a surah you've memorized, but it's not necessary. As long as you have the fundamentals, it's good enough. If you would like more help, feel free to send me a telegram.

As for Ramadan, I am not sure if that is an excuse. I mean, if you have a problem where not eating or drinking for a time will cause you to collapse, then obviously you cannot fast. For my age, I am also rather underweight. Yet, fasting from sunrise to sunset will not cause me to collapse if I manage my energy wisely. If you absolutely will cause a fatal injury to yourself if you fast, then you are excused. If not, then try to develop some willpower.

I have also not done my pilgrimage, because I cannot afford it, and I have no means to get there. If I cannot afford to go to Makkah, or I have a problem that prevents me from going there (I might have a broken leg or something), then it is pardoned from me, as it would be pardoned from you under the same circumstances.

I want to give a reminder to try not to lag off in your practice. Remember that when you are outside, you are the face of the Muslim Community, so try to be the best of characters as well.

This probably is where Catholics are excluded, then. Not that she believes in humans, but does ask for certain saints to "intercede" for her and those around her.

(In Iberian culture people tend to ask favors for different saints. There are some asked by those seeking health, others seeking safety, others seeking blessings and others seeking even love or lost property; the power used is that of God, but they are seen as specific "messengers" for certain deeds.)


In Islam, we also have certain figures that we know of that are major contributors to the Islamic cause, such as Umar ibn al-Khattab or Saladin or whatnot. However, they are not spiritual figures for us.

The average Muslim rejects the idea that someone must intercede for them in order to contact God. I mean to Muslims, if God is all-seeing, all-knowing, why do people need to ask Clergy to contact God or repent? Why not ask for repentance directly from God?

Islam never really had a clerical body like Christianity had, although there were some failed attempts by the Ottomans. To Muslims, their prayers and repentance are directed only towards God, because God is the only one responsible for those.

Muslims fear that if other are interceding for God, the interceder might eventually be seen as divine, and might be worshipped alongside God. Islam is strictly monotheistic, so this cannot happen in Islam.

Though in Shi'a Islam, the privilege for interpreting the Qur'an is only done by Imams, which are religious leaders who are descendants of the Messenger Muhammad, and their interpretations are seen as absolute. However, those Imams do not intercede for God; Shi'a Muslims still ask only God for repentance and prayer.
Last edited by Islamic Commune on Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Personal Freedom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11257
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Personal Freedom » Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:50 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:
I don't pray 5 times a day, fast during Ramadan (I'm too underweight), or go to Mecca.

Then again I'm still young.

If you have not yet reached puberty, it's fine. Once you have hit puberty, you start to become accountable for all of your actions and inactions.

Brother, if you are a Muslim, then it is your best interest to try to uphold the five pillars. Of course, there are numerous exceptions.

You might not pray five times a day, probably because you don't know how to pray. That is okay, as long as you are making the effort to learn. There are several 'extras' you can add to prayer, like reciting a surah you've memorized, but it's not necessary. As long as you have the fundamentals, it's good enough. If you would like more help, feel free to send me a telegram.

As for Ramadan, I am not sure if that is an excuse. I mean, if you have a problem where not eating or drinking for a time will cause you to collapse, then obviously you cannot fast. For my age, I am also rather underweight. Yet, fasting from sunrise to sunset will not cause me to collapse if I manage my energy wisely. If you absolutely will cause a fatal injury to yourself if you fast, then you are excused. If not, then try to develop some willpower.

I have also not done my pilgrimage, because I cannot afford it, and I have no means to get there. If I cannot afford to go to Makkah, or I have a problem that prevents me from going there (I might have a broken leg or something), then it is pardoned from me, as it would be pardoned from you under the same circumstances.

I want to give a reminder to try not to lag off in your practice. Remember that when you are outside, you are the face of the Muslim Community, so try to be the best of characters as well.

This probably is where Catholics are excluded, then. Not that she believes in humans, but does ask for certain saints to "intercede" for her and those around her.

