NATION

PASSWORD

Islam/Muslim Discussion Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

To which branch of Islam do you belong?

Sunni
164
41%
Shia
53
13%
Ibadi
15
4%
Ahmadiyya
10
2%
Sufi
31
8%
Nondenominational
47
12%
Other
84
21%
 
Total votes : 404

User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Sat Jan 11, 2014 7:59 pm

Menassa wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Both the Old Testament and New Testament explicitly approve slavery.

By your logic, all adherents of Abrahamic Religions should approve of slavery.

I'd hardly call it slavery.


Why?

Slavery is forced labour without pay. This is approved of in the bible.
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
Kemalist
Senator
 
Posts: 4470
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kemalist » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:03 pm

DogDoo 7 wrote:Happy birthday muhammed! i'll drink a toast to you, old friend.


Mohammad was a cool guy. He was the Che Guevara of his period.
Likes: Ataturk's ideals, CHP, State feminism, Social liberalism, LGBT rights, Laïcité, FEMEN, Civic nationalism, Westernization, Turkish Gezi protests, Social drinking, Anime
Dislikes: Bigotry, Religious conservatism, Authoritarianism, Ethnic nationalism, Moralism, Hijab, Stereotypes, Turcophobia

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33851
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Menassa » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:08 pm

The Scientific States wrote:
Menassa wrote:I'd hardly call it slavery.


Why?

Slavery is forced labour without pay. This is approved of in the bible.

Biblically, and that is with the Torahs there are two types of servitude and in those two types of servitude are two distinct ways to become a servant.
One of them fits in with the 13th Amendment of the US constitution.
US Constitution wrote:Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.


One of the servitude is punishment for a crime, if a man commits a crime and cannot repay his debt he must work for that debt to be repaid.
The other is when a human willingly sells himself into slavery because he cannot afford to live on his own, so in exchange for food and shelter he works.

In half of the slavery all of these are minimally 6 years, then the man can choose to leave if he wants or stay until the 50th year (in a yearly cycle) where he is freed and the master must give him many gifts.


While the person is a slave he must be treated better than the master would treat himself... which is probably why the quote exists.
"He who acquires himself a slave, acquires himself a master."
Last edited by Menassa on Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey --- Do not Forget!
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

User avatar
Absurrania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1682
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Absurrania » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:24 pm

DogDoo 7 wrote:Happy birthday muhammed! i'll drink a toast to you, old friend.


Lahowla Walaguuwati Illah Billah. Do not make such jokes, as Islam is against celebrating birthdays and other holidays that are made up, and is especially against celebrating the birthdays of those of religious importance. That is why pictures of Prophet Muhammed(pbuh), cannot be shown, and even his grave is locked and barred. People tend to stray from worshipping god to worshipping Prophets and others like them, in the false belief that they can reach god through them.

Quintium wrote:Question - why have islamic countries made slavery illegal?
Allah explicitly approves of slavery in the Quran and offers his own set of rules.


The Quran allows for slavery of non-Muslims, but demands that they be treated fairly and with decency. However, slavery is pretty much useless today and any attempt to revive it would cause far more harm that gain. Besides, I'm sure that enslaving random non-Muslims who owe no debts to you or haven't committed a crime is against the rules of Islam. And even if you were only to enslave criminals, the way Muslims governments tend to handle things today, there is no guarantee they would be treated properly.

Polski Swiety Imperium wrote:http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

And don't say this is hypocritical because I'm Christian.

a) Website is unreliable source clearly biased against Islam.
b) Don't call out another religion on some absurd claim and then say not to call your religion out on that same absurd claim. That doesn't work, and we've been over that.
c) You tried to state this "point", but horribly failed in your own thread, and subsequently ran away the second your failure was evident. The proof of your failure is here for display at:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=278934
d) Don't go trolling about the same topic repeatedly.
e) I think that, as a lifetime Muslim, I know just a smidge more about whether or not Islam advocates violence than some Christian dude on the Internet who seems to get 99% of his information on Islam from the terror instigating media, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabab, Hezbollah, and a website that is designed to be against Islam.

I do MT, PMT, PT, but not FT, PMT, or FanT. Too many blurred lines and people with overactive imaginations.
98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig.

User avatar
Anollasia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25633
Founded: Apr 05, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Anollasia » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:37 pm

Absurrania wrote:
DogDoo 7 wrote:Happy birthday muhammed! i'll drink a toast to you, old friend.