(In Iberian culture people tend to ask favors for different saints. There are some asked by those seeking health, others seeking safety, others seeking blessings and others seeking even love or lost property; the power used is that of God, but they are seen as specific "messengers" for certain deeds.)


In Islam, we also have certain figures that we know of that are major contributors to the Islamic cause, such as Umar ibn al-Khattab or Saladin or whatnot. However, they are not spiritual figures for us.

The average Muslim rejects the idea that someone must intercede for them in order to contact God. I mean to Muslims, if God is all-seeing, all-knowing, why do people need to ask Clergy to contact God or repent? Why not ask for repentance directly from God?

Islam never really had a clerical body like Christianity had, although there were some failed attempts by the Ottomans. To Muslims, their prayers and repentance are directed only towards God, because God is the only one responsible for those.

Muslims fear that if other are interceding for God, the interceder might eventually be seen as divine, and might be worshipped alongside God. Islam is strictly monotheistic, so this cannot happen in Islam.

Though in Shi'a Islam, the privilege for interpreting the Qur'an is only done by Imams, which are religious leaders who is a descendant of the Messenger Muhammad, and their interpretations are seen as aboslute. In a sense, that is somewhat close to how Catholicism works, excluding the descendant part. Correct me if I'm wrong.

What about Abu Bakr? Was he not a spiritual successor?
Economic Left/Right: -10.0 (previously -6.45)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18 (previously -4.72 )
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves;
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:08 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:Muslims fear that if other are interceding for God, the interceder might eventually be seen as divine, and might be worshipped alongside God. Islam is strictly monotheistic, so this cannot happen in Islam.

Fun. Sounds like Protestantism. They are also a lot against rich religious symbolism because it is seen as "adoration of images".

It might be seen as extreme cosmic irony, but in my country Catholics much more fear being too dogmatic about life.

Often it seems rather like, instead of polytheism in disguise, that the concept of the Triple God became so expanded that it is even a lot pantheistic-like. The gone spirits aren't held along God as divine 'brothers', but rather a part of a spiritual existence that is a whole powerful driving force, and that they're at the same time just seeking for different faces of the same God. The Bible is very contradictory at times when we compare Old and New Testaments, and to many when it refers to God, it often seems like it is talking about different entities, so people see different aspects in it, some nurturing and some warring. Certain saints are for whatever reason more identified with one of these particular aspects. Mary being by far the most important one.

At least that is what I see with my personal dealing with Catholics... I'm pretty sure that the Church's take on it is a lot different from what our culture actually does.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Islamic Commune
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Nov 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic Commune » Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:14 pm

What about Abu Bakr? Was he not a spiritual successor?


Abu Bakr was merely the Khalifa of the Muslim community.

Khalifa means two things:
-representative
-Successor

He was termed, "Khalifat Rasul-illah", which means Successor (Representative) of the Messenger of God.

Abu Bakr was a successor of the Messenger in terms of political succession, but not spiritual. Reasons why:
-He was not believed by anyone to have divine revelation
-He was not believed to have divine right of rule.

Abu Bakr was elected by the Muslim Community to succeed the Messenger in order to ensure that the Muslim Community remains united and the message of Islam can carry on. Each tribe had their own representative that pledged their allegiance to Abu Bakr, and that is how he obtained leadership. It wasn't seen as his right to rule.

In fact, the concept of Divine Right of (Person) never really existed in Islam, because Divine Right belongs only to God, no one else. In theory, if a ruler fails to uphold the priorities of Islam in the Muslim Community, they are ousted, because they would be infringing on God's rights. (If you want me to explain that more, just ask).

He was not seen as a holy man by any means, just a leader at the time. Definitely, no Muslim sees Abu Bakr as a spiritual leader of any sorts.


@Degenerate Heart of HetRio:
I was reading a book the other day about the Protestant Reformation, and I was interested in how each sect viewed Islam.