Lahowla Walaguuwati Illah Billah. Do not make such jokes, as Islam is against celebrating birthdays and other holidays that are made up, and is especially against celebrating the birthdays of those of religious importance. That is why pictures of Prophet Muhammed(pbuh), cannot be shown, and even his grave is locked and barred. People tend to stray from worshipping god to worshipping Prophets and others like them, in the false belief that they can reach god through them.

Quintium wrote:Question - why have islamic countries made slavery illegal?
Allah explicitly approves of slavery in the Quran and offers his own set of rules.


The Quran allows for slavery of non-Muslims, but demands that they be treated fairly and with decency. However, slavery is pretty much useless today and any attempt to revive it would cause far more harm that gain. Besides, I'm sure that enslaving random non-Muslims who owe no debts to you or haven't committed a crime is against the rules of Islam. And even if you were only to enslave criminals, the way Muslims governments tend to handle things today, there is no guarantee they would be treated properly.

Polski Swiety Imperium wrote:http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

And don't say this is hypocritical because I'm Christian.

a) Website is unreliable source clearly biased against Islam.
b) Don't call out another religion on some absurd claim and then say not to call your religion out on that same absurd claim. That doesn't work, and we've been over that.
c) You tried to state this "point", but horribly failed in your own thread, and subsequently ran away the second your failure was evident. The proof of your failure is here for display at:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=278934
d) Don't go trolling about the same topic repeatedly.
e) I think that, as a lifetime Muslim, I know just a smidge more about whether or not Islam advocates violence than some Christian dude on the Internet who seems to get 99% of his information on Islam from the terror instigating media, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabab, Hezbollah, and a website that is designed to be against Islam.


I'm a Muslim and I celebrate my birthday. Problem?

User avatar
Kemalist
Senator
 
Posts: 4470
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kemalist » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:46 pm

Absurrania wrote: Do not make such jokes, as Islam is against celebrating birthdays and other holidays that are made up, and is especially against celebrating the birthdays of those of religious importance.


Turkey celebrates Holy Birth Week which is dedicated to Muhammad. Actually the tradition was started by a group of islamists during 1980s and then became popular. But of course; we Turks have a different understanding of Islam, more blended with our ancient shamanic beliefs. We give importance to graves and yet they are banned in Saudi Arabia for example.
Likes: Ataturk's ideals, CHP, State feminism, Social liberalism, LGBT rights, Laïcité, FEMEN, Civic nationalism, Westernization, Turkish Gezi protests, Social drinking, Anime
Dislikes: Bigotry, Religious conservatism, Authoritarianism, Ethnic nationalism, Moralism, Hijab, Stereotypes, Turcophobia

User avatar
Absurrania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1682
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Absurrania » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:48 pm

Anollasia wrote:I'm a Muslim and I celebrate my birthday. Problem?


Islamically, it is not supposed to be celebrated. However, that is between you and Allah, not you and me. But my earlier comment referred to the celebration of Prophet Muhammed's (pbuh) birthday, although we don't really know when he was born, as that would quickly lead to some sort of worship towards him.

I do MT, PMT, PT, but not FT, PMT, or FanT. Too many blurred lines and people with overactive imaginations.
98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig.

User avatar
Taoju
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6231
Founded: Nov 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Taoju » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:51 pm

Absurrania wrote:
Anollasia wrote:I'm a Muslim and I celebrate my birthday. Problem?


Islamically, it is not supposed to be celebrated. However, that is between you and Allah, not you and me. But my earlier comment referred to the celebration of Prophet Muhammed's (pbuh) birthday, although we don't really know when he was born, as that would quickly lead to some sort of worship towards him.

Explain why Malaysia and Brunei, presumably Islamic nations, celebrate it anyways?
The Republic of Taoju ― Tauzhur Mineli ― Таужур Минули

User avatar
Seljuq Kyiv
Minister
 
Posts: 3178
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seljuq Kyiv » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:53 pm

Quintium wrote:Question - why have islamic countries made slavery illegal?
Allah explicitly approves of slavery in the Quran and offers his own set of rules.


It's legal, it's regulated, but it's just that — legal. Slavery is frowned upon, and if it has to be done you are commanded to treat them as you would other free human beings (with respect, kindness, etc. — as brothers), if not better. Slaves have rights just as any other citizen of the state, and these rights cannot be infringed upon.

There is this mental picture when one hears slaves of whipping and beating. Such is forbidden in Islam, and its punishment is Hellfire.

Above all, the greatest thing you could is free your slaves.

User avatar
Seljuq Kyiv
Minister
 
Posts: 3178
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seljuq Kyiv » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:00 pm

Taoju wrote:
Absurrania wrote:
Islamically, it is not supposed to be celebrated. However, that is between you and Allah, not you and me. But my earlier comment referred to the celebration of Prophet Muhammed's (pbuh) birthday, although we don't really know when he was born, as that would quickly lead to some sort of worship towards him.

Explain why Malaysia and Brunei, presumably Islamic nations, celebrate it anyways?


Well, I believe that it is ok to celebrate, as long as you don't go overboard. Muhammad (saw) used to celebrate his birthday by fasting every Monday (the day he was born).

But then again you often find in the various nations Islam has touched that these cultures evolve by themselves, often adding bits and pieces of their own pre-Islamic culture into the mix.

Kemalist wrote:
Absurrania wrote: Do not make such jokes, as Islam is against celebrating birthdays and other holidays that are made up, and is especially against celebrating the birthdays of those of religious importance.


Turkey celebrates Holy Birth Week which is dedicated to Muhammad. Actually the tradition was started by a group of islamists during 1980s and then became popular. But of course; we Turks have a different understanding of Islam, more blended with our ancient shamanic beliefs. We give importance to graves and yet they are banned in Saudi Arabia for example.


Well, as long as you don't ask for help from the graves or its occupants (praying for the occupants of the graves (ie their safety in the hereafter, forgiveness for them by God, etc.) is a noble endeavor).
Last edited by Seljuq Kyiv on Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Southern Arkansas
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 484
Founded: Jan 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Arkansas » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:01 pm

Taoju wrote:
Absurrania wrote:
Islamically, it is not supposed to be celebrated. However, that is between you and Allah, not you and me. But my earlier comment referred to the celebration of Prophet Muhammed's (pbuh) birthday, although we don't really know when he was born, as that would quickly lead to some sort of worship towards him.

Explain why Malaysia and Brunei, presumably Islamic nations, celebrate it anyways?


No nation on earth 100% follows Shariah Law.
American. Socially Conservative. Shia Muslim looking into the way of the Salaf.

User avatar
Leningrad Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6184
Founded: Jul 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Leningrad Union » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:06 pm

The Scientific States wrote:
Leningrad Union wrote:Damn right I support it


You're being sarcastic. I really hope you are.

If it is in the Torah, I support it.

JK! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37334
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:10 pm

The Scientific States wrote:
Quintium wrote:Question - why have islamic countries made slavery illegal?
Allah explicitly approves of slavery in the Quran and offers his own set of rules.


Both the Old Testament and New Testament explicitly approve slavery.

By your logic, all adherents of Abrahamic Religions should approve of slavery.

Either way the NT does not explicitly approve slavery "because slavery" the letters of the Tarsusian couldn't condone open slave resistance (unless you want to invoke the wrath of the Roman justice system for supporting slave insurrection). As for the Tanach I would hardly call it slavery given its status of proprietorship rather than direct ownership (as it would be forbidden on the basis of humanity). These are human beings the laws deal with not to be treated as sub-humans (as echoed throughout history). It seems Menassa beat me to the rest of it (oh well).
Last edited by Benuty on Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Menassa
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33851
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Menassa » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:11 pm

Benuty wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
Both the Old Testament and New Testament explicitly approve slavery.

By your logic, all adherents of Abrahamic Religions should approve of slavery.

[...] It seems Menassa beat me to the rest of it (oh well).

*insert Jew-Jitsu picture*
Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey --- Do not Forget!
Their hollow inheritance.
This is my god and I shall exalt him
Jewish Discussion Thread בְּ
"A missionary uses the Bible like a drunk uses a lamppost, not so much for illumination, but for support"
"Imagine of a bunch of Zulu tribesmen told Congress how to read the Constitution, that's how it feels to a Jew when you tell us how to read our bible"
"God said: you must teach, as I taught, without a fee."
"Against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings..."

User avatar
Glorious Wonderland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 136
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Wonderland » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:23 pm

Quintium wrote:Question - why have islamic countries made slavery illegal?
Allah explicitly approves of slavery in the Quran and offers his own set of rules.