Catholics view Muslims as the first Protestants, and that Protestantism is an Islamic plot to cause religious division. That's not far from the truth, because the Ottomans financed the Protestants a lot.

Protestants on the other hand, view Muslims as, "The Scourge of God" sent to the Christians as punishment for their immorality or something of that sort.
Last edited by Islamic Commune on Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Puerto Tyranus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1756
Founded: Sep 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Puerto Tyranus » Sat Mar 29, 2014 7:56 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:
@Degenerate Heart of HetRio:
I was reading a book the other day about the Protestant Reformation, and I was interested in how each sect viewed Islam.

Catholics view Muslims as the first Protestants, and that Protestantism is an Islamic plot to cause religious division. That's not far from the truth, because the Ottomans financed the Protestants a lot.

Protestants on the other hand, view Muslims as, "The Scourge of God" sent to the Christians as punishment for their immorality or something of that sort.


Wow...I didn't think I believed either of those things.

At any rate, on your discussion question, I find myself agreeing. Those who covert can be generally found to be more pious than those who are born into any faith, and, through the same logic, one who chooses to follow a religion without any sort of pressure from any sides to join them can be nearly guaranteed to be very knowledgeable about the Religion of their choosing. My only word of warning is to make sure that, if you really are going to go through with this, you need to regulate most of the aspects of the child's life. You never know where a vulnerable child may find pressure, after all.
"There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people."
-Commander William Adama
I'm Roman Catholic, so there's that. If you have any questions about what Roman Catholicism really does, I guess I can help. You should probably go to a priest to ask, but I know some things.
Total Population: 1,103,000,000
Criminals: 49,954,494
Elderly, Disabled, & Retirees: 144,083,650
Military & Reserves: 110,182,685
Students and Youth: 195,506,750
Unemployed but Able: 121,075,077
Working Class: 482,197,344
Defcon: 3

User avatar
Islamic Commune
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Nov 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic Commune » Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:12 pm

Obviously, some things I have to teach my child are basic manners and the such. The truth is that I have absolutely no influence on my child the second they go to school. Especially where I live in Canada, parents start being less influential on their child as they go to school, and the parent is replaced by the teacher or other students as a source of influence.

The best I can do is educate my child about my religion in an objective way, and explain to them why I do what I do.

For example, I abstain from consuming alcohol. What I can do is buy some alcohol one day and show it to my child, so that he acknowledges it is not forbidden fruit. And then I explain to my child what alcohol does, some of its benefits and negatives. In fact, once my child reaches the age of 13, I can sit with them once every week, showing them a collection of "Taboo" items, and explaining them.

If I just forbid my child from these products without a reason why, they will be curious about it, and might consume it behind my back. If the child knows that alcohol is available at the house and is not forbidden fruit, there will be no forbidden fruit psychology.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:32 pm

Islamic Commune wrote:I have a discussion question, if anyone wants to participate.

Because there is no compulsion in religion in Islam, is it correct to indoctrinate children into Islam? Should children make the final choice once they reach puberty once they want to be a Muslim or not?

I know in Islam, parents have to teach their children about the religion, but to force a child to follow Islam is really not in the ethics of Islam. If I raise a child, I will ask them once they reach 15 whether or not they want to follow Islam or not, and their choice I will accept. What do you guys think about this?

I find that when someone chooses to do something, they are more committed to it, and this applies to religion as well. Those who pledge themselves into Islam when they are mature enough are often more devout than those who were, "born into the faith".

I agree that children shouldn't be forced to follow Islam. Teaching them about it is fine, but they should be responsible for the final decision.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Anollasia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25633
Founded: Apr 05, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Anollasia » Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:48 pm

I also believe if you can't go to Mecca, giving someone else the opportunity to go is just as good or even better.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Bhadeshistan, El Lazaro, Glorious Freedonia, Republics of the Solar Union, Stellar Colonies, Uvolla, Zancostan

Advertisement

Remove ads