Because you know...not all of us are Qur'an literalists and wish to remain in pre-medieval era. Slavery is simply morally despicable and even in Muhammad's era it is not condoned.

Another question, what are my fellow Muslims' stance for human evolution? Is it stand in contrary for your understanding of Quran?

User avatar
Virana
Minister
 
Posts: 2547
Founded: Jan 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Virana » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:28 pm

Glorious Wonderland wrote:
Quintium wrote:Question - why have islamic countries made slavery illegal?
Allah explicitly approves of slavery in the Quran and offers his own set of rules.

Because you know...not all of us are Qur'an literalists and wish to remain in pre-medieval era. Slavery is simply morally despicable and even in Muhammad's era it is not condoned.

Another question, what are my fellow Muslims' stance for human evolution? Is it stand in contrary for your understanding of Quran?

Evolution doesn't contradict anything in the Qur'an in my opinion. The only areas where people think it contradicts Quranic verses are when the Qur'an is still popularly interpreted in archaic, outdated ways that contradict not just evolution, but most modern science.

Empirical and observational evidence in favor of evolutionary theories effectively debunk the idea that evolution and natural selection aren't basic facts of nature. Only those who interpret the Qur'an in a modern, moderate way with an open mind will be able to understand that nothing in the Qur'an contradicts modern science.

Anyways, what's your view?
II Mentor specializing in MT and GE&T. If you need help, TG me, visit our thread, or join our IRC channel, #NSMentors on irc.esper.net!

Mentors Hub | Welcome to II | RP Questions | #NSMentors
International Incidents Mentor | IIwiki Administrator

Owner of the United Republic of Emmeria and everything about it

User avatar
Seljuq Kyiv
Minister
 
Posts: 3178
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seljuq Kyiv » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:36 pm

Southern Arkansas wrote:
Taoju wrote:Explain why Malaysia and Brunei, presumably Islamic nations, celebrate it anyways?


No nation on earth 100% follows Shariah Law.


Aye. The government has done nothing to stop alcohol or smoking amongst Muslims here. Meanwhile we are still yapping about Christians using the word Allah (which translates to THE GOD — a semantics failure as it refers to a singular indivisible Being in contrast to the Trinity, but not exactly threatening the religion, etc.) and the smallest things.

User avatar
Taoju
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6231
Founded: Nov 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Taoju » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:39 pm

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
Southern Arkansas wrote:
No nation on earth 100% follows Shariah Law.


Aye. The government has done nothing to stop alcohol or smoking amongst Muslims here. Meanwhile we are still yapping about Christians using the word Allah (which translates to THE GOD — a semantics failure as it refers to a singular indivisible Being in contrast to the Trinity, but not exactly threatening the religion, etc.) and the smallest things.

And Malaysia is extremely diverse so~

Good luck imposing Shariah and driving all the Chinese or Hindu business owners away :/
The Republic of Taoju ― Tauzhur Mineli ― Таужур Минули

User avatar
Glorious Wonderland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 136
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Wonderland » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:39 pm

Virana wrote:Evolution doesn't contradict anything in the Qur'an in my opinion. The only areas where people think it contradicts Quranic verses are when the Qur'an is still popularly interpreted in archaic, outdated ways that contradict not just evolution, but most modern science.

Empirical and observational evidence in favor of evolutionary theories effectively debunk the idea that evolution and natural selection aren't basic facts of nature. Only those who interpret the Qur'an in a modern, moderate way with an open mind will be able to understand that nothing in the Qur'an contradicts modern science.

Anyways, what's your view?

I view evolution as a valid way of human creation. I oppose concept of Adam as the first human, despite I'm rather torn off in regard of whether the story of Adam is purely allegorical/symbolic or that he's indeed the first prophet of Allah.
Last edited by Glorious Wonderland on Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Taoju
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6231
Founded: Nov 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Taoju » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:41 pm

Glorious Wonderland wrote:
Virana wrote:Evolution doesn't contradict anything in the Qur'an in my opinion. The only areas where people think it contradicts Quranic verses are when the Qur'an is still popularly interpreted in archaic, outdated ways that contradict not just evolution, but most modern science.

Empirical and observational evidence in favor of evolutionary theories effectively debunk the idea that evolution and natural selection aren't basic facts of nature. Only those who interpret the Qur'an in a modern, moderate way with an open mind will be able to understand that nothing in the Qur'an contradicts modern science.

Anyways, what's your view?

I view evolution as a valid way of human creation. I oppose concept of Adam as the first human, despite I'm rather torn off in regard of whether the story of Adam is purely allegorical/symbolic or that he's indeed the first prophet of Allah.

Wasn't there an interprestation where Adam wasn't the first, but a first of many? And that he was chosen by The Lord out of the many?

I don't remember where I heard this from though, so don't take it int too too much.
The Republic of Taoju ― Tauzhur Mineli ― Таужур Минули

User avatar
Virana
Minister
 
Posts: 2547
Founded: Jan 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Virana » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:46 pm

Glorious Wonderland wrote:
Virana wrote:Evolution doesn't contradict anything in the Qur'an in my opinion. The only areas where people think it contradicts Quranic verses are when the Qur'an is still popularly interpreted in archaic, outdated ways that contradict not just evolution, but most modern science.

Empirical and observational evidence in favor of evolutionary theories effectively debunk the idea that evolution and natural selection aren't basic facts of nature. Only those who interpret the Qur'an in a modern, moderate way with an open mind will be able to understand that nothing in the Qur'an contradicts modern science.

Anyways, what's your view?

I view evolution as a valid way of human creation. I tend to oppose concept of Adam as the first human, despite I'm rather torn off in regard of whether the story of Adam is purely allegorical/symbolic or that he's indeed the first prophet of Allah.

I generally consider the story of Adam as being allegorical/symbolic, but the idea that he is the first prophet is one that interests me.
II Mentor specializing in MT and GE&T. If you need help, TG me, visit our thread, or join our IRC channel, #NSMentors on irc.esper.net!

Mentors Hub | Welcome to II | RP Questions | #NSMentors
International Incidents Mentor | IIwiki Administrator

Owner of the United Republic of Emmeria and everything about it

User avatar
Glorious Wonderland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 136
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Wonderland » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:49 pm

happy birthday Muhammad, old chap! may peace be always upon to you!

to celebrate your birthday I'm going to finish my the satanic verses, damn book like a bollywood movie with hilarious wordmixing, it's easy to know the writer is an Indian. plus a sirah.

yay mawlid is a holiday here in Indonesia!

User avatar
Alouite
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12478
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Alouite » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:51 pm

Virana wrote:
Glorious Wonderland wrote:I view evolution as a valid way of human creation. I tend to oppose concept of Adam as the first human, despite I'm rather torn off in regard of whether the story of Adam is purely allegorical/symbolic or that he's indeed the first prophet of Allah.

I generally consider the story of Adam as being allegorical/symbolic, but the idea that he is the first prophet is one that interests me.

You consider the story of adam and eve an Al Gore Story? Lol, just kiddin, if I devoted my religious views to an aberhamic sect I would agree.
Last edited by Alouite on Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
National Liberalism, National School Economics, National Dividend, Constitutional Originalism, Protection of US Domestic Trade, The Chinese Gov't in Exile in Taipei, and Ending the War on Nouns
Hyman Minsky
Totalitarianism, the Destruction of the Environment, Racism, and, most of all, people who end statements in questions?
The Patriot Act, The Illegitimate Communist Authorities in China, Economic Libertarianism, Absolutism and Communism

User avatar
Southern Arkansas
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 484
Founded: Jan 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Arkansas » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:53 pm

I personally believe Adam (Peace be upon him) was created from Clay..
American. Socially Conservative. Shia Muslim looking into the way of the Salaf.

User avatar
Glorious Wonderland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 136
Founded: Nov 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Wonderland » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:58 pm

Southern Arkansas wrote:I personally believe Adam (Peace be upon him) was created from Clay..

Qur'an (or at least its traditional translation) appear to regard the story of Adam in literal sense, as one verse mention him as the similarity of Jesus -- that is, parentless. And thus I've seen a quite intriguing compromise, that Adam is indeed made without parents, however he isn't the first human--he's a prophet of Allah and taught intelligence by God.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 00-ARIA, A United American Empire, Dutch Socialist States, Einaro, Ifreann, Maximum Imperium Rex, Nature and dragons, New Palau, Statesburg, The Black Forrest, The Rich Port, Tiami

Advertisement

Remove ads